MSN Home  |  My MSN  |  Hotmail
Sign in to Windows Live ID Web Search:   
go to MSNGroups 
Free Forum Hosting
 
Important Announcement Important Announcement
The MSN Groups service will close in February 2009. You can move your group to Multiply, MSN’s partner for online groups. Learn More
A Peaceful Place[email protected] 
  
What's New
  
  �?•�?·´`·.·�? �?/A>  
  Copyrights  
  Disclaimer  
  �?•�?·´`·.·�? �?/A>  
  Messages  
  General  
  Articles - Misc.  
  ADHD,ADD, Autism  
  �?Allergies �?/A>  
  Alternative & +  
  § Arthritis §  
  Depression  
  �?Diet �?/A>  
  �?Exercise �?/A>  
  Eyes  
  Fitness and Exercise  
  �? FM & CF �?/A>  
  Headaches  
  Herbs etc  
  IBS & Other DD's  
  �?•�?·´`·.·�?�?/A>  
  Liver  
  Lung Health  
  MS �?/A>  
  ◄Mycoplasms�?/A>  
  Osteoporosis  
  Pain-Coping  
  Skin Disorders  
  Sleep  
  �?Supplements  
  �?Toxins �?/A>  
  Humor �?/A>  
  Household ☼¿☼  
  Mind-Body-Spirit  
  Pictures  
    
  �?Links �?/A>  
  Snags  
  Sources & Resources  
  ≈☆≈E-Cards ≈☆�?/A>  
  Pesticides Exp  
  �?Organic Living  
  Organic Gardens  
  See the Most Recent Posts  
  
  
  Tools  
 
General : Quackbusters
Choose another message board
 
     
Reply
 Message 1 of 3 in Discussion 
From: Rene  (Original Message)Sent: 4/11/2005 10:15 PM
Controversy:
 
I've seen this site - sometime ago - and am familiar with a number of attempts by pharmaceutical companies to squeeze out herbal approaches and alternatives to prescription meds, but these links provide some interesting reading. 
 
I found the material in the January 28/05 RMHI Herbalist Review.
 
Good news in the fight against Big Pharma
Quackbusters, an organization funded by several major drug companies to discredit alternative practitioners of all types, has suffered serious setbacks as a result of several major court decisions.
 
According to Tim Bolen:
    "North Americans have known, or suspected, for some time, that there has been an organized assault by a group, against companies, and practitioners, offering alternatives to the drugs/surgery paradigm. That group calls itself the "quackbusters", and they are a scam."
 
Bolen reports that recent U.S. court rulings have severely crippled Quackbusters. A recent published Appeals Court decision called its founder, Steven Barrett, biased and of minimal credibility. Moreover, the National Council Against Health Fraud (NCAHF), a similar organization to Quackwatch, was defeated in similar court actions in California and Wisconsin.
 
Recently, Barrett, quackwatch.com, the NCAHF, Robert Baratz, and others have been named in a federal Racketeering (RICO) lawsuit in Colorado (CAVITAT v. Aetna Insurance). Aetna has filed four separate motions for dismissal in this case, and each motion has been rejected by the court; the case will proceed.
 
If you, or anyone you know, has ever been victimized by Quackbusters or any of the parties named in the preceding lawsuit, you may be able to help put these organizations out of business and send a strong message to the pharmaceutical companies that this type of behavior WILL NOT BE TOLERATED.
 
Please see for more information, including specific advice for former victims of Quackwatch:
    http://www.quackpotwatch.org/opinionpieces/quacksurv2005.htm
    Will the "Quackbusters" Survive 2005?...
    by Tim Bolen
For more background on Quackbusters:
    http://www.njnhc.org/articles/swanson-2.htm
    Deconstructing the Quackbusters and their myths about alternative health     4-part series by Kent Swanson
    http://www.quackpotwatch.org/opinionpieces/RacketeeringColorado.htm
    Quackbusters Accused of "Racketeering" (RICO) in Colorado...
    Opinion by Consumer Advocate Tim Bolen
    Thursday, August 12th, 2004
    http://www.ghchealth.com/forum/post-121.html
    Medscape - Your Credibility is on the Line...
    An Open Letter to MedScape
    Opinion by Consumer Advocate Tim Bolen; Saturday, November 13th, 2004
    http://www.happyherbalist.com/quackbusters_busted.htm
    California Superior Court Judge Rules on Quackbuster "Credibility"
    (This is a copy of the original Court document signed by Judge Fromholz.)


First  Previous  2-3 of 3  Next  Last 
Reply
 Message 2 of 3 in Discussion 
From: MSN Nicknamenancy_peaSent: 5/21/2005 11:44 PM
dear rene,
 
i know this is to be true. when i was still on a certain LE (lymphedema) group somebody tried to say that the feingold diet (a totally all natural diet for ADHD, ADD and other food allergy and disabilities) was bad. how can a truly natural diet be bad? if the pharma companies hate it of course. seems that if you change your childs diet 9 times out of 10 you won't need ritalin or any of the other new meds out there. but some ppl just would rather believe in the meds.
 
back in 1986 when my son was 8yrs old i found the feingold diet. somebody told me about it word of mouth. i went to the library the very next day and bought the book. i was astounded at how much junk and garbage was in foods. i found out that Aspartame aka Nutrasweet instead of being a good sugar replacement was 100% worse than sugar to my son. NOBODY in our house uses aspartame EVER. that stuff is nasty.
 
my son was violent, could barely talk understandable english, would barely sleep or sit still and reading and writing were out for him. i thought i would have a killer on my hands someday. well, just 2wks into the diet and he calmed down, stopped the violence, started reading, writing, drawing and getting along w/others. also he was happy again. no he wasn't perfect and i had to get him to relearn some good habits. but EVERYBODY saw improvement.
 
the only problem i had was w/some aides at his special education school. they thought the diet was crap. but i talked to the teachers and they had to apologize. i used to baked bread, cakes and other goodies for the week every sunday (i wasn't working at the time and actually had time and energy to do this then), read every label of everything my son would ingest or use next to his body and applied it to daily life.
 
i removed artificial flavorings, food colorings, preservatives, aspartame and any other junk that didn't belong in my families system by reading labels and boycotting anything that had garbage in it. it wasn't easy either. i was very low income. my son had SSI, my daughter and i had welfare. but i managed to do this. he was eligible for free lunch. but i made his lunch everyday b/c theirs was full of stuff he could not eat.
 
he is now 26 yrs old and doing very well. now he can eat anything he wants pretty much. altho we all encourage good food and my daughter who is 25 reads labels extensively. yes, he still has learning disabilities and he still is special (he was born that way) but he is not violent, he reads, writes and draws. he even will be getting his first job soon. hopefully at wal-mart.
 
so QUACKBUSTERS should be busted. its total BS! take my word for it. sorry this is long winded, but i tend to be that way.
 
thanx,
 
nancy in reno

Reply
 Message 3 of 3 in Discussion 
From: ReneSent: 5/27/2005 5:27 AM
Dear Nancy
I remember hearing some controversy about this (feingold diet) a few years ago, but one of my trusty health magazines gave it a good write-up & infact I found my son's (severe allergies) behavior improved & my FM too if I followed some of the ideas in it.  I really appreciate you taking the time to share your experience about it.  Yes, we still read labels - of most of what comes into the house, too !
 
My hat's off to you for delving into such a non mainstream approach !  From what I gather, I sense your son to be quite a likeable member of society now!  What a credit to your determination.
 
Again thank you so much for sharing your experiences about this.!
 
Gentle Hugs
Rene M