|
|
 |
|
Reply
| | | From: Rene (Original Message) | Sent: 7/19/2006 10:11 PM |
The Vaccination Debate Goes Mainstream
A couple of weeks ago, two of the most prominent medical journals in the world, The British Medical Journal (BMJ) and The Lancet, each published 'Letters to the Editor' which call into question one of the most sacred and hitherto "untouchable" subjects - universal childhood vaccination. This was significant because it signals that maybe there is a new willingness of mainstream medicine to discuss and openly debate the issue. The first letter in the BMJ was from Nikki Lee of the Center for Breastfeeding, Sandwich, MA and was entitled "Breastfeeding Should be Promoted." Some of the main points in her letter: -
Four months after the CDC recommended that all babies should receive 3 doses of the rotavirus vaccine, the use of this vaccine was being indefinitely suspended after reports of over 100 cases of intussusception and two deaths resulting from its use. The manufacturer voluntarily withdrew the vaccine. -
Babies who receive the 15 recommended vaccines in the first six months of their lives have a cumulative mercury exposure that exceeds limits set by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). -
She asks what the impact may be when, by the age of 5 years, children have received over two dozen doses of vaccines containing mercury and other toxins? -
In July 1999 the US Public Health Service and the American Academy of Pediatrics asked vaccine manufacturers to eliminate the preservative mercury from vaccines because of concern about its cumulative effects. -
Some scientists say that the massive polio immunisation campaign in Zaire and other African countries in the 1950s accelerated the spread of HIV. The aerosol vaccine was grown in monkey kidney tissue; that same species of monkey carries a simian immune deficiency virus (SIV), the virus from which HIV is widely believed to derive from. The places where the vaccine was administered are the epicentre of the AIDS epidemic. -
She cites many instances in the past where important information about safety has been hidden to protect profit, and questions whether vaccination will one day also be seen in the same light. Some examples she cites are the use of DES and Thalidomide on pregnant women, -
She states that "It costs millions to develop, research, and market a vaccine. Wouldn't it make more sense to spend that money to protect, promote, and support breast feeding for every baby? There is much evidence that breast feeding reduces the incidence and severity of rotavirus, respiratory syncytial virus, and otitis media, without side effects." Another letter in the BMJ was from Peter Morrell, who is an honorary research associate of the history of medicine at Staffordshire University in Britain. Some of the points in his letter: -
The existing evidence does not conclusively show that vaccination caused the decline of infectious diseases. -
Diphtheria, tuberculosis, and pertussis were virtually extinct before vaccines were introduced. -
More likely causes are improved water supply, sanitation, adequate food supply, and birth control. -
Martin Miles, a London homoeopath, believes that vaccination causes cancer, meningitis, arthritis, constitutional weaknesses and neurological damage, and increases the level of mucus in the body. -
Harris Coulter, a historian, blames vaccination for mental illness, crime, and social deviance. -
A prominent Dutch homoeopath describes "post vaccination syndrome," and he claims that potentised vaccines can cure this syndrome and act prophylactically against many infections. This claim was confirmed by Margery Grace Blackie, the Queen of England's former physician. It is interesting to note that the authors of the 2 letters mentioned above have no declared competing interests, while the authors of 2 letters published on the other side of the issue have financial interests in the pharmaceutical and vaccine industry. Letters were also published in The Lancet, in response to an editorial published earlier this year entitled "Measles, MMR, and autism: the confusion continues." One of these was from Dr. James H. Roger, of Livedata (UK) Ltd, a independent statistical consulting company, which specializes in medical and pharmaceutical applications. Some of his points: -
The authors of the editorial "perpetuated the myth that good scientific evidence rejects a link between MMR vaccination and autism." -
He states that the correct interpretation of the statistical data from currently published studies show that the data is consistent with an appreciable number of autism cases being triggered by MMR vaccination. -
The authors of a 1999 study in the Lancet used the wrong study design to attempt to detect an association between immunisation and a disease with chronic onset, such as autism. -
The gastrointestinal model for autism, described by Dr. Wakefield and others in a 1998 study in the Lancet, would suggest a variable delay for perhaps several months between immunisation and first symptoms of autism. -
It is unlikely that any true association could be spotted when looking at quite short intervals after immunisation, typically 6 months. -
The current epidemiological evidence does not refute MMR immunisation possibly triggering the onset of autism Another letter was from Ray Gallup, president of the Autism Autoimmunity Project, in New Jersey. Some of his points: -
There is a dire need for more studies on the possible immunological aspects of autism. -
At the recent US congressional hearings on the subject, the author of a pro-vaccine study would not agree to turn over his data for an independent review. -
Three authors of studies showing links between the MMR and autism all agreed to turn over their data for independent review. -
Mr. Gallup's autistic son tested was tested with an immune panel blood test and had raised measles titres, as well as inflammation of the colon. Many parents report the same results with their autistic children. COMMENT: It is great to see critics of routine vaccination being published in pretigious medical journals. I have been writing about the dangers of vaccination for years (see links below). If you are really interested in the vaccination debate there is a great national conference coming up September 8-10, in Washington DC, sponsored by the National Vaccine Information Center (NVIC), that will include many prominent speakers. For more information see their website. Thanks to Irishrose for posting this today in another group |
|
 First
Previous
2-5 of 5
Next
Last
|
|
Reply
| | | From: Rene | Sent: 7/19/2006 10:16 PM |
Vaccinations May Increase Death Toll
By Helen Pearson Inadequate vaccines can encourage the emergence of nastier bugs, placing the unprotected at risk, a new mathematical model shows. The effect could undermine future vaccination programs. Many vaccines save people from dying of a disease, but do not stop them carrying and transmitting it. Over a few decades this may cause more virulent strains to evolve, predict Andrew Read and his colleagues of the University of Edinburgh, UK(1). In some situations, such as in areas endemic for malaria, deadlier disease strains could kill more people than vaccination saves. Most of the time the benefits of vaccination will be eroded. Vaccines for HIV, and hepatitis B and C "give most cause for concern", says immunologist Charles Bangham, of Imperial College in London. These viruses are difficult for the body's immune system to eradicate, leaving them time to reproduce and evolve. Tearaway strains of flu also emerge regularly and evade existing vaccines. Infections that linger in the body are more likely to meet a second bug, explains evolutionary biologist Dieter Ebert from the University of Fribourg in Switzerland. The competition drives pathogens to evolve faster, nastier killing tactics to get the most from their host. Don't Encourage Them Vaccines that encourage evolution include those that slow a disease-causing organism's growth or target its harmful toxin. These types are being pursued to fight diseases such as anthrax and malaria. The possibility that these might save individuals but harm populations "has not been considered before", says Ebert, and should be a factor in public-health policy. Most existing vaccines, such as those for smallpox, polio and measles, are very effective as they use a different strategy. They stimulate a natural immune reaction which either kills off subsequent infections or blocks pathogen reproduction and transmission altogether. Read does not advocate halting such programs. New vaccines should similarly aim to prevent pathogens getting a toehold, says Bangham; many in the pipeline do not. Several different vaccines are being developed to fight malaria: results of clinical trials for one that interrupts the life cycle of microorganism Plasmodium falciparum were announced last week(2). 'Multivalent vaccines' that target several different parts of a pathogen or life cycle at once are the better choice, Read suggests. Nature December 13, 2001 Dr. Mercola's Comment: Many people will not realize that Nature is one of the most prestigious scientific journals in the world. I point that out to highlight the fact that the concern with vaccines is actually starting to be voiced by some well respected scientists. Additional Comment from Dawn Richardson of PROVE: Being healthy becomes an even more elusive goal if you primarily rely on vaccines to get there. When you read this article, keep in mind that children now receive as many as 39 doses of vaccines for 12 different viral and bacterial illnesses and there are literally hundreds of new vaccines in development. It is also interesting to keep in mind that the bacteria strains chosen for inclusion in the pnuemococcal vaccine for children were specifically chosen because they are the strains that have evolved to be the most antibiotic resistant. It is very difficult to do fair and comprehensive risk/benefit analysis when there is so much about the unintended consequences of vaccines that have yet to even be studied. More is not better - educated parents everywhere will continue to demand having options for their individual children and the legal right to exercise those options. |
|
Reply
| | | From: Rene | Sent: 7/19/2006 10:19 PM |
Vaccines and Immune Suppression Vaccines, all vaccines, are immune suppressing; that is they depress our immune functions. The chemicals in the vaccines depress our immune system; the virus present depresses immune function, and the foreign DNA/RNA from animal tissues depresses immunity. Toraldo, et al found that the chemotaxis and metabolic function of PMNs (polymorphonuclear neutrophils) was significantly reduced after vaccinations were given and did not return to normal for months. Other indicators of immune system depression included reduced lymphocyte viability, neutrophil hyper-segmentation, and a reduced white cell count. All vaccines are immune depressing to some extent and that is the trade-off we are risking. The medical thought is that we trade a small immune depression for an immunity to one disease. Now let me repeat, we are trading a total immune system depression (our only defense against all known disease - including millions of pathogens) for a temporary immunity against one disease, usually an innocuous childhood disease. Therefore, the trade is not at all fair. Mullins puts it this way, "Are we trading mumps and measles for cancer and AIDS." The trade-off is not worth the risk. We are risking getting many more diseases than we are "preventing" from getting. [Later we will see that there is literally no prevention.] Another good example is the ritual of the yearly flu shot. There may be only two or three varieties of flu viruses in each shot, hence the names "Asian-Flu", "Japanese-Flu" "Indian-Flu" or "Swine-Flu". But there are literally thousands, may be millions of flu-causing viruses. Taking one or two does not make sense and many people report getting the flu after taking a flu shot. We do not know which variety of flu will affect us each year and in each locale. Therefore, the best method to avoid the flu is to strengthen our immune system by eating properly and getting all the essential vitamins and minerals that our body needs. Only nutrition can build and support a strong immune system, while vaccines help to tear our immunity down. Vaccines have been linked to AIDS and other immuno-deficient disorders as well. Vaccinations depress our body’s immune functions and that keeps us open to developing many other diseases. It is very childish to think that we are going to take one flu vaccine and never get sick from the many varieties of flu that exist, especially since viruses can mutate so fast when the conditions arise. Keeping up with these fast mutating viruses can only be done by priming our immune system with good nutrition and keeping the conditions/environment for their growth minimal. In other words, pathogenic viruses will not grow where the conditions will not allow it. It is the terrain which dictates our health and not the germs/viruses themselves. Germs are pleiomorphic, meaning that they can change with their environment; rods become cocci, and vice-versa. Thinking that germs cause disease means that we are not responsible for our own health and we place that responsibility in the hands of some one who has the means to kill these germs with toxic chemicals (drugs), even if those drugs/vaccines harm our body. Vaccines prevent health! Vaccinations reduce our immunity in many important ways: 1) Vaccines contain many chemicals and heavy metals, like mercury and aluminum, which are in-themselves immuno-suppressing. Mercury actually causes changes in the lymphocyte activity and decreases lymphocyte viability. 2) Vaccines contain foreign tissues and foreign DNA/RNA which act to suppress the immune system via graft-vs-host rejection phenomena. 3) Vaccines alter our t-cell helper/suppressor ratios ... just like those seen with AIDS. This ratio is a key indicator of a proper functioning immune system. 4) Vaccines alter the metabolic activity of PMNs and reduce their chemotaxic abilities. PMNs are our body’s defenses against pathogenic bacteria and viruses. 5) Vaccines suppress our immunity merely buy over-taxing our immune system with foreign material, heavy metals, pathogens and viruses. The heavy metals slow down our immune system, while the viruses set up shop to grow and divide. It is like being chained and handcuffed before swimming. 6) Vaccines clog our lymphatic system and lymph nodes with large protein molecules which have not been adequately broken down by our digestive processes, since vaccines by pass digestion with injections. This is why vaccines are linked to allergies, because they contain large proteins which as circulating immune complexes (CICs) or "klinkers" which cause our body to become allergic. 7) Vaccines deplete our body of vital immune-enhancing nutrients, like vitamin C, A and zinc, which are needed for a strong immune system. It is nutrients like these that primes our immune system, feeds the white blood cells and macrophages and allows them to function optimally. 8) Vaccines are neurotoxic and slow the level of nervous transmission, and communications to the brain and other tissues. Now we know that some lymphocytes communicate directly with the brain through a complex set of neurotransmitters. Altering these factors will also depress our immunity. 4) Links of Vaccines to AIDS - While the medical profession does not lightly discuss AIDS and vaccines in the same sentence, there is much evidence linking AIDS to vaccines. Buttram and Hoffman state, "Indirect immunofluorescence evaluation of T-lymphocytes from blood samples taken ... after vaccination revealed a temporary drop ... in the helper/suppressor ratio after vaccination." What that means is that immediately after vaccines are given our blood "looks" like the blood of and AIDS patient. AIDS is diagnosed when the T -cell (helper to suppressor) ratios are depressed and vaccines cause that same occurrence. Now is it any coincidence that the countries where AIDS is rampant most, are the same countries which received the most vaccinations? It is no joke when one asks, "Are we trading mumps and measles for cancer and AIDS?" When we look into vaccine production we see the links of vaccines to monkey viruses, like SV-40, which causes immuno-deficiencies (similar to AIDS) in monkeys. Some scientists feel that SIV and HIV are very similar viruses and may be one in the same. If it is found in monkeys it is called SIV and if it is found in people it is then called HIV. Very likely, it is the foreign nature of SIV which makes it deadly to our immune system and our immune system goes on the blink. Vaccinations and AIDS are clearly related, and the medical literature shows us many links to AIDS. The first Hepatitis vaccines made were notorious for causing AIDS and were made from the blood of the gay populations, who had high levels of hepatitis and AIDS. Links of AIDS to the hepatitis vaccines were numerous in the medical literature at the time (the 1970s) of the first hepatitis vaccines and people were afraid to take them for that reason. Yes, one may fear hepatitis, but we also had a greater fear of AIDS, which was more deadly and serious a condition, although many more people experienced hepatitis each year. Many other views of how vaccines started the AIDS epidemic are available, but none can be proven with any degree of certainty. Whether HIV is a disease similar to the SIV found in monkey, remains to be seen. Is SIV and HIV the same virus? Is SV-40 involved in immuno-suppression and immunodeficiency? There were reports of the smallpox vaccines delivered to Haiti, Brazil and Africa containing HIV by the London Times in 1987. Some persons have taken conspiratorial views of AIDS, but none have surfaced with any degree of veracity and it misses the point ... all vaccines are immuno-suppressive and compromise the host’s immunity. Whether they contain actual HIV viruses may be disputable, they will depress the immune system. Today more care is taken in vaccine production and there are better methods of locating and removing contaminant viruses, but vaccines are still dangerous from their humble beginning and set the stage for many other diseases to follow suit many years later. 5) True Immunity: Where Does it Come From? Nutrition! Science has glossed over the most valuable point of health, ... nutrition. What is it that boosts our immune system and gives one a vibrant healthy life? ... nutrition. What is it that allows one to over -come the most devastating diseases known to mankind? ... Nutrition. What is the key factor for the recovery of disease? ... Nutrition. What is needed for the body to heal itself? ... Nutrition. What key factor prevents disease? ... Nutrition. What is missing from allopathic medicine today? ... Nutrition! It is nutrition and only nutrition which boosts our immune system and helps the body defend itself from foreign pathogens. Herbs, foods, nutrients and vitamin supplements are the tour-de-force of our immunity and it is virtually ignored by medical science in favor of drugs (chemicals). One can speculate many reasons why medical science has chosen to ignore this most important aspect of our health ... perhaps, because there is no profit in broccoli and carrots. But regardless of profit there is a side of science that altruistically searches for truth. Herbalists and naturopaths for centuries have cured devastating diseases with nature’s remedies and proper diet. Medicine has shunned diet and nutrition (and herbs) as not having a place in scientific medicine. But the lowly herb can cure more than an equal share of allopathic man-made (synthetic) drugs which although originally came from many herbs are now toxic according to their dose and must be tightly regulated. The divergent paths of allopathic medicine and herbal naturopathic remedies is seen in the philosophy of vaccination. Vaccines are the only way modern medicine has to "prevent" disease for they don’t believe in or use herbs or nutrition. Therefore, toxic vaccines are their only tool to "promote health". Herbalists and naturopaths, on the other hand, see the person with a totally different point of view and understanding. The person is taught how to live with nature, how to eat naturally and how to not create the environment for pathogens to grow. When the body is periodically cleansed, disease is not a problem. Allopathy desires to force health by giving the body more toxins (vaccines) to deal with in a futile and erroneous attempt at "preventing" disease. Yet, vaccines cause illnesses, many diseases, numerous disorders and set the stage for cancerous grow while depressing our body’s ability to fight off pathogens. Allopathy depresses important body functions, while making the body more toxic. Naturopathy helps the body eliminate toxins while supporting the body’s immune functions. Therefore, there are many points in which allopathic medicine and naturopathic medicine diverge and differ. Yet, the laws of our land only allow allopathic methods (vaccinations) of disease "prevention" and not other more effective and less damaging methods of prevention, i.e., homeopathy and naturopathy. Many religions refuse vaccines on religious grounds, because vaccines are contrary to their beliefs and vaccines are blood products grown on aborted fetuses and human and animal tissues. Vaccines grown on animal tissues, aborted fetuses, and cancer cells would be against anyone’s fair judgement and common sense, regardless of religious beliefs. Therefore, it is common sense which mandates our opinions against putrid vaccines, as well as religious beliefs. It is no secret anymore that proper nutrition builds good immunity, when the medical literature is full of studies on the intimate details of our immunity as related to nutrients. The fact that nutrition plays a large role in one’s health (and immune functions) can no longer be suppressed by prejudice. The over-whelming science today substantiates nutrition as a key factor in our health. Nutrition boosts our immune system like nothing else can. Field stated, "it is accepted that nutrition is important in the development and function of the immune system." Harbige noted that "Nutrition and nutritional status can have profound effects on immune functions, resistance to infection and auto-immunity in man and other animals." Scrimshaw and SanGiovanni state that "infections, ... have adverse effects on nutritional status. ... Conversely, almost any nutrient deficiency, if sufficiently severe, will impair resistance to infection." Chandra (Am J Clin Nutrition, 1997; 66(2):460s-463s) also noted, "Nutrition is a critical determinant of immune responses and malnutrition is the most common cause of immunodeficiency worldwide." Chandra and Chandra (Prog Food Nutrition Sci, 1986;10(1-2):1-65) stated that "the immune system plays a key role in the body’s ability to fight infection and reduce the risk of developing tumors, autoimmune and degenerative disease." Yet, although this information is new to us now, it is not new to everyone. Many people have always maintained that a strong immune system began with good nutrition. Roger Williams, Linus Pauling, Ewan Cameron, Adelle Davis, John R Christopher, Jethro Kloss, and many other notable nutritionist have claimed nutrition was important to our health for many years, but were ignored. Profit of man-made chemicals came before the health of the patrons, many asked to suffer needlessly in the name of science when they could have been cured by a simple herbal remedy or a food. Nutrition has been down-played in the last 80 years in favor of patent-able drugs (man-made chemicals). Perhaps, the penicillin era was the greatest cause of the downfall of nutrition as a part of our health. The search for the magic bullet began with Paul Erlich’s compound 606, and continues to this day. We think that cancer must be cured from without by a man-made chemical, while we ignore the inner terrain and the body’s natural innate abilities (to heal) within ... governed, of course, by nutrition. Hopefully within the next decade great strides will be taken in nutrition and health to make up for lost time. Many physicians are learning nutrition and herbology and homeopathy on their own time. Their patients will be the better for it. As more nutritional oriented physicians become available, the people will have a choice and a place to turn to when in need. Nutrition Produces Health and Vitality! Vaccines Prevent Health! |
|
Reply
| | | From: Rene | Sent: 7/19/2006 10:22 PM |
6) Vaccines and Cancer - "I never saw cancer in an un-vaccinated person." Dr W B Clarke, circa 1909 We don’t usually associate vaccinations with cancer, but there are many citations in the medial literature where vaccines caused cancers. Sometimes cancer occurred at the site of injection and sometimes a lymphatic type of cancer would occur many years later in locations. Vaccines cause cancer. Yes, not everybody gets cancer after receiving a vaccine, but their body has been seeded with the ingredients for cancer to grow. Picture cancer as a window of opportunity. Once that window is opened, cancer can grow. Dr Vincent’s work with Biologic Terrain Assessment (BTA) found that all children were pushed into the cancer "window" after vaccines were given. Now those children who don’t develop cancer were (obviously) able to negate that cancer "window" with good nutrition. It is the environment which allows cancer to grow in the first place, and vaccines create that environment. When the cancer is at the site of the vaccine injection, it is hard to deny a causal relationship. Miraculously, doctors tell their patients it is co-incidental or unrelated to the vaccines. Yet, it was known in the 1800s that vaccines clog our lymphatics and contain toxic materials which could lead to disease, even cancers. Even Jenner himself had trouble with his vaccines causing diseases, and death. He was nearly lynched in one town for his specious concoctions. Our lymphatic system is designed to carry our lymphocytes throughout our body and maintain control over our cellular immunity. Therefore, the injection of large molecular sized proteins (foreign tissues in the vaccines) will clog our lymph-nodes and create problems for the lymphatic system. Therefore, it is no mystery that vaccines and lymphatic diseases, like leukemias and lymphomas, are related. "Syphilis, phthisis, scrofula, cancer, erysipelas and almost all diseases of the skin, have been conveyed, occasioned, or intensified by vaccination." Dr William Hitchman "Cancer and other vile diseases are daily inflicted on virtuous families by vaccination." Dr Edward Haughton, BAMD, MRCS "Experts say 98 million Americans who took polio shots in the 1950s and 1960s may get a deadly brain cancer from the inoculations ... Researchers at the University of Chicago Medical Center say that a virus contaminated the polio vaccine and they have now found genetic material from the virus in a number of brain cancer victims." Dr Jacob Rachlin quoted from Weekly World News of Lantana [FL] Of course, anything which depresses our immunity will eventually lead to cancer, since it is our immune system which cleanses and eliminates mutated (cancerous) cells from our body daily. If this is not done, cancers will grow and develop unchecked by our immune system. Therefore, a healthy immune system is needed to protect us from cancer and Vaccines Prevent Health. Vaccines and Auto-Immune Disease - [The injection of foreign animal DNA/RNA.] Auto-immune disease is common-place today, but were very rare just a few years ago. Does anybody wonder why one day we are healthy and the next day our body no longer recognizes our own cells as self? Could the injection of foreign animal DNA/RNA have anything to do with our epidemic rise in auto-immune disease today? Bart Classen, MD has done some remarkable research on vaccines and auto-immune diseases, especially Diabetes mellitus, which he sees as a marker disease for all auto-immune conditions. His research finds that the more that vaccinations are given the more diabetes (and auto-immune diseases) appears. Dr Classen’s research found that this held true for many animal models; after receiving vaccines they experienced increases in diabetes. Then he carried his research to include vaccinated human populations. He found that in retrospective studies of vaccinations in five different human populations, this fact held true also. The more vaccines one received the more was their incidence of diabetes (and auto-immune diseases). Now it is interesting that the increases in diabetes included Juvenile-onset diabetes, which we are told today is a profoundly "genetic" disease. Yet, Dr Claussen’s studies revealed that vaccinations [any vaccination] can cause increases in Juvenile-onset diabetes, too. Now one theory said that the antigenic structure of the measles/mumps virus was similar to the antigenic structure of the beta cells (which produce insulin) in the pancreas. So when our body makes antibodies to fight off measles virus, those antibodies attack the pancreatic beta cells, too. Viola diabetes! Vaccines create the foundations for auto-immune disease when foreign animal tissues are injected into our blood streams. It alters our genes ("jumping" genes) and creates havoc in our lymphatic system. Auto-immune conditions are more common today than before massive vaccination programs began in the 1940s. Auto-immune conditions such as ALS, MS, RA, and Diabetes are severe diseases and not to be taken lightly. They alter people’s lives for ever and cost more than money when we consider the time involved, the stress involved, and eventually death ensues. There is even some speculation that auto-immune conditions may be behind the brain conditions they see in autism and there is some talk in the medical literature of auto-immunity to brain cells. If the body can not even recognize its own cells, then it has been tricked into thinking that those cells are no longer self. Why does this occur? Could AIDS be an auto-immune condition where the lymphocytes are reacting against each other? What about the myriad of neurological disorders, kidney disorders, blood disorders and the many diseases associated with vaccinations? When we are looking for excellent health, we need to avoid auto-immune disorders. One must remember that Vaccines Prevent Health! [Note: Dr Classen feels that Diabetes is an indicator (marker) disease for auto-immunity. |
|
Reply
| | | From: Rene | Sent: 8/6/2008 1:09 AM |
Dear Subscribers, Long before the media was completely overtaken by "the corporate
agenda," there was a documentary on flu vaccines that rattled my
cage. Apparently, according to the producers, one cannot know in
advance which of the many possible influenzas will make the rounds in
any given flu season. Ergo, committees sit around and haggle over the
various premonitions individual participants might have. I am
intentionally using unscientific language because the process used is
unscientific. They might as well use a ouija board, but millions of
people, mainly elderly people, will blindly follow the advice of
these pundits and subject themselves to serums that likely as not
have never been tested. Oh, yes, this was another shock. Because the
concept of vaccination is so well "understood," the need for clinical
trials is not deemed necessary. Oh, and we might as well add that
expiry dates are now also meaningless. So, pardon the language, but
if it was guesswork before, it's pure insanity now.
Now, we have an even more unique "situation" in the making. A virus
is alleged to have jumped species and caused precisely 79 deaths
worldwide; 100% of these deaths occurred among people who had direct
contact with poultry, including, in one case, a dead swan in
Azerbaijan. There was a "cluster" of deaths, enough to cause global
alarm, in Sumatra and seven people died. I didn't make this up, I took the "facts" from the CDC web site: http://www.cdc.gov/flu/avian/gen-info/avian-flu-humans.htm However, based on these really scary figures, governments around the
world are preparing for a global pandemic. The Guardian has this
story: http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2008/jul/21/pandemic.warning A parliamentary committee has determined -- with their sixth sense? -- that 75,000 humans will die in a pandemic of bird flu. The race for a vaccine: Google! January 26, 2006: University of Pittsburgh researchers have developed a vaccine that is 100% effective for birds. It's genetically engineered: http://www.physorg.com/news10302.html April 17, 2007: FDA approves bird flu vaccine.
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/18156492/ May 19, 2008: EU approves vaccine:
http://www.iht.com/articles/2008/05/19/business/glaxo.php Oh, hey, but wait, they tried a vaccine on indigents in Poland and the Minister of Health went a bit ballistic: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/poland/2235676/Homeless-people-die-after-bird-flu-vaccine-trial-in-Poland.htm
<http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/poland/2235676/Homeless-people-die-after-bird-flu-vaccine-trial-in-Poland.html> June 11, 2008: another miracle, a vaccine that "appears to be safe for humans"
http://www.nlm.nih.gov/medlineplus/news/fullstory_65696.html Oh, but wait, before we had a safe vaccine, we already accepted delivery of a different one: http://www.poconorecord.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080514/NEWS/805140342 I don't know who is in charge of the world in which we find ourselves, but I think some big time mismanagement has occurred. Want to protect yourself: stay away from sick swans in Aberbaijan and poultry farms in Sumatra. Oh, and don't hold your arm out under a needle or use imported feathers from Guangdong to rub the sleep sand out of your eyes. If you follow these really simple safety precautions, you should be fine unless, unless, unless someone is monkeying around. If there is a pandemic, there will clearly be cause for investigation. If anyone is alive to investigate, they better try the labs, not bird farms because the really dangerous and virulent avian flu killed 79 people in nine countries over several years, not quite the Black Death unless someone wants it to become such. Many blessings, Ingrid [http://www.sacredmedicinesanctuary.com] |
|
|
First
Previous
2-5 of 5
Next
Last
|
|
|
Free Forum Hosting
Important Announcement
Return to �?Toxins �?/A>