MSN Home  |  My MSN  |  Hotmail
Sign in to Windows Live ID Web Search:   
go to MSNGroups 
Free Forum Hosting
 
Important Announcement Important Announcement
The MSN Groups service will close in February 2009. You can move your group to Multiply, MSN’s partner for online groups. Learn More
A Peaceful Place[email protected] 
  
What's New
  
  �?•�?·´`·.·�? �?/A>  
  Copyrights  
  Disclaimer  
  �?•�?·´`·.·�? �?/A>  
  Messages  
  General  
  Articles - Misc.  
  ADHD,ADD, Autism  
  �?Allergies �?/A>  
  Alternative & +  
  § Arthritis §  
  Depression  
  �?Diet �?/A>  
  �?Exercise �?/A>  
  Eyes  
  Fitness and Exercise  
  �? FM & CF �?/A>  
  Headaches  
  Herbs etc  
  IBS & Other DD's  
  �?•�?·´`·.·�?�?/A>  
  Liver  
  Lung Health  
  MS �?/A>  
  ◄Mycoplasms�?/A>  
  Osteoporosis  
  Pain-Coping  
  Skin Disorders  
  Sleep  
  �?Supplements  
  �?Toxins �?/A>  
  Humor �?/A>  
  Household ☼¿☼  
  Mind-Body-Spirit  
  Pictures  
    
  �?Links �?/A>  
  Snags  
  Sources & Resources  
  ≈☆≈E-Cards ≈☆�?/A>  
  Pesticides Exp  
  �?Organic Living  
  Organic Gardens  
  See the Most Recent Posts  
  
  
  Tools  
 
�?Toxins �?/A> : Genetically Engineered Foods
Choose another message board
 
     
Reply
 Message 1 of 2 in Discussion 
From: Rene  (Original Message)Sent: 8/22/2006 10:48 PM
 
Center for Food Safety

 

Center for Food Safety and Earth Justice Victory!

Court Rules Federal Government Acted Illegally In Permitting Field Trials Of Genetically Engineered (GE) Crops In Hawaii

Ruling First Ever on Controversial Drug-Producing GE Crops

Citing possible harm to Hawaii's 329 endangered and threatened species, a federal district judge has ruled that the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) violated the Endangered Species Act (ESA) in permitting the cultivation of drug-producing, genetically engineered crops throughout Hawaii. The court found that USDA acted in "utter disregard" of the ESA, and also violated the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), by failing to conduct even preliminary investigations prior to its approval of the plantings.

The August 10th decision represents the first federal court ruling ever on "biopharming," the controversial practice of genetically altering food crops to produce experimental drugs and industrial compounds. Biopharming has provoked the ire of the food industry, public interest groups, and farmers concerned about contamination of foods and the environment with potent drugs, and potential economic losses from adulterated food. The four USDA-issued permits primarily at issue in the case authorized Monsanto, ProdiGene, Garst Seed Company, and the Hawaii Agriculture Research Center to plant over 800 acres (1.25 square miles) of drug-producing corn and sugarcane at various sites in Kauai, Oahu, Molokai, and Maui from 2001 to 2003.

The plaintiffs in the case - Center for Food Safety, Friends of the Earth, Pesticide Action Network North America, and KAHEA (the Hawaiian-Environmental Alliance) - sued the USDA in November 2003. Plaintiffs were represented by Earthjustice and Center for Food Safety.

"This decision shows that regulatory oversight of this out-of-control industry has been woefully inadequate. The agency entrusted with protecting human health and the environment from the impacts of genetic engineering experiments has been asleep at the wheel," said Paul Achitoff, attorney with Earthjustice.

"The ruling is a clear victory for Hawaii's environment," said Joseph Mendelson, Legal Director of the Center for Food Safety. "It will help protect the islands from the illegal field-testing of genetically engineered, drug-producing crops."

Plaintiffs point to a scathing critique of USDA's regulation of biopharm and other genetically altered crops issued by the agency's Inspector General in December 2005 as evidence that USDA continues to neglect its regulatory duties. That report documented numerous violations, including USDA's failure to record locations of field trial sites and conduct required inspections. In two instances, USDA regulators were unaware that a total of more than two tons of harvested biopharm crop material was stored at uninspected facilities for over a year.

Hawaii is the nation's leading state for plantings of experimental, genetically engineered crops, having hosted more than 5,000 such tests from 1987 through 2004, including several dozen biopharm crop trials. Biopharm crops produce substances such as experimental vaccines, growth hormones, blood-clotting and thinning agents, antibodies, and industrial enzymes. Two high-profile contamination incidents in 2002, in which biopharm corn produced by ProdiGene contaminated soybeans and corn in Nebraska and Iowa, provoked widespread criticism of the practice, which nevertheless continues.

Plaintiffs have also challenged USDA's practice of concealing the locations of trials from the public, and in most cases not disclosing the substances being grown in the plants.

Judge J. Michael Seabright ordered the parties to appear in court on August 22, 2006, to discuss remedies for the government's violations.

"We will not rest until the federal government prohibits the irresponsible and hazardous field-testing of drug-producing, genetically engineered crops," said Andrew Kimbrell, executive director of Center for Food Safety.

For more information and to read the ruling, visit the Center for Food safety at http://www.centerforfoodsafety.org/press_room.cfm




First  Previous  2 of 2  Next  Last 
Reply
 Message 2 of 2 in Discussion 
From: ReneSent: 8/22/2006 11:35 PM


Europeans Fighting Back Against the GM Crop Blight
 
 
 In late July, protesters in southwest France entered two testing fields growing genetically modified commercial maize, and destroyed 6 to 10 hectares of the plants.

In another field in the same region, Greenpeace activists cut a giant version of the universal danger sign for "contamination" through the maize.

After French courts ordered the removal of a Web site listing the locations of GM maize fields across the country, protesters have begun marking the fields themselves.

They have threatened to continue doing so unless an official register of GM fields is made publicly available. Destroying crops in this manner could result in a five-year prison sentence or a fine of 75,000 euros ($96,000). The demonstrators plan to reimburse farmers for the value of the damaged crops.

Between 1999 and 2003, the European Union banned GM food imports. In 2006, the World Trade Organization ruled this a violation of trade rules. Last year, 500 French hectares were planted with GM crops, a figure that may soar to 10 times that amount by the end of this year.
 
 Science Daily August 2, 2006  <
http://www.sciencedaily.com/upi/index.php?feed=Science&article=UPI-1-20060802-14200900-bc-eat2live-corn.xml>

 



 
 Dr. Mercola's Comment:

 
 Although Americans may be feeling a little wary, at best, about the spread of genetically modified (GM) crops, many Europeans make no secret about their disdain for such Frankenstein foods. A mere mention of the words Monsanto or genetic engineering provokes a fight.

Contrary to the claims of industry proponents, GM crops have not been proven safe. The regulatory framework governing them was fatally flawed from the start; it was designed to expedite product approval at the expense of safety considerations.

The approval of GM crops uses a principal called 'substantial equivalence,' which is intentionally vague and ill-defined. It gives companies complete license to claim that transgenic products are 'substantially equivalent' to non-transgenic products, and hence 'safe.'

Actually, there have been very few credible studies on GM food safety. And what findings there are already give cause for concern.

In one of the few systematic investigations on GM food ever carried out, 'growth factor-like' effects were found in the stomach and small intestine of young rats that ate GM plants. There have also been other studies that raised serious safety concerns.

Much of what little protesting is being done about GM blight in America, however, flies under the consumer radar. Some food companies have shelved GM concoctions due to legal obstacles thrown their way by a few consumer groups.

I am convinced that the GMO issue may be one of the biggest threats to the future health of the world and very few people are aware of the danger. Industry has been able to hoodwink the vast majority of the public on this important topic. It is likely my next book will address this topic.

Unfortunately, that hasn't stopped the use of GM products in some 75 percent of the processed foods you'll see at a typical grocery store near you. To protect your family's health from GM foods, please review a short list of tips I posted earlier this year on how to avoid them:

Reduce or eliminate processed foods. There are many reasons why processed foods are not optimal for your health -- for instance they often contain trans fat, acrylamide and little nutritional value -- so avoiding them will not only help you to cut back on the amount of GM foods you are consuming, but will also boost your health.

Read produce and food labels. GM soybeans and corn make up the largest portion of genetically modified crops. When looking at a product label, if any ingredients such as corn flour and meal, dextrin, starch, soy sauce, margarine, and tofu (to name a few) are listed, there's a good chance it has come from GM corn or soy, unless it's listed as organic.

Buy organic produce. Buying organic is currently the best way to ensure that your food has not been genetically modified. By definition, food that is certified organic must be free from all GM organisms, produced without artificial pesticides and fertilizers and from an animal reared without the routine use of antibiotics, growth promoters or other drugs.

Look at produce stickers. Those little stickers on fruit and vegetables contain different PLU codes depending on whether the fruit was conventionally grown, organically grown or genetically modified. The PLU code for conventionally grown fruit consists of four numbers, organically grown fruit has five numbers prefaced by the number nine, and GM fruit has five numbers prefaced by the number eight.

 
 
 
Related Articles:
 
Genetically Modified (GM) Foods Prepare a Takeover

The Damage GM Foods Can do to Your Body

Prominent Scientists Form Group to Counter GM Food
 
 
Return to Table of Contents #833 
http://www.mercola.com/2006/aug/15/index.htm