MSN Home  |  My MSN  |  Hotmail
Sign in to Windows Live ID Web Search:   
go to MSNGroups 
Free Forum Hosting
 
Important Announcement Important Announcement
The MSN Groups service will close in February 2009. You can move your group to Multiply, MSN’s partner for online groups. Learn More
Alice's Restaurant[email protected] 
  
What's New
  
  Alice's Restaurant  
  Alice's (G-Rated) Rules/Info  
  Alice's Mailboxs  
  Pictures  
  MESSAGE BOARDS  
  General  
  Debate Club  
  Games  
  Laugh In  
  Members Profiles  
  Links/Banners  
  Mbrs Favorite Links  
  Information Desk  
  Alice's Cafe  
  Other MSN Servers  
  
  
  Tools  
 
Debate Club : Another View: Immigration issue shouldn’t deny aspirations of children
Choose another message board
 
     
Reply
 Message 1 of 5 in Discussion 
From: Kat  (Original Message)Sent: 4/3/2008 11:15 PM
 

Another View: Immigration issue shouldn’t deny aspirations of children

April 3, 2008

The Tennessean, Nashville, Tenn., March 20, 2008

\While immigration policy is debated at every level of government, there should at least be agreement that children should not have to suffer for circumstances they did not create or are unable to control.

Given the recognized importance of education, both in terms of child development and long-term impact, it makes good sense to provide children with the opportunities they need to succeed. Unfortunately, some efforts would deny undocumented children the chance to learn and show what they can do in a college or university.

Tennessee lawmakers have been considering legislation that would deny children from undocumented families the ability to get a college education. A bill in the General Assembly seeks to prohibit admission and enrollment in a college or university in the state unless the student establishes citizenship or can provide proof of being in the nation legally.

Meanwhile, federal legislation, known as the DREAM Act, would allow undocumented immigrant students to apply for legal residency and enter public colleges or universities, including the potential of admittance with in-state tuition rates. In addition to being a basically principled step, the legislation should be viewed in terms of real-life conditions facing those students.

The issue involves children who played little if any role in the decision-making of the adults in those families. These children have often grown up in American schools. During that time, they have worked hard, like other students, to achieve. They graduate from American high schools after learning and completing the same coursework as their peers. They also have aspirations in life that spring from their work in school. What sense does it make to prohibit those children from further pursuing their goals through education because of disagreements over decisions made by their parents?

If policy makers are unable to see the fairness of such proposals based on principle, they should consider the social and economic impact of limiting young people’s opportunities in education. Take away the goal of college, and it takes away the motivation to excel in high school. That can even contribute to the dropout rate. That has an effect on young people’s potential to earn. It can even lead some kids into trouble. Higher education is not only an opportunity to improve the quality of life for those students but an opportunity to make greater strides in broad terms for everyone. To deny students those chances seems not only unfair but unwise.

The college opportunity issue is only one of many issues facing lawmakers on immigration. The nation needs a healthy debate on these issues at every level because the subject is far more complex than the simple answers often offered might suggest.

A practical, level-headed approach is necessary to address economic, workplace and education factors, but surely the nation and communities across the land can deal with immigration without making it tough on children, whose only desire is to do well in life, potentially to the benefit of many others. As long as decision-makers keep that perspective in mind, they will increase the chance that the right answers will be found.

-- Gannett News Service



First  Previous  2-5 of 5  Next  Last 
Reply
 Message 2 of 5 in Discussion 
From: KatSent: 4/3/2008 11:16 PM
This article was in the Statesman Journal and this was on of the replys. I could not have said it better myself.
 
Good for the Tennessee lawmakers is what I say. We do not, and should not be paying for the Education for the children of illegal aliens, ever! The Education system and our tax payer dollars should be spent on our children, not those of the illegals.
It was reported on the news yesterday(by the Federal government) that illegals cost the tax payers approximately 10.4 Billion dollars more than they pay in taxes each year. Think of how much we could do with 10.4 BILLION dollars. We could provide free college for a large number of our own citizen children, improve the health care system, or use the money to fix our falling apart schools. Who knows how long the list of things could be that this money could be and should be spent on.
Let's keep up the pressure and maybe the government will get their heads out of the sand and fix this problem and finally tell the illegals that they have nothing coming. One can only hope.

Reply
 Message 3 of 5 in Discussion 
From: WindySent: 6/22/2008 11:46 PM
AMEN again!

Reply
 Message 4 of 5 in Discussion 
From: Green EyezSent: 8/5/2008 3:29 PM
Well I wish they'd enforce this in Savannah!
Gabi has been placed on a waiting list for Pre-K this year .
Now I have to find daycare that has preschool for $100/week,transportation at MY expense while the illegal preschoolers get to go to school on a State Voucher, transported for free on the school bus.

Reply
 Message 5 of 5 in Discussion 
From: KatSent: 8/5/2008 9:35 PM
And Congress sits and does nothing. For money and power. While I think Carter still holds the reigns of worst president ever, bush is a very close second. That is so wrong GE. I hope all voters remember how much we citizens are getting shafted by our government when they vote.

First  Previous  2-5 of 5  Next  Last 
Return to Debate Club