MSN Home  |  My MSN  |  Hotmail
Sign in to Windows Live ID Web Search:   
go to MSNGroups 
Free Forum Hosting
 
Important Announcement Important Announcement
The MSN Groups service will close in February 2009. You can move your group to Multiply, MSN’s partner for online groups. Learn More
Build on the True Foundation[email protected] 
  
What's New
  
  Welcome  
  Welcome, by Isaiah  
  All topics  
  Pictures  
  Holy KJV Bible  
  Links  
  Posting guide  
  EMMANUEL  
  Emmanuel--Part two  
  Proof of Emmanuel  
  In The Beginnig  
  Question&Answer  
  Wel./new members  
  Testimonies  
  on trinity  
  On Jesus only  
  Jesus  
  Baptism  
  Gifts of Spirit  
  Law & Sabbath  
  Grace  
  Peace  
  Salvation  
  Eve  
  Adam; Satan  
  The Beginning  
  God and Jesus  
  Day of Lord  
  Church: Israel  
  Genesis  
  The WORD  
  Women  
  Rapture?  
  Revelation  
  Beast Heads  
  Fall of OT  
  Psalm  
  Special Verses  
  Prayer Request  
  Dake's Studies  
  Let's Praise Him  
  Dreams /Visions  
  Family  
  SACRED NAME  
  gift messages  
  Ellen White  
  Holidays  
  Heresy  
  Triva Board  
  Health Tips  
  For Unbelievers  
  Birthdays  
    
  
  
  Tools  
 
Dake's Studies : Serpent of the Garden
Choose another message board
 
     
Reply
 Message 1 of 3 in Discussion 
From: MSN NicknameTweety134  (Original Message)Sent: 6/19/2007 12:58 AM

The Serpent of Eden

"Serpent" comes from the Hebrew: nachash (HSN-<H5175>), snake. A literal serpent is involved as a tool of Satan; otherwise, it would be unjust of God to curse it. This same Hebrew word (nachash) is used of literal snakes throughout Scripture (Gen. 3:1-14; 49:17; Ex. 7:15; Num. 21:9; 2Ki. 18:4; Prov. 30:19; Eccl. 10:8,11; Amos 5:19; 9:3). It wouldn't make sense to substitute Satan for serpent in these and other scriptures. Satan has no power to transform himself into a snake. He is an angel and always will be, though now fallen (Ezek. 28:11-17).

"Subtil" comes from the Hebrew `aruwm (HSN-<H6175>), cunning (usually in a bad sense), crafty (Job 5:12; 15:5). The character of the temptation illustrates craftiness. Satan and the serpent agreed on the best method to cause the fall of man. Nothing was said at first to awaken suspicion or shock the moral sense; merely a sly insinuation calculated to excite natural curiosity. Then there was a direct lie combined with just enough truth to give it plausibility (Gen. 3:4-5). Note the three steps leading to transgression in the outline of Gen. 3:1-4 (Gen. 3:6; Jn. 8:44; 2Cor. 11:3; 1Tim. 2:14).

The facts of this account are neither allegory, myth, legend, nor fable, but literal and historical. They are rarely even expressed in figurative language. In fact, there are only three figurative statements in the third chapter of Genesis:

1. "Dust shalt thou eat all the days of thy life" -- expressing utter humiliation of the serpent as the lowest of all the beasts of the field (note, Gen. 3:14)

2. "It shall bruise thy head" -- expressing complete and crushing defeat of the devil and all his forces, as a serpent is killed by crushing its head (note, Gen. 3:14)

3. "Thou shalt bruise his heel" -- expressing temporary sufferings of the Messiah (note, Gen. 3:14).

The "seed of the serpent" refers to natural serpents being natural enemies of man. The "seed of the woman" refers to the incarnation of God as a man (Gen. 3:15; Isa. 7:14; 9:6-7; 11:1; Mt. 1; Jn. 1:14; Rom. 1:1-2; Gal. 4:4; 1Tim. 3:16; Heb. 2:14-18).

There is no reason to make the historical record of man's fall figurative in any way. To make the serpent figurative of Satan rather than a tool of Satan is out of harmony with all facts in Scripture. The serpent is classed with the beasts of the field and cursed above them (Gen. 3:1,14). It is spoken of as being formed by God's hand (Job 26:13), as being cursed in the Millennium when Satan is bound (Isa. 65:25), and in the same literal sense as other creatures formed in Adam's day. True, Satan is symbolized by a great red dragon and is called "that old serpent" (Isa. 27:1; Job 41:34; Rev. 12:3-17; 20:2), and he is like the serpent of Eden who deceived Eve (2Cor. 11:3; 1Tim. 2:14); but this doesn't make the serpent of Gen. 3 the personal devil any more than it does Peter in Mt. 16:22-23, or the kings of Babylon and Tyre in Isa. 14:12-14 and Ezek. 28:11-17. All were merely tools of Satan (see The Law of Double Reference). The most fundamental principle of interpretation is to take the Bible literally wherever possible. If the language can't be taken literally, then determine what is the literal truth conveyed bys the figurative expressions.

Fifteen Facts about the Serpent of Eden

1. He was a beast of the field (Gen. 3:1).

2. He was more subtle than all others (Gen. 3:1).

3. He was created by God (Gen. 3:1).

4. He was a serpent, not Satan (Gen. 3:1).

5. He had power of speech (Gen. 3:1-6).

6. He had reasoning powers (Gen. 3:1-6).

7. He had deceptive powers (Gen. 3:1-6).

8. He had knowledge of God's plan (Gen. 3:1-6).

9. He walked upright before the fall (Gen. 3:14).

10. He was head of all animals (Gen. 3:1,14).

11. He was capable of enmity (Gen. 3:15).

12. He was close to man in Eden (Gen. 3:1-15).

13. He carried on conversation (Gen. 3:1-6).

14. He was cursed above all animals (Gen. 3:14).

15. He was a literal snake that was used as a tool of Satan to deceive man (Gen. 3:1-19).

Eightfold Prophecy to the Serpent

1. You are cursed above all cattle (Gen. 3:14).

2. You are cursed above all beasts (Gen. 3:14).

3. Upon your belly you shall go all the days of your life (Gen. 3:14).

4. Dust you shall eat all the days of your life (Gen. 3:14; Isa. 65:25).

5. I will put enmity between you and the woman (Gen. 3:15).

6. I will put enmity between your seed and her seed (Gen. 3:15)

7. The seed of the woman shall bruise your head (Gen. 3:15; Rom. 16:20; Rev. 20:1-10).

8. You shall bruise His heel (Gen. 3:15; Rev. 1:18).

Points 1 through 6 are will continue being fulfilled into eternity. Point 7 was partially fulfilled when Satan was defeated at the cross (Col. 2:14-17), but the final fulfillment will be at Armageddon (Rev. 19:11 -- Rev. 20:3) and at the end of the Millennium (Rev. 20:7-11). Point 8 was fulfilled completely when Christ was crucified. He was not crushed by seeming defeat in being killed, because it was impossible that He should be held in death (Jn. 10:18; Acts 2:23-36). He was merely wounded as a heel is bruised, but Satan is to be completely defeated and his power destroyed as when a serpent's head is crushed (Gen. 3:15; Col. 2:14-17; Rom. 16:20; Rev. 20:7-10).

—Dake's Study Notes


First  Previous  2-3 of 3  Next  Last 
Reply
 Message 2 of 3 in Discussion 
From: MSN NicknameFreeborn551Sent: 6/19/2007 6:28 AM
To believe any of this message is to completely deny Scripture.  there is really no point in my posting Rev. 12 and 20 any more to you.  I have done it many times already, and still you believe Dake instead of the Scripture.
 
No Scripture says that the serpent was a beast.  He is never named as a beast.  God plainly said in more than one verse that the serpent is the devil and Satan...yet your man, Dake, plainly denies this here.  and you believe him,  and not Revelation.
 
And no use for me to ask again how the Pharisees are literal snakes.  done that many times already....you refuse to listen to Jesus.....who called them serpents.....and John who called them vipers  (same thing)
 
Not one verse says that Satan and the serpent agreed on the best method to cause man to fall.
Find me that verse, and quote it here.
 
So he thought Jesus dies to kill some literal snake?  to cursh some literal snakes' head?  is that what you think?
He contradicts himself here...when he said the serpent was a literal snake,,,,,,cursed by God..then says this is only a figurative statement.....that dust shalt thou eat is only figurative,,,,,expressing utter humilation of some literal snake!
 
My gosh.  tweety.  why would God be interested in humilating some literal reptile snake?  what is the world does animals have to do with any of this?
 
Notice that God was speaking directly  TO  THE SERPENT......SAYING  , HE, (JESUS) will bruise your head.....why then does Dake call this one figutrative?  No, God was speaking to the serpent, personally.
So if that serpent were a literal SNAKE,  then God was speaking of bruising a literal snakes' head,  not the devil, unless the devil is the serpent, as Revelation declares!
 
No,  not as a serpent is killed......he was saying the crush would be to the SERPENT'S HEAD.
Now take that down and think on it.
 
Do you really think that Jesus died on that cross to bruise the head of a literal snake?  If so,  which one?  Those in the Garden, or the Pharisees in his day?  or a snake today?  or when?  many snakes live.....so which one?
 
It is total darkness, confusion, and lies to believe the above post.
 
Dake is a liar and had no truth.
 
Jo
p.s.  and my trying so hard to bring you into real truth is perceived by Anne and others as being antagnostic.  then those who do not care what you believe, must be the christians?
What about Jesus?  and Paul?  they tried so hard to get people into truth.
Only truth saves the soul.
regardless of what the 'annes' claim.
 
I stand on intergirty and truth.

Reply
 Message 3 of 3 in Discussion 
From: MSN NicknameFreeborn551Sent: 6/19/2007 5:49 PM
I have written a complete and very good and easy to understand history of the true origine and nature of the OLD SERPENT.  I had intended to post it here,  but it became a full message.
 
So I will post it as a new message on the Adam/Satan board.
I do hope you all will really take the time to read and study and prove this message.  It will shed the true light on the subject.
 
So unless your deeds are evil, and you love darkness, rather than light,  study this true message.  and stop believing these lies of man.
 
The above message from Dake is nothing but lies.
 
Nothing there could be proven with Scripture.
 
Jo