People who try to say Jesus , or any other 'messiah', for that matter, was God in the flesh, are so mixed up, it is total mass confusion and they wear themselves out trying to explain this stupid blunder of man-made doctrine.
If Jesus, or some other Messiah, were God in the flesh, how is it that he went to appear in the presence of the God which he already is? That is so stupid only the blind could believe such stuff.
If Jesus were God in the flesh, then he would have always been in the presence of God, being God himself. why even say, in the presence of God, when he was God? Makes no sense at all.
for me to say, Jo went somewhere to appear in the presence of Jo is nothing less than mockery of words.
I cannot go somewhere to appear in the presence of myself. and to jump to, ' with God all things are possible' to try to explain some crazy thing like this, is surely handlying the Word of God deceitfully and irresponsibily.
I truly do not think that anyone has ever really taken note of what they are actually saying. They repeat words others made up. Messiah is god....dodododo.... but as a flesh man, ...dadadada.. this man , mean God...but anyway this man is required to exhibit every characteristic of a man and must appear and bow before his own presence....for he is god...and as a man.this god,...must bow before himself.......??/////
And that is Scriptural? If so, any of you claiming the Messiah was God in flesh......PLEASE BE SO KIND AS TO GIVE ME THAT SCRIPTURE!!!
Here is another instance of Jesus being presented to the Lord:
Lu 2:21 And when eight days were accomplished for the circumcising of the child, his name was called JESUS, which was so named of the angel before he was conceived in the womb.
Lu 2:22 And when the days of her purification according to the law of Moses were accomplished, they brought him to Jerusalem, to present him to the Lord;
Lu 2:23 (As it is written in the law of the Lord, Every male that openeth the womb shall be called holy to the Lord;)
Jesus would have been in the area of a month old here, I think, (have not studied it out in a long time, how long the pruification took)...but the point is, they brought the baby to Jerusalem TO PRESENT HIM TO THE LORD.
Now I want someone to explain, sensibly, why this month old baby had to be taken to Jerusalem, to be presented TO THE LORD, if he were the Lord?
According to both the false doctrines of Jesus-only and trinity, it was the Lord who opened Mary's womb! It was God she held in her arms! It was God she nursed at her breast! (a lifeless body, with God living in it!!!) a lifeless body, because he is supposed to not have a human mind of his own!! the body without the spirit is DEAD. such ignorant and deceptive doctrines!!
I say, away with such FOOLISH DOCTRINES. Nothing of this sort is taught in Scripture.
JESUS WAS NOT GOD IN FLESH. You all really need to get the truth of this and stop calling God a lie.....when he testified of HIS SON.
Free Forum Hosting
Important Announcement
Prev Message
