FROM THE LINK POSTED:

 

In my research, I found that there were some of the quoted Considerations
that he never even mentioned in his chart examples, for example, Moon in the  Via Combusta. Saturn in the 1st, is used, too. His workbooks suggest that he
did not judge horaries when the Moon was in late degrees of Gemini, as  stated in the Considerations. He judged charts with Saturn in the 1st, the  Moon void (in his terms that is), the Moon in the Via Combusta, early and
late ascendants and when the planetary hour was not in accord by the three  stated means. BUT, there were either mitigating factors, the essay is at Carol's website
(http://www.horary.com) if you are interested, it is very long. 

 

 that I do not think he saw them  as strictures, but that he allowed them to guide him. This is where my study
of his work led me, if this is a whitewash then I'm still confused and would  ask your help with this.

>
>By whitewash, I meant that Lilly seems to regard the considerations as
>strictures  as (limitations, confining parameters)

Anthony Louis Site:

 

 

good articles on Horary