MSN Home  |  My MSN  |  Hotmail
Sign in to Windows Live ID Web Search:   
go to MSNGroups 
Free Forum Hosting
 
Important Announcement Important Announcement
The MSN Groups service will close in February 2009. You can move your group to Multiply, MSN’s partner for online groups. Learn More
Dreams & HoroscopesContains "mature" content, but not necessarily adult.[email protected] 
  
What's New
  
  WELCOME  
  -Rules-  
  MESSAGE BOARDS  
  ASTROLOGY  
  DREAMS  
  ASK FOR ADVICE  
  PHILOSOPHY  
  EDGAR CAYCE  
  OFF TOPIC  
  Pictures  
  SUGGESTION BOX  
  VIDEOS ,FUN  
  OUR NATAL CHARTS  
  OUR MEMBERS PHOTOS  
  POETRY & MUSINGS  
  Holiday Magic  
  ASTROLOGY TOOLS  
  Sidereal Charts  
  Galactic Center  
  Travel Photos  
  Politics  
  
  
  Tools  
 
Politics : Finally it's OFFICIAL !!
Choose another message board
 
     
Reply
 Message 1 of 2 in Discussion 
From: MSN NicknameCaringLeomoon  (Original Message)Sent: 1/23/2008 4:32 PM
 

Media Study Claims Bush Administration Lied Hundreds of Times About Iraq

Tuesday, January 22, 2008

WASHINGTON -  A study by two nonprofit journalism organizations found that President Bush and top administration officials issued hundreds of false statements about the national security threat from Iraq in the two years following the 2001 terrorist attacks.

The study concluded that the statements "were part of an orchestrated campaign that effectively galvanized public opinion and, in the process, led the nation to war under decidedly false pretenses."

The study was posted Tuesday on the Web site of the Center for Public Integrity, which worked with the Fund for Independence in Journalism. White House spokesman Scott Stanzel said he could not comment on the study because he had not seen it.

The study counted 935 false statements in the two-year period. It found that in speeches, briefings, interviews and other venues, Bush and administration officials stated unequivocally on at least 532 occasions that Iraq had weapons of mass destruction or was trying to produce or obtain them or had links to Al Qaeda or both.

"It is now beyond dispute that Iraq did not possess any weapons of mass destruction or have meaningful ties to Al Qaeda," according to Charles Lewis and Mark Reading-Smith of the Fund for Independence in Journalism staff members, writing an overview of the study. "In short, the Bush administration led the nation to war on the basis of erroneous information that it methodically propagated and that culminated in military action against Iraq on March 19, 2003."



First  Previous  2 of 2  Next  Last 
Reply
 Message 2 of 2 in Discussion 
From: MSN NicknameCaringLeomoonSent: 1/28/2008 7:21 PM
IN THIS ARTICLE (READ LINK), THE US SAYS IT'S "INSURGENTS" AND THE SADR GOVERNEMENT, POINTS ONLY TO CIVIL WAR BETWEEN
TWO RIVAL SIDES (SHIITES AND SUNNIS)........WHOSE TELLING THE TRUTH? 
 
 I THINK IT'S WHAT SEN. KERRY & GEN. MURTHA SAID 2 YEARS AGO, IT'S AN ALL OUT CIVIL WAR........ONLY BEING CURTAILED, BECAUSE OF THE U.S. PRESENCE...BUT IT WILL BE WORSE (WHEN THEY ARE THEN "ALLOWED" TO FIGHT EACH OTHER IN THE STREETS........AFTER THE SO-CALLED PULLOUT) OCCURS NEXT YEAR OR 2010.
 
 
I ALSO THINK THAT THE SPOKESWOMAN, (PEGGY WHATSHERNAME) IS COVERING FOR THE BUSH ADM. TO NOT CALL IT WHAT IT IS!!
ALWAYS BLAMING, SO-CALLED "INSURGENTS" ......WHEN IT 'S A CIVIL WAR ONGOING.
 
The insurgents are actually citizens of Iraq...they are referring to.
It's like calling the North Vietnamese "insurgents" when they were fighting their own brethern, the South Vietnamese and the Americans or The French before them.
 
 
 
 
The insurgents are willing to desecrate a place of worship by using it to attack soldiers to further their agenda," said Maj. Peggy Kageleiry, a U.S. military spokeswoman in northern Iraq.

U.S. commanders describe Mosul as the last major urban center with a significant Al Qaeda presence since the terror network has been driven from its strongholds in the capital and Anbar province.

The U.S. military has said Iraqi security forces will take the lead in Mosul - a major test of Washington's plan to, at an undetermined date, shrink the American force and leave it as backup for Iraqi security forces.

The Iraqi Red Crescent Organization, meanwhile, gave a higher death toll than Iraqi officials from Wednesday's devastating house explosion. The U.S. military said the cause of the blast has yet to be determined, although Iraqi officials were quick to blame Al Qaeda.

Bolstering that claim, a suicide attacker killed a top police official and two other officers as they toured the wreckage the next day.

The relief organization said more than 60 people were killed and 280 wounded based on estimates from relatives who buried victims without officially registering them. Iraqi officials in Mosul maintain that nearly 40 were killed and more than 200 wounded.

The U.S.-led security crackdown, along with a Sunni revolt against Al Qaeda in Iraq and a cease-fire order by radical Shiite cleric Muqtada al-Sadr have been credited with a dramatic drop in attacks in the capital.

However, influential members of al-Sadr's movement said Monday they have urged the anti-U.S. Shiite cleric to follow through with threats not to extend the cease-fire when it expires next month, a move that could jeopardize the recent security gains.

The Sadrists are angry over the insistence of U.S. and Iraqi forces on continuing to hunt down so-called rogue fighters who ignored the six-month order, which was issued in August. Al-Sadr's followers claim this is a pretext to crack down on their movement.

The maverick cleric announced earlier this month that he would not renew the order unless the Iraqi government purges "criminal gangs" operating within security forces he claims are targeting his followers.

That was a reference to rival Shiite militiamen from the Badr Brigade who have infiltrated security forces participating in the ongoing crackdown against breakaway militia cells the U.S. has said were linked to Iran.