MSN Home  |  My MSN  |  Hotmail
Sign in to Windows Live ID Web Search:   
go to MSNGroups 
Free Forum Hosting
 
Important Announcement Important Announcement
The MSN Groups service will close in February 2009. You can move your group to Multiply, MSN’s partner for online groups. Learn More
HANDMAIDENS OF THE LORD[email protected] 
  
What's New
  
  WELCOME  
  NEW GALS BEGIN HERE  
  
  GENERAL  
  
  RECIPE CORNER  
  
  COMPUTERS 101  
  
  PARENTING BOARD  
  
  GAMES CORNER  
  
  BEAUTY AND STYLE  
  
  POETRY CORNER  
  
  MARRIAGE CORNER  
  
  STRESS BOARD  
  
  FAITH AND HEALTH  
  
  NEWBIE CORNER  
  
  INSPIRATION  
  
  DEVOTIONS  
  
  PRAYER CORNER  
  
  HOUSEHOLD HINTS  
  
  LEADER TRAINING  
  
  CHURCH HISTORY  
  
  DISCIPLESHIP  
  
  SINGLES CORNER  
  
  ARTS AND CRAFTS  
  
  WORKING WOMEN  
  
  SIG TAG REQUEST  
  
  MOVIE REVIEWS  
  
  MUSIC REVIEWS  
  
  BOOKS & CULTURE  
  
  SIG TAG PICK UP  
  
  BIBLE STUDY  
  PRAYER PAGES  
  LINKS  
  Pictures  
  
  
  Tools  
 
CHURCH HISTORY : the bitter harvest of sexual ideology
Choose another message board
 
     
Reply
 Message 1 of 1 in Discussion 
From: MSN NicknameFAIRYPRINCESSHOPE1  (Original Message)Sent: 8/14/2003 8:56 PM
Christianity Today, Week of August 4

Dispatch: The Bitter Harvest of Sexual Ideology
No one wanted the Gene Robinson bishopric debate to take this sad turn.
By Douglas LeBlanc, at the Episcopal Church's General Convention | posted 08/05/2003

Watching a media feeding frenzy is a disturbing thing, even to some of us self-described ink-stained wretches. In his film The Right Stuff, director Philip Kaufman makes snapping camera shutters sound like so many locusts, and shows reporters repeatedly invading the privacy of the first astronauts' families.

On Monday afternoon, the same sort of suffocating media attention surrounded the Rev. Michael Hopkins of Integrity (the Episcopal Church's gay caucus), then Jim Solheim of Episcopal News Service. Even as Solheim tried to walk away from an impromptu news conference, cameras and boom mikes moved with him like an electronic retinue.

That sort of media attention doesn't affect the Episcopal Church very often. Bishop Walter Righter went through it when the Court for the Trial of a Bishop held two pretrial hearings and then exonerated him in his ordaining an openly gay man as a deacon. Bishop John Shelby Spong attracted it a few times during his career, when he was well ahead on the wave of sexual liberationism that the House of Deputies surfed on Sunday afternoon.

Now Gene Robinson is going through the glare of celebrity, and until Monday the ride mostly went well for him. The House of Deputies confirmed his election by a more than comfortable margin, and it appeared he would win a confirming vote in the House of Bishops.

"My guess is that in the next few days you all are going to be so bored with me," Robinson said Sunday night, as he described returning to his ministry as New Hampshire Bishop Douglas Theuner's chief administrator. Already those words seem like echoes from an almost tranquil time that we cannot recover.

Even as conservatives grieved at the decision of the House of Deputies, few of us would have wished that Robinson's confirmation be derailed by accusations of scandal.

Robinson now faces one of the worst types of public scrutiny anyone can endure: being accused of sexual harassment. The accusation comes, ironically, from a man who identifies himself as supporting the Episcopal Church's movement toward blessing same-sex couples.

In an e-mail message he sent to at least one member of the House of Bishops, Robinson's accuser writes: "PLEASE DO allow the development of some sort of blessing of committed same-sex relationships. That symbolism is important and overdue. However, PLEASE DO NOT consent to the consecration of Gene Robinson as a bishop."

Robinson's accuser identifies himself as David Lewis of Manchester, Vermont, and his message lists a return e-mail address and phone number. No reporter has yet obtained an interview with Lewis, but Solheim said Monday that at least one bishop has communicated with him.

In his e-mail message, copies of which circulated freely in the Convention newsroom on Monday afternoon, Lewis claims that Robinson "put his hands on me inappropriately every time I engaged him in conversation."

More ironically, the process that Robinson now must endure assumes credibility of any accusation of sexual impropriety. "Failure to uphold the Bible and Christian tradition has led inexorably to our current predicament," the Rev. Whis Hays argued in his essay "Arresting the New Sexual McCarthyism" (United Voice, published by Episcopalians United, May 1995). "Most new regulations do absolutely nothing to correct this. Instead, we are substituting codes of professional ethics (driven by case law) for the older consensus about moral right and wrong based on divine revelation."

Certain modernist assumptions about sexual misconduct have left us with the process now beginning during this General Convention. Conservatives did not press for or create these canons, and so far there is no credible evidence that they prompted this accusation of misconduct.

Indeed, most conservatives wish this debate had been settled strictly in terms of disciplined, historically informed theology and ecclesiology. Now that an already painful debate has just turned more terribly painful for us all, we'll have to trust the bishops who must discharge this canonical process. And we'll have to pray that God's holy and miraculous power will lead us through this increasingly dark tunnel.

Douglas LeBlanc is an associate editor of Christianity Today.

Copyright © 2003 Christianity Today. Click for reprint information.


First  Previous  No Replies  Next  Last