Followers of all of these religions who wish to enter the army must decide how to handle their faith's teaching to not harm others. In fact, Christians have an additional hurdle not shared by Wiccans: one of the Ten Commandments. Exodus 20:13 specifically says "Thou shalt not kill." (KJV) Most individuals come to terms with their faith by citing self-defense and protecting one's country as considerations which over-ride their religion's teachings. Others simply avoid joining the armed forces. During warfare, many Quakers (members of the Society of Friends) and others became conscientious objectors. 

One might assume that all applicants to the armed forces have come to terms with this religious conflict. Wiccans in no way differ from followers of other religions on this matter. Pacifism within Wicca is not a concern to the army.

His references to Isaac Bonewits and the Arn Draiocht Fein (ADF) are not particularly meaningful, because Bonewits is a Druid. Druidism is a different religion from Wicca.

Concerns over ethical relativism:

Maginnis quotes The Covenant of the Goddess as saying  "[W]hat is good for one may be evil for another and vice versa." ₃  This, of course, is merely a reflection of ethical diversity within of American society. Some people believe that wives should be submissive to their husbands and that equal power sharing in marriage is forbidden; others believe the opposite. Some believe that an early abortion is the least unethical action for a woman in some circumstances; others believe that abortion involves the murder of a human being. The list goes on endlessly. 

He quotes the Circle Sanctuary's web site that says: "Witches have no specific taboos against speaking any particular words, consensual sexual acts among individuals capable of rational consent, or breaking laws they know to be unjust." ₄  This statement is generally true:

	Wiccans have no reserved words that must not be spoken, like the name of G-d in Judaism. Christianity does not have reserved words either.
	Wiccans do not generally object to consensual sexual acts between mature people, particularly if they are done within a committed, dedicated, monogamous relationship. They typically condemn sexual activity between individuals where manipulation, coercion, force, or undue influence are involved. But religious liberals, many religious moderates, and the laws in most of North America agree with this stance.
	Rarely, Wiccans will knowingly break laws that they know to be unjust or unconstitutional. Some held a demonstration in North Carolina against an obviously unconstitutional state law which prohibits reading of palms, use of tarot cards, casting runes, etc - whether for money, done as an amateur, or done alone in the privacy of one's home. Quiet protest against unethical laws is an established American practice for those brave souls who are willing to accept the consequences. Faced with a constitution that guarantees personal religious freedom and a state law that eliminates that freedom, some Wiccans will willingly break the unjust law in order to be charged and have the law declared unconstitutional.

Concerns over Wiccan magical practices:

Magic is definitely part of some witches' religious practice:

	Most Wiccans do cast spells. But they are normally prohibited unless they are done with the prior consent of the recipient of the spell. And they are never done if the spell is manipulative, coercive or may harm anyone. Love spells which are designed to influence a person to fall in love with another individual are not allowed. These are not particularly different from a Christian's blessing and prayer.
	Some forms of sex magic involve actual sexual activities. These are occasionally performed by some Wiccans. However, the ritual is done in private by a couple who are in a committed relationship.
	Some witches "believe that the dead join the Blessed Ancestors, who watch over, protect and advise their descendants." 3 This is very similar to some Christians who pray for support and guidance from dead saints.
	There is no "basic Wiccan dedication ritual" as stated in Maginnis' paper. Different Wiccan traditions have various rituals for dedication and initiation. There are probably thousands of them in existence.

Concerns over Military Readiness:

Maginnis cites a number of concerns about the adverse effect that Wiccans would have over military readiness. None seem to be valid:

	Wiccans are "noted for their ethical relativism." This is common among all Neopagans, religious liberals and religious moderates. It results in a person carefully considering their decisions - an advantage in today's army.
	Wiccans approve of consensual acts by persons of minority sexual orientation. This is probably true, although we are unaware of any surveys that would confirm that. This is also the policy of the DOD ever since they implemented their "don't ask, don't tell" guidelines. Thus, all soldiers are required to support this policy.
	Wiccans in the armed forces are not pacifists. If they were pacifists then, like most Quakers, they never would have joined the army. Wiccans in the army have come to terms with the Wiccan Rede, just as the majority Christians have come to terms with their Golden Rule and 10 commandments.
	All that Wiccans have asked for is to be allowed to practice their religion like the Christians, Jews and Muslims. They do not ask for special religious facilities; they do not ask for professional chaplains. In fact, if the majority of soldiers were Wiccans, the armed forces' task of providing for the spiritual need of its soldiers would be significantly simplified. There would be no need for chaplains and supporting facilities. All Wiccans ask for is access to existing rooms and permission to hold their rituals on the base.
	It is true that many English versions of the Bible label "witchcraft as an abomination." Eating cheeseburgers or wearing shirts made of polyester-cotton blends is also an abomination, according to the Bible. But  the Bible's original Hebrew and Greek do not mention Wicca. The words mistranslated as "Witch" and "Witchcraft" are totally unrelated to Wiccans and Wicca.
	Many conservative Christians believe that the Bible is inerrant. The New Testament contains passages that state that the Gods and Goddesses of non-Judeo-Christians are really Satan or his demons. Since conservative Christian soldiers have to accept what they regard as Satan worshipers in their midst, there should be no difficulty for them to accept Wiccans.
	The Army has stated that Wiccans do not represent a discipline problem or adversely affect military readiness.

For many decades, the armed forces have made major contributions towards diminishing internal hatred, bigotry and intolerance. Society has benefited greatly from these policies. Decades ago, they racially integrated the military. Over the past decade, they have greatly reduced sexism in the military by allowing women to accept an increasing range of combat positions. Recently they have learned to accept persons with minority sexual orientations, as long as they "don't tell." And now, they are formally recognizing small minority religions. The result is an armed forces that fully reflects the diversity of American culture. This will become increasingly important in the future, as military roles evolve.

Positive aspects of Maginnis' paper

Lt. Col. Robert L. Maginnis' paper contained a number of positive items that are infrequently found in Christian essays: 

	He capitalized references to Wicca and Wiccans. This is a small item, but an encouraging one. Although most writers capitalize the names of religions and their followers (e.g. Christianity, Christian) out of respect, many Christian web sites omit this when referring to Neopagan religions.
	He mentioned bisexuality as a sexual behavior.  Most conservative Christian websites basically recognize only one sexual orientation: heterosexuality. Homosexuality is usually described as an addiction or a deviate behavior, rather than as an orientation. Bisexuality is rarely mentioned at all.
	Perhaps the main encouraging sign in Maginnis' paper is that he consulted Neopagan sources to find descriptions of Wiccan beliefs and practices. He describes Wicca fairly accurately. He does not describe them as evil people, murderers who barbeque babies for breakfast, abortion providers who consider abortion to be a religious ritual, etc. as in so many other Christian web sites. For decades, conservative Christians have written books, given lectures, and (recently) created web sites attacking Wiccans as profoundly evil people. They have based almost all of their writings, directly or indirectly, on Christian propaganda from the 15th to 18th centuries. These were the burning times when the church was actively exterminating what it regarded as heretics. For what we believe is the first time, Wiccans are being criticized on a conservative Christian website for being too gentle and nice, not willing to kill other human beings. Maginnis' paper will be a useful essay for Wiccans to use as a refernce when they are trying to convince conservative Christians that they are not kidnappers, torturers, and murderers of children, or Satan worshipers.