|
|
Reply
| | From: GIPPO99 (Original Message) | Sent: 9/7/2002 8:38 PM |
I took pards 3c as second negative She plays it to show controls 1.What is the most common second negative and 2. What is best bid here to show east hand 3. Is this a 2c opener? Deal 24 North West deals S 7543 None vul H Q8765 D 3 C 942 West East S AKQJ1096 S 2 H A3 H K1092 D A4 D 109865 C 73 C AK5 South S 8 H J4 D KQJ72 C QJ1086 West North East South GIPPO99 Nat2_Saun MoonDove1 jeewat 2C Pass 2D! Dbl 2S Pass 3C Pass 4S Pass Pass Pass |
|
Reply
| | From: IRDOZ | Sent: 9/7/2002 10:43 PM |
On hand 1. After 2 spades no common method plays 3c as 'control showing'. After 2d the standard method is to bid 3s (totally solid suit)...then 4c would show the ace. |
|
Reply
| | From: IanD | Sent: 9/7/2002 10:58 PM |
Your bidding was just fine. 3C IS the second negative in the SAYC 2D waiting method. 3C is a misbid, pure and simple. More importantly, partner's hand is good enough to continue after a 2C opening bid, you could hardly have had a hand any weaker than you held. I do agree with Ross that 3S over 2D, guaranteeing a solid suit and asking partner to cue bid, would have been better, but that does require an agreement. |
|
Reply
| | From: GIPPO99 | Sent: 9/7/2002 11:01 PM |
Thank you both. I always thougtht I didn't need to jump and keep the bidding low but this makes more sense |
|
Reply
| | From: IanD | Sent: 9/7/2002 11:17 PM |
OK let's expand a bit further. Playing SAYC, the bidding has gone: 2C by partner, 2D by you, 3S by partner. What is your bid with these hands? 1. x Qxxxx Jxxxx Ax 2. x Kxx Jxxxxx xxx 3, Void xxxx xxxxx xxxx Warning: There is only ONE right answer to each problem! |
|
Reply
| 0 recommendations | Message 8 of 18 in Discussion |
|
This message has been deleted by the author. |
|
Reply
| | From: GIPPO99 | Sent: 9/7/2002 11:21 PM |
1. x 4C Qxxxx Jxxxx Ax 2. x 4S Kxx Jxxxxx xxx 3, Void Pass I think this is one time I can pass xxxx xxxxx xxxx |
|
Reply
| | From: GIPPO99 | Sent: 9/7/2002 11:27 PM |
On second thought I think 4 S and pray for #3 I had a hand once my partner passed and I made 6 |
|
Reply
| |
I agree. 4C, 4S, 4S. 4S may not work out very well on the last one but bridge is an imperfect game. Partner should have a self-sufficient spade suit to bid 3S |
|
Reply
| | From: rbbrg | Sent: 9/8/2002 4:42 PM |
Gipp: You point out an often overlooked part of opening 2c. The 3rd example give by Ian is a forcing situation you must bid. In fact responder can never pass unless opener bids a suit twice or you have reached game level. So in fact a sequence of 2c p 2d p 3s... is game forcing. There is no room to rebid below game. Control showing on the second bid??? That must be a joke. Controls if agreed are bid on the first response. |
|
Reply
| |
rbbrg, some people play that the Jump to 3S sets the suit and asks for responder to cuebid with any ace. |
|
Reply
| | From: IanD | Sent: 9/8/2002 9:00 PM |
Good change Gippo! 4S 100% on the last hand. Partner could have AKQJxxxxx, Ax, AK, void and need one card for a grand slam. And yes 4C is right on the first hand, showing the Ace. On #2 the correct bid is 3NT! This denies an Ace but shows at least one King. Partner can then ASK in the suit or suits where he needs a King, if any. Responder's bids then are: 4 of Trump-No K in ask suit 4NT-Protected K in ask suit 5 of Trump--singleton in ask suit with trump support 5 of Ask Suit-- KQ(x)(x) of that suit. 5 of New Suit-Asked K plus that K With my example hand above opposite hand 2 the bidding would go: 2C-2D-3S-3NT-4H-4NT-7H Rusty, rbbrg was referring to the original auction where Gippo rebid 2S |
|
Reply
| |
interesting on responses to 2clubs opening bid[game force] i must agree with rbbrg,i prefer using the show of controls on 1st level. |
|
Reply
| |
Now I know why I abandoned SAYC and 2/1 methods for a forcing club. I have rarely seen casual partnerships after a 2C opening, cuebid there way into a slam. If any slam is obtained, it's the 2C bidder seizing control of the auction and driving forward. I must admit freely that with a sound Precision-based method like mine (hence the name) there's much more room to describe each other's hand. |
|
Reply
| |
Of course Precision has a lot to be said for it. But it's no argument against standard methods that a lot of people play them badly. |
|
Reply
| | From: cadet | Sent: 1/27/2003 11:20 AM |
seems many pairs have their favorite treatment of how they handle 2club forcing responses.when i play with other than my regular partner,i conform to partners preference,if not playing with regular partner and partner likes steps ,i do ask if we can play waiting,and depending on their understanding of this treatment play accordenly.IMO,many dont know how to handle 2ds waiting,this treatment has many aspects to it other than the"2d" response. |
|
|
|