MSN Home  |  My MSN  |  Hotmail
Sign in to Windows Live ID Web Search:   
go to MSNGroups 
Free Forum Hosting
 
Important Announcement Important Announcement
The MSN Groups service will close in February 2009. You can move your group to Multiply, MSN’s partner for online groups. Learn More
MSN Bridge ClubActively managed by MSN.[email protected] 
  
What's New
  
  Message Board  
  Play Online  
  Swan Download  
  Bridge Reference  
  Pictures  
  Links  
  Ingberman  
  Imp Strategy  
  Rev Drury  
  Hand Templates  
  Alert Chart  
  Bridge Basics  
  Members Art Work  
  
  
  Tools  
 
Bridge Basics : responses 2Club openers
Choose another message board
 
     
Reply
Recommend  Message 1 of 18 in Discussion 
From: MSN NicknameGIPPO99  (Original Message)Sent: 9/7/2002 8:38 PM
  I took  pards  3c as  second negative   She plays it to show  controls 
1.What is the most common  second negative and 
2.  What is best bid here to show east hand 
3.  Is this a 2c opener?
Deal 24        North
West deals     S 7543
None vul       H Q8765
               D 3
               C 942
West                          East
S AKQJ1096                    S 2
H A3                          H K1092
D A4                          D 109865
C 73                          C AK5
               South
               S 8
               H J4
               D KQJ72
               C QJ1086
   West     North      East     South  
 GIPPO99  Nat2_Saun MoonDove1   jeewat 
   2C        Pass      2D!       Dbl    
   2S        Pass      3C        Pass   
   4S        Pass      Pass      Pass 


First  Previous  4-18 of 18  Next  Last 
Reply
Recommend  Message 4 of 18 in Discussion 
From: MSN NicknameIRDOZSent: 9/7/2002 10:43 PM
On hand 1.  After 2 spades no common method plays 3c as 'control showing'.
 
After 2d the standard method is to bid 3s (totally solid suit)...then 4c would show the ace.
 

Reply
Recommend  Message 5 of 18 in Discussion 
From: IanDSent: 9/7/2002 10:58 PM
Your bidding was just fine.  3C IS the second negative in the SAYC 2D waiting method.   3C is a misbid, pure and simple.  More importantly, partner's hand is good enough to continue after a 2C opening bid, you could hardly have had a hand any weaker than you held.
 
I do agree with Ross that 3S over 2D, guaranteeing a solid suit and asking partner to cue bid, would have been better, but that does require an agreement.

Reply
Recommend  Message 6 of 18 in Discussion 
From: MSN NicknameGIPPO99Sent: 9/7/2002 11:01 PM
 
 
Thank you both.      I always thougtht  I didn't need  to jump  and keep the bidding low but  this makes more  sense

Reply
Recommend  Message 7 of 18 in Discussion 
From: IanDSent: 9/7/2002 11:17 PM
OK let's expand a bit further.  
 
Playing SAYC, the bidding has gone:  2C by partner, 2D by you, 3S by partner.  What is your bid with these hands?
 
1.    x
       Qxxxx
       Jxxxx
       Ax
 
2.    x
       Kxx
       Jxxxxx
       xxx
 
3,    Void
        xxxx
        xxxxx
        xxxx
 
Warning: There is only ONE right answer to each problem! 
 

Reply
The number of members that recommended this message. 0 recommendations  Message 8 of 18 in Discussion 
Sent: 9/7/2002 11:19 PM
This message has been deleted by the author.

Reply
Recommend  Message 9 of 18 in Discussion 
From: MSN NicknameGIPPO99Sent: 9/7/2002 11:21 PM
1.    x                                     4C
       Qxxxx
       Jxxxx
       Ax
 
2.    x                                     4S
       Kxx
       Jxxxxx
       xxx
 
3,    Void                               Pass  I  think this is one time I can pass
        xxxx
        xxxxx
        xxxx

Reply
Recommend  Message 10 of 18 in Discussion 
From: MSN NicknameGIPPO99Sent: 9/7/2002 11:27 PM
On second thought   I think 4 S  and pray   for  #3
I had a hand once  my partner passed  and I made 6 

Reply
Recommend  Message 11 of 18 in Discussion 
From: MSN Nickname_destiny_6Sent: 9/8/2002 2:42 AM
I agree.  4C, 4S, 4S.  4S may not work out very well on the last one but bridge is an imperfect game.  Partner should have a self-sufficient spade suit to bid 3S

Reply
Recommend  Message 12 of 18 in Discussion 
From: rbbrgSent: 9/8/2002 4:42 PM
Gipp:
 
You point out an often overlooked part of opening 2c. The 3rd example give by Ian is a forcing situation you must bid. In fact responder can never pass unless opener bids a suit twice or you have reached game level.
 
So in fact a sequence of 2c p 2d p 3s... is game forcing. There is no room to rebid below game.
 
Control showing on the second bid??? That must be a joke. Controls if agreed are bid on the first response.

Reply
Recommend  Message 13 of 18 in Discussion 
From: MSN NicknameRusty0404Sent: 9/8/2002 5:01 PM
rbbrg, some people play that the Jump to 3S sets the suit and asks for responder to cuebid with any ace.

Reply
Recommend  Message 14 of 18 in Discussion 
From: IanDSent: 9/8/2002 9:00 PM
Good change Gippo!  4S 100% on the last hand.  Partner could have AKQJxxxxx, Ax, AK, void and need one card for a grand slam.
 
And yes 4C is right on the first hand, showing the Ace.
 
On #2 the correct bid is 3NT!  This denies an Ace but shows at least one King. Partner can then ASK in the suit or suits where he needs a King, if any. Responder's bids then are:
 
4 of Trump-No K in ask suit
4NT-Protected K in ask suit
5 of Trump--singleton in ask suit with trump support
5 of Ask Suit-- KQ(x)(x) of that suit.
5 of New Suit-Asked K plus that K
 
With my example hand above opposite hand 2 the bidding would go:
 
2C-2D-3S-3NT-4H-4NT-7H
 
 
Rusty, rbbrg was referring to the original auction where Gippo rebid 2S
 
 

Reply
Recommend  Message 15 of 18 in Discussion 
From: flash7235Sent: 9/8/2002 9:40 PM
interesting on responses to 2clubs opening bid[game force] i must agree with rbbrg,i prefer using the show of controls on 1st level.
 

Reply
Recommend  Message 16 of 18 in Discussion 
From: keylimeprecisionSent: 1/27/2003 1:52 AM
Now I know why I abandoned SAYC and 2/1 methods for a forcing club. I have rarely seen casual partnerships after a 2C opening, cuebid there way into a slam. If any slam is obtained, it's the 2C bidder seizing control of the auction and driving forward.
 
I must admit freely that with a sound Precision-based method like mine (hence the name) there's much more room to describe each other's hand.

Reply
Recommend  Message 17 of 18 in Discussion 
From: MSN Nickname_destiny_6Sent: 1/27/2003 5:15 AM
Of course Precision has a lot to be said for it.  But it's no argument against standard methods that a lot of people play them badly.

Reply
Recommend  Message 18 of 18 in Discussion 
From: cadetSent: 1/27/2003 11:20 AM
seems many pairs have their favorite treatment of how they handle 2club forcing responses.when i play with other than my regular partner,i conform to partners preference,if not playing with regular partner and partner likes steps ,i do ask if we can play waiting,and depending on their understanding of this treatment play accordenly.IMO,many dont know how to handle 2ds waiting,this treatment has many aspects to it other than the"2d" response.

First  Previous  4-18 of 18  Next  Last 
Return to Bridge Basics