I've a fair number of posts in my files, many be Barton, lamenting the same title:
" Our NT structure sucks" -- emphasis on the minor suits .
One needs a structure to handle :
-- long Cl ( weak, invitational, or strong-slammish )
-- long Diam ( " " " )
-- 5/4+ in the minors ( weak, invitational, or strong )
The trouble is running out of bids at a decent level to fit all situations.
At least one situation willsuffer when picking any structure
If using Minor Suit Stayman ( for the 5/4+ ), it is difficult to express the long, strong Cl hand.
If using 4-suit transfers, the 5/4+ hands suffer.
Our old friend, IanD, for example felt MSS cases outweighed the need for 4-suit transfers.
But our other old friend, jobanjo preferred conditional 4 suit transfers.
Here is what she said six years ago in response to one of my posts ( Minor Suit Transfers and MSS )
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
From: jobanjo | Sent: 12/8/2002 9:30 PM |
Twofer, if you play Conditional 4-Suit xfers, you can play 2S and 2NT for weak, strong or invitational hands. That frees up 3C and 3D for the MSS hand types. I used to play as Wash Stnd. plays, but I prefer 3C=4-4 or better, slammish and 3D, 5-5 or better, GF. With a two suited bust, pick a suit and xfer. After a minor-suit xfer, the weak hand passes or corrects. The invitational hand signs off with no fit and bids game with a fit. The strong hand bids game with no fit and q-bids with a fit. _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ |