MSN Home  |  My MSN  |  Hotmail
Sign in to Windows Live ID Web Search:   
go to MSN 
Free Forum Hosting
 
Important Announcement Important Announcement
The MSN Groups service will close in February 2009. You can move your group to Multiply, MSN’s partner for online groups. Learn More
RAZFandEverythingElse[email protected] 
  
What's New
  
  Messages  
  Code of Conduct  
  Pictures  
  Rules of Chat  
    
    
  Links  
  Search This Site  
  Poster-of-Month  
  Emotes - Emotes  
  FrontPage  
  When Servers are Slow  
  
  
  Tools  
 
General : Found This......Just in....Mark Cuban accused of insider trading.  
     
Reply
Recommend  Message 1 of 7 in Discussion 
From: MSN NicknameArmchairConstant  (Original Message)Sent: 11/17/2008 4:57 PM
Can't even find an article on it yet as reported by CNBC.
But I dug up this article on Bloomberg.
 
Is the Fed wielding its power over him after these remarks he made?
 
You decide.
 
 
"The Fed's collateral ``absolutely should be made public,'' said Mark Cuban, an activist investor, the owner of the Dallas Mavericks professional basketball team and the creator of the Web site BailoutSleuth.com, which focuses on the secrecy shrouding the Fed's moves. he Fed's collateral ``absolutely should be made public,'' said Mark Cuban, an activist investor, the owner of the Dallas Mavericks professional basketball team and the creator of the Web site BailoutSleuth.com, which focuses on the secrecy shrouding the Fed's moves.


First  Previous  2-7 of 7  Next  Last 
Reply
Recommend  Message 2 of 7 in Discussion 
From: KutzSent: 11/17/2008 8:32 PM
If he is guilty then he is guilty.  To the guillotine and off to the farm like past celebrity inside traders!
 
Have to question the SEC intentions here though.  With all the problems this agency could chase that are way much bigger than this, they choose to chase Marc Cubans $750,000 gain? 
 
Looks to me like they are chasing news that will show they are on the ball when in fact it distracts from gigantic issues they refuse to touch that affect us all!?  I guess thats by design!
 
This agency is a joke in my eyes!
 
Kutz 

Reply
Recommend  Message 3 of 7 in Discussion 
From: MSN NicknameArmchairConstantSent: 11/17/2008 9:29 PM
sheesh Kutz. My thoughts also

Reply
Recommend  Message 4 of 7 in Discussion 
From: MSN NicknameArmchairConstantSent: 11/17/2008 9:36 PM
Text: SEC Complaint Against Mark Cuban
11.17.08, 12:11 PM ET

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
DALLAS DIVISION
:
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, :
:
Plaintiff, : Civil Action No.: _______ (___)
:
v. :
: DEMAND FOR
MARK CUBAN, : JURY TRIAL
:
Defendant. :
:
COMPLAINT


Plaintiff Securities and Exchange Commission (“Commission�? alleges as follows:


SUMMARY OF ALLEGATIONS


1. The Commission charges Defendant Mark Cuban (“Cuban�? with committing securities fraud by engaging in illegal insider trading. Despite agreeing in June 2004 to keep material, non-public information about an impending stock offering by Mamma.com Inc. confidential, Cuban sold his entire stake in the company �?600,000 shares �?prior to the public announcement of the offering. By selling when he did, Cuban avoided losses in excess of $750,000.


2. By conduct detailed in this Complaint, Cuban violated Section 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 (“Securities Act�? [15 U.S.C. § 77q(a)] and Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Exchange Act�? [15 U.S.C. § 78j(b)] and Rule 10b-5 thereunder [17 C.F.R. § 240.10b-5]. Unless enjoined, Cuban is likely to commit such violations again in the future.

3. The Commission seeks a judgment from the Court: (a) enjoining Cuban from engaging in future violations of the antifraud provisions of the federal securities laws; (b) ordering Cuban to disgorge, with prejudgment interest, the losses avoided as a result of the actions described herein; and (c) ordering Cuban to pay a civil money penalty pursuant to Section 21A of the Exchange Act [15 U.S.C. § 78u-1].


JURISDICTION AND VENUE
4. The Commission brings this action pursuant to Sections 20(b) and 20(d) of the Securities Act [15 U.S.C. §§ 77t(b) and 77t(d)] and Section 21(d) of the Exchange Act [15 U.S.C. § 78u(d)].


5. The Court has jurisdiction over this action under Sections 20(b), 20(d), and 22(a) of the Securities Act [15 U.S.C. §§ 77t(b), 77t(d), and 77v(a)] and Sections 21(d), 21(e), 21A, and 27 of the Exchange Act [15 U.S.C. §§ 78u(d), 78u(e), 78u-1, and 78aa].


6. Cuban, directly or indirectly, used the means or instruments of interstate commerce, the mails, or the facilities of a national securities exchange in connection with the acts described herein.


7. Venue is proper because certain of the transactions, acts, practices, and courses of business occurred within this judicial district.


DEFENDANT
8. Mark Cuban, age 50, resides in Dallas, Texas. Among other things, he owns the NBA’s Dallas Mavericks franchise, HDNet, a national high-definition television network, and Landmark Theaters.


OTHER RELEVANT ENTITY
9. Mamma.com Inc. was a foreign private issuer headquartered in Montreal, Québec, Canada. On June 8, 2007, Mamma.com Inc. shareholders voted to change the company’s name from Mamma.com Inc. to Copernic Inc., and on June 21, 2007 the company’s NASDAQ ticker symbol changed from MAMA to CNIC.


STATEMENT OF FACTS
10. In March 2004, Cuban acquired 600,000 shares of Mamma.com, a 6.3% stake in the company. After his acquisition, the company’s chief executive officer and president (“the CEO�? was Cuban’s primary point of contact at Mamma.com.


11. During Spring 2004, Merriman Curhan Ford & Co. (“Merriman�?, an investment bank, suggested that Mamma.com should consider raising capital through a private placement known as a PIPE (“private investment in public equity�? offering. After consideration, the company decided to proceed with the PIPE and engaged Merriman to serve as the placement agent.


12. At the end of June 2004, as the PIPE progressed toward closing, Mamma.com, at Merriman’s suggestion, decided to invite Cuban, the company’s then-largest known shareholder, to participate in the PIPE. The CEO was instructed to contact Cuban and to preface the conversation by informing Cuban that he had confidential information to convey to him in order to make sure that Cuban understood �?before the information was conveyed to him �?that he would have to keep the information confidential.


13. On June 28, 2004, the CEO sent an email message to Cuban titled “Call me pls,�?in which he asked Cuban to call him “ASAP�?and provided both his cellular and office telephone numbers. Cuban called four minutes later from the American Airlines Center in Dallas, home of the NBA’s Dallas Mavericks, and spoke to the CEO for eight minutes and thirty-five seconds.


14. The CEO prefaced the call by informing Cuban that he had confidential information to convey to him, and Cuban agreed that he would keep whatever information the CEO intended to share with him confidential. The CEO, in reliance on Cuban’s agreement to keep the information confidential, proceeded to tell Cuban about the PIPE offering. Cuban became very upset and angry during the conversation, and said, among other things, that he did not like PIPEs because they dilute the existing shareholders. At the end of the call, Cuban told the CEO “Well, now I’m screwed. I can’t sell.�?/P>


15. After speaking to Cuban, the CEO told the company’s then-executive chairman about his conversation with Cuban, including the fact that Cuban was very upset and angry about the PIPE. Shortly thereafter, the executive chairman sent an email to the other Mamma.com board members updating them on various PIPE-related items, including the fact that the CEO had spoken to Cuban: Today, after much discussion, [the CEO] spoke to Mark Cuban about this equity raise and whether or not he would be interested in participating. As anticipated he initially ‘flew off the handle�?and said he would sell his shares (recognizing
that he was not able to do anything until we announce the equity) but then asked to see the terms and conditions which we have arranged for him to receive from one of the participating investor groups with which he has dealt in the past.

16. In reliance on Cuban’s acceptance of a duty of confidentiality and his acknowledgment that he could not sell until after the public announcement, the CEO, several hours after their conversation, sent Cuban a follow-up email in which he wrote: “If you want more details about the private placement please contact . . . [Merriman].�?In his email, the CEO provided the Merriman sales representative’s telephone number.

17. Using that telephone number, Cuban called the Merriman sales representative later that afternoon and spoke to him for eight minutes about the PIPE. During that call, the salesman supplied Cuban with additional confidential details about the PIPE. In response to Cuban’s questions, the salesman told him that the PIPE was being sold at a discount to the market price and that the offering included other incentives for the PIPE investors. Cuban was very upset and angry about the PIPE during the call.


18. One minute after hanging up with the Merriman sales representative, Cuban called his broker in Dallas and told the broker to sell his entire 600,000 share Mamma.com position. He told the broker “sell what you can tonight and just get me out the next day.�?BR>

19. During after-hours trading on June 28, 2004, Cuban sold 10,000 of his 600,000
Mamma.com shares at an average cost per share of $13.4990.


20. The following morning, June 29, 2004, Mamma.com’s executive chairman sent another email to the board. He wrote that “we did speak to Mark Cuban ([the CEO] and, subsequently, our investment banker) to find out if he had any interest in participating to the extent of maintaining his interest. His answers were: he would not invest, he does not want the company to make acquisitions, he will sell his shares which he can not do until after we announce.�?/P>


21. On June 29, 2004, Cuban sold his remaining 590,000 Mamma.com shares during regular trading at an average cost per share of $13.2937.

22. On June 29, 2004, at 6:00 p.m. after the markets had closed, Mamma.com publicly announced the PIPE offering.

23. On June 30, 2004, the first trading day following the public announcement, trading in Mamma.com opened at $11.89 �?down $1.215, or 9.3%, from the June 29, 2004 closing price of $13.105. The stock price on June 30, 2004 ultimately closed at $11.99, down $1.115, or 8.5%, from the June 29, 2004 closing price. Mamma.com continued to decline over the next week, closing at $8.00 on July 8, 2004 (down 39% from the June 29, 2004 closing price).


24. By selling his Mamma.com shares prior to the public announcement of the PIPE, Cuban avoided losses in excess of $750,000.


25. Cuban later publicly stated that he had sold his Mamma.com shares because the company was conducting a PIPE, which issued shares at a discount to the prevailing market price and also would have caused his ownership position to be diluted. Cuban never disclosed to Mamma.com that he was going to sell his shares prior to the public announcement of the PIPE.

26. Cuban sold his Mamma.com securities on the basis of material, non-public information he received from the CEO, and, subsequently, from the Merriman sales representative. Cuban knew or was reckless in not knowing that he had received material, nonpublic information from Mamma.com and that he breached a duty of trust or confidence that he owed to Mamma.com when he sold on the basis of that information.

27. As a result of the conduct described herein, Cuban violated Section 17(a) of the Securities Act and Section 10(b) of the Exchange Act and Rule 10b-5 thereunder.

FIRST CLAIM
INSIDER TRADING IN CONNECTION WITH THE PURCHASE OR SALE OF SECURITIES
Violations of Section 10(b) of the Exchange Act and Rule 10b-5 Thereunder


28. The Commission re-alleges and reincorporates paragraphs 1 through 27 as if fully set forth herein.

29. Cuban, with scienter, by use of the means or instrumentalities of interstate commerce
or of the mails, in connection with the purchase or sale of securities: (a) employed devices, schemes, or artifices to defraud; (b) made untrue statements of material fact or omissions to state material facts necessary in order to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which they were made, not misleading; and/or (c) engaged in acts, practices or courses of business which operated or would operate as a fraud or deceit.

30. By reason of the actions alleged herein, Cuban violated Section 10(b) of the
Exchange Act [15 U.S.C. § 78j(b)] and Rule 10b-5 thereunder [17 C.F.R. § 240.10b-5].


SECOND CLAIM
INSIDER TRADING IN THE OFFER OR SALE OF SECURITIES
Violations of Section 17(a) of the Securities Act

31. The Commission re-alleges and reincorporates paragraphs 1 through 30 as if fully set forth herein.

32. Cuban, with scienter, by use of the means or instrumentalities of interstate commerce or of the mails, in the offer or sale of securities: (a) employed devices, schemes or artifices to defraud; (b) obtained money or property by means of untrue statements of material fact or omissions to state material facts necessary in order to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which they were made, not misleading; and/or (c) engaged in acts, practices or courses of business which operated or would operate as a fraud or deceit upon the purchasers of the securities offered and sold by Cuban.

3. By reason of the actions alleged herein, Cuban violated Section 17(a) of the Securities Act [15 U.S.C. § 77q(a)].


PRAYER FOR RELIEF
WHEREFORE, the Commission respectfully requests that the Court enter a judgment:
(i) finding that Cuban violated the antifraud provisions of the federal securities laws
as alleged herein;
(ii) permanently enjoining Cuban from violating Section 17(a) of the Securities Act
[15 U.S.C. § 77q(a)] and Section 10(b) of the Exchange Act [15 U.S.C. § 78j(b)] and Rule 10b-5
thereunder [17 C.F.R. § 240.10b-5];
(iii) ordering Cuban to disgorge the losses avoided as a result of the actions alleged
herein and to pay prejudgment interest thereon;
(iv) ordering Cuban to a pay civil monetary penalty pursuant to Section 21A of the
Exchange Act [15 U.S.C. § 78u-1]; and
(v) granting such other relief as this Court may deem just and proper.
Dated: November 17, 2008 Respectfully submitted,
______________________________
Kevin P. O’Rourke (D.C. Bar No. 254920)
Scott W. Friestad
Robert B. Kaplan
Daniel T. Chaudoin
Julie M. Riewe (D.C. Bar No. 472470)
Adam S. Aderton (D.C. Bar No. 496247)
Securities and Exchange Commission
100 F Street, N.E.
Washington, D.C. 20549
(202) 551-4442 (O’Rourke)
(202) 772-9246 (fax) (O’Rourke)
[email protected]
Toby Galloway (Texas Bar No. 00790733)
Securities and Exchange Commission
Burnett Plaza, Suite 1900
801 Cherry Street, Unit 18
Fort Worth, TX 76102
(817) 978-6447
(817) 978-2700 (fax)
Attorneys for Plaintiff
Securities and Exchange Commission


Reply
Recommend  Message 5 of 7 in Discussion 
From: MSN NicknameScott482Sent: 11/18/2008 12:00 AM
I liked Cramer's take on this... Guilty or not, this is just a smoke screen for the SEC not doing anything to all the CEO's involved in the morgage and banking collapse...

Reply
Recommend  Message 6 of 7 in Discussion 
From: KutzSent: 11/18/2008 12:36 AM
The post above doesn't look good for Cuban!  You would have to hire 5000 more SEC employees to begin to even capture the excess that has occurred over the last few years.  So many more important things totaling billions of dollars totally ignored as this Cuban thing plays out!
 
The market got its just reward for a complacent SEC.  Its dead and all the smart money is on the sidelines.  Most of it should just stay there!  The stock market will have to learn the hard way!  they had their fun and now its done!
 
Kutz 

Reply
Recommend  Message 7 of 7 in Discussion 
From: KutzSent: 11/18/2008 12:38 AM
Oh-hope the market pumpers, CNBC, hedge funds, and generally mistakenly entitled are happy with what they created!
 
Kutz 

First  Previous  2-7 of 7  Next  Last 
Return to General