MSN Home  |  My MSN  |  Hotmail
Sign in to Windows Live ID Web Search:   
go to MSNGroups 
Free Forum Hosting
 
Important Announcement Important Announcement
The MSN Groups service will close in February 2009. You can move your group to Multiply, MSN’s partner for online groups. Learn More
THE BRONX, USAContains "mature" content, but not necessarily adult.[email protected] 
  
What's New
  
  WELCOME  
  Code of Conduct  
  Bronx Talk  
  General  
  Good Old Bx Days  
  chat  
  Bronx Trivia  
  MUSIC OLDIES  
  LOOKING FOR...  
  Reunions &Events  
  In Memory Of....  
  The Sports Page  
  My New Hometown  
  Pictures  
  Hot Spots  
  
  
  Tools  
 
General : Trampling on people's rights to the last day...
Choose another message board
 
     
Reply
 Message 1 of 3 in Discussion 
From: MSN NicknameCrotonaPark40s-50s  (Original Message)Sent: 12/26/2008 4:23 PM
From today's New York Times...
 
Editorial</NYT_KICKER>

<NYT_HEADLINE type=" " version="1.0">A Parting Shot at Women’s Rights </NYT_HEADLINE>

language=JavaScript type=text/JavaScript>function getSharePasskey() { return 'ex=1387947600&en=99c318870533c513&ei=5124';}</SCRIPT> language=JavaScript type=text/JavaScript> function getShareURL() { return encodeURIComponent('http://www.nytimes.com/2008/12/26/opinion/26fri2.html'); } function getShareHeadline() { return encodeURIComponent('A Parting Shot at Women’s Rights'); } function getShareDescription() { return encodeURIComponent('The law has long allowed doctors and nurses to refuse to participate in an abortion, but new regulations elevate the so-called right to refuse beyond reason.'); } function getShareKeywords() { return encodeURIComponent('Medicine and Health,Abortion,Birth Control and Family Planning,Editorials'); } function getShareSection() { return encodeURIComponent('opinion'); } function getShareSectionDisplay() { return encodeURIComponent('Editorial'); } function getShareSubSection() { return encodeURIComponent(''); } function getShareByline() { return encodeURIComponent(''); } function getSharePubdate() { return encodeURIComponent('December 26, 2008'); } </SCRIPT>
<NYT_REPRINTS_FORM></NYT_REPRINTS_FORM>
  • Published: December 25, 2008
<NYT_TEXT>

Undermining women’s reproductive rights and access to health care has been a pervasive theme of the outgoing administration. On his first full day in office, President Bush imposed the “global gag rule,�?which prohibits taxpayer dollars from going to international family-planning groups that perform abortions using their own funds or that advocate for safe abortion laws.

So it was unsurprising, but still dismaying, that the secretary of health and human services, Michael Leavitt, chose to extend that dismal record at the last minute with yet another awful regulation. A parting gift to the far right, the new regulation aims to hinder women’s access to abortion, contraceptives and the information necessary to make decisions about their own health. What makes it worse is that the policy is wrapped up in a phony claim to safeguard religious freedom.

The law has long allowed doctors and nurses to refuse to participate in an abortion. Mr. Leavitt’s changes elevate the so-called right to refuse beyond reason to an increased number of medical institutions and a broad range of health care workers and services �?including abortion referrals, unbiased counseling and provision of emergency contraception, even to rape victims.

The impact will be hardest on poor women who rely on public programs for their health care.

In July, Barack Obama, still a senator at the time, signed a letter to Mr. Leavitt, along with some of his colleagues, urging Mr. Leavitt to scrap an earlier draft of the regulation. It cited a number of problems that were perpetuated in the final version.

The Health and Human Services regulation is due to become effective on Jan. 20, Inauguration Day. By acting right away to suspend its implementation, President-elect Barack Obama and his choice to succeed Mr. Leavitt, Tom Daschle, can block irresponsible changes that threaten people’s rights and defy the federal government’s duty on public health.

They should do so, and promptly follow up with a formal rule-making proceeding to rescind the regulation once and for all. And they can get rid of the gag rule.

<NYT_UPDATE_BOTTOM></NYT_UPDATE_BOTTOM></NYT_TEXT>
More Articles in Opinion » A version of this article appeared in print on December 26, 2008, on page A24 of the New York edition.

Past Coverage



First  Previous  2-3 of 3  Next  Last 
Reply
 Message 2 of 3 in Discussion 
From: MSN Nickname-JXSent: 12/26/2008 6:11 PM
I have no problem with my tax dollars paying for necessary health care for the poor. I have a big problem with my tax dollars being used for elective procedures being performed on the poor, such as cosmetic surgery or abortions.

Reply
 Message 3 of 3 in Discussion 
From: MSN NicknameMarty-GSent: 12/27/2008 2:22 AM
including abortion referrals, unbiased counseling and provision of emergency contraception, even to rape victims.
------------------------------------------------
Are such procedures for rape victims "elective procedures?"