MSN Home  |   Hotmail  |   Shopping  |   Money  |   People & Groups
Windows Live ID
go to MSNGroups 
Groups Home  |  My Groups  |  Help  
 
Important Announcement Important Announcement
The MSN Groups service will close in February 2009. You can move your group to Multiply, MSN’s partner for online groups. Learn More

THE GUN ROOMTHEGUNROOM@uk.msnusers.com 
  
What's New
  
  HOME PAGE  
  "DISCLAIMER"  
  EMAIL SETTINGS  
  GUN ROOM RULES  
  General  
  BOARD LIST  
  GUN RIGHTS  
  FUNNY STORIES  
  MEMBERS INFO  
  MYRIGHTS Tribute  
  OPEN CARRY.ORG  
  GUNSMITHING  
  Chat Room  
  BUY/SELL/SWAP  
  HUNTER TIPS  
  SURVIVAL TIPS  
  SPORTSMEN TIPS  
  SHOOTING TIPS  
  GUN QUESTIONS  
  LIBRARY OF INFO  
  MILITARY NEWS  
  GUN REVIEWS  
  PET LOADS  
  CARTRIDGES  
  GUN MYTHS  
  CCW STATE LAWS  
  STATE GUN LAWS  
  Pictures  
  TARGETS  
  TRAP SHOOTERS  
  LINKS  
  WEBSITES  
  ONLINE STORES  
  MANUFACTURERS  
  AMMO SITES  
  GUN MAKERS  
  HUNTING RESOURCES  
  HANDLOADING(1)  
  HANDLOADING(2)  
  HANDLOADING(3)  
  HANDLOADING(4)  
  HANDLOADING(5)  
  HANDLOADING(6)  
  HANDLOADING(7)  
  BLACKPOWDER  
  MUZZLE LOADING  
  GUNPOWDER TIP  
  BULLET CASTING(1)  
  BULLET CASTING(2)  
  HEADSTAMPS  
  HEADSPACE  
  BALLISTICS  
  MASTER EYE  
  ACCURACY (1)  
  ACCURACY (2)  
  ACCURACY (3)  
  SHOT PLACEMENT  
  SHOT PLACEMENT2  
  RIFLE MARKSMANSHIP(1)  
  RIFLE MARKSMANSHIP(2)  
  RANGE DETERMINATION  
  SAFETY INFO(1)  
  SAFETY INFO(2)  
  SAFETY INFO(3)  
  SAFETY INFO(4)  
  GELATINE TESTS  
  SOURCE STUDIES  
  EMOTICONS 1  
  EMOTICONS 2  
  EMOTICONS 3  
  SCOPES(1)  
  SCOPES(2)  
  RIFLE SCOPES  
  GUN ROOM LINK  
  STATE HUNTING  
  HUNTING INFO(1)  
  HUNTING INFO(2)  
  HUNTING INFO(3)  
  HUNTING INFO(4)  
  HUNTING INFO(5)  
  HUNTING INFO(6)  
  HUNTING INFO(7)  
  HUNTING INFO(8)  
  HUNTING INFO(9)  
  HUNTING INF0(10)  
  HUNTING INFO(11)  
  HUNTING INFO(12)  
  FIELD DRESSING DEER  
  VENISON RECIPES  
  VENISON RECIPES(2)  
  GAME RECIPES  
  AGE DETERMINATION  
  BLACK BEARS(1)  
  BLACK BEARS(2)  
  BLACK BEARS(3)  
  GRIZZLY BEARS(1)  
  GRIZZY BEARS(2)  
  HANDGUN SHOOTING  
  BASIC DRAW  
  WEAVER STANCE  
  ISOSCELES(1)  
  ISOSCELES(2)  
  SHOOT HANDGUN(1)  
  SHOOT HANDGUN(2)  
  SHOOT HANDGUN(3)  
  BOWHUNTING (1)  
  BOWHUNTING(2)  
  TIPS FOR WOMEN(1)  
  TIPS FOR WOMEN(2)  
  RIGHTS LINKS  
  PRO-GUN RIGHTS  
  FOUNDING FATHERS  
  WHAT CAN YOU DO TO PROTECT YOUR RIGHTS  
  DECLARATION OF INDEPENDENCE  
  THE BILL OF RIGHTS  
  AMENDMENTS 11-18  
  AMENDMENTS 19-27  
  LEST WE FORGET  
  CONTACTING CONGRESS  
  GUN INFORMATION  
  LINKS TO D.C. AND MORE  
  YOUR CHOICE  
  MANUALS  
  THE SLING  
  GAMES & MORE  
  
  
  Tools  
 
MILITARY NEWS : THE TERRORISTS ARE IN IRAQ, NOT NEW YORK
Choose another message board
 
     
Reply
Recommend  Message 1 of 1 in Discussion 
From: MSN NicknameGunrockets  (Original Message)Sent: 11/09/2003 02:33
'The Central Front'
The terrorists are in Iraq, not New York. That's huge progress.

Tuesday, September 9, 2003 12:01 a.m. EDT

Yes, sure, President Bush's remarks to the nation Sunday evening could have come sooner. But the critics can no longer claim that Mr. Bush hasn't been forthright about either his strategy for victory in Iraq, or the cost of achieving it.

"Iraq is now the central front" in the war on terror, he told the country. "Enemies of freedom are making a desperate stand there--and there they must be defeated. This will take time and require sacrifice." He proved the latter point by announcing a request to Congress for $87 billion more for Iraq, Afghanistan and the war on terror, and of course he spoke about the dangers facing U.S. troops.

This expression of resolve was especially needed in the wake of Mr. Bush's decision to invite United Nations help in Iraq. His adversaries have portrayed this as a sign of weakness, the desire to cut and run. Mr. Bush made clear it is no such thing. Instead he challenged the U.N. as a matter of its "responsibility" to help Iraq become free and democratic. The speech contained no evidence that Mr. Bush is willing to turn Baghdad into some French co-prosperity sphere.

Some critics, especially Democrats, hailed the speech as a U-turn. And they have a point in that Sunday's sober remarks were an implicit admission that Mr. Bush's aircraft-carrier speech on May 1 was a premature celebration. The Administration underestimated the ferocity of the guerrilla campaign in Iraq, not to mention the damage done to that country's psyche and physical plant by 30 years of Saddam's rule.

But in a larger strategic sense, Mr. Bush's May 1 speech was the exception, and Sunday's remarks more consistent with his themes since September 11. The war on terror was always going to be long and hard, very much like the Cold War. Most important, we are better off fighting it far from our shores, in places like Iraq, rather than placing our hope in a Maginot Line called "homeland security."

"The surest way to avoid attacks on our own people is to engage the enemy where he lives and plans," Mr. Bush said, in what for us was the heart of his speech. "We are fighting that enemy in Iraq and Afghanistan today so that we do not meet him again on our own streets, in our own cities."

In this, as in so many ways, the American public is wiser than political and media elites. The Washington Post devoted page-one space the other day to a piece professing amazement that some Americans still think Saddam had something to do with 9/11. (Those rubes outside the Beltway again!) But Americans realize that al Qaeda and Saddam share a common goal of killing Americans and driving us from the Middle East. They don't need proof of collusion beyond a reasonable doubt to know that ridding the world of a dictator who supports terror is an act of American self-defense.

Casualties of War
American death toll from terror
World Trade Center, 1993
6
Khobar Towers, 1996
19
African embassies, 1998
12
USS Cole, 2000
17
Sept. 11, 2001
2,902

Operation Enduring Freedom
(Afghanistan, Philippines, other countries)

87*
Iraq, since March 2003
287*

*Military deaths
Sources: Pentagon, WSJ research
The table nearby shows the number of Americans who have died in major acts of terrorism in the past decade, followed by the casualties from fighting terror since 9/11. The 2,956 murdered by terrorists, nearly all noncombatants, exceed by nearly eight times the 374 who have died fighting back. Service in Iraq--and the Philippines, for that matter--is tough, dangerous duty. But Americans understand, even if talking heads on CNN do not, that U.S. troops are risking their lives there to prevent another 9/11 in Miami or Chicago.

What Americans want to know in wartime is that their leaders have a strategy to win, and that they are being honest about the cost. Mr. Bush was telling Americans Sunday night that more U.S. soldiers will die in Iraq, perhaps many more. But he also laid out a plan for victory that looks achievable.

Most of Iraq is not in "chaos." The Marines in the South and the Army's 101st Airborne in the North have earned Iraqi respect and support. Local self-government is sprouting up throughout those regions. The battles between Kurds and Arabs, or Shiite and Sunni Muslims, simply haven't happened. The Sunni Triangle surrounding Baghdad remains a war zone, and invading jihadis will do more damage before they can be killed. But the larger story, missed by most of the media, is one of slow progress toward stability and Iraqi self-government.

The danger now is not that the U.S. will be drawn into some quagmire, a la Vietnam, but that we will show a desire to leave too soon, as in Somalia. Terrorists thrive on such weakness, indeed it is the basis for their current strategy. They think that if they can impose enough casualties, or create enough havoc, the voices of retreat will begin to say once again, "Come home, America." Judging by Sunday night, those voices will first have to defeat Mr. Bush in 2004. 'The Central Front'
The terrorists are in Iraq, not New York. That's huge progress.

Tuesday, September 9, 2003 12:01 a.m. EDT

Yes, sure, President Bush's remarks to the nation Sunday evening could have come sooner. But the critics can no longer claim that Mr. Bush hasn't been forthright about either his strategy for victory in Iraq, or the cost of achieving it.

"Iraq is now the central front" in the war on terror, he told the country. "Enemies of freedom are making a desperate stand there--and there they must be defeated. This will take time and require sacrifice." He proved the latter point by announcing a request to Congress for $87 billion more for Iraq, Afghanistan and the war on terror, and of course he spoke about the dangers facing U.S. troops.

This expression of resolve was especially needed in the wake of Mr. Bush's decision to invite United Nations help in Iraq. His adversaries have portrayed this as a sign of weakness, the desire to cut and run. Mr. Bush made clear it is no such thing. Instead he challenged the U.N. as a matter of its "responsibility" to help Iraq become free and democratic. The speech contained no evidence that Mr. Bush is willing to turn Baghdad into some French co-prosperity sphere.

Some critics, especially Democrats, hailed the speech as a U-turn. And they have a point in that Sunday's sober remarks were an implicit admission that Mr. Bush's aircraft-carrier speech on May 1 was a premature celebration. The Administration underestimated the ferocity of the guerrilla campaign in Iraq, not to mention the damage done to that country's psyche and physical plant by 30 years of Saddam's rule.

But in a larger strategic sense, Mr. Bush's May 1 speech was the exception, and Sunday's remarks more consistent with his themes since September 11. The war on terror was always going to be long and hard, very much like the Cold War. Most important, we are better off fighting it far from our shores, in places like Iraq, rather than placing our hope in a Maginot Line called "homeland security."

"The surest way to avoid attacks on our own people is to engage the enemy where he lives and plans," Mr. Bush said, in what for us was the heart of his speech. "We are fighting that enemy in Iraq and Afghanistan today so that we do not meet him again on our own streets, in our own cities."

In this, as in so many ways, the American public is wiser than political and media elites. The Washington Post devoted page-one space the other day to a piece professing amazement that some Americans still think Saddam had something to do with 9/11. (Those rubes outside the Beltway again!) But Americans realize that al Qaeda and Saddam share a common goal of killing Americans and driving us from the Middle East. They don't need proof of collusion beyond a reasonable doubt to know that ridding the world of a dictator who supports terror is an act of American self-defense.

Casualties of War
American death toll from terror
World Trade Center, 1993
6
Khobar Towers, 1996
19
African embassies, 1998
12
USS Cole, 2000
17
Sept. 11, 2001
2,902

Operation Enduring Freedom
(Afghanistan, Philippines, other countries)

87*
Iraq, since March 2003
287*

*Military deaths
Sources: Pentagon, WSJ research
The table nearby shows the number of Americans who have died in major acts of terrorism in the past decade, followed by the casualties from fighting terror since 9/11. The 2,956 murdered by terrorists, nearly all noncombatants, exceed by nearly eight times the 374 who have died fighting back. Service in Iraq--and the Philippines, for that matter--is tough, dangerous duty. But Americans understand, even if talking heads on CNN do not, that U.S. troops are risking their lives there to prevent another 9/11 in Miami or Chicago.

What Americans want to know in wartime is that their leaders have a strategy to win, and that they are being honest about the cost. Mr. Bush was telling Americans Sunday night that more U.S. soldiers will die in Iraq, perhaps many more. But he also laid out a plan for victory that looks achievable.

Most of Iraq is not in "chaos." The Marines in the South and the Army's 101st Airborne in the North have earned Iraqi respect and support. Local self-government is sprouting up throughout those regions. The battles between Kurds and Arabs, or Shiite and Sunni Muslims, simply haven't happened. The Sunni Triangle surrounding Baghdad remains a war zone, and invading jihadis will do more damage before they can be killed. But the larger story, missed by most of the media, is one of slow progress toward stability and Iraqi self-government.

The danger now is not that the U.S. will be drawn into some quagmire, a la Vietnam, but that we will show a desire to leave too soon, as in Somalia. Terrorists thrive on such weakness, indeed it is the basis for their current strategy. They think that if they can impose enough casualties, or create enough havoc, the voices of retreat will begin to say once again, "Come home, America." Judging by Sunday night, those voices will first have to defeat Mr. Bush in 2004. <SECTION:CONTENT_FOOTER>

</SECTION:CONTENT_FOOTER>
<SECTION:CONTENT_FOOTER></SECTION:CONTENT_FOOTER>


First  Previous  No Replies  Next  Last 
Notice: Microsoft has no responsibility for the content featured in this group. Click here for more info.
 MSN - Make it Your Home