MSN Home  |   Hotmail  |   Shopping  |   Money  |   People & Groups
Windows Live ID
go to MSNGroups 
Groups Home  |  My Groups  |  Help  
 
Important Announcement Important Announcement
The MSN Groups service will close in February 2009. You can move your group to Multiply, MSN’s partner for online groups. Learn More

THE GUN ROOMTHEGUNROOM@uk.msnusers.com 
  
What's New
  
  HOME PAGE  
  "DISCLAIMER"  
  EMAIL SETTINGS  
  GUN ROOM RULES  
  General  
  BOARD LIST  
  GUN RIGHTS  
  FUNNY STORIES  
  MEMBERS INFO  
  MYRIGHTS Tribute  
  OPEN CARRY.ORG  
  GUNSMITHING  
  Chat Room  
  BUY/SELL/SWAP  
  HUNTER TIPS  
  SURVIVAL TIPS  
  SPORTSMEN TIPS  
  SHOOTING TIPS  
  GUN QUESTIONS  
  LIBRARY OF INFO  
  MILITARY NEWS  
  GUN REVIEWS  
  PET LOADS  
  CARTRIDGES  
  GUN MYTHS  
  CCW STATE LAWS  
  STATE GUN LAWS  
  Pictures  
  TARGETS  
  TRAP SHOOTERS  
  LINKS  
  WEBSITES  
  ONLINE STORES  
  MANUFACTURERS  
  AMMO SITES  
  GUN MAKERS  
  HUNTING RESOURCES  
  HANDLOADING(1)  
  HANDLOADING(2)  
  HANDLOADING(3)  
  HANDLOADING(4)  
  HANDLOADING(5)  
  HANDLOADING(6)  
  HANDLOADING(7)  
  BLACKPOWDER  
  MUZZLE LOADING  
  GUNPOWDER TIP  
  BULLET CASTING(1)  
  BULLET CASTING(2)  
  HEADSTAMPS  
  HEADSPACE  
  BALLISTICS  
  MASTER EYE  
  ACCURACY (1)  
  ACCURACY (2)  
  ACCURACY (3)  
  SHOT PLACEMENT  
  SHOT PLACEMENT2  
  RIFLE MARKSMANSHIP(1)  
  RIFLE MARKSMANSHIP(2)  
  RANGE DETERMINATION  
  SAFETY INFO(1)  
  SAFETY INFO(2)  
  SAFETY INFO(3)  
  SAFETY INFO(4)  
  GELATINE TESTS  
  SOURCE STUDIES  
  EMOTICONS 1  
  EMOTICONS 2  
  EMOTICONS 3  
  SCOPES(1)  
  SCOPES(2)  
  RIFLE SCOPES  
  GUN ROOM LINK  
  STATE HUNTING  
  HUNTING INFO(1)  
  HUNTING INFO(2)  
  HUNTING INFO(3)  
  HUNTING INFO(4)  
  HUNTING INFO(5)  
  HUNTING INFO(6)  
  HUNTING INFO(7)  
  HUNTING INFO(8)  
  HUNTING INFO(9)  
  HUNTING INF0(10)  
  HUNTING INFO(11)  
  HUNTING INFO(12)  
  FIELD DRESSING DEER  
  VENISON RECIPES  
  VENISON RECIPES(2)  
  GAME RECIPES  
  AGE DETERMINATION  
  BLACK BEARS(1)  
  BLACK BEARS(2)  
  BLACK BEARS(3)  
  GRIZZLY BEARS(1)  
  GRIZZY BEARS(2)  
  HANDGUN SHOOTING  
  BASIC DRAW  
  WEAVER STANCE  
  ISOSCELES(1)  
  ISOSCELES(2)  
  SHOOT HANDGUN(1)  
  SHOOT HANDGUN(2)  
  SHOOT HANDGUN(3)  
  BOWHUNTING (1)  
  BOWHUNTING(2)  
  TIPS FOR WOMEN(1)  
  TIPS FOR WOMEN(2)  
  RIGHTS LINKS  
  PRO-GUN RIGHTS  
  FOUNDING FATHERS  
  WHAT CAN YOU DO TO PROTECT YOUR RIGHTS  
  DECLARATION OF INDEPENDENCE  
  THE BILL OF RIGHTS  
  AMENDMENTS 11-18  
  AMENDMENTS 19-27  
  LEST WE FORGET  
  CONTACTING CONGRESS  
  GUN INFORMATION  
  LINKS TO D.C. AND MORE  
  YOUR CHOICE  
  MANUALS  
  THE SLING  
  GAMES & MORE  
  
  
  Tools  
 
MILITARY NEWS : WOMEN IN A COMBAT ROLE???
Choose another message board
 
     
Reply
Recommend  Message 1 of 4 in Discussion 
From: MSN NicknameGunrockets  (Original Message)Sent: 22/03/2004 12:46
By James W. Revels

After reading David DeBatto's article ("The Young and Restless") I believe the points he raised should make all concerned people reconsider their support of flawed decisions that allow women to be placed in combat situations.

As you probably know, women constitute about 15 percent of the active force today. Some Reserve and National Guard units have a higher concentration of females, who did not enlist for combat duty.

At last count, seven females have been killed in Iraq, and no one seems to care, but let one sexual assault complaint see the light of day, and a congressional hearing is launched. We would not be flooded with sexual assault investigations today if the senior leadership displayed the courage needed years ago to prevent the expanding employment of women in the military. This being an election year, you can bet the farm no politician will take on the feminist movement that is pushing for greater opportunities for women in the military.

Dressing women in battle dress uniforms does not make them soldiers. Calling them soldiers does not mean they possess the requisite skills required of warriors.

No nation, in modern history, has advanced the cause of equality and women rights by sending women into combat. Until the American people demand reconsideration of existing deployment policies, women will continue to die needlessly in Iraq and Congress will continue to waste time and resources reviewing sexual assault complaints.

For years, the senior leadership ignored declining physical standards caused by increasing reliance on female recruits to fill manpower quotas. Mention pregnancy rates and no comment follows. Now, because some women, who are as culpable as some men at initiating sexual contact, are complaining, the brass are forced to take another look at predictable problems created by sex integration.

Old soldiers, like me, remember Tailhook and its impact. Years ago, Tailhook allowed the media to blackmail the senior leadership into over-reacting to claims of sexual harassment. Because this nation is so obsessed with anything involving sex, excessive media coverage, as witnessed today, is the natural result. However, national security concerns warrant more than congressional hearings that fail to address the negative impact of consensual sexual activities, as well as the corrosive impact of women in combat. Asking young men and women to ignore sexual attractions, resulting from living and working conditions found today in our armed forces, is unnatural and dangerous.



language=javascript> siteName = "military.content"; pageName = "more_content"; adWidth = "350"; adHeight = "250"; ExtraInfo = ""; var myarg = "s="+sr+";a="+a+";r="+r+";st="+st+";z="+z; ord=Math.random()*10000000000000000; document.write(' LANGUAGE="JavaScript1.1" SRC="http://ad.doubleclick.net/adj/' + siteName + '/' + pageName + ';' + ExtraInfo + myarg + ';sz=' + adWidth + 'x' + adHeight + ';ord=' + ord + '?" ><\/SCRIPT>'); if ((!document.images && navigator.userAgent.indexOf("Mozilla/2.") >= 0) || navigator.userAgent.indexOf("WebTV")>= 0) { document.write(''); document.write(''); } </SCRIPT> language=JavaScript1.1 src="http://ad.doubleclick.net/adj/military.content/more_content;s=7;a=ag0;r=0;st=0;z=;sz=350x250;ord=9153172070961976?"></SCRIPT> Click here to find out more!
Our national security will be impacted if common sense does not prevail. Away from the media spotlight, I believe education and discipline will correct most problems drawing media attention today.

No one seems to understand that it is not the primary purpose of our armed forces to provide employment opportunities for women and young men. Our armed forces exist for the single purpose of defending the nation by destroying any enemy that threatens our national security. Clearly, women can contribute to the nation's defense, but not as warriors.

[Have a comment on this opinion article? Sound off in the Hot Issues with Defensewatch Forum.]

Contributing Editor Jim Revels is a retired U.S. Army colonel. He can be reached at jwscezer@mailstation.com. Please send Feedback responses to dwfeedback@yahoo.com. ©2004 DefenseWatch. All opinions expressed in this article are the author's and do not necessarily reflect those of Military.com.



First  Previous  2-4 of 4  Next  Last 
Reply
Recommend  Message 2 of 4 in Discussion 
From: nickel257Sent: 23/03/2004 04:40
As Vietnam company level infantry officer and a father of two daughters, I have more than a passing interest in this question.
 
I too deplore the degradation of training standards of recent years in both the military and police arenas, but it is unconscionable to put the onus on women.
 
As long as anyone can meet the mental, psychological, and physical requirements of a training regimen, he should be able to go for it.
 
I have jumped from airplanes, SCUBA dived, and worked out with women over the years.  Many of them could out perform me in tests of strength, endurance, and motivation. 
 
Carpe diem.

Reply
Recommend  Message 3 of 4 in Discussion 
From: MSN NicknameToomuch_36Sent: 25/03/2004 13:31
On surface I would agree that some women can, and do, match or excede the rigors needed for combat service [even before they were watered down for political reasons]. This being said, the only reason this has become an issue is because of the degrading of women by Susan B. Anthony. Ladies used to have a position of high esteme in our society to be respected. With the passage of all the "womens rights" laws they have been reduced to the position of "just one of the boys" wich I think is very sad. 

Reply
Recommend  Message 4 of 4 in Discussion 
From: MSN Nicknamefowlers1Sent: 03/06/2004 20:38
As a Vietnam Era Vet and a retired SFC, I was very outspoken about our society being ready to send females into combat.  I noted that of the six females that went into the Hanoi Hilton, NONE came out alive.  As a tank platoon sergeant in the 82nd Airborne Division, I could see only problems with putting a female on a tank crew.  Physically there those that can out preform men, but more than once I saw female mechanics that could not carry their own tool box.  As a father (and a combat vet) with two daughters and two sons in the Army, I hope we never send females into combat. 

First  Previous  2-4 of 4  Next  Last 
Return to MILITARY NEWS       
Notice: Microsoft has no responsibility for the content featured in this group. Click here for more info.
 MSN - Make it Your Home