MSN Home  |  My MSN  |  Hotmail
Sign in to Windows Live ID Web Search:   
go to MSNGroups 
Free Forum Hosting
 
Important Announcement Important Announcement
The MSN Groups service will close in February 2009. You can move your group to Multiply, MSN’s partner for online groups. Learn More
The American ExperienceContains "mature" content, but not necessarily adult.[email protected] 
  
What's New
  
  General  
  Ask Management  
  Member's Place  
  Coffee Breaks  
  Members Recipes  
  Pictures  
    
  Backup Group  
  Links  
    
  
  
  Tools  
 
General : Are we heading toward a second "Cold War"?
Choose another message board
 
     
Reply
 Message 1 of 6 in Discussion 
From: Noserose  (Original Message)Sent: 12/1/2008 4:59 PM

Are we heading toward a second "cold war"?
 
Relations between Russia and the USA are very bad at the moment. Neither side trusts the other and Putin's hand picked new Russian leader Dmitry Medvedev is both firmly in Putin's back pocket and openly hostile to America's goals in the area. The United States seems determined to surround Russia with an anti-missile missile system and incorporate her border states into NATO. This is bound to infuriate Russia as she has traditionally feared being surrounded by hostile or unfriendly nations. Russia seems determined to strike back by embracing our enemies in our own backyard. Russia and Venezuela's leader Chavez have signed a deal for Moscow to help the South American country build a nuclear energy plant and they are currently carrying out military exercises together. This does not bode well for Washington.

Russia under Putin/Medvedev want to re-establish their countries dominance in world affairs and as always prefers to be feared rather than liked. The USA under Bush/Cheney are not helping the situation improve and are pushing Russia to even more drastic actions. Russia has hinted that Cuba could once again be of "interest" to them. That statement has scary overtones.

There is no easy or clear path for the new Obama administration to follow. Russia does not always act in her own best interests and that makes her unpredictable. She may never again have the military might of the old Soviet Union but her military is well trained and well equipped and she remains a formidable adversary. What to do?

Why is the United States so determined to surround Russia with this anti-missile missile system? It may be no threat to Russia but she sees it as one and for her the perception is the reality. Should Obama put an end to this program once he becomes President? Will it help cool relations between Russia and us? Should we stand up to Russian interference in our area of the world or is it just tit for tat and we should expect it?

Russia is one more bubbling pot on Obama's stove about to break into a boil. The prospect of another cold war looms ahead of us on the horizon and someone had better come up with some answers pretty quick. What do you think of the situation?



First  Previous  2-6 of 6  Next  Last 
Reply
 Message 2 of 6 in Discussion 
From: MSN NicknameTheJollyTrollSent: 12/1/2008 5:06 PM

Currently it is war or be dominated by our pathetic looser Commander on Vacation... Tumbleweed.

 

So I really can not blame the Russians for taking their current stance. One would imagine once we get adult leadership in the US, everyone (including myself) will revaluate their positions.


Reply
 Message 3 of 6 in Discussion 
From: MSN Nicknameftjames857Sent: 12/1/2008 5:20 PM
I'm not so sure the cold war ever ended.

Reply
 Message 4 of 6 in Discussion 
From: MSN Nickname™Curm�?/nobr>Sent: 12/1/2008 5:27 PM
NR,
 
Russia is one more bubbling pot on Obama's stove about to break into a boil. The prospect of another cold war looms ahead of us on the horizon and someone had better come up with some answers pretty quick.
 
LOL!  Putin is pulling all the Russian strings behind the scenes.  He loathes the USA and all that we stand for, however, our liberal Congress is helping him generate the cold war 2 bigtime.
 
Our refusal to drill for oil has enabled Russia to trade their oil for our dollars, and then use that to update their military.  They are currently employing our purchase funds to build state of the art ICBM Nukes to point at our cities in a three step 'potential' military offensive.
 
The great news is that our money enabling their buildup will require us to build greater military capacity.
 
NATO needs to add all eastern European nations quickly as members or this will explode in our faces.
 
Bush has done all that he can until Congress possibly starts siding with the American people.  We shall see if Obama can bring that about...
 
Just my opinion, and everyone has one.
 
Curm

Reply
 Message 5 of 6 in Discussion 
From: MSN NicknameKnightly-Sent: 12/1/2008 5:43 PM
a lot of the anti-missile systems being built is to pad the the profits of the military-industry complex.  just as homeland security has become a pork barrel scheme.

Reply
 Message 6 of 6 in Discussion 
From: MSN NicknameTheJollyTrollSent: 12/1/2008 6:06 PM
a lot of the anti-missile systems being built is to pad the the profits of the military-industry complex.  just as homeland security has become a pork barrel scheme.
In other words Socialism for the Olgarchy.

First  Previous  2-6 of 6  Next  Last 
Return to General