MSN Home  |  My MSN  |  Hotmail
Sign in to Windows Live ID Web Search:   
go to MSNGroups 
Free Forum Hosting
 
Important Announcement Important Announcement
The MSN Groups service will close in February 2009. You can move your group to Multiply, MSN’s partner for online groups. Learn More
The Garden Of Babble-On[email protected] 
  
What's New
  
  Welcome 2008  
  Message Board  
  PSP  
  
  Interesting?  
  Roll Calls>>>>>>  
  PC-GAMES  
  Animations/Fun  
  House Rules  
  Miriam´s Photo Site  
  Ricky´s Website  
  In Loving Memory  
  Pictures  
  Where we Live!!  
  *World Clock*  
  Birthdays  
  Nicky´s Poems  
  Favourite Foods  
  Group Links  
  snags and shares  
  Help - Advise  
  Towds poems  
  Rons Poems  
  
  
  Tools  
 
Interesting? : St. Petersburg/Russia
Choose another message board
 
     
Reply
 Message 1 of 8 in Discussion 
From: MSN NicknameSamoy_1  (Original Message)Sent: 2/10/2003 6:19 AM

Hi everybody,

with this satirical article by a Russian I want to introduce to you the place I´m living for the moment... it´s true - living here, you can take it only with lots of sense of humour - otherwise.....hmmmm

 

 

All Petersburg is an endless avenue leading on to infinity. Beyond Petersburg there is nothing...

 

IT'S BEEN LABELED "The Venice of the North," "The Window on the West," "Russia's Crown Jewel," "The Cradle of the Revolution." These attempts to sum up St. Petersburg in a few words only scratch the surface, focusing on its history and its look, and can't fully convey the energy pulsating from the spires and waterways, crumbling facades, and torn-up roads. St. Petersburg, like Russia as a whole, is hurtling forward like a jet-propelled gorilla in zero gravity.

First-year psychology majors would classify Petersburg as a disfunctional child. Forced into being by an overbearing father and subjected to various foreign influences at the whims of its stepmothers, it's faced abuse, neglect, scorn, and attempted murder, and suffers from an identity crisis brought on by name changes and from living in the shadow of big brother Moscow. And it's just gotten its driver's license and has started cruising down a highway where there's no speed limit and no place to get a decent cheeseburger for miles. It is this strange energy that gives St. Petersburg its special allure.

There are many reasons to visit St. Petersburg, a city filled with cultural, historical, and architectural treasures, and the people are hospitable and generous, often going to incredible lengths to make visitors feel welcome. But added to this is a certain dynamic that can only be found in a country firmly in the grip of a drastic and fundamental overhaul. Change isn't just in the air; it's on the walls, on people's faces, in their attitudes, and up their noses.

St. Petersburg combines the excitement of Saigon, Johannesburg, and Tangiers with a setting reminiscent of Venice, Paris, and Amsterdam. There are few places on the planet as interesting and complex as this. There are, of course, some minor infrastructural difficulties involved in travelling to St. Petersburg. This is to be expected in a country where for years tourism was the domain of a single state-run tourist monopoly that specialized in herding people from sight to sight, making sure they understood the proper ideological meaning of every one of them. Fortunately the monopoly went out with the ideology and the effects of several years of market competition in the tourist industry are indeed palpable.

Still, Rome was not built in a day, and it wasn't built in Russia, so you'll need to brace yourself for poor service, delays, disorganization, mysterious cancellations, and frustrating and pointless bureaucratic procedures. There are two ways to react to this: you can wig out and make things even more difficult for yourself and everyone around you, or you can accept it as part of the Russia Experience. A positive attitude goes a long way here. If you find your tour bus has been hijacked to Bucharest, your beef stroganoff overcooked by about three weeks, or your visit to the Kirov Ballet cancelled and replaced by a recital of the Smolensk Bird-Watchers' Society Kazoo Band look on it as a character building experience.



First  Previous  2-8 of 8  Next  Last 
Reply
 Message 2 of 8 in Discussion 
From: MSN NicknameSamoy_1Sent: 2/10/2003 6:38 AM

        HISTORY

 

ST. PETERSBURG IS INEXORABLY linked with the personality of its founder, Tsar Peter I. Peter was the grandson of Mikhail Romanov, founder of the Romanov dynasty which ruled Russia from 1613 until 1917.

The son of Tsar Alexis (1645-1676) from his second marriage, Peter rose to power despite the meddling of jealous relatives from Alexis' first marriage. The most menacing of these was Sophie, Alexis' daughter and the older sister of Peter's physically and mentally retarded half-brother Ivan. Ivan and Peter, both kids, were declared co-tsars in 1681 and then sent off to play while Sophie ruled as regent. Whereas Ivan remained unfit for duty as a ruler for his entire short life, Peter learned military skills and built up loyalty in the most influential regiments during his half-sister's regency. In 1689 Peter returned to Moscow, deposed her, and shipped her off to a convent.

Peter inherited a Russia that was too backward for his taste. Trade was relatively undeveloped due to the lack of access to a warm-water port (the Baltic belonged to the Swedes and the Black Sea was in Turkish hands) and the populace, even the aristocracy, was for the most part uneducated. Peter was determined to modernize Russia regardless of the cost, and immediately after Ivan's death in 1696 left him as sole sovereign he took off incognito on a two-year fact-finding and recruitment mission across Europe. Peter's first goal was to turn Russia into a formidable naval power. He had seen navies and wanted one too. With this in mind he attacked both north and south, taking the Azov Sea from the Turks in the south in 1696 and then in 1703 driving the Swedes from the Neva delta, seizing the fortress-town Noteburg and renaming it Schlьsselburg (now called Petrokrepost). In order to strengthen the northern position Peter decided to build a second fortress on the Neva delta.

He Built it on a Swamp

On May 16, 1703, Peter laid the first stone of the fortress he named St. Petersburg in honor of St. Peter, guardian of the gates of Heaven. Across the river from the fortress Peter built a shipyard (the Admiralty). Peter then figured why not build a city around his little fortress and shipyard, providing Russia with a trading port and a "window onto Europe" through which Russia could hopefully catch Poland in her underwear.

Geological conditions presented Peter with a formidable challenge. In many areas the ground was so soft that huge wooden planks had to be laid as foundations to prevent buildings from sinking. During the initial phases of construction thousands of peasants and workers died of malaria or scurvy and many were picked off by marauding wolves, earning Petersburg the epithet "the city laid on bones."

In 1712 Peter decided to make St. Petersburg Russia's capital and required the aristocracy to move here and build lavish homes for themselves (at their own expense), as well as chip in to help build government buildings.


Reply
 Message 3 of 8 in Discussion 
From: MSN NicknameSamoy_1Sent: 2/10/2003 6:59 AM

gif sammlung gifs Linien

 

Petersburg after Peter

The 18th century saw Petersburg develop not only into Russia's political and economic center but into its cultural center as well. Russian and European culture met in St. Petersburg, with more and more members of the aristocracy studying abroad and learning foreign languages at home. While the rest of Russia remained mired in backwardness, Petersburg flourished under the auspices of the nobility and the merchant classes that were based here. By the end of the 18th century secular literature and art (previously forbidden) had begun to develop, setting the stage for the tremendous flowering of the arts during the 19th century.

A Few Intrigues

For seventy-one years after Peter the Great's death Russia was ruled almost exclusively by women. Having had his first son imprisoned and killed (some say with his own hands) and losing his second son to a premature natural death, Peter, left without a male heir, decreed that the emperor could name his successor as he pleased without regard to hereditary concerns, and thus did his second wife, Catherine I, succeeded him to the throne. She ruled from 1725 until 1727, followed by Peter the Great's grandson Peter II who died of smallpox in 1730 at the age of seventeen. The throne then passed to Anna the corpulent daughter of Peter the Great's half-brother Ivan. She ruled until 1740, nominating her older sister's grandson, the two-month old Ivan VI,to succeed her. At first the Empress Anna's favorite, Ernst Bьren, was named regent but he was deposed within three weeks and Ivan VI's mother (who was also called Anna) was given the regency.

After a year the Grand Duchess Elizabeth, Peter the Great's last surviving child, seized power and had the one-year old Ivan VI locked up in the Schlusselburg Fortress with instructions to kill him, if he tried to escape. Which just goes to show that a royal birth does not necessarily entitle one to a life of ballroom dancing, military parades, and a quiet retirement in Monte Carlo.


Reply
 Message 4 of 8 in Discussion 
From: MSN NicknameSamoy_1Sent: 2/10/2003 7:06 AM
... to be continued
gif sammlung gifs Zeitungen
 

Reply
 Message 5 of 8 in Discussion 
From: MSN NicknameRicky·Sent: 2/10/2003 9:53 AM
Very, very interesting Samoy
Ricky

Reply
 Message 6 of 8 in Discussion 
From: MiriamSent: 2/10/2003 12:38 PM
Very interesting, Samoy!

Reply
 Message 7 of 8 in Discussion 
From: MSN NicknameSamoy_1Sent: 2/13/2003 8:52 AM
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Lesson One: Be Nice to Your Wife

Despite her reputation as an insatiable nymphomaniac, Elizabeth had no children and ended up leaving the throne to her nephew, Charles Peter Ulrich of Holstein (Peter III). Peter assumed the throne in January 1762 and within six months he had managed to alienate everyone with his Prussophilia, offenses against the Orthodox Church, and his boyish obsession with guns and the military. His wife, the German born Sophie of Anhalt-Zerbst, took to Russia much better than Peter, learning the language and adopting Orthodoxy. Sophie (rechristened Catherine) had Peter III arrested in June 1762 and forced him to abdicate in her favor. One week later he died in somewhat mysterious circumstances.

Catherine the Great

Of all the empresses, Catherine II (later known as Catherine the Great) deserves special note. She combined an avid personal interest in Enlightenment ideas (she was quite well-read and corresponded with Diderot, Voltaire, and d'Alembert) with the unbending conviction that autocracy was the only thing that could handle Russia. Under her rule Russia experienced the "golden age of the nobility" where the aristocracy was permitted to forego state service and concentrate on their personal affairs. The Russian Empire expanded into the Crimea and, together with Prussia and Austria, partitioned Poland three times, controlling Warsaw until 1918. Under Catherine, Russia grew into the great European power Peter the Great had envisaged one hundred years before. And though it is common knowledge that she had quite a voracious sexual appetite, the legend about the horse is just not true.

 
 

Lesson Two: Be Nice to Your Son

Catherine's son, Paul I, assumed the throne in 1796. Like Peter III, Paul exhibited a manic love of all things military, drilling his troops incessantly and even becoming Grand Poobah of the Knights of Malta. His unpredictability and paranoia made him both feared and hated by the court, and in 1801 he was deposed by guard officers and disaffected courtiers with the tacit agreement of his eldest son, Alexander. During the coup Paul was accidently killed by the intoxicated conspirators.
 

How One Little Frenchman can Ruin Your Day

Having observed the political lessons of the 18th century (notably the French Revolution and its rather unhealthy consequence for a particular monarch), Alexander I recognized the need to overhaul his country somehow. He was distracted however by Napoleon who in 1812 sent an army of six hundred thousand in Alexander's general direction, eventually taking Moscow. That winter the Russians, under the leadership of the brilliant Marshal Kutuzov, turned the tide against the pesky little Corsican, destroying most of the invading army and marching victoriously into Paris. After the victory Alexander went weird, becoming so wrapped up in what he saw as his divine mission to preserve autocracy on the planet that reforms became of little concern to him and nothing major was accomplished. Still, the economic and social problems Russia faced did not disappear and many of the officers who saw Europe during the war grew increasingly resentful at their lack of say in how things were run in Russia.
 

The Decembrists' Uprising

Anti-authoritarian sentiments burst into open demonstration when Alexander died in December 1825. The throne passed to his younger brother, Nicholas I, who had a reputation as an autocratic hard-ass. A group of disgruntled army officers gathered in Senate Square, proclaimed their loyalty to Nicholas' older brother, Constantine, and demanded such outrageous things as representation in the government and an end to serfdom. Nicholas responded by bringing in loyal troops and forcing the rebels (later known as the Decembrists) to surrender. They were sent to the dungeons at the Peter and Paul Fortress, the ringleaders were hanged, and that was the last Russia heard of reform for a while.
 
There is no question that this revolt, combined with the waning of autocracy across Europe, profoundly affected Nicholas I's way of thinking. Fearing revolution in any shape or form, his reign became intensely repressive with censorship heavily enforced, education abroad curtailed, and a system of secret police and internal spies put into operation. Nonetheless Petersburg was buzzing with underground discussion groups working out alternative ideas and philosophies, and Russia experienced a golden age of literature with Pushkin, Lermontov, and Gogol writing their seminal works and Dostoevsky and Turgenev launching their literary careers.
 

Serf's Up

When Alexander II assumed the throne in 1855 Russia had more problems than an epileptic tight-rope walker. Nicholas' imperialist pretensions towards Turkey left Russia embroiled in the embarrassing Crimean War with France and Britain, and discontent both among the upper classes and the serfs was becoming more evident (during Nicholas' reign there had been over five hundred peasant uprisings). A series of reforms including the abolition of flogging in the army and some judicial and educational reforms culminated in the abolition of serfdom in 1861. After an assassination attempt on Alexander II in 1866, the reform period gradually faded and Russia slid back into conservatism.

During the 1860s and 1870s revolutionary groups began to flower in St. Petersburg, mostly among students. The 1860s were the heydey of the nihilists, 19th century hippies who offended people with their hair styles and free-loving attitudes. In the 1870s populism was the rage, and young starry-eyed revolutionaries "went to the people" (i.e. travelled to peasant communes in an attempt to put their theories about the political potential of the Russian countryside into practice) only to have the people tell them to get lost. Anarchists and terrorists also appeared, and it was one of the latter (representing an extremist group called People's Will) that assassinated Alexander II on March 1, 1881.
 

No More Mr. Nice Guy

The last two tsars rejected the idea that the autocracy needed reforming from above and so the gap between the authorities and the people continued to widen. Tsar Alexander III hunted out terrorists and revolutionaries, tightened censorship, and reined in the educational and judicial systems. It was also at this time that Russia embarked on the path of industrialization with massive factories appearing in the Petersburg area. Working conditions were miserable and social tension continued to grow as more and more people came to believe that only revolution could bring about social, economic, and political change.
 

The last tsar, Nicholas II, was not so much a bad man as just a Clark Kent when Russia needed a Superman, or at least an Aquaman. His wife, Alexandra, totally dominated him and together they were unprepared to deal with the tremendous crises that faced Russia. His reign was punctuated with one disaster after another, from worker and peasant uprisings to defeat in war with Japan, and his final rating as tsar suffers a lot from the fact that the four-hundred-year Romanov Dynasty ended during his reign.

 


Reply
 Message 8 of 8 in Discussion 
From: MiriamSent: 2/13/2003 1:29 PM
Very interesting! Waiting for continuation!

First  Previous  2-8 of 8  Next  Last 
Return to Interesting?