MSN Home  |  My MSN  |  Hotmail
Sign in to Windows Live ID Web Search:   
go to MSNGroups 
Free Forum Hosting
 
Important Announcement Important Announcement
The MSN Groups service will close in February 2009. You can move your group to Multiply, MSN’s partner for online groups. Learn More
The History Page[email protected] 
  
What's New
  
  Message Boards  
  For New Members  
  On This Day....  
  General  
  American History  
  Ancient History  
  British History  
  Current Events  
  European History  
  The Civil War  
  War  
  World History  
  Pictures  
    
    
  Links  
  Militaria Board  
  Cars/Motorcycles  
  
  
  Tools  
 
American History : American Revolution Month by Month
Choose another message board
 
     
Reply
 Message 1 of 16 in Discussion 
From: MSN NicknameBIGSNOWBIRD1  (Original Message)Sent: 5/24/2008 2:04 AM

Not much interist on this page so I thought maybe I would post a month by month article on the Amer. Revolution.  Comments welcome. 

The American Revolution Month-by-Month May 1775

By Compatriot Andrew "Andy" Stough

Editor's Note: This article was reprinted by Permission of the Gold Country Chapter No. 7 of the CSSAR and was slightly edited by the Sons of Liberty Chapter of the CSSAR

The euphoria following the exciting activity at Concord on April 19th and it’s follow up in the siege of the city of Boston gradually wore thin. Sitting around bottling up British General Sir Thomas Gage in Boston was not what most of the army had expected when they enlisted. When things were the most boring and many soldiers pondered going home, enlistment or no enlistment, there came the news that Ticonderoga had fallen on 10 May, 1775 to Ethan Allen and his Green Mountain Boys. Capture of what was thought to be an impregnable fortress came just in the nick of time to revive the morale of soldiers and civilians alike. While it was a lift to American morale; it also turned the tenor of the uprising from objection to revolution. The result was a strengthening of resolve on both sides.

Ticonderoga was seen as the Gateway to the North; with it secured it would take a strong force to attack the colonies from Canada. Congress mistakenly thought that the Canadians, so recently French subjects, would rally to an American attack Congress began to see possession of Ticonderoga as an open the door for an attack to the North.

The siege of Boston (April 19, 1775 to March 17, 1776) was the first intentional act of war on the part of the colonists. Begun on the night of April 19 as a logical follow up on the day's battle begun at the old north bridge in Concord. Up to the beginning of the siege, all action had been unplanned, simply a reaction to the movement of British troops. When the Minutemen found themselves surrounding Boston and all British troops inside the city, reality set in. The action of April 19 and the night following placed the Minutemen in a state of open rebellion against the British Crown.

The new situation was apparent to the local leaders but not to the Minutemen whose organization to this point had been strictly reactionary - to guard and defend - but not to oppose the King in open rebellion. The Minutemen, relatively leaderless, began to disperse as rapidly as they had come; farmers for the most part, they began to return to their farms and families, for this was the season to begin preparation for the year’s crops.

The local leaders realized that whether they had intended rebellion or not, that the actions of the day and night of the 19th of April had created a declaration of war. A message made more forceful by the large losses suffered by the British and subsequent bottling up of their forces within the city of Boston.

Fortunately, the British Commander, General Gage, was impressed by the effectiveness of the Minutemen on the way back to Boston and their seemingly determination to continue the conflict by their effective and timely occupation of the area around the city. The actual turmoil within the colonist’s ranks was not observable to him. All he saw was the continued fortification and strengthening of the rude forts surrounding his position indicating that they were in place and planned to stay there. Additionally, there was the cutting off of all supplies from the countryside upon which the citizens of Boston and British defenders were totally dependent.

Neither, the British or Americans were prepared for the situation in which they now found themselves. Adding to the confusion was the failure of both the Americans and the British to properly assess the others actual capabilities. The Americans underestimated the British capability and fortunately for the Americans, General Gage, vastly under-estimated the American forces and their ability to fight.

In the beginning the Americans lacked weapons, ammunition and any commitment by the Minutemen to serve beyond an emergency. Above all, there was no central leadership to direct and support troops in the enforcement of a siege. There wasn’t any preparation to feed, clothe and house a large force even by the day, not to mention the requirement for an extended siege. If there ever was an army whose motto should be "In God We Trust" this was it.

The siege bumbled along until leaders appeared on the scene. Colonies rallied to the cause, committing interim funds, supplies and bodies. The so-called "rabble" that Major Pitcairn had dispersed at Lexington was on it's way to becoming an army sufficiently formidable to not only defy the vaunted British Regulars but thirteen months later on March 17, 1776, see the last British soldier board ship and sail away.



First  Previous  2-16 of 16  Next  Last 
Reply
 Message 2 of 16 in Discussion 
From: MSN NicknameSharon55510Sent: 5/24/2008 4:18 AM
I will be very interested in reading this Big Snow Bird.  I have become aware that I have neglected battles and strategy.  My focus has been on why and how the wars started and the aftermath.

Reply
The number of members that recommended this message. 0 recommendations  Message 3 of 16 in Discussion 
Sent: 5/24/2008 6:09 AM
This message has been deleted due to termination of membership.

Reply
 Message 4 of 16 in Discussion 
From: MSN NicknameFlashman191Sent: 5/24/2008 4:40 PM
#2 change that to "how i can distort reality to my political dogmas and feed it to disadvantaged children because I cannot answer criticism"

Reply
 Message 5 of 16 in Discussion 
From: MSN NicknameBIGSNOWBIRD1Sent: 5/26/2008 4:35 AM

Sharon: Living in NJ I find it hard not being interested in the Revolution/Civil War. NJ is called the crossroads of the American Revolution with so many battles important and minor being fought here. The movement of armies retreating and advancing the stories personal and military are incredible.

If you live in the north east visiting lake Champlain. Fort Ticonderoga, Bennington, the Hubardtown Battlefield you will get a view into the geography and background leading up to the Battle of Saratoga. Sailing on Lake Champlain up into Canada will only ignite your curiosity about Valcour Island and our invasion of Canada and retreat to fort Ti. It is a beautiful area for a vacation with Vermont on the east coast of the lake except for their politics is a joy.


Reply
 Message 6 of 16 in Discussion 
From: MSN NicknameSharon55510Sent: 5/26/2008 5:02 AM
It sounds very exciting, Snow.  I  would love to visit all those places.  So you are going to be publishing this?

Reply
 Message 7 of 16 in Discussion 
From: MSN Nickname--sundaySent: 5/26/2008 3:15 PM
Excellent post, Snowbird.  Thank you.

Reply
 Message 8 of 16 in Discussion 
From: MSN NicknametommytalldogSent: 5/26/2008 3:48 PM
Snow, & remember that N.Y.  State was the "key to the empire."
 
T-Dog

Reply
 Message 9 of 16 in Discussion 
From: MSN NicknameMOREREPETESSent: 5/26/2008 9:23 PM
Snow, & remember that N.Y.  State was the "key to the empire."
 
WAS THAT BEFORE OR AFTER THE TERRORIST BROKE THE LOCK TOMMY.

Reply
 Message 10 of 16 in Discussion 
From: MSN NicknameBIGSNOWBIRD1Sent: 5/26/2008 10:26 PM
copy & paste hopefully some discussion will develop.

Reply
 Message 11 of 16 in Discussion 
From: MSN NicknameBIGSNOWBIRD1Sent: 6/2/2008 2:29 AM

The American Revolution Month-by-Month June 1775

The Battle of Bunker Hill - June 17, 1775

By Compatriot Andrew "Andy" Stough

Editor's Note: This article was reprinted by Permission of the Gold Country Chapter No. 7 of the CSSAR and was slightly edited by the Sons of Liberty Chapter of the CSSAR

The battle on April 19th and the subsequent siege of Boston was a catalyst to bring the colonies together to pool their resources in what had now become a common cause. In addition, it had shown them that the British Lion was not always invincible. But the lack of activity afterwards began to erode the original euphoria gained by the retreat from Concord which was relieved by the capture of Fort Ticonderoga on May 10th.

Ticonderoga was seen as the Gateway to the North; with it secured it would take a strong force to attack the colonies from Canada. While it was a lift to the colonists' morale; it also turned the tenor of the uprising from objection to revolution. The result was a strengthening of resolve on both sides. Particularly on the American side. Sometime prior to Bunker Hill the Massachusetts Provincial Congress had asked the Continental Congress in Philadelphia to adopt the New England army in the interest of uniting the 13 United Colonies in the cause then being prosecuted in the area of Boston by the New England army. On the 14th of June 1775 Congress voted to accept the New England army; establishing June 14, 1775 as the birth of the U.S. Army as we know it today. On June 15th, 1775 Congress chose George Washington as Commander-in-Chief to lead the Continental Army created by Congress the next day June 16th, 1775. On June 23rd he left Philadelphia for New York. Enroute, arriving at Cambridge on July 2nd, he immediately took command of the army.(Ward)

In the meantime British General Sir Thomas Gage had been forced to bring in provisions for the town by sea. Britain ruled the sea, but it was faced with the problems previously encountered by the Spanish Armada. British ships of war were unable to cope with the hit and run tactics of the smaller and faster Yankee vessels who harassed and in some cases captured British supply vessels. This so angered the Britons that they launched retaliatory sea attacks on New England coastal towns setting them afire with red hot shot. Such retribution only stiffened the resolve of the New Englanders and offended the other colonies. The result was a drawing together of all the colonies for the common defense where ever it might occur.

Reinforcements to the Boston garrison led the colonists to tighten their hold on the city. Moving forward they fortified two hills, Breed's the smaller and Bunker the larger and tallest. Considered, but not implemented was the Dorchester Heights which were even closer to the town of Boston.

Construction of the new forts and fortifying of the hills irritated the British who decided to give the defenders a taste of cold British steel. Why, other than vanity, did the British not use their naval superiority to land troops behind the rebel lines, reverse the siege and advance on the hills from the unfortified side? It can only be conjectured that Gage intended to humiliate the "rude farmers" by subjecting them to the sight of seasoned lines of Redcoats advancing inexorably forward with fixed bayonets to oppose the defenders' muskets and fowling pieces. Perhaps Gage thought the sight of colonial troops abandoning their positions and fleeing for their lives would so impress the colonies that they would abandon any thought of resistance, anywhere. If that was his thought then as we now know it backfired to his own dismay.

The attack came on June 17th, 1775 on what appeared to be the more vulnerable Breed's Hill. It was a hot and humid day, the attackers were forced first to slog through the low marshlands, then uphill through knee high grass and brush. Advance of the scarlet coated Royal Welch Fusiliers was impressive. Halting several times to allow the land batteries and ships cannons to deliver a devastating fire on the hill above they came on until they were close enough for the colonists to fire which tore great holes in their ranks. Recoiling, they closed ranks and advanced again until another deadly fusillade tore the line to shreds. The Royal Welch Fusiliers was no more.

A second line, The King's own, advanced in the same ordered fashion and were as summarily dispatched. Two crack regiments had been destroyed and Gage's plan had failed. Not to be denied victory, Gage formed a new plan and within fifteen minutes a regrouped and reinforced British force moved forward. Advancing with the same precision as before they stopped only to fire then advanced with fixed bayonets to meet with the same fate as the previous assaults.

Against the advice of his staff but still not to be denied his victory regardless of cost, Gage gathered new troops for a another assault. The defenders had scarcely been hurt, nor had a Redcoat breached their lines. They were strong of heart and ready to engage the enemy but there was little hope of holding the ground against another such determined attack for they were now woefully short of powder and ball and muskets could not stand against bayonets. Still, with such odds against them, they stood fast.

The final assault was repulsed several times leaving great piles of the King's men dead and wounded. British regulars regrouped and were able to forge up the hill due to the reduced fire as colonists exhausted their powder and ball. When there was no more powder and ball Britons entered the entrenchments with fixed bayonets. There were no bayonets to meet British bayonets, Still the defenders held their ground using anything available to club the enemy. With support of cannon and musket fire from Bunker Hill they held off the advancing troops until all hope failed. Then the defenders fell back in fairly good order leaving a rear guard to cover their retreat by fighting from stone wall to stone wall until the last man was safe from British fire.

More men were killed and wounded in the retreat to hills on the road to Cambridge than were casualties in the battle. Even the British generals acknowledged that it had not been a flight but a well ordered retreat done with military skill.

Heroes of the battle can not be enumerated nor are all of them known but the names of General Israel Putnam, Gen. Seth Pomeroy, Col. William Prescott, Joseph Warren (killed in the retreat) should always be remembered. The men who fought there gave them credit as the officers who gave them direction and the moral support that led farmers to stand fast when in other wars the sight of such determination by the British Army had led seasoned soldiers to flee pell-mell from the field.

The aftermath of the action was that Europeans no longer saw the colonists as simple farmers but patriots capable of great military exploits and fired with a revolutionary zeal to continue their fight for justice and perhaps now, even freedom from Britain.

To the Colonial leaders it confirmed that a Revolution had occurred and that this was "The War of that Revolution" and that not only New England but each and every colony was now involved. It gave the Continental Congress authority as a central ruling body, also encouragement and acknowledgement that there must now be a more coordinated and devoted prosecution of what had become not a local rebellion but a full fledged war to the death.

References: Christopher Ward's “The War of the Revolution�?/EM>; National Park Service "The Battle Road"; The Encyclopedia Britannica "The Revolutionary Years"; and above all, the respect for our ancestors gained in Mrs. Collins', Sherborn, Massachusetts 6th grade class.


Reply
 Message 12 of 16 in Discussion 
From: MSN NicknameHobbs410Sent: 6/8/2008 8:11 AM
Wasn't that the Battle that Benedict Arnold turned Traitor?

Reply
 Message 13 of 16 in Discussion 
From: MSN NicknameBIGSNOWBIRD1Sent: 6/9/2008 12:32 AM
Arnold was a heroe of Saratoga and was seriously wonded.
I think he became disalushioned when he submitted his expenses to the congress and they turned a cold shoulder on him.  He had spent his family fortune on the war ad now he was beieng stiffed.  The congress had also overlooked him for promotiion that he no doubt deserved by reason of qualification.

Reply
 Message 14 of 16 in Discussion 
From: bowleggedSent: 6/9/2008 4:20 PM
BS,

Good points about Benedict Arnold. I think his bride had a lot to do with his turncoat loyalties. It has been said that she was much smarter than he. What say ye?

Reply
 Message 15 of 16 in Discussion 
From: MSN NicknameFlashman191Sent: 6/9/2008 5:12 PM
Impossible. If she was female.
 
Mark GB

Reply
 Message 16 of 16 in Discussion 
From: MSN NicknameBIGSNOWBIRD1Sent: 6/9/2008 7:34 PM
Bow:  She was the daughter of a well respected PA judge.  The judge and his family remained neutral during the revolution but some thought they were loyalists.
 
She was supposedly a very beautiful and inteligent women by one account.  Another account says she was running on a 40 watt bulb.  I don't know if she intentionally gave that appearance to disarm others.  
Margaret Peggy Shippen was also discribed as being snooty and it is said she planted the idea of helping the British in his head. At this pont Arnold is still recovering from the wounds he suffered at Saratoga.  He had been taking heat from Joe Reed a local radical for cavorting with the Shippen family he thought to be loyalists.
She is reported to have questioned Arnold as to why he continued his association with the rebels because "they hate you," she said.  Arnold was supposedly shocked and forbade her to speak of it again. 
I don't think it's possible to tell a women to butt out so I think she probably used her womenly charms to get him to think about the British bribe.  They were broke he unable to collect from congress.  His first wife had past away his business ruined, Gen. Gates had lied to Congress about him.  I guess he was worn down and found it easy to justify doing business with theBrits.

First  Previous  2-16 of 16  Next  Last 
Return to American History