MSN Home  |  My MSN  |  Hotmail
Sign in to Windows Live ID Web Search:   
go to MSNGroups 
Free Forum Hosting
 
Important Announcement Important Announcement
The MSN Groups service will close in February 2009. You can move your group to Multiply, MSN’s partner for online groups. Learn More
The History Page[email protected] 
  
What's New
  
  Message Boards  
  For New Members  
  On This Day....  
  General  
  American History  
  Ancient History  
  British History  
  Current Events  
  European History  
  The Civil War  
  War  
  World History  
  Pictures  
    
    
  Links  
  Militaria Board  
  Cars/Motorcycles  
  
  
  Tools  
 
Ancient History : Was King Arthur real?????
Choose another message board
 
     
Reply
 Message 1 of 64 in Discussion 
From: MSN Nicknameh3ll_has_frozen  (Original Message)Sent: 2/20/2004 11:10 PM
I have read alot of books about King Arthur and his knights of the round table and I have had many different opinions about the truth in his tales. Do you think he was real and that he did all they say he did or do you think that he was made up of many different kings and heroes, give a reason why you think so.


First  Previous  50-64 of 64  Next  Last 
Reply
 Message 50 of 64 in Discussion 
From: MSN NicknamesunnyboyreturnsSent: 7/30/2007 5:44 PM
The two worst areas for any Roman soliders of officers to be station was England and Judea. This were the pits of humanity . Only the crew up were sent there.



sunny

Reply
 Message 51 of 64 in Discussion 
From: MSN NicknameNormalParanoiaSent: 8/1/2007 5:56 AM
Flash, as ya know the infantry was the heart of the Romans.  The infantry was the professional soliders that could be drawn from any walk of soceity and all over the republic.  Cavalry however was recruited from the wealthiest citizens.  This included the top 18 centuries of the votin' assembly, the Comittia Centuriata, who were rated equo publico.  The state was therefore responsible for the cost of a remount if the horse was lost in service.  Sons of Senators were also in the cavalry who upon servin' in ten campaigns became eligible for political office.  Cavalry served more as a steppin' stone for a subsequent career.  So while the were bravo and full of all kinds of bravado.  It had a higher turnover than the infantry were folk where there a lot of time to retirement to receive their plot of land and pension.  So the Romans where highly dependent on allies and others in the empire for cavalry.

Reply
 Message 52 of 64 in Discussion 
From: MSN NicknameFlashman8Sent: 8/1/2007 1:14 PM
Sunny, right.
My father served in Judaea Abyssinia Minor and Teutonia, I in Brittania and Hibernia and Teutonia where I might have met the Duplicarius Posterior Charioteer Plus Repetitii (More Repetes?) fomenting his many mutinies.
 
Normal, what you are saying is native Roman Cavalry was more of a social thing, and you are raising a point there I'd overlooked.
I was fascinated by the point which the person I was cribbing from made that Cavalry was more preferred as being less manpower intensive. In our day, we'd prefer Infantry as being cheaper.
 
There was a parsallel I noticed in Kuwait. In 1927 the Saudi Wahabi attacked Kuwait, and were defeated by the British garrison at a town called Jahra. Nevetheless, if as a Kuwait your family "manned the walls " (they actually fled en masse to the harbour) your family are deemed "first class citizens" and  were (maybe still are) the only ones eligible to vote. (Males only of course)
 
Peter

Reply
 Message 53 of 64 in Discussion 
From: MSN NicknameLewWetzel1Sent: 8/2/2007 11:37 AM
Normal, Roman citizens of the Equestrian class were 'Knights' but that was more a social thing than a military branch.  There was an annual parade, by the Knights, to remind the City that they had once been its prime defenders.  The Legions were recruited in specific areas, usually the home area (ie. Spain) of the troops in a particular Legion.  For instance, Julius Caeser's 7, 8, 9,&10 were all Spnish troops and their replacement levies were raised in the same area.   Incidently, the Legions were never reinforced piecemeal but all at once, when the enlistments had run out and the troops either signed over or discharged.   The retiring veterans marched off under their standards (except the Eagle) and were required to serve as a sort of reserve force called the Evocoti.  Sorry,  Didn't mean to get carried away.

Reply
 Message 54 of 64 in Discussion 
From: MSN NicknameFlashman8Sent: 8/2/2007 1:33 PM
Lew,
 
I see a problem there.
" Incidently, the Legions were never reinforced piecemeal but all at once",
Since you then had new virtually untrained legions.
 
In our days of conscription you had a situation when whole platoons of untrained soldiers turned up on the same commencement date. But there were 2 animals, one the room lance-corporal (who had a separate cubicle, one room per section - squad to you) and the other, the Trained Soldier.
 
He was actually called "Trained Soldier" and wore a patch with the regimental colour, and of course was fully badged at a time when recruits wore no badges until they'd passed a stage in their training.
 
Naturally, he lorded it a trifle, but showed the new lads the tricks of the trade; how to polish boots, make beds, and all the other hideous domestic pitfalls of the conscript. . I believe this post was given to Regular Privates, maybe ones with local family problems.
 
After training (which was done at the Regimental depot) the conscripts would be sent to the operational battalions, and mixed with full trained soldiers.  
 
Before my time; conscription ended in 1962, but I'm sure a system the ancient Romans would have used.
 
Your retired veterans; did they have to live in a certain area?
Peter 

Reply
 Message 55 of 64 in Discussion 
From: MSN NicknameNormalParanoiaSent: 8/2/2007 6:09 PM
Lew, I agree that is what I was sayin' to Flash that the Roman cav was a social political thing.  Citizens that were eligible for service where divided by their lot the poorest were sent to the navy, the next lot to the infantry, and the richest to the cavalry.  In 209 B.C. the censors made a example of equestrians from the highest centuries who were old enough in 218, but failed to serve in a campaign durin' the war.  They did this by downgradin' them to a lower class.  I have to disagree that the Romans knights were just for show and parade.  Since at the battle of Cannae, ya had roughly 100 senators who were of the equite order and of them 80 were killed.  Cato also was said to have boasted that his granfather had 5 horses killed from underneath him.......I found it interestin' how the new recruits were trained in the infantry.  Day 1, a 6km run in full armour.  Day 2, polished armour and arms, then had a inspection.  Day 3, they got to rest.  Day 4, weapons drill.  Day 5, 6km run in armour agaim.  Day 6, spit and polish with inspection.  Day 7, rest day again.  Then the process started all over again........Curious how did the replacemant of a whole Legion and not piecemeal work with the system of three lines and the 1st bein' the raw and youngest, the 2nd the prime of life, the 3rd the vets?  If ya have read somewhere how they did it please let me know as I am very curious and would appreciate ya shedin' some light there for me bro.....Also hell feel free to get carried away, I found what ya had to say interestin', I do believe yer right I do believe that I had read that they did replace the Legion as a whole.  So if ya know how this worked with the formation let me know.

Reply
 Message 56 of 64 in Discussion 
From: MSN NicknameFlashman8Sent: 8/2/2007 8:48 PM
Normal
There is an element of common sense in the recruits' regime . Day 1 Run. Day 5 run. One big problem which we faced was unfit men being expected to run on consecutive days. With the best will in the world, they will not do so well on day 2, but will with a day's rest. Then after a week or so they'll perform daily.
 
Trained soldiers in Barracks. Non excersise routine. Full 3 course dinner at say 18.00, beautiful food, steak, fish,. roast beef, lamb, chicken you name it. fries, boiled roast potatoes, rice, greens, soups, custard, cake, ice cream.
 
And there's the Orderly Officer, dribbling, knowing he's going to be fed much later, and far less. Usual cartoon theme "everything OK? is your dinner alright?" Occasionally the odd blackened potato is complained about, or bit of gristle. Good chance to have an informal word, answer the odd question that's occurred to them.
 
Dinner over, all kit maintenance sorted, down to the pub. THEN a portion of fish and chips. Then bed. God!! Has the new boy puked again?
 
I wonder how different that was for our Roman forbears on garrison duty.

Reply
 Message 57 of 64 in Discussion 
From: MSN NicknameLewWetzel1Sent: 8/3/2007 11:47 AM
Normal  & Flash, much as I would like to respond as if I had done the research I must confess that my source is Stephen Dando-Collins and his most excellent series on the Roman Legions (individually rather than as a single force).  There are 4 books published so far (3, 10, 14,& 6 Legion) and they contain a wealth of details that should win you major drinks in a bar game of trivial pursuit. 

Reply
 Message 58 of 64 in Discussion 
From: YgraineSent: 8/4/2007 4:22 AM
Ref #48 Flashman, I had no idea you were such a dashing charcter, and apparent savior of damsels in distress! Ygraine

Reply
 Message 59 of 64 in Discussion 
From: MSN NicknameLewWetzel1Sent: 8/4/2007 4:54 AM
Flashman,  prior to Augustus the Legions had an 18 year commitment.  After his consolidation of the Army, Augustus raised it to 20 years.  Replacements for the Legion were taken just prior to the discharge date of the veterans.  Normally about 1/3 of the vets would reenlist and would stay with their legion.  The exception to this was the assignment of the Centurians who were transfered to different Legions or promoted up through the cohorts with the senior going to the 1st Cohort and the others to others.  But the thing is, that the Legions fought with what they had until the new levies arrived.  For instance, Julius Caeser's 10th Legion started with over 5000 men (all totaled) but by Pharsalas had less than 2500.    When the Iceni rose against Rome, they smashed the 9th Hispania and sent the survivors running for their camp.  The 9th was a highly respected outfit but  it haed just recieved its new troops so approximately 70 percent of it was green recruits.   All though the recruits were raised in the Legion's home area, the retiring veterans could settle anyplace in the Empire that they wanted but they usually went home..  Their main requirement, after retiring, was to serve as a reserve force, the Evocati. which fought under its own standards.  The standards, except the Eagle, went with them when they retired .  

Reply
 Message 60 of 64 in Discussion 
From: MSN NicknameFlashman8Sent: 8/4/2007 1:26 PM
Ygraine
 
I start by beatin' me dad's mistress when she wouldn't give me a second helpin' after my expulsion from Rugby for drunkeness.
 
The lady you see cowering at me knee was Fetnab, whom I had throughly thrashed by me Syce (Groom) and I sold for a good profit when I got bored with her.
 
Later in the same book I have me wicked will of an Afghan beauty who, with her fiancee, tries to kill me with the aid of a muscle-bound dwarf.
 
I conclude by runnin' away from the enemy, trying to surrender the flag, and then stealing the credit which belonged to me gallant sergeant (late gallant sergeant) and trouserin' his rightful VC.
 
An' this is just the first volume of me memoirs.
 
Savin' damsels? dashin' character? Well, Queen Vicky did love me whiskers. And my book, The case Against Army reform, and my Chairmanship of the Society for the Reclamation of Fallen Women do take up me time in me dotage.
 
Furtive Flash

Reply
 Message 61 of 64 in Discussion 
From: MSN NicknameFlashman8Sent: 8/4/2007 1:32 PM
Lew
After you have made the requisite purchase of the Flashman series (no cheques) I do recommend you invest your remaining guineas in "Imperial Governor" by George Shipway.
Set in Suetonius' time.
Written very much from an Army Officer's viewpinmt (he was one of my instructors at Sandhurst I believe)
Also wrote "Warrior in Bronze"and 2 others a trilogy of Theseus' time. How they decided not to bother with steel swords, bronze was easier.
cheers
Peter

Reply
 Message 62 of 64 in Discussion 
From: MSN NicknameMarkGB5Sent: 8/5/2007 11:01 AM
Ref # 47, They're all very good. He covers almost every aspect of Scottish history from the 6th century to the 18th, all the major figures are covered and many of the minor ones. The only slight blot is that all the battle scenes are pretty much described the same, after a while you forget which was which. Personally I prefer the political dealings etc in the novels more than the battle scenes.    

Reply
 Message 63 of 64 in Discussion 
From: MSN NicknameOwlatnight8880Sent: 9/22/2007 5:29 AM
Artorious riothalmus? Roman?

Reply
 Message 64 of 64 in Discussion 
From: MSN NicknameFlashman8Sent: 9/22/2007 2:56 PM
If you read Cornwell and Rosemary Sutcliffe's books they credit Arthur with the revival of the Calafractii (stirruped cavalry) using heavy horses bred from France.

First  Previous  50-64 of 64  Next  Last 
Return to Ancient History