MSN Home  |  My MSN  |  Hotmail
Sign in to Windows Live ID Web Search:   
go to MSNGroups 
Free Forum Hosting
 
Important Announcement Important Announcement
The MSN Groups service will close in February 2009. You can move your group to Multiply, MSN’s partner for online groups. Learn More
The History Page[email protected] 
  
What's New
  
  Message Boards  
  For New Members  
  On This Day....  
  General  
  American History  
  Ancient History  
  British History  
  Current Events  
  European History  
  The Civil War  
  War  
  World History  
  Pictures  
    
    
  Links  
  Militaria Board  
  Cars/Motorcycles  
  
  
  Tools  
 
Ancient History : The Da Vinci Code, and the Holy Grail
Choose another message board
 
     
Reply
 Message 1 of 53 in Discussion 
From: krds88  (Original Message)Sent: 12/22/2005 4:34 PM

I know that anyone in this group that is an Ancient History buff, have asked or been asked the question, "Have you read the Da Vinci Code?"

In the novel, the Holy Grail is believed to be a person, rather then a chalice. The novel also looks at the Grail theory in two ways. Toward the end of the novel it is said that the Holy Grail is in the pyramid in the Louvre. The pyramid being, in a sense, an "ice-burg" with only the tip being visible.

If the Knights Templar was trying to hide the Holy Grail, then what better place to hide it then in an obvious place. I say obvious for the fact that, the Holy Grail is one of the biggest religious artifacts. Excuse me, it is the biggest religious artifact, that ever will be found. If they were hiding the Grail from the Romans or other religious leaders, then the people looking for it would look in religious temples, or monuments. They would never think to look in a Generals home. (The Louvre being Napoleons home.). What is your thoughts on the theory that the Holy Grail and the location of the Holy Grail?

 

Links:

http://www.catholiceducation.org/articles/facts/fm0035.html



First  Previous  39-53 of 53  Next  Last 
Reply
 Message 39 of 53 in Discussion 
From: bowleggedSent: 5/15/2007 7:55 PM
I've heard that Leonardo inserted his self-portrait into this painting as one of the Apostles. But I can't remember which one.

Reply
 Message 40 of 53 in Discussion 
From: joshSent: 5/16/2007 3:40 AM
Please, disregard Leonardo da Vinci's knowledge with the last supper, which
he has none in this subject. da Vinci was born 04/23/1452 he never saw the
last supper which took place Nisan 14 of the year 33 C.E., Jesus gathered
with his 12 apostles in Jerusalem to celebrate the last valid Passover.



Reply
 Message 41 of 53 in Discussion 
From: MSN NicknameFlashman8Sent: 5/16/2007 12:37 PM
Josh
 
last supper which took place Nisan 14 of the year 33 C.E., Jesus gathered
with his 12 apostles in Jerusalem to celebrate the last valid Passover.

Those bits I've highlighted. What do they mean?

Big Snow.

Sorry about the tip. Probably thought the Pork chops were gristly.

Peter




Reply
 Message 42 of 53 in Discussion 
From: joshSent: 5/17/2007 3:57 AM
The Passover(Last Supper) was always observed on Nisan (Abib) 14, being on
or near the day of full moon, inasmuch as the first day of every month
(lunar month) in the Jewish calendar was the day of the new moon, as
determined by visual observation. Therefore the 14th day of the month would
be about the middle of a lunation. The date of Jesus�?death is shown in the
article JESUS CHRIST (Time of his death) to be Nisan 14, 33 C.E.(Common Era)
Concerning the day of his death as reckoned on the Gregorian calendar,
astronomical calculations show that there was an eclipse of the moon on
Friday, April 3, 33 C.E. (Julian calendar), which would be Friday, April 1,
on the Gregorian calendar. (Oppolzer’s Canon of Eclipses, translated by
O. Gingerich, 1962, p. 344) Eclipses of the moon always occur at the time of
full moon. This evidence strongly indicates that Nisan 14, 33 C.E., fell on
Thursday-Friday, March 31–April 1, 33 C.E., on the Gregorian calendar.



Reply
 Message 43 of 53 in Discussion 
From: MSN NicknameFlashman8Sent: 5/17/2007 12:58 PM
Most edifying.
What is Common Era? Is that AD to li'l ol' Christian moi?
All Muslim newspapers must by Law show the Muslim year first

Reply
 Message 44 of 53 in Discussion 
From: MSN NicknameNevetsnayaSent: 5/26/2007 3:09 AM
Dan Brown screwed up history royally. He did a crappy job of research. I read the book, plus Holy Blood Holy Grail. He stole from that book as well. All it is is pop culture history. Read the anti-Brown stuff, and you'll see where he screwed up.

Reply
 Message 45 of 53 in Discussion 
From: MSN NicknameLewWetzel1Sent: 6/9/2007 5:29 PM
I'd be willing to bet that Brown's motive in writing that novel had more to do with profit than historical accuracy.   I am sure that he appreciated all the free publicity too.

Reply
 Message 46 of 53 in Discussion 
From: MSN NicknameFlashman8Sent: 6/9/2007 6:22 PM
Lew
I'll prop your statement with the fact that all struggling authors choose a name next to that of a popular author.
Like, Bernard/Patricia Cornwell,.Dale/Dan Brown, Patrick/Derek Robinson, Flash/ Flesh Gordon
 
Plagiarism is an evil thing.
 
The one and only Flash. Ignore all imitations. Except my rich nephew Flasharry

Reply
 Message 47 of 53 in Discussion 
From: MSN NicknameNevetsnayaSent: 7/16/2007 4:54 AM
Brown's mistake was claiming that his bogus information in the novel came from authentic research, when in fact it didn't. I agree that he was in it strickly for the money and fame, both of which he got, unfortunately.

Reply
 Message 48 of 53 in Discussion 
From: MSN NicknamesunnyboyreturnsSent: 7/16/2007 5:21 PM
What the heck is that white thing in front of JC?  Nice table cloth also.  Very clean cloths for that un-soap time in history.  No one painted anything during that period of time with out the approval of the church RCC.     So one painted as one was informed to do.
 
 
 
sunny

Reply
 Message 49 of 53 in Discussion 
From: MSN NicknameMarkGB5Sent: 7/16/2007 6:53 PM
It's obvious what the white thing is, it's the back of a television, they'll all watching the football over a meal.

Reply
 Message 50 of 53 in Discussion 
From: MSN NicknameBIGSNOWBIRD1Sent: 7/17/2007 12:46 AM
Mark: I think Manchester won that match too.

Reply
 Message 51 of 53 in Discussion 
From: MSN NicknameRosororari8Sent: 8/12/2007 3:04 AM
Exucse me, but Leonardo Da Vinci wasn't alive in ancient times. He was born in the 15th century.

Reply
 Message 52 of 53 in Discussion 
From: MSN NicknameMOREREPETESSent: 8/12/2007 8:23 AM
OH SURE ROSO, BREAK OUR BUBBLE WHY DON'T YOU.

Reply
 Message 53 of 53 in Discussion 
From: MSN NicknameLewWetzel1Sent: 8/12/2007 3:21 PM
Roso, please be cautious when inserting facts into the discussion, it interrupts the smooth flow of the posts.

First  Previous  39-53 of 53  Next  Last 
Return to Ancient History