MSN Home  |  My MSN  |  Hotmail
Sign in to Windows Live ID Web Search:   
go to MSNGroups 
Free Forum Hosting
 
Important Announcement Important Announcement
The MSN Groups service will close in February 2009. You can move your group to Multiply, MSN’s partner for online groups. Learn More
The History Page[email protected] 
  
What's New
  
  Message Boards  
  For New Members  
  On This Day....  
  General  
  American History  
  Ancient History  
  British History  
  Current Events  
  European History  
  The Civil War  
  War  
  World History  
  Pictures  
    
    
  Links  
  Militaria Board  
  Cars/Motorcycles  
  
  
  Tools  
 
British History : State of the Union
Choose another message board
 
     
Reply
 Message 1 of 29 in Discussion 
From: MSN NicknameCurliestJimbert  (Original Message)Sent: 1/7/2007 9:21 PM
300 years ago, the union between England and Scotland was formed.
These snippets from the Scotsman.
Jimbert
 

Welcome to England: a land where Union means rugby, strikes and marriage

AS YOU travel out though the suburbs of north-west London towards the new Wembley stadium, it is the cross of St George you see on the railings by the Metropolitan line, not the Union flag. Many of these emblems are tattered and stained, suggesting they have been there since the summer of 2006; that mad, distant season in which England allowed itself to dream, and only in that dream was the World Cup won.

It may seem flippant to approach a question of politics with reference to football, but the symbolism is important. Thirty years ago, English fans would have been flying the Union flag, unaware that it was the emblem of the United Kingdom. This would have been an honest representation of political reality. In London and the shires, England was Britain, and Britain was England. The banishment of this view is one of the most obvious successes of Scottish nationalism.

Now, the stakes are higher, and it isn't just a question of sport. The 300th anniversary of the Act of Union coincides with the elections to the Holyrood parliament. The opinion polls suggest that there is a chance of the nationalists being in a position to lead an administration, taking Scotland significantly closer to a referendum on independence.

O'Hagan argues that England will ignore the anniversary because "to mark it properly would be to speak up for the goodness of their marriage with the Scots, and England isn't feeling too good in that marriage at the moment. It might not want a divorce, but it can't quite sleep at night for the slow workings of resentment. We've been here before - in the late 18th century the cry of 'No Scots!' was often to be heard, apparently, from the pit at Drury Lane - and it is brought on now by a perception that the Scots are running Britain, and doing rather better out of the arrangement than is England. This is an old-fashioned resentment and will go away eventually, unless something seismic happens, like Scotland breaking away. For the moment it means that the anniversary of the Act of Union will probably be met with a bit of a groan by England."



First  Previous  15-29 of 29  Next  Last 
Reply
 Message 15 of 29 in Discussion 
From: MSN NicknameDavid_PiperSent: 1/10/2007 9:50 PM
Why? GB is a constitutional monarchy and not part of England. It is the reverse isn't it?

Reply
 Message 16 of 29 in Discussion 
From: MSN NicknameCatfishKingdomSent: 1/11/2007 1:09 AM
I see what you all r saying, however, I still wish it could all be put behind people and they move on.  What a lot of ancestors did, doesn't really have anything to do with how we could get along together now....We were not here then, none of us were the instigators of the past indignations that were put on our ancestors.
 
I just can't get past it all sometimes.
Being mixed, I could be angry at all the ancestors progeny for what they did but, it was in the past, it is now that matters isn't it?

Reply
 Message 17 of 29 in Discussion 
From: MSN NicknameMOREREPETESSent: 1/11/2007 6:29 AM
THEY ARE LEAVING OUT RELIGIOUS INDIFFERENCES, FISH.

Reply
 Message 18 of 29 in Discussion 
From: MSN NicknameMarkGB5Sent: 1/11/2007 7:17 PM
Ref # 15, what the Welsh and Scots hate to hear of GB spoken of as England and the Queen as Queen of England. It implies they are subservient to England.

Reply
 Message 19 of 29 in Discussion 
From: MSN NicknamefunkmasterjeeSent: 2/5/2007 9:12 PM
Yes a lot of scots hate England and the English.  This stems from an inferiority complex and also a state of mind past on from one generation to the next.
 
If the scots want independence from England, they have only to vote SNP in vast numbers ......but strangely, they don't. If they did Scotland would by now be independent. They know where the grass is greener
 
Frankly, now that most of the north sea oil has been used up, it wouldnt make any difference to England.  What is annoying is that scottish MPs can vote in westminster parliament, but English MPs have no say in Scotland.  Scotland has its own parliament so they should go to THAT parliament.

Reply
 Message 20 of 29 in Discussion 
From: MSN NicknameMarkGB5Sent: 2/5/2007 9:17 PM
The only suitable solution would be to ban Scottish, Welsh and Ulster MPs from voting in Westminster on devolved matters. This shouldn't be difficult to arrange. They can speak but not vote. 

Reply
 Message 21 of 29 in Discussion 
From: MSN NicknameFlashman8Sent: 2/5/2007 11:30 PM
As the site's token Scotsman, I totally agree with you.
It's like Welsh devolution, it's the political North welsh who brought it in. The Southern Welsh, who keep Wales going financially, didn't want to know.
What it is simply is Blair wants to make as many irreversible changes, like changes to the House of Lords as he can.
You'll find plenty of English who hate England. but it's a political thing.

Reply
 Message 22 of 29 in Discussion 
From: MSN NicknamefunkmasterjeeSent: 2/16/2007 8:51 PM
Blair is now just going for Maggie's record  ....otherwise he'd have gone by now

Reply
 Message 23 of 29 in Discussion 
From: MSN NicknamefunkmasterjeeSent: 2/16/2007 9:04 PM
Britain ....
....long NHS waiting lists,
grey skies,
rain,
3000 new laws
prisons full
paedophiles released early 
withdrawl of automatic right to trial by jury
congestion charging (or on the way)
....more grey skies
37% of income taken in various taxes,
worst developed nation for bringing up kids (reportedly)
now work till your 68 (and not 65)
borrowing rates set to rise
....more rain
 
It's all fun in UK.
Anyone spent time in (tax free) Dubai ?   What was it like?

Reply
 Message 24 of 29 in Discussion 
From: MSN NicknameFlashman8Sent: 2/16/2007 11:19 PM
Vast malls and projects, ski slopes, you can drink there, cheapest duty free in the world. Only 60 miles cross the Straits of Hormuz to iran. 3/4 Indian and Pakistani, so they'll betray Dubai to the Ayatollahs or whoever, just as they tried to hand Kuwait over to the Iraqis.

Reply
 Message 25 of 29 in Discussion 
From: MSN NicknameMarkGB5Sent: 2/17/2007 2:31 PM
Ref # 22, Tony Blair is not going for Maggie's record. She served as PM for 11 years 7 months, that will take Tony Blair to November 2008. He's almost certain to step down this summer, 16 months short. 

Reply
 Message 26 of 29 in Discussion 
From: MSN NicknamefunkmasterjeeSent: 2/18/2007 6:28 PM
Unless something happens to Gordon Brown

Reply
 Message 27 of 29 in Discussion 
From: MSN NicknamefunkmasterjeeSent: 2/18/2007 6:34 PM
Flash,   how long did you spend there?
 
I think Dubai (and UAE) are too much in the western sphere (like Kuwait and Saudi) for the west to allow it to be dominated by Iran ...but you never know. Iran's main target now is Iraq or at least the south of it.
 
...been thinking about going out there and starting a real estate/architechtural photography business - god knowns there's enough of it! maybe wedding photography too but no idea how easy or difficult visas and residency is.
 
I would have thought it not difficult for brits but I don't realy know

Reply
 Message 28 of 29 in Discussion 
From: MSN NicknamefunkmasterjeeSent: 2/18/2007 6:39 PM
ski slopes .....I must admit the concept does seem bizarre in a middle east country. Presume you mean dry slopes?  ....although I've seen an indoor one with artificial snow and refrigeration
 
When you say you can drink - do you mean bars just like UK or is it in the confines of residential compounds?

Reply
 Message 29 of 29 in Discussion 
From: MSN NicknameFlashman8Sent: 2/18/2007 9:40 PM
No, Funk
 
True snow. Don't forget. although Dubai isn't oil rich like Kuwait it still pays a fraction of what we would for oil, to power the refigeration compressors.
 
Yes, you can go into a Hotel bar and order a drink. When I was out there, '81-83, you had to produce a permit, which I was told was issued on medical grounds, like you were an alcoholic.
 
There was always a sensible reluctance to issue these permits to Indians because they would sell booze on. And with outside temperatures of 120F with 80% humidity, it was lethal for outdoor workers to drink. Still, the Indians sold when they got the chance.
 
In '81 I went to Bahrein, and there you ordered your booze in the bar without permits.
My father worked there 1956-60, and then there were no restrictions for booze anywhere except Saudi Arabia. But then the restrictions came in as we pulled out.
 
Peter

First  Previous  15-29 of 29  Next  Last 
Return to British History