MSN Home  |  My MSN  |  Hotmail
Sign in to Windows Live ID Web Search:   
go to MSNGroups 
Free Forum Hosting
 
Important Announcement Important Announcement
The MSN Groups service will close in February 2009. You can move your group to Multiply, MSN’s partner for online groups. Learn More
The History Page[email protected] 
  
What's New
  
  Message Boards  
  For New Members  
  On This Day....  
  General  
  American History  
  Ancient History  
  British History  
  Current Events  
  European History  
  The Civil War  
  War  
  World History  
  Pictures  
    
    
  Links  
  Militaria Board  
  Cars/Motorcycles  
  
  
  Tools  
 
European History : MASTERS OF DARKNESS - No 1 Rasputin
Choose another message board
 
     
Reply
 Message 1 of 25 in Discussion 
From: MSN NicknameArnie-113  (Original Message)Sent: 8/19/2003 11:35 AM
 
 
 
 
 

 

 

The scandalous 'mad monk' of Tsarist Russia has a dark, sexual and bestial image. His nickname, Rasputin, means debauched one, and he'd already earned it, by his wild and licentious behaviour, when he was in his teens. But was he an enigmatic mystic, a political rogue or a skilled manipulator of innocent women? Contrary to popular belief, he was neither a monk nor a priest, but a wandering peasant who eventually exerted a powerful influence over Nicholas II, the last Tsar of imperial Russia. This association would cost him his life.

RASPUTIN

Siberian sin

Rasputin was born Grigori Yefimovich Novykh in the small Siberian village of Pokrovskoe. There was talk of young Rasputin's visions and ability to heal, but he settled into peasant life, marrying at the age of 20 and having four children. A visit to a monastery in Verkhoturye changed him, however. Here he encountered a secret sect called the khlysty, which profoundly influenced him. They gathered in crypts, indulging in flagellation, mad dancing and orgiastic sex. Only after sinning could they repent and come closer to God. This mix of religious piety and sexual hedonism, 'driving out sin with sin', was a notion that never left Rasputin.

In 1901 he quit his home to become a 'strannik', a pilgrim or wanderer. He stopped washing and didn't touch his body for months on end. In an effort to gain spirituality, he sometimes wore shackles to increase the hardship of his journey. When he reached St Petersburg in 1903 he was perceived by those he encountered to have a luminescent religious essence. He was now a 'staryet', a wandering holy man.

Occult sisters

In St Petersburg, Rasputin quickly impressed Bishop Theophan, the Tsar's confessor, and in 1905 he introduced Rasputin to the Montenegrin princesses, Militsa and Anastasia. Despite his unwashed smell, the sisters �?dubbed 'the crows' by Russian society for their jet-black hair and fascination with the occult �?were captivated.

The presence of a holy man with healing powers excited them, and, in 1906, despite Theophan's growing doubts, Militsa persuaded Nicholas II and Aleksandra, the Tsar and Tsarina, to let Rasputin look at their son, Aleksei. He was thought to suffer from haemophilia, but his illness was a state secret. Mysteriously, Rasputin knew all about it. Stranger still, when he prayed over the young Aleksei, the boy's haemorrhaging stopped. The Tsarina fell firmly under Rasputin's spell.

Rasputin did not waste this advantage and told Aleksandra, often described as a gullible and neurotic woman, that the boy would die without him. He became a regular palace visitor.

Other society women were also falling for Rasputin's hypnotic charms. One, Olga Lokhtina, invited him to stay in her home. She became a lifelong devotee, changing from a witty, intelligent socialite into a crazed eccentric. On one occasion Rasputin was observed violently beating her while she held on to his penis, shouting: 'I am your ewe, and you are Christ.' Other women claimed he'd raped them.

Unholy behaviour

In late 1908, General Dedylin, responsible for the Tsar's security, presented a report to Nicholas documenting Rasputin's unsavoury actions: outings to bathhouses, beatings and violent sex with society women and prostitutes. He was also rumoured to have kept virgins' hair. Tyutchera, the royal governess, even claimed that Rasputin had been abusing the Tsar's children. By this time, however, the Siberian peasant was calling the Tsar and Tsarina Mama and Papa. Nicholas laughed off the report.

Others were not so blind: Theophan tried to warn the Tsar to distance himself from Rasputin, but he was relieved of his post and banished. In 1911 two former supporters of Rasputin, Illiodor, a fanatical right-wing monk, and Hermogen, Bishop of Saratov, brutally attacked Rasputin. They were exiled.

The Spala Miracle

Rasputin's position in St Petersburg was already secure, but in 1912 it was reinforced by one of the most famous demonstrations of his healing power. The Romanovs went on holiday to Spala in Poland and Aleksei became ill. Fearing for her son's life, the distraught Tsarina contacted Rasputin, begging for help. He telegraphed back, saying the 'little one' would not die. The boy immediately recovered.

Today it is believed that Aleksei may have actually been suffering from aplastic anaemia. This disease carries many of the same symptoms as haemophilia �?pallor, internal haemorrhaging, high fevers and delirium �?but is characterised by spontaneous remission. Rasputin may simply have been blessed with good timing. Whatever the truth, Rasputin's reputation as a healer flourished and he began to receive dozens of visitors.

Devil Town

In spring 1914 Rasputin, on a visit to Pokrovskoe, was savagely stabbed by Chionya Gusyeva, an ex-prostitute and follower of Illiodor. While he recovered, Nicholas took Russia into the First World War. This was to be a disaster for his country, with more than four million Russians losing their lives. In the dark times that followed, Rasputin's influence over the Tsar's political decisions was increasingly blamed for Russia's problems. St Petersburg became known as 'Chertograd', or Devil Town.

In early December 1916 Rasputin wrote the Tsar a letter, claiming to have seen a vision of his own death. The letter contained a chilling prophecy: if the Tsar's relations were responsible for his death, none would remain alive for more than two years.

By this time Rasputin had become acquainted with Prince Felix Yusupov, the bisexual husband of the Tsar's niece Irina. Far from admiring Rasputin, however, Yusupov wanted him dead �?and he wasn't alone. Both the Tsar's cousin, the Grand Duke Dmitry Pavlovich, and Vladimir Purishkevich, a member parliament, also wished to rid Russia of his demonic influence.

Foul murder

On the night of 16 December 1916, Rasputin was lured by Yusupov to Moika Palace with the excuse that Irina wanted to meet him. There he was fed cakes and drink laced with cyanide. To the horror of the conspirators, however, Rasputin was unaffected. In desperation, they shot him several times and beat him with a dumb-bell handle before dumping him into the icy waters of the river Neva.

Rasputin's immunity to the enormous dose of cyanide he imbibed is often seen as the final proof of his supernatural powers, but there is perhaps a more mundane explanation. Rasputin is believed to have had chronic gastritis, resulting from heavy drinking. This condition can mean that ingested cyanide is not rendered volatile �?and therefore not fatal.

His murder marked the beginning of the end for Nicholas and Aleksandra: only 10 weeks after his death, the Romanov dynasty was overthrown during the Russian Revolution of 1917. Less than two years later, Nicholas and his entire family were executed by firing squad. Rasputin's final prediction had been fulfilled and his dark legacy immortalised.

 



First  Previous  11-25 of 25  Next  Last 
Reply
 Message 11 of 25 in Discussion 
From: MSN NicknameCatfishKingdomSent: 1/8/2007 1:08 AM
Kind of disturbing,eh what?
http://www.channel4.com/history/microsites/M/masters_darkness/desade.html
Marquis de Sade

Some revere the Marquis de Sade as a free-thinking radical, others condemn him as a depraved sex-mad monster. His novels are filled with sexual violence and mutilation but de Sade, infamous French writer and libertine, is a confusing figure. Was he as perverse and cruel as his critics suggest or were his novels a radical defiance of pre-Revolutionary French morality?

Avignon aristo

Born Donatien-Alphonse-François de Sade in Paris, the Marquis was the only surviving child of provincial noble parents. His father, Jean-Baptiste, was a diplomat and notorious bisexual playboy, and his mother, Marie-Eleonore, was a cold and distant woman who left her son to live in a convent soon after he was born. At the age of five, de Sade was packed off to his uncle, the Abbé de Sade, in Avignon. This would have a profound effect on the young Marquis.

Although the Abbé was a churchman, he kept a mistress and may even have run a brothel. Growing up surrounded by hypocrisy, de Sade learnt to despise the Church and its morality. Later he went to a Jesuit college, Louis Le Grand, where the pupils were publicly beaten. Perhaps this experience, coupled with joining the military at 14, sowed the seeds of his legendary penchant for violence and humiliation, although his experience of fighting in the Seven Years' War must also have influenced him.

After the war, de Sade took to aristocratic life in Paris, developing a love of theatre and the arts, frequenting brothels and keeping a mistress. In May 1763, on the wishes of his family, de Sade married Renée-Pélagie de Montreuil, the daughter of a high-ranking, bourgeois family, but he was a faithless husband. In October of the same year, he was imprisoned for 'excesses' committed in a brothel. His taste for violent sex remained, and it wasn't long before another scandal occurred. This time it would make him so notorious that the police would ask brothel madames to keep their girls away from him.


 Beating and mutilation

On Easter Sunday 1768, de Sade met a young widow called Rose Keller in the street, and later claimed to have offered her money for sex �?she said he offered her a position as a maid. Keller went with him to his small house in Arcueil where, according to her, de Sade threatened to kill her before tying her to a bed and whipping her with a birch branch. He then sliced her buttocks open with a hunting knife and poured wax into the wounds. Keller finally escaped by tying sheets together and climbing out of a bedroom window, running directly to the authorities.

When questioned, Sade claimed she was a willing partner in the beating and denied mutilating her. When examined by doctors, Keller showed no signs of having been cut, but she had been severely whipped. De Sade was imprisoned.

His wife stood by him, even addressing him as 'my good little boy' in her letters, and after his release they had three children. But if the Marquise hoped that her husband would now adopt the role of dutiful husband and father she was very much mistaken.

Orgies and prostitutes

De Sade continued his life of excess, organising orgies and using prostitutes. When he inherited the Chateau La Coste from his father, a property commanding a breathtaking view over the Vaucluse valley, he and his wife hired several servants and pretty young maids. The chateau was not the idyllic fortress depicted in his later novel, The 120 Days of Sodom. Following his violent sexual demands, the maids all ran away and the cook became pregnant and left.

In 1771, after another short spell in prison for debt, de Sade seduced his virginal sister-in-law, Anne-Prospre. The two ran off to Marseilles together, but soon she retreated to a convent and de Sade returned to his ever-forgiving wife. Less that a year later, however, de Sade organised another orgy in Marseilles with four prostitutes and his valet, Latour, passing around a home-made aphrodisiac in the process. The next day, the girls became ill and two of them brought charges of sodomy and attempted poisoning against de Sade. Once again, a warrant was issued for his arrest.

Revenge and imprisonment

De Sade was eventually cleared of the poisoning and sodomy charges, but his mother-in-law, Madame de Montreuil, never forgave him for seducing her daughter Anne-Prospre. She successfully lobbied King Louis XVI for a lettre de cachet, a royal order to arrest him (a method often utilised by the rich and powerful to remove troublesome relatives). It proved effective and de Sade was imprisoned on royal authority and without trial.

In 1778, de Sade began an 11-year stay in prison, first in Vincennes, then later at the notorious Bastille prison in Paris. Denied the decadent lifestyle he was used to, de Sade began to write down his fantasies �?and they proved to be increasingly disturbing, involving severe sexual mutilation, rape and incest. Practically every violent or sexual act imaginable is present in his work.

It is ironic that Madame de Montreuil, who hated de Sade so much, was indirectly responsible for the work that would immortalise him, and he produced almost all his novels �?including The 120 Days of Sodom and the first drafts of Justine and Juliette �?in this period of incarceration. So shocking were these novels that they were published anonymously.

 






Freedom and asylum

On Good Friday 1790, after the outbreak of the French Revolution, the prisoners of the Bastille, including de Sade, were released. By this time, however, his wife no longer wanted anything to do with him.

Paris was now in revolution and 'petty' crimes such as de Sade's were no longer a public priority. Bizarrely, he became involved in politics, serving as a Grand Juror in many trials. One of these was against his mother-in-law. Given his reputation and her part in his imprisonment, he could have used this opportunity to exact revenge. Instead he had the case dismissed and later resigned his political post.

He didn't remain a free man for long, however, and in 1801 found himself imprisoned again, this time at the hands of the Emperor Napoleon's government, which suspected that he had penned the anonymously published Justine. He was sent to Sainte-Pélagie prison and was later moved to Charenton, an insane asylum where he wrote the 10-volume novel, Crimes of Passion. He spent the remainder of his life there, dying in 1814 at the age of 74.

Classy convict

The Marquis de Sade is often depicted as an evil deviant, but judged in the context of his society his offences are less clear. Pre-Revolutionary France was decadent in the extreme and the upper classes used and abused the peasant population �?a common motto of nobility was 'Plaisir a tout prix', meaning 'Pleasure at any price'. So was de Sade truly a monster, or simply a product of his time? Perhaps we'll never know for sure.

 

 

 








Reply
 Message 12 of 25 in Discussion 
From: MSN NicknameCatfishKingdomSent: 1/13/2007 6:19 AM
Many Legends have buried within them some elements of real facts.
The trick is finding the facts.  It is a fascinating treasure hunt to trace the elements of truth that may be and are buried within these legends and fairy tales.
 
 
All About Dracula
Facts, history, and legends
http://www.infoplease.com/spot/dracula9.html
 
Dracula: Fact or Folklore?
Have Dracula stories been exaggerated by political enemies and in peasant folklore?

by David Johnson

While his political enemies, and peasant folklore, have no doubt exaggerated Dracula's story, scholars nonetheless believe it is factual. Archives in various nations contain contemporary accounts of Dracula's life, often written by diplomats. These reports are often strikingly similar and yet provide differing perspectives, indicating they were not copied or translated from the same sources. In addition, these documents typically provide other details such as names, dates, and locations that can be verified by other sources, adding to their credibility.

They say Dracula was spectacularly cruel.

For instance, Nicholas of Modrussa, Papal envoy in Buda (now Budapest) Hungary, wrote Pope Pius II that Dracula massacred 40,000 men, women, and children of all ages and nationalities in one incident in 1464. Gabriele Rangone, bishop of Erlau, stated in 1475 that Dracula had personally ordered the murders of 100,000 people, or close to one-fifth the population under his rule.
 
The Terrifying Truth About Dracula
How a 15th-century Walachian prince became a frightening modern legend
 
Dracula: A Medical Explanation?
Some traits attributed to vampires�?sensitivity to light, fangs, pale skin - may actually describe certain illnesses

by David Johnson

Some doctors believe that old peasant tales of aristocratic "vampires" living in nearby castles could be based on medical fact. Some traits attributed to vampires - sensitivity to light, fangs, pale skin - may actually describe certain illnesses.
For example, the hereditary blood disease porphyria was believed to be endemic among the Eastern European aristocracy, which routinely intermarried. Physicians sometimes told patients to drink blood from other people to build up their own.

People with porphyria become extremely sensitive to light, develop skin lesions, and get brown or reddish teeth.
 
................

Reply
 Message 13 of 25 in Discussion 
From: MSN NicknameMarkGB5Sent: 1/13/2007 9:40 AM
Dracula has been in the news recently. Castle Bran in Transylvania, Rumania, which has links with the original "Dracula" is up for sale. If we club together we could buy it as a holiday home for members of The History Page. I'd like the first week in August please. 

Reply
 Message 14 of 25 in Discussion 
From: MSN NicknameFlashman8Sent: 1/13/2007 1:06 PM
Mark,
You might think we junior members are just thick, but I for one will object violently to the subsidy of your grubby little researches into "Droits du Seigneur, the Carpathian Aspect".
We also note your recent soi-disant appellation of "Assistant Manager, Europe, History Unlimited" and are not sure this is unrelated. BTW, Herr Dominic von Hapsburg, a New York Architect, would like the Roumanian Government to return his castle.
Peter

Reply
 Message 15 of 25 in Discussion 
From: MSN NicknameMOREREPETESSent: 1/13/2007 9:06 PM
I THINK THAT THEY ARE ASKING FORTY MILLION FOR THE CASTLE.
WE WILL HAVE TO ASK SUNDAY TO USE SOME OF HER PIN MONEY TO HELP OUT HERE.

Reply
 Message 16 of 25 in Discussion 
From: MSN NicknameFlashman8Sent: 1/13/2007 11:00 PM

And where did we manage to squeeze the words "incurable optimism" into PBA?


Reply
 Message 17 of 25 in Discussion 
From: MSN NicknameMarkGB5Sent: 1/14/2007 11:32 AM
If it's 40 million dollars or euros we could just about make it, but if it's pounds we've no chance.

Reply
 Message 18 of 25 in Discussion 
From: MSN NicknameFlashman8Sent: 1/14/2007 1:30 PM
Mark
Do I get to interview the Female staff.?
Far too grubby a job for Asst Mgrs (Des) Europe.
Peter

Reply
 Message 19 of 25 in Discussion 
From: MSN NicknameMOREREPETESSent: 1/15/2007 7:34 AM
80 MIL AMERICAN 40 MIL POUNDS. BUT WHAT A VIEW.

Reply
 Message 20 of 25 in Discussion 
From: MSN NicknamefunkmasterjeeSent: 2/13/2007 5:41 PM
I take it that was the castle of 'Vlad the impailer' ??
 
Maybe that band that won the eurovision SC last year (Lordi ?) will buy it? ...only the dead can stand the crap they play

Reply
The number of members that recommended this message. 0 recommendations  Message 21 of 25 in Discussion 
Sent: 2/13/2007 6:24 PM
This message has been deleted by the author.

Reply
 Message 22 of 25 in Discussion 
From: MSN NicknameFlashman8Sent: 2/13/2007 6:27 PM
 
For the odd occasional anal fetishist in this site.
 
I read a tremendous historical fiction book about an Englishman caught up in the Ottoman capture of Constantinople, and how his family become gunmakers for the Ottomans (it's a dirty job but the pay's good).
 
They eventually have a row with the bosses, and end up running away during the battle of Lepanto.
 
But T-Dog's role model Vlad upset a few of the Ottomans' allies, by impaling them, and ended up getting his piles sorted out.
 
This would have been in the 16th Century, long before 2007 as T-Dog insists. Now, Is Vlad meant to be the inspiration for Dracula, or just a lonely Haemorroid Hater?

Reply
 Message 23 of 25 in Discussion 
From: MSN NicknamefunkmasterjeeSent: 2/15/2007 9:36 PM

http://www.vladtheimpaler.com/

Vlad the Impaler (1431-1476)


A famous portrait of Vlad the Impaler.As you may well know, author Bram Stoker (1847-1912) based the title character of his 1897 novel Dracula on an actual human being, or should we say inhuman being.  In this website, we will try our best to make the distinction between the real and the imaginary, the facts and the fiction.  This is not an easy task, considering the amount of vampire lore which has imbibed our culture since Dracula was first published in 1897.

Even if you haven't yet read Stoker's novel, and seen the stage play which came after, you have probably seen some of the many films based on his character. Some of the most important cinematic adaptations are F.W. Murnau's 1922 masterpiece "Nosferatu", which was loosely based on Dracula but subjected to a "makeover" for copyright reasons, Todd Browning's "Dracula", which starred Bela Lugosi, a Romanian actor who had previously incarnated the titular character on the stage, and would forever be remembered, and unfortunately typecast as Dracula; the British Hammer Films releases of the 70s, which starred Christopher Lee as a sexier, and far more violent vampire.  While there were others in between, one of the most interesting, although flawed adaptation, of Dracula was Francis Ford Coppola's 1992 release, "Bram Stoker's Dracula".  Coppola's version is noteworthy for it's inclusion of the "Order of the Dracul", which cleverly interwove the fictional vampire with the historical figure.

What is interesting to note, is that Stoker's vampire, while being loosely based on Vlad the Impaler, is nowhere near as threatening, nor as sadistic.  Stoker's Dracula is a mysterious, somewhat sensual character who kills and feeds to survive, much like any being in nature.  In fact, as much as there is reference to the evil of Dracula, it can be reasoned that all of his actions were motivated by survival. Vlad the Impaler, on the other hand, killed not to feed, but to revel in his own power, and just for the sheer pleasure of seeing the suffering of his numerous victims. We will attempt to put together as accurate a portrait of the man as available documentation permits, his life, loves, enemies, and all of his infamous deeds.

Vlad the Impaler wasn't a "real" vampire, but he probably caused more rivers of blood to flow than any other tyrant in the history of the world. Bear in mind that there are many versions of Vlad the Impaler's life story, and there are no entirely accurate ones.  We have cross referenced every detail to try and bring you what we believe is the most accurate portrait of a man who keeps inspiring fear into each and every new generation.  In this website, you will learn how Vlad Dracula came to be known as "the Impaler", you will also be able to read Bram Stoker's Dracula, and you will be shown an open door to the most interesting and accurate resources on Vlad the Impaler and  Dracula, from books, to movies, to websites.

http://www.vladtheimpaler.com/

Reply
 Message 24 of 25 in Discussion 
From: MSN NicknameHardiboiSent: 2/24/2007 1:41 PM
There has beena  case put forward in support of a theory that he was in fact shot by a member of the British intelligence community who arranged the scene at  Yusupovs  house.The motive being  that he was encourageing the Tsar to withdraw Russia from the war and that the Tsar was so affected by his wife who in turn was so affected by the Vile charlatan that  Russia might have actually withdrawn .

Reply
 Message 25 of 25 in Discussion 
From: MSN Nicknamevicbc6Sent: 3/9/2007 10:22 PM
As  for   his  supposssed hynotizing the  czaeavitch  when he was bleeding . I have  read  that  maybe all he did was tell  him siberian stories, which  helped ease his mind off the immediate problem. See R Massie's "Nicholas & Aalexandra" for  details/

First  Previous  11-25 of 25  Next  Last 
Return to European History