MSN Home  |  My MSN  |  Hotmail
Sign in to Windows Live ID Web Search:   
go to MSNGroups 
Free Forum Hosting
 
Important Announcement Important Announcement
The MSN Groups service will close in February 2009. You can move your group to Multiply, MSN’s partner for online groups. Learn More
The History Page[email protected] 
  
What's New
  
  Message Boards  
  For New Members  
  On This Day....  
  General  
  American History  
  Ancient History  
  British History  
  Current Events  
  European History  
  The Civil War  
  War  
  World History  
  Pictures  
    
    
  Links  
  Militaria Board  
  Cars/Motorcycles  
  
  
  Tools  
 
Militaria Board : Developement of the jet fighter
Choose another message board
 
     
Reply
 Message 1 of 24 in Discussion 
From: MSN NicknameCurliestJimbert  (Original Message)Sent: 5/21/2008 10:59 PM
 The ME 262 gets most publicity as  a jet fight, but there were other developements being carried out at the same time. This is one example. What is it?
Jimbert
 
 
 


First  Previous  10-24 of 24  Next  Last 
Reply
The number of members that recommended this message. 0 recommendations  Message 10 of 24 in Discussion 
Sent: 5/22/2008 9:44 AM
This message has been deleted due to termination of membership.

Reply
The number of members that recommended this message. 0 recommendations  Message 11 of 24 in Discussion 
Sent: 5/22/2008 9:51 AM
This message has been deleted due to termination of membership.

Reply
 Message 12 of 24 in Discussion 
From: MSN Nicknamezackzwerling1Sent: 5/22/2008 12:15 PM
ref 9

sort of resembles an A10

Reply
 Message 13 of 24 in Discussion 
From: MSN NicknamePDQuestSent: 5/22/2008 3:06 PM
Does SAAB have a role in the world of jet fighters?

Reply
 Message 14 of 24 in Discussion 
From: MSN NicknametommytalldogSent: 5/22/2008 9:55 PM
Interesting comparison of the F-86 & the Mig 15 on the military channel the other day.   As our esteemed Flash has pointed out numerous times the jet engine in the Mig was a gift of the Brits when they & the Soviets were still allies.   But that engine was copied & improved by the Soviets by the time the Korean War errupted.   The engine in the Harrier the U.S.  uses is not the original Brit one either.
 
T-Dog

Reply
 Message 15 of 24 in Discussion 
From: MSN NicknametommytalldogSent: 5/22/2008 9:57 PM
Larry Bell built the Aircobra (piston aircraft)  in his plant in Buffalo during the war.   My mother worked at that plant.   Curtis Wright had a plant there too.
 
T-Dog

Reply
 Message 16 of 24 in Discussion 
From: MSN NicknameHobbs410Sent: 5/23/2008 8:09 AM
Saw an interview with the pilot that flew the ME 262 out of germany to England after the war was over. it provided the allies with lots of useful info.

Reply
 Message 17 of 24 in Discussion 
From: MSN NicknamemajorshrapnelSent: 5/23/2008 1:35 PM
I read a book many years ago on the 262 development. It was a very short lived career for most

Reply
 Message 18 of 24 in Discussion 
From: MSN NicknameFlashman191Sent: 5/23/2008 7:53 PM
Since you have very wide posts again, i cannot find the question.
 
SAAB yes, SAAB Draken And Viggen very good aircraft, only sold to Sweden by law. Swedish design parameters like must fit into road tunnels.
 
 
 
 
Top one Viggen (tufted duck) Bottom Draken.Names have been kept for 30 years.

Reply
 Message 19 of 24 in Discussion 
From: MSN NicknameFlashman191Sent: 5/23/2008 7:56 PM
Above was in answer to PD Quest #13.
 
Incidentally, i try always to answer miliotaria questions so if you'rer missing an answwer, give me a shout on General or whatever.
 
Tiger's complaint about excessive cartoons and, logically, prints, has been noted and rejected.

Reply
 Message 20 of 24 in Discussion 
From: MSN NicknameFlashman191Sent: 5/23/2008 8:02 PM
JimBert
Thought this might fit with your thread.
 
 
In 1969 two ex-Iraqi MiG-17s transferred from Israeli stocks were added to the operation and it was renamed Have Drill. These aircraft were given US designations and fake serial numbers so that they may be identified in DOD standard flight logs. At least one more MIG-21 was captured in Vietnam and a MiG-25 flown by defector Soviet Pilot Viktor Belenko was turned over but had to be sent back. In May 1973, Project Have Idea was formed which took over from the older Have Donut, Have Ferry and Have Drill projects. In July 1975, the 4477th TEF (“Red Eagles�? was formed at Nellis AFB and in December 1977 the 6513th Test Squadron (“Red Hats�? was formed at Edwards AFB to continue testing these craft. Some aggressor training was done where the units went head to head against USAF fighters in mock dogfights at this time to find out and exploit possible weaknesses.
In 1980 the 4477th TEF was made a full-fledged squadron and the operation was renamed again to Constant Peg. It developed realistic combat training operations featuring adversary tactics, dissimilar air combat training, and electronic warfare. Over the years more aircraft were acquired until they numbered about two dozen including ultra modern MiG-23s (designated YF-113s). Egypt was thought to turn over a number of un-needed MiGs but planes kept coming in from other sources as well. No less than three Cuban pilots brought their MiGs to Florida. A number of Chinese made MiGs were purchased outright from China via the front company Combat Core Certification Professionals Company (CCCP!) and imported in crates. Three Syrians flew their MiG-23 and MiG-29s to Turkey in 1988 followed by Soviet Captain Alexander Zuyev in 1989. The first thing Captian Zuyev said after stepping out of the cockpit of his MiG-29 was that: "I'll be an American!"
The American flyers of these aircraft had to contend with un-maintainable and mysterious planes as they had no spare parts or technical manuals available. Ground crews had to resort to reverse engineering aircraft components and manufacturing them from raw materials just to keep them in the air. US pilots found out first hand how dangerous these aircraft were and two lost their lives in catastrophic crashes. They did, however, learn the strengths and weakness of the Warsaw Pact's fast movers and this information would prove to be invaluable to NATO fliers in any sort of East/West engagement. This was proven in air to air combat every time these Soviet Cold War era aircraft have been encountered in Iraq, Libya, Angola and elsewhere

Reply
 Message 21 of 24 in Discussion 
From: MSN NicknameCurliestJimbertSent: 6/5/2008 2:45 AM
A couple of German examples.
Jimbert
 
 
 
 
 
 

Reply
 Message 22 of 24 in Discussion 
From: MSN NicknameFlashman191Sent: 6/5/2008 4:28 PM
At the risk of sounding pedantic, Jimbert, aren't those rocket propelled? Hence no air intakes? (like my Triumph Bonneville)

Reply
 Message 23 of 24 in Discussion 
From: MSN NicknameMarkGB5Sent: 6/5/2008 7:21 PM
Ref # 21. The top picture looks like one of the Thunderbirds aircraft, the big green one.

Reply
 Message 24 of 24 in Discussion 
From: MSN NicknameFlashman191Sent: 6/5/2008 7:40 PM
Well blow me down! And there I was thinking it was the pearl of Nazi research.
 
I'll never be rude about Thunderbirds again.
 
BTW do you remember the space ship Anastasia in Dan Dare? That was based on existing German WW2 technology.
 
 
And this was Digby, Intergalactic fruit.

First  Previous  10-24 of 24  Next  Last 
Return to Militaria Board