MSN Home  |  My MSN  |  Hotmail
Sign in to Windows Live ID Web Search:   
go to MSNGroups 
Free Forum Hosting
 
Important Announcement Important Announcement
The MSN Groups service will close in February 2009. You can move your group to Multiply, MSN’s partner for online groups. Learn More
The History Page[email protected] 
  
What's New
  
  Message Boards  
  For New Members  
  On This Day....  
  General  
  American History  
  Ancient History  
  British History  
  Current Events  
  European History  
  The Civil War  
  War  
  World History  
  Pictures  
    
    
  Links  
  Militaria Board  
  Cars/Motorcycles  
  
  
  Tools  
 
Militaria Board : New Future Cannon
Choose another message board
 
     
Reply
 Message 1 of 10 in Discussion 
From: MSN NicknameBIGSNOWBIRD1  (Original Message)Sent: 5/25/2008 3:10 AM
Saturday, May 24, 2008 7:29 AM


Top Army General Praises New Cannon in Minnesota


MINNEAPOLIS -- The Army's top general said he saw the future when looking at a new artillery vehicle that can hit a target over the horizon while remaining lighter, faster and more fuel efficient than the vehicle it will replace.

Gen. George W. Casey Jr., the Army's chief of staff, examined the so-called non-line-of-sight cannon with Sen. James Inhofe, R-Okla., at Minnesota defense contractor BAE Systems on Friday during a visit Casey said was meant to "check on our future."

The cannon, a two-man combat vehicle with an automated ammunition system that can fire 155 mm projectiles with greater precision than current Army equipment, is part of an Army modernization plan called Future Combat Systems. The Army will formally unveil the cannon next month at its birthday celebration in Washington, D.C.

The Future Combat Systems initiative has been criticized by some members of Congress for delays and escalating costs. But with a cannon prototype to show off, Casey said he hopes to convert the skeptics.

"We're able to demonstrate to people that the Future Combat Systems is real. They've been hearing about it, seeing it on briefing slides for a long time. But Sen. Inhofe and I just saw it drive around the parking lot," Casey said during a roundtable discussion with reporters at BAE Systems, which designed and built the cannon with help from several other contractors.

The cannon is still several years away from being used in combat. Like the other vehicles in the program, it's built on a common chassis that can travel up to about 37 mph. It's much lighter than conventional combat vehicles, with rubber tracks and a compact, hybrid-electric engine.

It can fire six rounds a minute, compared to less than four for current Army artillery units, Casey said. It's been engineered to precisely hit a target up to nearly 19 miles away, which Casey said is important for both urban and rural warfare. It will give U.S. troops a "decisive advantage" over any enemy, he said.

The cannon also takes fewer soldiers to operate because ammunition can be loaded automatically. Comparable vehicles the Army uses require four people, and the soldiers have to handle 100-pound bullets to make it work, said Deepak Bazaz, who helped direct the cannon project for BAE Systems.

"These are getting to be more like aircraft," Bazaz said while showing the vehicle to reporters. "All that automation is back here and the crew is up front controlling it."



First  Previous  2-10 of 10  Next  Last 
Reply
 Message 2 of 10 in Discussion 
From: MSN NicknameFlashman191Sent: 5/25/2008 9:52 AM
Snow
Thanks for that. I'm out for a while now. be back to chat about that.

Reply
 Message 3 of 10 in Discussion 
From: MSN Nickname--sundaySent: 5/25/2008 1:59 PM
I have a question.  Does this new vehicle have rubber tracks because it specifically designed for desert warfare?

Reply
 Message 4 of 10 in Discussion 
From: MSN NicknameFlashman191Sent: 5/25/2008 6:00 PM
No

Reply
 Message 5 of 10 in Discussion 
From: MSN Nickname--sundaySent: 5/25/2008 6:05 PM
Thank you.

Reply
 Message 6 of 10 in Discussion 
From: MSN NicknameHobbs410Sent: 5/26/2008 12:28 AM
I believe rubber would be a detriment in the desert.

Reply
 Message 7 of 10 in Discussion 
From: MSN NicknameMOREREPETESSent: 5/26/2008 3:30 AM
RUBBER WAS USED IN IRAQ BUT IT WORE DOWN FASTER BECAUSE A LOT OF THE DISTANCES TRAVELLED WAS ON HARD SURFACES.(PAVED ROADS) ALSO TRAVELLING AT HIGHER SPEEDS ON HARD SURFACES WOULD ADD GREATLY TO THE WARE. RUBBER PADS OR SHOES CAN BE REPLACED FASTER THAT METAL ONES. PROBABLY LESS WEIGHT ALSO. BOTH HAVE ADVANTAGES AND DISADVANTAGES.

Reply
 Message 8 of 10 in Discussion 
From: MSN NicknamejamestrdSent: 5/26/2008 9:33 PM
ref 6,
 
depends what you use the rubber for.

Reply
 Message 9 of 10 in Discussion 
From: MSN NicknameFlashman191Sent: 5/27/2008 1:59 AM
Stopping the camels getting pregnant.
 
Didn't your White half tracks have rubber tracks?
 
What we are talking about are band tracks looks like this is a set for an M113

Reply
 Message 10 of 10 in Discussion 
From: MSN NicknameFlashman191Sent: 5/27/2008 2:11 AM
Centaur with LR 110 front
 
Centaur land rover used by Omani forces and others.

First  Previous  2-10 of 10  Next  Last 
Return to Militaria Board