MSN Home  |  My MSN  |  Hotmail
Sign in to Windows Live ID Web Search:   
go to MSNGroups 
Free Forum Hosting
 
Important Announcement Important Announcement
The MSN Groups service will close in February 2009. You can move your group to Multiply, MSN’s partner for online groups. Learn More
The History Page[email protected] 
  
What's New
  
  Message Boards  
  For New Members  
  On This Day....  
  General  
  American History  
  Ancient History  
  British History  
  Current Events  
  European History  
  The Civil War  
  War  
  World History  
  Pictures  
    
    
  Links  
  Militaria Board  
  Cars/Motorcycles  
  
  
  Tools  
 
On This Day.... : JOHN LENNON SHOT
Choose another message board
 
     
Reply
 Message 1 of 15 in Discussion 
From: MSN Nicknametommytalldog  (Original Message)Sent: 12/8/2008 8:04 PM
December 8, 1980, John Lennon shot to death outside of  his luxury Dakota Apartment Building in NYC.  Mark David Chapman the culprit did the dirty deed with a .38 cal. snubnose revolver. 
 
T-Dog


First  Previous  2-15 of 15  Next  Last 
Reply
 Message 2 of 15 in Discussion 
From: MSN NicknameMarkGB5Sent: 12/8/2008 9:13 PM
"Shot to death" is a peculiarly American phrase. Shot dead sounds better.

Reply
 Message 3 of 15 in Discussion 
From: MSN Nickname--sundaySent: 12/8/2008 9:23 PM
I think it actually took 5 shots to kill him which is perhaps why the phrase "shot to death" is used.  Generally "shot dead" is used when all it takes is one shot.

Reply
 Message 4 of 15 in Discussion 
From: MSN Nickname-TinCanSent: 12/9/2008 11:47 AM
And if ya really want to get nasty with someone you can of course,"shoot em all to hell", or,"shoot em all to pieces".

Reply
 Message 5 of 15 in Discussion 
From: MSN NicknametommytalldogSent: 12/9/2008 12:52 PM
Shula, it probably only took one shot to kill him but Chapman wanted to make absolutely sure, plus he wanted the notoriety.  Ol Mark (Chapman that is) wasn't quite right, in the head.
 
T-Dog

Reply
 Message 6 of 15 in Discussion 
From: MSN NicknameMarkGB5Sent: 12/9/2008 7:20 PM
Thanks for clarifying which Mark you were referring to.
Hospitalized is another Americanism I can't stand, what's wrong with "sent to hospital" apart from being longer.

Reply
 Message 7 of 15 in Discussion 
From: bowleggedSent: 12/10/2008 3:23 PM
Mark,

It's language evolution in action, right before your very eyes. Shakespeare himself often would turn nouns into verbs - even proper nouns:

"...I would have such a fellow whipped for o'erdoing Termagant; it out-herods Herod: pray you, avoid it."
from Hamlet, Act 3, Scene 2

Reply
 Message 8 of 15 in Discussion 
From: MSN NicknameMarkGB5Sent: 12/10/2008 7:24 PM
But evolving into what ?

Reply
 Message 9 of 15 in Discussion 
From: bowleggedSent: 12/10/2008 8:28 PM
Does it matter? (Don't you just hate it when your question is answered with a question? - I sure do!)

Language evolution is a good thing. It's a sign of an active and dynamic culture. Better an evolving language than a dead one.

Reply
 Message 10 of 15 in Discussion 
From: MSN NicknameBIGSNOWBIRD1Sent: 12/10/2008 10:19 PM
Hay take it easy on Latin Bow.  It could evolve too.

Reply
 Message 11 of 15 in Discussion 
From: MSN NicknamemajorshrapnelSent: 12/11/2008 4:31 PM
I totally agree Bow, a language must always continue to grow and evolve, because if it doesn't, what will it become?....... French.

Reply
 Message 12 of 15 in Discussion 
From: MSN NicknameFirstflashman1Sent: 12/13/2008 11:03 AM
Rabbi, why do you always answer a question with a question?
Vell, vy not?

Reply
 Message 13 of 15 in Discussion 
From: MSN NicknameFirstflashman1Sent: 12/13/2008 11:04 AM
We Parkerise weapons.......But do you Durex your victims?

Reply
 Message 14 of 15 in Discussion 
From: MSN NicknametommytalldogSent: 12/13/2008 2:04 PM
Answering a question with a question is part of the Reid Interrogation technique of which I am a graduate.  Reid is now Wicklander who is based in Chicago of all places & is not associated with any of our current members with the same surname.  Answering a question with a question is termed as "giving answers indicative of deception."  Example:
 
Suspect:  "Why would I steal that merchandise, I have lots of money in my purse to pay for it?"
Interrogator:  "I am glad you told me that, cause that means this was a spur of the moment decision & you are really a good person."
 
The purpose is the interrogator gets to the level of the suspect to make it easier for him/her to confess their evil crimes.
 
Detective T-Dog

Reply
 Message 15 of 15 in Discussion 
From: MSN NicknamemajorshrapnelSent: 12/13/2008 9:52 PM
You lost me half way through the first sentence Tom.

First  Previous  2-15 of 15  Next  Last 
Return to On This Day....