MSN Home  |  My MSN  |  Hotmail
Sign in to Windows Live ID Web Search:   
go to MSNGroups 
Free Forum Hosting
 
Important Announcement Important Announcement
The MSN Groups service will close in February 2009. You can move your group to Multiply, MSN’s partner for online groups. Learn More
The History Page[email protected] 
  
What's New
  
  Message Boards  
  For New Members  
  On This Day....  
  General  
  American History  
  Ancient History  
  British History  
  Current Events  
  European History  
  The Civil War  
  War  
  World History  
  Pictures  
    
    
  Links  
  Militaria Board  
  Cars/Motorcycles  
  
  
  Tools  
 
The Civil War : Cold Harbour
Choose another message board
 
     
Reply
 Message 1 of 10 in Discussion 
From: MSN NicknameCurliestJimbert  (Original Message)Sent: 4/21/2007 8:52 AM
Who was to blame for the debacle of Cold Harbour. Grant or Meade?
Jimbert


First  Previous  2-10 of 10  Next  Last 
Reply
 Message 2 of 10 in Discussion 
From: MSN NicknameCurliestJimbertSent: 4/22/2007 2:34 AM
Does anybody know who Grant and Meade were??
Jimbert

Reply
 Message 3 of 10 in Discussion 
From: MSN Nickname--sundaySent: 4/22/2007 4:14 AM
Gen. Grant took the blame for the debacle when he wrote in his memoirs that the attack on Cold Harbour was the only one he regretted ordering.  However, Gen. Meade's performance was poor and he must take some of the blame for the loss of this battle.
 
Despite the heavy Union losses and the loss of the battle, Gen. Lee was trapped after this point in the war. 
 
sunday

Reply
 Message 4 of 10 in Discussion 
From: MSN NicknameFlashman8Sent: 4/22/2007 8:22 PM
Sunday is a crawler and teacher's pet.
 
Oh yes! Oh Yes! Please sir, I know who Meade and Grant were! Flashy's not paying any attention,  bullying the 1st Formers or smoking in the Senior bogs!
 
  
 
Molesworth Flash

Reply
 Message 5 of 10 in Discussion 
From: MSN Nickname--sundaySent: 4/22/2007 10:07 PM
Mr. Jimbert!  Mr. Jimbert!  Flashman is bullying me again!
 
little sunday

Reply
 Message 6 of 10 in Discussion 
From: MSN NicknameCurliestJimbertSent: 4/22/2007 10:21 PM
He is just preparing you for the wicked world we live in. If you learn from him, there is a profitable form of employment you can undertake, involving bullying teachers, whilst wearing your school uniform.
I asked about Cold Harbour as an indication of then and now.
7000 Union soldiers lost there life there in a couple of hours. More than Iraq in four years.
Jimbert

Reply
The number of members that recommended this message. 0 recommendations  Message 7 of 10 in Discussion 
Sent: 4/22/2007 10:34 PM
This message has been deleted by the author.

Reply
 Message 8 of 10 in Discussion 
From: MSN Nickname--sundaySent: 4/22/2007 10:49 PM
The death toll reached approximately 618,000 by the end of the Civil War.
 
sunday

Reply
 Message 9 of 10 in Discussion 
From: MSN NicknameCurliestJimbertSent: 4/23/2007 3:54 AM
From what I have read about Meade, it seems he was more concerned about his public image than the welfare of his men.
Jimbert

Reply
 Message 10 of 10 in Discussion 
From: MSN NicknameTheUsualSuspect6168Sent: 4/25/2008 12:19 PM
7000 Union soldiers lost there life there in a couple of hours. More than Iraq in four years.
 
An historian named Gordon Rhea has spent years researching and writing about Grant's 1864 Overland Campaign and has published at 4 books on the subject.  His book on Cold Harbor has come up with a much different figure, no more than 3,000 or 4,000 total Union casualties for the entire day of June 1st which includes the charges and the preliminaries.  When compared with Lee's casualties at battles like Antietam or Chancellorsville or Gettysburg, it's clear that the Cold Harbor attack was not the disaster history has portrayed it as.

First  Previous  2-10 of 10  Next  Last 
Return to The Civil War