|
|
Reply
| | From: PDQuest (Original Message) | Sent: 5/21/2008 2:35 PM |
Are you aware that MSN group. Southern History and Topics has gone into hiding? That is, only accepted members can read their message board. I asked about this at Mason Dixon chat Forum, but my message was deleted by the management. Should we 2008 pro-Unionist celebrate this as a victory since we have driven them from the battlefiled and back into their fortress? |
|
Reply
| |
Usual Suspect Your billet doux to Lew #30 I had replied on his behalf with an incredible foul-mouthed rejoinder, but I was told you are in fact an OK guy and your cheque's in the post. Lew ain't that well at the moment, so don't badger if he takes a while to reply, please. Cheers Peter |
|
Reply
| |
Who was that huge indian that played the chief in One Flew Over The Cuckoo's Nest? And then there is Wes Studi an ugly man but a handsome indian. T-Dog |
|
Reply
| |
That was Will Sampson, T-dog, who played Chief {something} in the movie. |
|
Reply
| |
This message has been deleted due to termination of membership. |
|
Reply
| |
THERE ARE MORE AND MORE CANADIAN NATIVES TAKING UP ACTING. TWO OR THREE HAD PARTS IN DANCES WITH WOLVES. THEY NOW HAVE THEIR OWN TV STATION. GRAHAM GREENE IS ONE OF THEM WHO PLAYED IN DANCES WITH WOLVES THUNDER HEART, MAVERICK, POWWOW HIGHWAY. SEEN HERE ON THE LEFT. |
| |
Reply
| |
This message has been deleted by the author. |
|
Reply
| |
PDQ I cannot understand your gloating about SH&T because I have been accepted for membership within 5 minutes of applying. I want to talk about their weapons smuggling hisdtory. If there's nothing there I'll leave. But acceptance in fact has been faster than HWP |
|
Reply
| |
re#30, I've posted the answer to that question many times on many different occasions. Look them up if you're really interested or ignore them if you're not. Either way works for me. |
|
Reply
| |
Lew I get the same sensation waiting for answers from PDQ. He's got to consult with the politburo first |
|
Reply
| |
I've posted the answer to that question many times on many different occasions. Look them up if you're really interested or ignore them if you're not. Well I'm a comparative newcomer to this site, so I haven't had the advantage of reading your past posts. How about indulging me just this once? |
|
Reply
| |
Do your own research. I have. That's what made me question your statement in the first place. I was just wondering what you had to back it up. |
|
Reply
| |
Suspect, do you not understand the difference between 'for' and 'of' ? The root causes OF all Wars are Political Power and Money (Wealth) but since no-one will fight for those, you must have causes FOR the War, and Slavery was only one such, and a minor one at that. It is considered important now because it is politically popular (since the civil rights era) to do so but if you study the treatment of blacks in the Northern & border States you'll see that few if any whites gave a damn about blacks being enslaved. The Noble Cause the Northern States mustered their militias for was, first & foremost, Preservation of the Union while the South rallied to States Rights and defending their sacred soil from Yankee invaders. |
|
|
|