you say tomayto, I say tomawto.....!!!
I SAY COLOUR, YOU SHOULD SAY COLOUR.
BACK TO YOUR #38 AND MARKS#41 CATFISH.
agree in having safeguards to protect ourselves and that other countries should have the same. However, if a country says blatantly that their policy is to destroy and conquer another, that is a horse of another color I would imagine.
FIRST,
agree in having safeguards to protect ourselves and that other countries should have the same.
DOES THIS PART APPLY TO NORTH KOREA AND THEIR DISCISION TO PROTECT THEMSELVES WITH A NUKE BOMBS LIKE AMERICA HAS..??
SECOND,
However, if a country says blatantly that their policy is to destroy and conquer another, that is a horse of another color I would imagine.
DOES THIS MEAN THAT ANY COUNTRY CAN ATTACK THEM AFTER THIS STATMENT OR JUST THE COUNTRY THAT IS BEING THREATENED.??
THIRD,
What about the fact that often one country may initiate attack on the premise that they " suppose " that country will use its weapons of destruction on another country....?
DID NOT JAPAN USE THIS REASONING AFTER BEING BLOCKAGED BY THE WEST TO ATTACK THE STATES ALSO USED BY AMERICA TO INVADE IRAQ.
DO YOU HAVE
COLOURED HORSES??