MSN Home  |  My MSN  |  Hotmail
Sign in to Windows Live ID Web Search:   
go to MSNGroups 
Free Forum Hosting
 
Important Announcement Important Announcement
The MSN Groups service will close in February 2009. You can move your group to Multiply, MSN’s partner for online groups. Learn More
The Peaceful OasisContains "mature" content, but not necessarily adult.[email protected] 
  
What's New
  
  Happy New Year!!  
  Merry Christmas!!  
  Starting/Welcome Page  
  Christmas Music  
  Christmas and Holiday Threads  
  member profiles  
  Message Archives  
  Search This Site  
  OASIS RADIO ROOM  
  Music Lyrics  
  POEM OF THE WEEK!  
  YOUR VOTE COUNTS!  
  Rate This Community!  
  Name Signatures  
  GAME PAGE  
  Creative Spirits  
  Message Board  
  Links  
  IN MEMORY OF....  
  Pictures  
  LINKS!!!!!  
  Banner Exchange  
    
    
  USEFUL ARTICLES  
  Happy Birthday!  
  Depression Info  
  Medical Info  
  Ecards Etc..  
  Holiday Page  
  Managers Page  
  backrounds 1  
  my critters  
  religious backrounds  
  music  
  Search This Site  
  test  
  backrounds 2  
  my backrounds  
  In Memory Of Tiger  
  In Memory Of Oreo  
  Animal Backgrounds  
  In Memory Of Teddy  
  
  
  Tools  
 
natural medicine : Creativity and the Troubled Mind
Choose another message board
 
     
Reply
 Message 1 of 8 in Discussion 
From: 2many  (Original Message)Sent: 3/26/2003 3:59 PM

Home: Articles: Bipolar: Creativity and the Troubled Mind

Creativity and the Troubled Mind

by Constance Holden

"The mind is its own place, and of itself
Can make a Heaven of Hell, a Hell of Heaven.":

So wrote John Milton in PARADISE LOST. Whether or not he suffered from an emotional disorder, Milton sounds like a man who knew firsthand the torments and elations of severe mood swings. If so, he was not unusual. Speculation on a connection between art and madness has gone on since the ancient Greeks. Now, a small handful of modern studies indicates there may be something to it. In particular, they indicate a striking association between creativity and manic depression, or bipolar illness. The phenomenon appears especially pronounced among writers, particularly poets.

Twentieth-century American poets have supplied poignant evidence for this. Some of the best known -- Robert Lowell, Delmore Schwartz, Randall Jarrell and Theodore Roethke -- were diagnosed as manic- depressive or had histories of such behavior. Quite a few, including John Berryman, Sylvia Plath and Anne Sexton, committed suicide.

Full-blown cases of manic-depression are characterized by episodes of uncontrollable hyperactivity, often accompanied by grandiose delusions, and longer periods of incapacitating, and often suicidal depression. The genetic component is strong: Among identical twins, whether or not they were raised together, if one twin has the illness, the other is 80 percent likely to suffer from it. Manic depression afflicts at least 1 percent of the population, and, in contrast to most mental illnesses, the rate is considerably higher in the upper social and economic classes.

Psychiatrist Nancy C. Andreasen of the University of Iowa College of Medicine is the first investigator to have used modern psychiatric diagnostic criteria to explore the relationship between mental illness and creativity. In the early 1970s, Andreasen completed a study of 15 topflight American writers at the prestigious University of Iowa Writers' Workshop and compared them with others matched for age, education and sex. Ten of the writers had histories of mood disorders, compared with only two from the comparison group. Two of the 10 were diagnosed as manic-depressive, and almost all reported mood swings, including manic or hypomanic (mildly manic) states.

Andreasen has continued the study during the past 15 years, expanding the sample of writers to 30. According to a recent report, the proportion of writers treated for mood disorders has increased to 80 percent, compared to 30 percent of the comparison group. Forty- three percent of the writers had some degree of manic-depressive illness, as compared with 10 percent of the others. Alcoholism, which is very high among sufferers of manic-depression, afflicted 30 percent of the writers and 7 percent of the comparison group. Two of the 30 committed suicide during the 15 years of the study. ":Issues of statistical significance pale before the clinical implications of this fact,": Andreasen says.

The data on the writers lend weight to the finding of a 1983 investigation conducted in England by psychologist Kay R. Jamison of the University of California, Los Angeles. Jamison surveyed 47 of the top British artists and writers, questioning them about their mood states and their treatment history.

Thirty-eight percent of the total had sought treatment for mood disorders -- a rate of about 30 times that of the general population. Writers experienced the most problems, and of these, poets topped the list -- with half od them reporting psychiatric intervention (drugs and/or hospitalization) for depression and/or mania. Almost two-thirds of the playwrights had been treated for mood disorders, mainly with psychotherapy. The rate for biographers was 20 percent, and for artists the incidence was 13 percent.

One-third of the 47 reported that they suffered from severe mood swings, particularly the poets and novelists. Jamison reports that the biographers, the least likely to be associated with ":creative fire,": reported no history of mood swings or elated states.

More data on contemporary artists may be forthcoming from a study being conducted in Paris involving exhaustive personal interviews with about 50 artists, writers and musicians.

Psychiatrist Hagop S. Akiskal of the University of Tennessee is collaborating in this study, which will compare information from recognized creative individuals with that from a comparison group matched for age, sex, background and achievement in nonartistic areas.

Akiskal has already looked at 750 of his patients in the U.S. who are diagnosed with depression, manic-depression and schizophrenia to see if any subgroups showed different levels of creativity. He found those with sever manic-depression showed high rates of antisocial behavior, including violent crimes. But among those with more moderate versions of the illness, he found that 9 to 10 percent were creative artists and writers.

Although most investigators believe that creative achievement occurs despite, not because of, emotional illness, Jamison says that ":intense creative episodes are, in many instances, indistinguishable from hypomania.": The similarities suggest that mild mania can supply intense energy as well as a way of seeing reality that, filtered through a creative mind and a discerning intellect, can be highly conducive to artistic productivity.

There are many elements that mood states have in common, sometimes including a sense of spiritual enlightenment that is reminiscent of certain mystical states. Some other commonalities are:

  • Emotional Reactivity. Both artists and manic-depressives tend to be highly sensitive to stimuli both from the outside and from within. Andreasen calls this an ":extremely fine-tuned": nervous system, sensitive to a wide range of stimuli, including pain. She has speculated that this results from ":input dysfunction": or ":a defect in the cognitive mechanisms which filter stimuli.":
  • Disihibition. Psychologist Ralph Tarter of the University of Pittsburgh says a ":fundamental breakdown in inhibitory mechanisms": is characteristic of most psychopathological conditions. This breakdown, which can also be stimulated by alcohol or drugs, leads to farfetched connections, and -- as is true in many artists -- easier access to unconscious material. Manic thinking flows freely, and includes man loose and novel associations.
  • Absorption. Hypomania is associated with superior powers of concentration. Harvard neurologist G. Robert DeLong, who studies children with early signs of manic-depression, says that these children have significantly richer imaginations than most. They show an ":unusual intensity of focus": when engaged in creative tasks, which results in impressive feats of memory and highly detailed drawings. They can become lost in fantasies for hours on end.

What of the emotionally ill -- are they more creative than average? There is only one modern study that explores this connection, conducted in Denmark by psychiatrist Ruth L. Richards and psychologist Dennis R. Kinney of Harvard Medical School's McLean Hospital. Richard's and Kinney's subjects were 17 manic-depressives, 16 cyclothymics (who suffer from milder forms of the illness) and 11 of their relatives with no psychiatric history. Of 33 people studied for comparison, 15 were illness-free, while the other carried other psychiatric diagnoses. Creativity was assessed by evaluating individuals' jobs and avocational activities.

The researchers found that creativity was significantly higher among the study subjects -- manic-depressives, cyclothymics and their relatives -- than among the comparison group. Cyclothymics and relatives of manic-depressives showed the highest levels of creativity. The researchers' conclusion: "Creativity can be enhanced, on the average, in subjects showing milder and perhaps 'subclinical' expressions of potential bipolar liability."

<BP>From these studies it appears that a tendency toward manic- depression may facilitate access, in creative individuals, to a richness and intensity of experience that is not shared by the rest of us. More systematic investigation into their mental troubles would perhaps give us a less romanticized view of geniuses, but it would add to our understanding of how the morbid and the extreme among us have enlarged our perceptions of reality.

Reprinted from Psychology Today, April, 1987
©1987 Psychology Today

Modified December 25, 2002



First  Previous  2-8 of 8  Next  Last 
Reply
 Message 2 of 8 in Discussion 
From: *2many*Sent: 5/6/2003 1:58 AM
**************

January 9, 1990.  I'm on my second day of no sleep and I actually feel great.
I'm running on fumes with the nutritional support of Diet Coke, coffee, and
Hostess powdered-sugar doughnuts.

In the middle of the night, hunched over my computer, with the rest of the
house dark and quiet, I feel a certain moral superiority to the sleeping world.  ///

January 14,1990.  There is something about flying through time, as I have over
the past week, that makes me think that I am exempted from the laws of gravity.

But the way I feel today lets me know that I'm not. I have done another of the
crash-and-burns that are the price for my blitzes. I am grounded, heavy, and slow.

I have overdosed on effort, and the hangover is horrible. I guess this is what I get
for flying too close to the sun. Unfortunately, I never remember this part when I am aloft.

   excerpt from Martha Manning Undercurrents : A Life Beneath the Surface

Martha Manning.  Undercurrents : A Life Beneath the Surface
[reader review:] "38 year old wife/mom/psychotherapist/writer shares her journal, which details
her descent into depression, her encounters with therapists, her eventual hospitalization and in-patient
ECT therapy... and her slow climb from numbness back to the realm of the living, able to appreciate
and enjoy what life has to offer.

~ ~ ~


Reply
The number of members that recommended this message. 0 recommendations  Message 3 of 8 in Discussion 
Sent: 5/6/2003 1:59 AM
This message has been deleted by the manager or assistant manager.

Reply
 Message 4 of 8 in Discussion 
From: *2many*Sent: 5/6/2003 2:00 AM
Marijuana, acid, cocaine, pharmaceuticals -- [Carrie Fisher] tried them all. Being on the manic side of bipolar disorder, her drug use was a way to "dial down" the manic in her. In some respects it was a form of self-medication.

"Drugs made me feel more normal," she says. "They contained me. So maybe I was taking drugs to keep the monster in the box." ...  She eventually found a psychiatrist, proper medication, and a support group for manic depressives.  ...

Fisher has two moods, Roy the manic extrovert and Pam the quiet introvert. "Roy decorated my house and Pam has to live in it," she quips.

from article: "Carrie Fisher" by Lybi Ma, Psychology Today, Dec. 2001


  books:

her autobiographical novel: Carrie Fisher. Postcards from the Edge

related book: Sisters of the Extreme: Women Writing on the Drug Experience, Including Charlotte Bronte,
Louisa May Alcott, Anais Nin, Maya Angelou, Billie Holiday, Nina Hagen, Carrie Fisher, and Others
by Michael Horowitz, editor

related page:  addictions

~ ~ ~ ~

Reply
 Message 5 of 8 in Discussion 
From: *2many*Sent: 5/6/2003 2:09 AM
Quotes XVII

Quotations about
GENIUS, TALENT and CREATIVITY

LIKE PSYCHOSIS AND CRIMINALITY, GENIUS HAS LATELY BEEN LINKED BY HANS EYSENCK TO HIS DIMENSION OF 'PSYCHOTICISM'-THUS REVIVING THE TRADITION OF THINKING GENIUS A FORM FRUSTE OF MADNESS. HERE THE POSSIBILITIES ARE INDICATED FOR UNDERSTANDING GENIUS IN TERMS OF PSYCHOTICISM, NEUROTICISM AND ALSO THE OTHER DIMENSIONS FROM THE 'BIG FIVE-OR-SIX' OF MODERN PSYCHOMETRIC PSYCHOLOGY. EVIDENTLY GENIUS (ESPECIALLY ARTISTIC GENIUS) IS ASSOCIATED WITH AN ABOVE-AVERAGE LEVEL OF PSYCHOLOGICAL DISTURBANCE-THOUGH IN COMBINATION WITH HIGH GENERAL INTELLIGENCE. ANECDOTALLY, 'WILL', 'CONSCIENCE' AND 'AFFECTION' SEEM ELEVATED IN ASSOCIATION WITH GENIUS; BUT THE INVOLVEMENT OF (SEXUAL) 'ENERGY' REMAINS A MATTER OF LIVELY DISPUTE. AS TO THE ORIGINS OF GENIUS, AVAILABLE EVIDENCE PROVIDES A SEVERE TEST FOR SOCIAL-ENVIRONMENTALIST BELIEFS, YET AT THE SAME TIME A FIRM ASSERTION OF THE IMPORTANCE OF THE MILIEU (OR MICRO-ENVIRONMENT) THAT BUDDING GENIUSES HELP CREATE FOR THEMSELVES IN INTERACTION WITH OTHERS.


A
century ago, the romantic individualism of the Victorians furnished exotic accounts of the existence, nature and origin of genius. Theorizing was especially enlivened by the linking of genius to madness. With syphilis an irremediable scourge, with alcoholism at higher levels than today, with 'hard' and 'soft' drugs legally available, and without today's major tranquillizers, there were many well-publicized careers of artistic 'degeneration'.
That the mid-twentieth century took a more subdued and pragmatic view of high human gifts had a little to do with psychology. The 1930's discoveries that Terman's 'gifted children' (having IQ's over 140) enjoyed relatively good physical and mental health tended at first to be interpreted as falsifying the 'mad genius' story. Additionally, historians of science became aware of the importance to discovery and invention of the milieu within which several 'workers' might come up with the needed breakthroughs at around the same time-thus de-emphasizing wholly individual factors. (Naturally, some enthusiasts extrapolated wildly to draw the conclusion that genius 'does not really exist'-except in some egalitarian sense in which 'we can all be geniuses.')
Only by way of criticism of IQ-type tests did a new hypothetical 'personality' correlate of high achievement present itself in the 1960's. The new trait involved tests on which testees had to produce many possible answers- e.g. 'words beginning with the letters sh...' Louis Thurstone had called such tests measures of fluency in the 1930's; but what they measured came to be called 'creativity' in the 1960's even though it soon proved markedly less predictive of real-life creativity than was boring old IQ. Just as disappointing to critics of IQ, and unremarkable to the London School, explanations of the origins of child prodigy and later genius proved hard to find-except via IQ, via exceptional performers having had rather odd parents and home lives, and via mathematical genius having a very modest association with myopia and left-handedensss (e.g. Brand, 1991, Person.& Indiv.Diffs.).
Today, partly because of the availability of more penetrating-or at least more frank and sexually explicit-biographies, opinion may be swinging back towards acknowledging the sheer libido, obsessionality, independence-of-mind, exquisite sensitivity and, above all, radical individuality that seem such astonishing features of the lives of many highly gifted and high-achieving people. Once more, the relatively frequent occurrence of mental illness, personal unhappiness, moodiness and alcoholism-at least in the lives of writers and artists-is being recognized (e.g. Kaye Jamison, 1995, Scientific American; Hans Eysenck, 1995, Genius, CUP).
It might be thought that the link between artistic excellence and emotionality (or neuroticism) would lead to over-representation of women in the ranks of artistic genius; but this is presumably prevented by the higher male standard deviation for general intelligence that produces a 1.4-to-1 male-to-female ratio in the range above IQ 140-as also below IQ 60-and by women's special involvement in child-care. On its own, the wider range of male intelligence levels yields an especially impressive 47-to-1 male-female ratio at above IQ 175 (The Times, 7 viii 1984, A. & E.Hendrickson, interviewed by D.Spanier)-i.e. in the range where the best-agreed geniuses of the past seem to fall {see Block (vii) of the present Quotes}. [In addition, Lynn (1994, Person.&Indiv.Diffs.) has claimed from modern Wechsler data that adult males are actually some three or four IQ points higher than females. Lynn points out that the equality of the sexes which Burt first remarked (on Binet's tests) has always been based chiefly on data from children tested early in adolescence-when girls may be have caught up temporarily with boys because of their earlier final growth spurts. However, Lynn's claim may involve post hoc concentration on unrepresentative data and is certainly contested by Mackintosh (1996, J.Biosoc. Sci.)}
Genius probably involves experience of a wide range of moods, problems and ways of looking at problems; and the more 'negative' (dystonic or dysthymic) moods (depression, anxiety, hostility, and boredom / fatigue) are sometimes experienced by artists with terrifying profundity. Moreover, some gifted people seem to manage to combine positive traits that appear to be unattainable 'opposites' for people of lesser intelligence: for example, as the Quotes mention, Tolstoy (perhaps the world's greatest novelist) combined formidable energy (including sexual energy-at age 80 he still prayed for relief) with a punishing work schedule; and ferocious determination and independence-of-mind with a touching tender-mindedness of both sensitivity and opinionation.
If only one could be more impressed by the efforts of psychologists in all this! In fairness, Sir Cyril Burt put his finger on the central phenomenon: the skewed, J-shaped distribution of high achievements-making it likely that many factors 'interact' (e.g. multiplicatively) to yield genius as a highly individual, 'idiographic' and non-transmissible quality. Yet no psychologist so far seems to have tried out even the pretty obvious idea of accounting for real-life creativity-at least in the arts-as a multiplicative interaction of g and n.
{See Quotes II, III and XI for wider consideration of the contributions of idiographic features, personality dimensions, and general intelligence respectively. The particular personality features of 'neuroticism' and 'psychoticism' are examined in Quotes XIV and XV.}



Reply
 Message 6 of 8 in Discussion 
From: 2manySent: 7/27/2003 7:45 PM

Reply
 Message 7 of 8 in Discussion 
From: 2manySent: 11/22/2003 4:17 AM
 

Reply
 Message 8 of 8 in Discussion 
From: overSent: 4/9/2005 10:04 PM
Lots of good stuff here, though it hurts to read it......thanks for having it here!

First  Previous  2-8 of 8  Next  Last 
Return to natural medicine