WHEN THEY DELEGATED PRESIDENT THEODORE ROOSEVELT
to "arbitrate" a Peace Treaty between Russia and Japan ...
This was the first time the International Bankers had used
their friend Theodore, but it was by no means the last time.
It was also during these proceedings that Theodore entered into
a "secret" agreement with Japan (see Mussey's American History
1942 ed. page 566) , an agreement so secret that even American
statesmen knew nothing about it until years later.
(See also Smssey's History, page 560-565.)
-But here we are ahead of our story, so let's return to that
fateful year 1890 when the International Bankers first began
their plans to remove German and American
competition.
The question which then troubled them was, which of the two nations
should be attacked frist, but having had some experience
in attacking America, in 1776 and 1812, they quickly and wisely
decided to center their first attack upon Germany:
And to this end in 1900 they set out to secure allies to
"aid" them with the fighting. Aware that France was still suffering
as a result of the German defeat at Sedan in 1870; and that
France had long desired to seize and colonize Morocco
just across the Mediterranean; and remembering finally
that Frence ambitions in Morocco had long been thwarted
by Great Britain; the Bankers now planned to give Morocco to France,
in return for a French pledge to join England in a later attack upon Germany.
-
The Bankers were well aware of the risk they here assumed
for a "colonized" Morocco would not only double the economic
and military strength of France
but would bring this revitalized France
right next door to British possessions in Egypt and the Sudan.
-
Moreover the gift of Morocco to France would not only be resisted
by Spain and Morocco but might be resisted by both Germany and Italy.
But since their European market was at stake and their World Plan
endangered, they were forced to assume these risks;
and so in 1904 the secret treaty for the theft of Morocco
was duly signed by France and England . .
.
And you may be sure that here as in the treaty between Theodore
and Japan, the PEOPLE of the countries involved had no knowledge
of the Secret Treaty . . . That Spain made no open resistance
to the French-English plot against her holdings in Morocco, is
understood when we remember that Spain had just lost her financial,
economic and military power in the Spanish-American War;
Nor did Morocco have the resources for successful resistance.
-
But as the International Bankers had foreseen, Germany
DID resent the French-English plot and for a good reason . . .
For more than twenty years prior to 1904, almost all
of the hydro-electric, sanitary and railroad equipment installed
in Morocco had come from Germany and had been paid for
with the surplus products of Morocco . . . As in our own case,
this
"trade and barter" carried on without borrowed Capital had been
highly profitable to both countries and particularly to Morocco:
And as a by-product of this trade a strong friendship had grown up
between the German Kaiser and the Sultan of Morocco.
Therefore when in 1905 it was clear that the French-English plot
would deprive both German and Morocco of their profitable trade,
the Kaiser visited the Sultan and urged the Moroccan monarch
to resist the French and English. Sorrowfully the Sultan replied
that he could not resist; he was surrounded on all sides
by French and English military and naval strength.
...But the Kaiser COULD do something about it and he did:
He demanded that German trade still have free passage into
and out of Morocco (And had this been then agreed to Morocco
would never have become a French colony and France might then
have hesitated to join England in a war against
Germany.)
So at the suggestion of the International Bankers,
the matter was referred to arbitration.
But what nation or monarch in Europe could arbitrate such a matter
when they were all financially interested in the outcome?
For this question the International Bankers had been waiting
and they at once proposed Theodore Roosevelt as arbitrator,
since he, they said, had no interest in the outcome.
In 1906 Theodore made his report and as you have already guessed
his report was in favor of France and England and against Germany.
(Mussey's History, p. 575.)
...Aware at last that he had been tricked, the Kaiser again
demanded that Moroccan ports be kept open to German shipping;
and since neither France nor England were then ready for their war,
they were forced to submit. Out of that affair only one nation
came forth as victor, and that was England; for she had won
permanently, French support for her coming war;
and of equal importance for the success of that war,
she had won for the second time the support of Theodore Roosevelt,
who two years later would appear for the third time
as a friend of the International Bankers.