MSN Home  |  My MSN  |  Hotmail
Sign in to Windows Live ID Web Search:   
go to MSNGroups 
Free Forum Hosting
 
Important Announcement Important Announcement
The MSN Groups service will close in February 2009. You can move your group to Multiply, MSN’s partner for online groups. Learn More
World Citizens' Concerns[email protected] 
  
What's New
  
  Home Page  
  Discussions  
  Pictures  
  Recommendations  
  Chat Schedule  
  HAL's science Q&As & MoreLinks  
  member profile  
  Some more links  
  MoreLinks  
  Hallinks  
  Say Again  
  NewsLinks  
  Messages from Management  
  Tried & True  
  Tried & Hung  
  BOOKS  
  Other Quotes  
  Documents  
  more links  
  Docs2  
  Yes MoreLinks  
  MJ12  
  medical  
  science  
  Media  
  MindControl  
  StrangeUniverse  
  Yes, It's A Conspiracy!  
  government  
  The Montauk Project  
  YahooGroups  
  msnCommunities  
  UpdatedLinks  
  Independence Day  
  NewLinks  
  LINKSpg10  
  Post A Link  
  More Books  
  From Judy  
  
  
  Tools  
 
All Message Boards : All Over Again -- The International Banking Conspiracy and U.S. Presidents Who
Choose another message board
 
     
Reply
Recommend  Message 1 of 3 in Discussion 
From: MSN NicknameHAL838  (Original Message)Sent: 12/16/2008 3:49 PM


http://groups.yahoo.com/group/NewWorldOrderWhistleBlowers2

--- On Mon, 12/15/08, Don Stacey <[email protected]> wrote:


Here is the second half of T.W.Hughes pamphlet which has been transcribed onto the internet by an individual. Previously, you have seen the first five installments. The remainder will be serialized starting with this one.

Don Stacey


All Over Again -- The International Banking Conspiracy
and U.S. Presidents Who Advanced It (1944) 

Part 2:
CHINA'S BOXER REBELLION TRAPS RUSSIA
 
   In 1890 the International Bankers began work on a secondary plan
to remove the barrier which blocked the progress of their World Plan;
the barrier of German and American competition. 
 
And the question which then concerned them was, which nation
should they attack first, and how?  But before they could take
their first steop toward their secondary plan, a new danger
confronted them in China where their third best market
was endangered by the Boxer Rebellion
 
...  Now a "rebellion" is usually the uprising of a people against
their own goverment, but this Boxer Rebellion was directed
against foreign governments (Chiefly England) which had been
exploiting the Chinese people.  This rebellion must be put down
or another great market for English goods and capital would be lost. 
But how could the International Bankers employ England's army
and Navy in China, when that army and navy
would soon be needed to regain her market in Europe?
 
The answer was both simple and typical:
they would get some other nation to do the fighting;
so they hurriedly signed a commercial treaty with Japan by which
British rights of extra-territoriality in Japan were abolished, and Japan
given the money and machinery necessary for a war against China. 
-
This war which began in 1894 soon liquidated what remained
of the Boxer rebellion, and what was almost equally important,
gave Korea to Japan; thus making Japanese military power
a new and dangerous threat to Russia,
AND TO A TRANS-SIBERAIN RAILROAD
then being considered by Russia and China 
...  It will be remembered that since the days of Peter the Great,
Russia had attempted to modernize and take her place among
the industrial nations of the West: 
 
But as Peter the Great and a dozen later monarchs had realized,
Russia could never become a great power until she could first
secure passage for her shipping through the Dardanelles
and into the Mediterranean and the Atlantic. 
But for two hundred years Turkey, backed by English naval
and military power had defeated the dozen attempts made by Russia
to secure this all-the-year passage to the Seven Seas. 
 
Thus, when in 1877 the English army and navy again came
to Turkey's aid and drove the Russian armies back from Constantinopel,
the Russian Czar realized that some other method
of solving Russia's shipping problem must be developed.  .
... To this end in 1879 the Czar proposed a military alliance with
France in the West, and similar alliances to the nations of the Balkans. 
-
Through it was some years before these alliances were achieved
the danger from such alliances was immediately apparent
to Germany, Austria and Italy, and these three nations
in 1883 formed what was later known as The Triple Alliance. 
 
For some years thereafter England approved of this Triple Alliance
since it caused France to seek England's friendship in the West;
and also weakened Russia in Asia and Siberia.  At this time
in 1890 Russia was preparing to begin the Siberian Railroad
which would give Russia an all-the-year port on the Pacific. 
But for two reasons England did not want this railroad built. 
-
Frist, because Russia since 1880 had been following America's
example of using German machines and chemicals for the building
of a Russian Industrial system; and though Russian Industry
would not endanger English Industry and Commerce
so long as Russian products were sold within the Empire,
those products would become a menace and particularly in China,
with the building of the Siberian Railroad ...
 
...England's second reason for opposing Russian expansion
was the fact that if Russia grew too strong it would be difficult
and more expensive later, when England would propose
a military alliance with Russia and France, against Germany.
 
...But as the records show, England was not able to prevent
the building of the Trans-Siberian railroad, and because of her failure
England was later compelled to use both War and Bribes
to bring Russia into the Triple Entent.
 
...Thus in 1897 the International Bankers made their first move
to entrap Russia when Japan adopted THE GOLD STANDARD: 
Five years later they made their next move,
and in 1904 Japan attacked Russia. 
Fifteen months later when the Russian Fleet had been destroyed
and the Russian armies annihilated, the Bankers made their third move,
 




First  Previous  2-3 of 3  Next  Last 
Reply
Recommend  Message 2 of 3 in Discussion 
From: MSN NicknameHAL838Sent: 12/20/2008 9:20 PM


http://groups.yahoo.com/group/NewWorldOrderWhistleBlowers2

--- On Fri, 12/19/08, Don Stacey <[email protected]> wrote:





WHEN THEY DELEGATED PRESIDENT THEODORE ROOSEVELT 
to "arbitrate" a Peace Treaty between Russia and Japan ... 
This was the first time the International Bankers had used
their friend Theodore, but it was by no means the last time. 
 
It was also during these proceedings that Theodore entered into
a "secret" agreement with Japan (see Mussey's American History
1942 ed. page 566) , an agreement so secret that even American
statesmen knew nothing about it until years later. 
(See also Smssey's History, page 560-565.)
 
-But here we are ahead of our story, so let's return to that
fateful year 1890 when the International Bankers first began
their plans to remove German and American competition. 
The question which then troubled them was, which of the two nations
should be attacked frist, but having had some experience
in attacking America, in 1776 and 1812, they quickly and wisely
decided to center their first attack upon Germany:
 
And to this end in 1900 they set out to secure allies to
"aid" them with the fighting.  Aware that France was still suffering
as a result of the German defeat at Sedan in 1870; and that
France had long desired to seize and colonize Morocco
just across the Mediterranean; and remembering finally
that Frence ambitions in Morocco had long been thwarted
by Great Britain; the Bankers now planned to give Morocco to France,
in return for a French pledge to join England in a later attack upon Germany. 
-
The Bankers were well aware of the risk they here assumed
for a "colonized" Morocco would not only double the economic
and military strength of France but would bring this revitalized France
right next door to British possessions in Egypt and the Sudan. 
-
Moreover the gift of Morocco to France would not only be resisted
by Spain and Morocco but might be resisted by both Germany and Italy. 
But since their European market was at stake and their World Plan
endangered, they were forced to assume these risks;
 and so in 1904 the secret treaty for the theft of Morocco
was duly signed by France and England . . .
 
And you may be sure that here as in the treaty between Theodore
and Japan, the PEOPLE of the countries involved had no knowledge
of the Secret Treaty . . .  That Spain made no open resistance
to the French-English plot against her holdings in Morocco, is
understood when we remember that Spain had just lost her financial,
economic and military power in the Spanish-American War;
Nor did Morocco have the resources for successful resistance. 
-
But as the International Bankers had foreseen, Germany
DID resent the French-English plot and for a good reason . . .
For more than twenty years prior to 1904, almost all
of the hydro-electric, sanitary and railroad equipment installed
in Morocco had come from Germany and had been paid for
with the surplus products of Morocco . . . As in our own case,
this "trade and barter" carried on without borrowed Capital had been
highly profitable to both countries and particularly to Morocco: 
 
And as a by-product of this trade a strong friendship had grown up
between the German Kaiser and the Sultan of Morocco. 
Therefore when in 1905 it was clear that the French-English plot
would deprive both German and Morocco of their profitable trade,
the Kaiser visited the Sultan and urged the Moroccan monarch
to resist the French and English.  Sorrowfully the Sultan replied
that he could not resist; he was surrounded on all sides
by French and English military and naval strength.
 ...But the Kaiser COULD do something about it and he did: 
He demanded that German trade still have free passage into
and out of Morocco (And had this been then agreed to Morocco
would never have become a French colony and France might then
have hesitated to join England in a war against Germany.) 
 
So at the suggestion of the International Bankers,
the matter was referred to arbitration. 
But what nation or monarch in Europe could arbitrate such a matter
when they were all financially interested in the outcome? 
For this question the International Bankers had been waiting
and they at once proposed Theodore Roosevelt as arbitrator,
since he, they said, had no interest in the outcome. 
In 1906 Theodore made his report and as you have already guessed
his report was in favor of France and England and against Germany. 
(Mussey's History, p. 575.)
 
...Aware at last that he had been tricked, the Kaiser again
demanded that Moroccan ports be kept open to German shipping;
and since neither France nor England were then ready for their war,
they were forced to submit.  Out of that affair only one nation
came forth as victor, and that was England; for she had won
permanently, French support for her coming war;
and of equal importance for the success of that war,
she had won for the second time the support of Theodore Roosevelt,
who two years later would appear for the third time
as a friend of the International Bankers.
 
 


Reply
Recommend  Message 3 of 3 in Discussion 
From: MSN NicknameHAL838Sent: 12/27/2008 5:20 PM


http://groups.yahoo.com/group/NewWorldOrderWhistleBlowers2

--- On Sat, 12/27/08, Don Stacey <[email protected]> wrote:



  With France already preparing for the War, England now turned
to Russia, whose boundaries encircled Germany on the East
as did those of France on the West.  As the International Bankers
had feared, the winning of Russia would prove far more difficult
than had been the winning of France;
 
For Russia still remembered that it was England which for 
200 years had deprived her of a passage into the Mediterranean,
and that in the past fifty years English armies had twice defeated
Russian armies at Sevastapol and Constantinople . . . 
Moreover in still more recent years Russia's plan to acquire
the oil fields of Persia had been blocked by this same England. 
Thus when asked to join the French-English military alliance
against Germany, Russia demonded both a passage
into the Mediterranean and the oil fields of Persia. 
 
This was clearly a terrible price to pay for a Russian alliance, for
the Persian Oil fields were already being developed by the British
Bankers and were among the most valuable oil fields in the world: 
And to grant Russia a passage-way through the Dardanelles
would not only endanger English domination of the Mediterranean,
but might drive Turkey into an alliance with Germany (as later happened.) 
Moreover to bring Russia into Persia and the Meditirranean
might later endanger English domination of India; and the India
of that date furnished two-thirds of Britain's income.
 
  But again England must assume all the risks here involved,
and with her promise that Russia should have the Persian oil fields
and a passage into the Mediterranean, the British-Russian
military alliance against Germany was signed in 1907.
 
A few months later England arranged a similar treaty with Belgium
by which English money and French engineers erected
a chain of forts along the Belgian-German border. 
Being already allied to Greece and Rumania by Royal marriages,
the fall of 1907 found England ready to begin actual preparation for war. 
For between 1900 and 1907, England had completely encircled
Germany with a wall of steel, and beyond that wall stood the
armies of Russia, Rumania, Greece, France, Belgium and England,
ready for the word to attack.
 
   Thus in 1907, the English press suddenly burst forth with violent
and continued attacks upon Germany, propaganda to secure
the support of the English public, for the war which
the International Bankers had hoped would begin in 1908 ...
 
   But there was one English statesman who know that England
was not ready for war, for as this statesman Winston Churchill
pointed out, they could not safely attack Germany until a way
 could be found to stop the flood of food and raw-materials flowing
into Germany from Scandanavia and the smaller states of Europe. 
 
If these imports had been of great value to Germany in time of Peace
they would be absolutely vital in time of war.  But how could these
European states be persuaded to stop their trade with Germany
when that trade was as important to them as it was to Germany?
 
Again the International Bankers had the answer.  They would
call in their good American Friend Theodore Roosevelt; as president
of the United States he could solve their problem, and he did.
 
For during 1907 and 1908 the American Goverment entered into
"reciprocal Trade Treaties" with every nation in Europe
EXCEPT Germany; as a result of which treaties
ALL THE SURPLUS PRODUCTS OF THESE EUROPEAN NATIONS
could be bought by the United States and would be paid for
with Gold or goods as the said nations might require ... 
 
Thus for the third time in four years the "good-neighbor" Theodore
had stepped into the World Picture;
and by so doing was guilty of a direct violation
of the Constitution and of his twice repeated oath of office;
but he had pulled the "Big" Banker's chestnuts out of the fire ...
But he had done more than that; he had destroyed that
Washington Policy of Isolation to which we had adhered
for one hundred and ten years to our continuing profit;
and he had set in motion that forty-year period of
Internationalist Imperialism which has already cost us two Wars,
four Depressions, a dozen Panics, and a Financial loss
beyond computation.  And the end is not yet.