<style type="text/css"> </style>

http://supreme.justia.com/us/111/746/case.html Read thru here as The Ohio Constn stands over any law, code, rule, policy § 01 Inalienable Rights (1851) & of property Rights see; LYNCH v. HOUSEHOLD FINANCE CORP., 405 U.S. 538 (1972) & US CODE: Title 42,1982. Property rights of citizens Also the alleged search warrant, those 2 letters are nothing but hearsayCRAWFORD V. WASHINGTON & need to be challenged in a Franks Hrg, see FRANKS V. DELAWARE, 438 U. S. 154 (1978) -- US Supreme Court Cases ...  Held: Where the defendant makes a substantial preliminary showing that a false statement knowingly and intentionally, or with reckless disregard for the truth, was included by the affiant in the warrant affidavit, and if the allegedly false statement is necessary to the finding of probable cause, the Fourth Amendment, as incorporated in the Fourteenth Amendment, requires that a hearing be held at the defendant's request. The trial court here therefore erred in refusing to examine the adequacy of petitioner's proffer of misrepresentation in the warrant affidavit. Pp. 438 U. S. 155-156; 438 U. S. 164-172. (a) To mandate an evidentiary hearing, the challenger's attack must be more than conclusory, and must be supported by more than a mere desire to cross-examine. The allegation of deliberate falsehood or of reckless disregard must point out specifically with supporting reasons the portion of the warrant affidavit that is claimed to be false. It also must be accompanied by an offer of proof, including affidavits or sworn or otherwise reliable statements of witnesses, or a satisfactory explanation of their absence. P. 438 U. S. 171. (b) If these requirements as to allegations and offer of proof are met, and if, when material that is the subject of the alleged falsity or reckless disregard is set to one side, there remains sufficient content in the warrant affidavit to support a finding of probable cause, no hearing is required, but if the remaining content is insufficient, the defendant is entitled under the Fourth and Fourteenth Amendments to a hearing. Pp. 438 U. S. 171-172. Page 438 U. S. 155 (c) If, after a hearing, a defendant establishes by a preponderance of the evidence that the false statement was included in the affidavit by the affiant knowingly and intentionally, or with reckless disregard for the truth, and the false statement was necessary to the finding of probable cause, then the search warrant must be voided, and the fruits of the search excluded from the trial to the same extent as if probable cause was lacking on the face of the affidavit. Pp. 155-156. 373 A.2d 578, reversed and remanded.                                                                   Just an "Uneventful Execution" of a Search Warrant The Lorain County Sheriff’s Department is reportedly “puzzled�?over Internet reaction to its Dec. 1 raid of Manna Storehouse, an organic food-buying and distribution co-operative owned by John and Jacqueline Stowers of LaGrange, Ohio, a small rural community near Cleveland.  As word of the raid spread across the Internet, sheriff deputies found themselves likened to Gestapo, and the department was denounced for using a SWAT team and threatening the family with semiautomatic rifles........ http://www.newswithviews.com/NWV-News/news116.htm SW & Affidavit "letters" r inside, why is a judge allowing a warrant w/o 1st hand knowledge & instead allows 2 letters that are not sworn affidavits I learned a lot a little too late-Donut learn as I did, take care & beware-FTG The sun shineth upon the dunghill, & isnt corrupted. We fear things in proportion to our ignorance of them. Confutatis maledictis, flammis acribus addictis

__,_._,___