|
|
 |
|
Reply
| | From:  Yankee_VT (Original Message) | Sent: 3/27/2003 8:08 AM |
Location in a global game of RISK (RISK is a board game of world conquest.) It doesn't matter if the American invasion if Iraq is for a noble goal of eliminating an alleged evil leader or a diabolical plot to steal the resources of another country. The location of Iraq is an ideal place for an outsider to attempt the conquest and plunder of Eurasia. Iraq has enough oil and water to warrant an invasion. Also enticing is its location. It is near the center of one of the largest oilfields in the world. It has a seaport. Perfect spot for a militarily strong nation to launch an assault on Iran thus linking up with the already conquered Afghanistan. With the conquest of Iraq, Iran, and Afghanistan, the USA will have the means to launch an invasion of the resource rich central Asian nations. America controlling this much of the world's oil and other resources will have a strangle hold on the rest of the world's economy. This is why I think the Bush cabal has invaded Iraq. Bush doesn't seem to be a compassionate person to me. |
|
 First
Previous
2-7 of 7
Next
Last
|
Reply
| |
Knight... Bush is just being used, It is obvious that he does not have the intellect to know what is going on.
Maybe his wife does...it does not matter. Watch 2004 when Lieberman gets the Democratic nod. The Security council will remain the same. as we have now..... Wolfowitz, Feith, Kissinger, Luttwak, Zakheim, and Libby.
Lieberman supported every move that Bush has made
now watch the media switch gears and start BUSH BASHING. promoting Lieberman. |
|
Reply
| |
K of Whim, The game in one of devide and concour, as soon as any county leader jumps out of the corprative pocket, and starts making good for a country, they become a threat to the "systum". A smear campaign followed by invation. To the powers that be, burrying the public eye in a war, is priceless to thier game of destraction. You see there is no risk to your leaders, thier aim is chaos... |
|
Reply
| |
Camelia, I agree with you, Bush, as is Blair, are just frount men. They get very well paid for delivering the speaches, they don't write them. Bush is very right wing blue, Blair is very left wing red. Yet they they're speaches are practically word for word. There is a goverment, that spans all countries leading to population, all the way to astray. The way this hypocrocy has continued for so long, is because people blaim the frount men (eg; Bush), and are fool enough to think the problum has gone away when a new leader is elected. The civil service rule the country. PUT YOUR EYES ON THEM> |
|
Reply
| |
This is why I think the Bush cabal has invaded Iraq. Bush doesn't seem to be a compassionate person to me. Ecconomic reasons was behind it, the US needed word projects to skim the profit from, so they created a need and filled it. |
|
Reply
| | | From: MDD | Sent: 5/1/2003 5:20 AM |
| I DON'T KNOW== I'M STILL TRYING TO FIGURE IT OUT |
|
|
First
Previous
2-7 of 7
Next
Last
|
|
|
Free Forum Hosting
Important Announcement
Recommend
Return to New World Order