|
|
 |
|
Reply
| | From:  HAL838 (Original Message) | Sent: 2/9/2002 2:42 AM |
is the main obstacle to world domination by the New World Order and therein lies the primary motive for the WTC attack. They want us to beg them to protect us at the expense of our rights. Believe it or not; oil was only a secondary motive. And by the way, the pop poles lie. It goes like this. You have three suspects in custody and nobody's talking. So you keep them apart and you tell each one that one of the others ratted on the other two. You do this with all your suspects and pretty soon, you have a confession and a conviction. The poles are meant to do the same thing. I've been poled. I know how they frame their questions. And when they can tell the public that Bu$h is holding at 85% popularity, no one wants to be thought of as bucking the tide. If I ask you "Do you think that Dumya is doing a better job as president than the devil would?" And no matter how much you hate King George Dumya, you go down as in favor of his presidency. You dig? |
|
 First
Previous
2-3 of 3
Next
Last
|
|
Reply
| | | From: Katrina | Sent: 2/13/2002 11:57 PM |
Hal and Everyone else,
I don't think it really matters who is in the presidental seat. Either way
they are going to be unliked by people and liked by others. In the military
you have to learn that it does not matter wether or not you like the person,
you still have to deal with them and make the best of it and trust in your
abilities as the only thing that is going to keep you alive. If Gore were
in the presidental seat we would have another Clinton, the only difference
is that Gore would write in the history textbooks that he create the world.
SO no one is qualified to be president, we just have to make due with what
God(dess)(however you believe) gave us to work with.
Now I'm not sure if I have stated this on the community before but incase I
have not I thought it only fair for everyone to know: The constitution does
not have anything stating that there is to be a "Seperation of Church and
State". Not even the first amendment includes it. All it says is that the
United States can not say that the entire nation is to be Catholic, Muslim,
Jewish, Wiccan, Buddhist, Shintoist, etc. However, it does allow for, oh
say the state of Texas, to declare the entire state's religion Catholic or
whatever they want to claim it. And California or Tennessee or any state
for that matter can do it. So for those of you who want to keep your
religion, you may want to keep it in mind that at any time Governor Don
Sunquist(For those of you in Tennessee) can declare whatever religion he
wants for his state.
Another thing I'd like to point out. Answer me this, if we have freedom of
speech in America, then why are the the most devout Conspiracy believers
being killed? The ones that's prime goal is to defeat conspirators?
Because there is only freedom of speech to an extent. Gee, I hope I don't
go up against a lawyer and judge who knows that. I hope none of you do
either.
_________________________________________________________________
MSN Photos is the easiest way to share and print your photos:
http://photos.msn.com/support/worldwide.aspx
|
|
Reply
| | | From: HAL838 | Sent: 2/14/2002 2:02 AM |
Yes, and Clinton was just as much a NWO leader as is Bush, although not being of wealth, his standing was different. Every persident in office all during the last century was put there by money, which has nothing to do with free speech (which brings us also to the first amendment, quoted below) and very little to do with vote since you're more apt to vote for the candidate you hear the most about (which takes money) or if you are a diehard party member. Most of the party squabbles are for show. "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people to peaceably assemble, and to petition the government for redress of grievances." I, for one, see no idea here, that freedom of press and speech means "money talks and everything else walks" or of "expression" such as pornography. There is such a thing as implied law and law of intent. And the intention of free press and speech was for the reporting of events and opinions and meant that it should not be suppressed. Dissent is even encouraged by this amendment and that was the Founder's intent; to keep the ideas flowing. The government is not supposed to muzzle those that disagree with it. "When the government fears the people, that is liberty. When the people fear the government, that is dictatorship." Thomas Jefferson Thank you, Katrina |
|
|
|
Free Forum Hosting
Important Announcement
Recommend
Recommend
Recommend
