MSN Home  |  My MSN  |  Hotmail
Sign in to Windows Live ID Web Search:   
go to MSNGroups 
Free Forum Hosting
 
Important Announcement Important Announcement
The MSN Groups service will close in February 2009. You can move your group to Multiply, MSN’s partner for online groups. Learn More
World Citizens' Concerns[email protected] 
  
What's New
  
  Home Page  
  Discussions  
  Pictures  
  Recommendations  
  Chat Schedule  
  HAL's science Q&As & MoreLinks  
  member profile  
  Some more links  
  MoreLinks  
  Hallinks  
  Say Again  
  NewsLinks  
  Messages from Management  
  Tried & True  
  Tried & Hung  
  BOOKS  
  Other Quotes  
  Documents  
  more links  
  Docs2  
  Yes MoreLinks  
  MJ12  
  medical  
  science  
  Media  
  MindControl  
  StrangeUniverse  
  Yes, It's A Conspiracy!  
  government  
  The Montauk Project  
  YahooGroups  
  msnCommunities  
  UpdatedLinks  
  Independence Day  
  NewLinks  
  LINKSpg10  
  Post A Link  
  More Books  
  From Judy  
  
  
  Tools  
 
Politics : Jew for President of USA
Choose another message board
 
     
Reply
Recommend  Message 1 of 23 in Discussion 
From: MSN NicknameAAWhite  (Original Message)Sent: 1/14/2003 7:37 AM
Should a Jew be permitted to run for President of USA??????????


First  Previous  9-23 of 23  Next  Last 
Reply
Recommend  Message 9 of 23 in Discussion 
From: MSN NicknameLuckfish2Sent: 4/28/2003 5:39 PM
A jew for president?  That's a tough one, but the real question should be "Should we let someone with red hair run for President?"  I mean, there are thousands of documented cases of red-heads being deviant, sociopathic, or just plain evil.  I shudder to think about what motivates a person with a different ancestry or religion than mine.  I think we should round up and export anyone who's the slightest bit different than us (We Know Who They Are), and then get together and have a good old fashoned book burning.  Hell, bring back the Spanish Inquisition too, I think too many people have forgotten about the despicable crime of Heresy.  Without religious persecution the pilgrims would have never thought to come over and start America, so religious persecution must be a good thing, right? 

Reply
Recommend  Message 10 of 23 in Discussion 
From: MSN NicknameTrueTales3Sent: 4/28/2003 11:04 PM
Yeah, and look at all the land we grabbed from the stupid Indians who never heard of owning land.  Come to think of it, no one DOES own land.....
 
If you don't PAY the taxes on it, they take it away.  Doesn't sound like ownwership, to me!

Reply
Recommend  Message 11 of 23 in Discussion 
From: brightiger2002Sent: 5/1/2003 2:17 PM


Do you Yahoo!?
The New Yahoo! Search - Faster. Easier. Bingo.

Reply
Recommend  Message 12 of 23 in Discussion 
From: MSN NicknameLuckfish2Sent: 8/14/2003 10:25 PM
How would you have the government collect money?  Just curious here...

Reply
Recommend  Message 13 of 23 in Discussion 
From: MSN NicknameLuckfish2Sent: 8/14/2003 10:32 PM
Oh, and Mileasecond:  I personally believe that the majority religion in this country is Christianity.  But if what you mean by if we were a "CHRISTIAN country" was that Christianity was the only official religion, and there were even more intolerance than there is now.....well, if that were the situation I'd pack up my stuff and my family and get the hell out.

Reply
Recommend  Message 14 of 23 in Discussion 
From: screenqwenSent: 8/15/2003 12:40 PM
should you be allowed to keep posting anti semetic garbage? any citizen of the u.s. regardless of ethnic background may run for president.

Reply
Recommend  Message 15 of 23 in Discussion 
From: MSN NicknameTrueTales3Sent: 8/15/2003 10:43 PM
I DO have a plan, and unlike the 16th amendment it is NOT UNConstitutional.

Reply
Recommend  Message 16 of 23 in Discussion 
From: MSN NicknameLuckfish2Sent: 8/16/2003 1:35 AM
Please, tell us about it...

Reply
Recommend  Message 17 of 23 in Discussion 
From: MSN NicknameAAWhiteSent: 11/27/2003 8:07 AM

APRIL 10, 2003/JUNE, 2003

OPEN LETTER

 

The principle of "right reason" is traced back to Coke’s opinion in Dr. Bonbam’s Case: that an act of the King or of Parliament is subject to right reason as embodied in the common law. This Principle is also applicable in scrutinizing the legacies of History so often distorted to meet the objectives of the writer or times.

This writer’s only intent is to arrive at the true bare facts of History. I challenge any reader after review of the Article to refute any false statements therein, supported by Genuine Historical Facts. There is not intent to demean, disparage or slander any persons or any religion.

 

 

AN OPEN LETTER TO THE U.S. CONGRESS AND TO THE UNITED NATIONS.

THE STATE OF ISRAEL CREATED BY THE U.N. SHOULD BE ABOLISHED AS ITS CREATION WAS BASED UPON TERRORISM AND FALSITY.

THE JEWS' GOD, Isn't the "Jewish" god the God of the Old Testament? Isn't this why we refer to the popular belief in Christ as the Judeo-Christian religion?

Rabbi Ben Zion Bokser wrote in "Judaism and the Christian Predicament" (New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1967) p. 59:

"This is not an uncommon impression and one finds it sometimes among Jews as well as Christians - that Judaism is the religion of the Hebrew Bible. It is, of course, a fallacious impression. Judaism is not the religion of the Bible."

 

Rabbi Moshe M. Maggal, wrote:

"...you will notice the great difference between the Jewish and Christian religions. But these are not all. We consider the two religions so different that one excludes the other. ...we emphasized that there is no such thing as a Judeo-Christian religion. There is not any similarity between the two concepts."[Rabbi Maggal (President, National Jewish Information Service) letter, 21 August 1961.]

So what is the nature of the "Jewish" god?

It is not the God of the Hebrew Bible as we have just seen by their own admission. They have no need of the concept of God as they have "killed off God" a long time ago, as James Yaffe comments:

And so it seems we must agree with Rabbi Richard Israel, who writes in Commentary's symposium on Jewish belief,

"[The current discussion on] the Death of God will cause Jews to ask, `So what else is new?' The Jewish funeral was a much more private affair. We buried him quietly and in the middle of the night.' [James Yaffe, "The American Jews" (New York: Random House, 1968), pg. 161]

James Yaffe's statement was a comment to a statement made by Rabbi Sherwin Wine of the Birmingham Temple:

"_the whole concept of God is outdated; Judaism can function perfectly well without it."

If the self-styled "Jews" have "killed off God", then what sort of "god" do they have? The Jewish God is the "Jew" as the Jewish Cabala (Kabbalah) puts it:

"The Jew is the living God, God incarnate: he is the heavenly man. The other men are earthly, of inferior race. They exist only to serve the Jew. They are the cattle seed."

In the following quote we begin to understand this "Jewish" idea of their "god" a little better as it is applied more directly to today:

"The Jewish people as a whole will be its own Messiah. It will attain world dominion by the dissolution of other races, by the abolition of frontiers, the annihilation of monarchy, and by the establishment of a world republic in which the Jews will everywhere exercise the privilege of citizenship. In this "new world order" the children of Israel will furnish all the leaders without encountering opposition. The Governments of the different peoples forming the world republic will fall without difficulty into the hands of the Jews. It will then be possible for the Jewish rulers to abolish private property, and everywhere to make use of the resources of the state. Thus will the promise of the Talmud be fulfilled, in which is said that when the Messianic time is come, the Jews will have all the property of the whole world in their hands."

Baruch Levy, Letter to Karl Marx, `La Revue de Paris', p. 574, June 1, 1928.

Who are these self-styled "Jews" then if they are not Israelites? One American Jew woke up to the lie after living in the Israeli occupational state in Palestine. He put it this way:

"The American people have been led to believe that Jews are "God's chosen people." This myth was started by a small group of Jews. A few Jewish leaders took excerpts from the Bible and interpreted them to mean that God designated them as "chosen people."

"Leading the cry, `We are God's Chosen People,' are the Zionist/Marxist (Ashkenazi) Jews who for political purposes chose Judaism and who don't have a drop of biblical Jewish blood in them. "The Judeo-Christian ethic we hear so much about in America is a big joke - the result of an intense Zionist propaganda campaign.

"I'll toss in one last thought about the `God's chosen people' myth: God said, `Beware of those who call themselves Jews and are not, for they lie.' Could it be the Ashkenazi Jews are the people to whom God was referring?"_Jack Bernstein, The Life of an American Jew in Racist Marxist Israel (California: The Noontide Press, 1984)

Are modern Jews Israelites? Are they Hebrews? In their own writings these self-styled "Jews" tell us it is incorrect to call a contemporary "Jew" an "Israelite" or a "Hebrew." Under the heading "A Brief History of the Terms for Jew," in the 1980 Jewish Almanac, is the following:

"Strictly speaking it is incorrect to call an ancient Israelite a "Jew" or to call a contemporary Jew an Israelite or a Hebrew." 1980 Jewish Almanac, P.3

Judaism or Pharisaism? In "The Pharisees_The Sociological Background of Their Faith," Rabbi Louis Finkelstein describes these self-styled "Jews" and their origins:

"Pharisaism became Talmudism, Talmudism became Medieval Rabbinism, and Medieval Rabbinism became Modern Rabbinism. But throughout these changes in name the spirit of the ancient Pharisee survives unaltered. When the Jew studies the Talmud, he is actually repeating the arguments used in the Palestinian academies."

"_rabbinic Judaism, the first-born child of Pharisaism, remains a unit until this day." (p.XXI of Forward to 1st Edition, "The Pharisees," Vol. 1, Philadelphia: The Jewish Publication Society of America, 1938 & Vol. 2, p. 622

Jesus had quite a verbal scathing for the Pharisees in Matthew 23. He exposed them for the sort of people they were:

"Hypocrites," "sons of hell," "blind guides," "fools," "full of robbery and self-indulgence," "whitewashed tombs full of dead men's bones and all uncleanness," "full of hypocrisy and lawlessness," "partners with them in shedding the blood of the prophets," and "serpents and brood of vipers."

Not quite an endorsement by the Christian Savior. And some fools have the gall, or should we say "chutzpah," to call Jesus a "Jew!" What blasphemy!

If modern Jews are not descendants of the original Israelites, who are they? Professor of Medieval Jewish History, Abraham N. Poliak of Tel Aviv University, has stated:

"The large majority of world Jewry is descended from the Jews of Khazaria." (The Thirteenth Tribe by Arthur Koestler (New York: Random House, 1976) p.226)

The people living in Palestine in the 20th century have no racial nor historic connection with Palestine and are, in reality, descendants from a Turko-Mongolian tribal people who created a kingdom called Khazaria which existed until the 10th century. These Khazarian "Jews" could just as easily have practiced Christianity, but for whatever reason they chose Judaism (Talmudic Pharisaism) and there is nothing that can be done about it.

Obviously, if these people have no racial, or historic connection with Palestine they have no claim to the promises made to Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob/Israel or the land known as "Israel" (Palestine) today. If this is true then there should be more evidence to support this position, and there is. The American People's Encyclopedia for 1964 at 15-292 records the following reference to Khazars:

"In the year 740 the Khazars were officially converted to Judaism. A century later they were cursed by the in-coming Slavic- speaking people and were scattered over central Europe where they were known as Jews. It is from this grouping that most German and Polish Jews are descended, and they likewise make up a considerable part of that population now found in America. The term Aschenazim is now applied to this division."

Alfred Lilienthal writes, in "What Price Israel" (Henry Regenery Co., 1953):

"Perhaps the most significant mass conversion to the Judaic Faith occurred in Europe, in the 8th century A.D., and that story of the Khazars (Turko-Finnish people) is quite pertinent to the establishment of the modern state of Israel." Again, "That the Khazars are the lineal ancestors of Eastern European Jewry is a historical fact. Jewish historians and religious textbooks acknowledge the fact, though the propagandists of Jewish nationalism belittle it as pro-Arab propaganda."

Arthur Koestler's book "The Thirteenth Tribe" (New York: Random House, Inc., 1976) blew the lid off this suppressed fact. Koestler notes:

"In the 1960's, the number of the Sephardim was estimated at 500,000. The Ashkenazim, at the same period, numbered about eleven million. Thus in common parlance, Jew is synonymous with Ashkenazi Jew."

He further states:

"For the sake of piquantry it should be mentioned that the Ashkenaz of the Bible refers to a people living somewhere in the vicinity of Mount Ararat and Armenia. The name occurs in Genesis 10:3 and 1 Chronicles 1:6 as one of the sons of Gomer, who was a son of Japheth. Ashkenaz is also a brother of Togarmah (and a nephew of Magog) whom the Khazars, according to King Joseph, claimed as their ancestor."

Koestler further quotes an early source indicating that the Khazars had some connection with Gog of the land of Magog.

"At some date earlier than 864, the Westphalian monk, Christian Druthmar of Acquitania, wrote a Latin treatise `Esposito in Evangelium Mattei,' in which he reported that `there exist people under the sky in regions where no Christian can be found, whose name is Gog and Magog, and who are Huns; among them is one, called the Gazari (Khazars) who are circumcised and observe Judaism in its entirety."

For those interested in Bible prophecy, the implications of this last sentence are staggering. Read Genesis 10:2-3 to see from whom Ashkenaz descended; notice who his relatives are. Then read Ezekiel 38 & 39. Jewish author Alfred Lilienthal further stated:

"These Ashkenazim Jews have little or no trace of Semitic blood."-p. 222, "What Price Israel."

This is now understandable from what Koestler revealed. The Jews fully understand their Khazarian heritage as the third edition of the Jewish Encyclopedia for 1925 records:

"Chazars: a people of Turkish origin whose life and history are interwoven with the very beginnings of the history of the Jews of Russia." The Jewish Encyclopedia, Third Edition, 1925.

There are two main "racial" branches of modern Jewry. The smaller of the two is called the Sephardim, some of whose ancestors fled after the fall of Jerusalem in 70 A.D. and spread across North Africa to Spain. This group has been from the outset so small, in terms of a viable gene pool, and has mixed with such regularity over the centuries with the indigenous peoples wherever they lived that Dr. Raphael Patai, a leading Jewish scholar, felt compelled to write a book entitled `The Myth of the Jewish Race' (Scribners, 1975).

In reviewing an earlier work by Dr. Patai, `Israel Between East and West,' Dr. Camille Honig, literary editor for the Voice (Jewish Voice of California, Sept. 25, 1953), stated:

"If you studied Jewish types and communities in five continents, as this writer had the opportunity of doing, you would have realized that it is sheer nonsense, and very dangerous nonsense, as well as unscientific, to speak about a Jewish race."

In a book entitled "Races in Europe", the author, William Z. Ripley, states under ethnology:

"The findings of physical anthropology show that contrary to all popular view, there is no Jewish race. "Our conclusion then is final. It is paradoxical yet true, we affirm. The Jews are not a race, but only a people after all."

Perhaps it can be understood why this is. The World Book Encyclopedia states:

"The Jews were once a sub-type of the Mediterranean race, but they have mixed with other peoples until the name Jew has lost all racial meaning."

Since the majority of people in modern Palestine and the world who call themselves "Jews" are descendants from a "Turko-Mongolian tribal people" known as Khazars, and have "little or no trace of Semitic blood in them," the word anti-Semitic, as applied to Jews, is meaningless. http://www.radio-program.com/posterity/ci/tjg.html


A. A. White

[email protected]


Reply
Recommend  Message 18 of 23 in Discussion 
From: MSN NicknameAAWhiteSent: 12/18/2003 1:18 PM

THE ORIGINAL "HATE" CRIMINALS

JEWS

Judaism a subversive demonic doctrine inculcated in the dictums of the "The Babylonian Talmud" http://www.gentileworld.com/id239_m.htm , http://www.gentileworld.com/id252.htm , http://www.scripturesforamerica.org/html2/jm0027h.htm , http://www.antiqillum.com/texts/bg/Qadosh/qadosh067.htm


Reply
The number of members that recommended this message. 0 recommendations  Message 19 of 23 in Discussion 
Sent: 12/18/2003 1:21 PM
This message has been deleted by the manager or assistant manager.

Reply
The number of members that recommended this message. 0 recommendations  Message 20 of 23 in Discussion 
Sent: 12/18/2003 1:22 PM
This message has been deleted by the manager or assistant manager.

Reply
The number of members that recommended this message. 0 recommendations  Message 21 of 23 in Discussion 
Sent: 12/18/2003 1:23 PM
This message has been deleted by the manager or assistant manager.

Reply
The number of members that recommended this message. 0 recommendations  Message 22 of 23 in Discussion 
Sent: 12/18/2003 1:24 PM
This message has been deleted by the manager or assistant manager.

Reply
The number of members that recommended this message. 0 recommendations  Message 23 of 23 in Discussion 
Sent: 12/18/2003 1:26 PM
This message has been deleted by the manager or assistant manager.

First  Previous  9-23 of 23  Next  Last 
Return to Politics