Vale bem o pequeno esforço de se deslocarem até ao:
JUSTICE FOR MADDIE AND THE TWINS
http://justiceformaddie.blogspot.com/

Go there and You must see with your owns eyes the e-fit(?)e do daddy. 2+2

Sorry by my bad english.

Run,run.

Funny: some time ago,Beatle or K.;
now,recently(public) man=G.

Accident or not, a child with the right to life and protection died in her parents' apartment whilst on holiday.

The case serves to illustrate not only Labour politicans' abuse of Government, but their contempt for the police in a case involving a case of homicide - conclusion reached by evidenced facts.

Metado 3's methods were handpicked.
As media controller, Mitchell ensures their ill gotten 'findings' make front page news.

guerra,

Each time truths about Metado 3 come to light, Mitchell quickly distances himself and his 'clients'.

FBI, CIA & M15 have been 'pulled out of the hat' since reports of a Metado 3 director being charged with attempted homicide and extortion in connection with their 'work' relating to Madeleine.

Think the person below has lost it completely. Do you have a problem with the principle of innocent until proven guilty? What a load of absolute twaddle. Have you seen the same files as me? What do you not understand about no evidence? I would consider using the ballot box if you are not happy with the government, as is your right.

"Accident or not, a child with the right to life and protection died in her parents' apartment whilst on holiday.

The case serves to illustrate not only Labour politicans' abuse of Government, but their contempt for the police in a case involving a case of homicide - conclusion reached by evidenced facts.

Metado 3's methods were handpicked.
As media controller, Mitchell ensures their ill gotten 'findings' make front page news."

anonymous,

In your view, I expect Martin Smith stands accused of 'losing it' as a result of his unique expertize in this case.

People removed from reality are the ones at risk of 'losing it', not those who assimilate evidenced facts and arrive at logical conclusions.

The Law dictates that the 15 DNA component match to Madeleine confirms the specimens scented by Eddie and pinpointed by Keela in various locations (police files) belong to no other. This is the ratio used in paternity cases in court. 10 components are the legal requirement for DNA databases.

Insults, as well as media spin and lies are the McCanns only means of defence. I have the right to an opinion and the right to voice it. Has Gordon Brown or the EU dictated otherwise ?

I thought Britain was still a law upholding democracy.

"People removed from reality are the ones at risk of 'losing it', not those who assimilate evidenced facts and arrive at logical conclusions."

The logical conclusion being that Mr and Mrs McCann have no evidence against them otherwise they would be behind bars. That's the logical conclusion I come to. I take it you've "lost it!"

Actually "Mr and Mrs McCann have no evidence against them" would be a legal conclusion and that is why they are not “behind bars�? Legal, not logical.
“If they don’t fit you must acquit�? remember that?!
The shadow of a doubt is still there and yes not enough to go to jail and that’s fine by me�?But you know how people are. Some still like to use their minds beyond the legal interpretation and the spinning of the papers, sometimes even beyond their own beliefs! Just for the sake of debate and none really has ‘to lose it�?
Don’t get confused and don’t patronise people�?ballots have nothing to do with this because as you said every government seems to be capable of being corrupt.

The investigation papers show a sniffer dog detected the apparent odour of a body in their hire car and apartment, but tests on a sample from the car were inconclusive.

British forensic scientist John Lowe said the sample contained 15 out of 19 components of Madeleine's DNA which were not "unique to her".

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/7543064.stm

Martin Smith? Irish witness?

anonymous

"no evidence against them otherwise they would be behind bars" would definitely apply to those not protected by the British Government.

Mr Amaral has confirmed that the British & Portuguese police had the evidence or proof in September. The reason they were not arrested and charged (as any other couple would have been) was due to Government intervention.

15 of Madeleine's 'unique to her' DNA markers - percentage used to legally confirm parentage - were found in apartment and vehicle specimens. Play on the word 'inconclusive' (1% less than 100%) does not alter the legal requirement for ID purposes.

In Madeleine's case, evidence of death is overwhelming, whereas no evidence exists supporting her parents plea. For this reason, it was essential for their friends in Government to keep them away from PJ for re-questioning and subsequent appearance in Court.

Extracts of Police files confirm PJ did not fly to Britain to interview the Tapas group as stated by the media, another lie. The statements were taken by Leicester Police who allowed all interviewees to read their original statements to PJ months earlier. The purpose of the exercise was compromised, corrupt in terms of legal requirements.
It's fair to deduce that Leciester Police conducted the interviews as ordered.

It's also fair to deduce that FSS would not withhold critical forensic results in any case, especially one concerning the death of a child. The reportedly 'considerable amount' of corpse hair retrieved from the vehicle would show whether or not Madeleine was given medication, the type and duration of administration.

Martin's expertize and recommendations solved the mystery of Madeleine's reported disappearance within a very short timescale and did so conclusively.

Reputable detectives work to the same principles as the police; to find the truth.

Those employed by McCann mechanics are for the sole purpose of marketing. How many more innocent fair haired children will be targeted, photographed and 'used' in the process ? Many, given that The Truth of the Lie is going global.

Strange that the media has no interest in any other of Britain's long list of genuine missing children.


"Money talks" but never as loudly as TRUTH - concisely contained in Mr Amaral's book and police files, not released in entirety.

Your insulting comment of me 'losing it' shows you have the same contempt for the police and free speech in this case as the McCanns and those protecting them.

anonymous,

Had the evidence found in the McCanns apartment, vehicle, car key, Kate & Madeleine's clothing (police files) been found in relation to another, i.e. immediate arrest, trial and, undoubtedly, imprisonment would have followed months ago.

The Hand at play in this case was shown by DE's unfounded, false proclamation of 'no evidence' allegedly made by a British Judge. Two Judges have been names in the McCanns marketing campaign; both have been cited as making comments whilst ignoring the facts on police files. Legal manipulation at the highest level; seems the legal rights of Madeleine and the police in their duty to the victim are overruled/disregarded.

It seems, police terms "abandonment, endangerment, homicide and concealment" plus wasting police time and taxpayers money perverting the course of justice is acceptable to the Government in this case.

They did not intervene when Shannon Matthews family were questioned; her mother handcuffed and arrested for 'neglect' and wasting police time in a multi million pound search. This family were 'inspired' by the McCanns and Shannon's mother knew her child was living with a relative.

In fact, the media showed the McCanns preparing for the trip to Strasbourg arranged by Miliband whose brother is employed by EU alongside Shannon's handcuffed mother.

PJ were not on their way to Britain when the McCanns disappeared to Strasbourg. All the interviews were conducted by Leicester Police in corrupt fashion; police files reveal all those making statements were allowed to read the originals made to PJ. DVD's made by British police were then sent to PJ.