MSN Home  |  My MSN  |  Hotmail
Sign in to Windows Live ID Web Search:   
go to MSNGroups 
Free Forum Hosting
 
Important Announcement Important Announcement
The MSN Groups service will close in February 2009. You can move your group to Multiply, MSN’s partner for online groups. Learn More
Madeleine McCannContains "mature" content, but not necessarily adult.[email protected] 
  
What's New
  
  WELCOME  
  LATEST NEWS  
  PJ FINAL REPORT  
  Member Messages  
  ►►SITE MENU◄◄  
  ►► MESSAGES �?/A>  
  All Messages  
  General  
  Messages For Maddie  
  Madeleine  
  Off Topic  
  Breaking News  
  Pet Memorials  
  MEMBER WELCOME  
  MEET THE MANAGER  
  ►►SUMMARIES◄◄  
  ►►�?MEDIA ◄◄�?/A>  
  NEWSPAPERS  
  Telegraph  
  Newspaper Thread  
  MAY Reports  
  JUNE Reports  
  SUN BOARD  
  TIMES BOARD  
  Daily Mail  
  MIRROR BOARD  
  GUARDIAN BOARD  
  Deleted EXPRESS  
  News Archives  
  News Articles  
  TV Program Links  
  Transcripts  
  TV News  
  Video Links  
  JOURNALISM  
  News Sniffer  
  ►INVESTIGATION�?/A>  
  Interviews  
  Suspicious  
  Re-enactment  
  Subliminal & Propaganda  
  Contrived Abduction  
  Facts  
  'Evidence'  
  Libel Threats  
  Lies  
  Quotes  
  Theories  
  Forged Photos?  
  McCann Travels  
  Timelines  
  FUND INFO  
  Fund  
  FUND INCOME / EXPENSES  
  Fund Compilation  
  FUNDRAISING  
  Fund 'Sources'  
  ►►►PEOPLE◄◄�?/A>  
  Kate McCann  
  Key People  
  Clarence Mitchel  
  Government  
  Brian Kennedy  
  Jon Corner  
  Metodo 3  
  Photofit  
  People MISC  
  Witnesses  
  Family  
  Unknown People  
  Esther McVey  
  Pol. Judiciaria  
  Tapas 7  
  Backers  
  ►►►► INFO◄◄�?/A>  
  Weather  
  The Law  
  Beachy  
  thentherewere4  
  Beachy Posts  
  AMBER ALERT  
  Information  
  M & E Children  
  Statistics  
  HUMAN BEHAVIOUR  
  Body Language  
  ►► CHAT ROOM�?/A>  
  Chat User Guide  
  ►► OPINIONS◄◄  
  Coldwater  
  HiDeHo  
  Jon Gaunt  
  Comments to Note  
  Gerry's Blog  
  Personal Attack  
  Misc Blogs  
  bb2002  
  Tabs poem  
  ►►WEBSITES◄◄  
  mccannfiles.com  
  Website Links  
  ►►PICTURES◄◄  
  Pictures  
  Manager Graphics  
  Pics fo Posting  
  Photo Curiosity  
  Backgrounds  
  ►►FORUMS◄◄  
  Digital Spy  
  Websleuths  
  THE 3 ARGUIDOS  
  3A Thread Lists  
  3A at Brussels Conference  
  3A Smiles  
  3A Ref. Threads  
  3A Distributions  
  3A Leaflets  
  MIRROR FORUM  
  M F Threads  
  Memorable Posts  
  Great Posts  
  Lost Pages  
  ►E-MAIL ADDYS�?/A>  
  ►►COMPUTER ◄◄  
  COMPUTER HELP  
  Computer Tips  
  HOW TO TIPS FOR 3A  
  3A How To Post  
  Avatars  
  ►►�?GAMES◄◄�?/A>  
  Brain Teasers  
  Time Wasters  
  Interesting Fact  
  Funnies  
  Points To Ponder  
  Nostalgia  
  Amateur Sleuth  
  For Skeptics  
  Estelle's Posts  
  Search  
  Priest  
  Remember Madeleine  
  Songs & Lyrics  
  'Source' Info  
  British Police  
  Sheree Dodds  
  PR & Spin  
  Trial  
  Your Web Page  
  3A Here To Stay  
  Documentaries  
  Diary  
  TEAM McCANN  
  Mgzne Interviews  
  TV INTERVIEWS  
  Robert Murat  
  Oprah  
  AMARAL'S BOOK  
  Fridge  
  McCanns History  
  McCann 'Defence'  
  Martin Brunt  
  Statements  
  Apologies  
  Investigate Fund  
  Statement Tables  
  MISC Web Pages  
  Millenium /Tapas  
  
  
  Tools  
 
Esther McVey : MF - The Fund Pls. read/bump- Re Companies House - UPDATE 06/11
Choose another message board
 
     
Reply
 Message 1 of 4 in Discussion 
From: MSN Nicknametin-lizzy  (Original Message)Sent: 2/17/2008 5:39 PM
Page 23
The Fund Pls. read/bump- Re Companies House - UPDATE 06/11
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 22, 23, 24 ... 29, 30, 31  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Forum Index -> The hunt for Maddy
Author Message
View previous topic :: View next topic  
thentherewere4



Joined: 09 Sep 2007
Posts: 3718
Location: http://the3arguidos.makeforum.org/
PostPosted: Thu Nov 08, 2007 12:44 pm    Post subject: Report this post Reply with quote

On rereading it I cant quite believe this question she asked,

"why do people feel they need a refund what have they been saying.?"

She is as misguided as the Mccanns.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
telegram



Joined: 17 Sep 2007
Posts: 494

PostPosted: Thu Nov 08, 2007 12:58 pm    Post subject: Report this post Reply with quote

Well done Nbrado and BJR for sticking with this. Hopefully we will get some answers on 14 November. Smile
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
JypsyBear



Joined: 21 May 2007
Posts: 1603

PostPosted: Thu Nov 08, 2007 12:58 pm    Post subject: Report this post Reply with quote

Thankyou Nbrado for your taking the trouble and time to ring Esther. So from that response , if others are footing legal fees , what exactly have they used this fund for . 1. Mortgage Repayments, we dont know fully how much either? or how many real payments have been made, 2? was what was revealed thus far. So what do they need a Fund for if others are footing the bills
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
nbrado



Joined: 06 Sep 2007
Posts: 1881
Location: @ my WWW link
PostPosted: Thu Nov 08, 2007 1:07 pm    Post subject: Report this post Reply with quote

No problemo guys and gals.

lets see what the 14th brings in terms of how people are entitled to a refund from the board.

I did point out to esther that legally i'm not implying that they did anything wrong but the whole thing stinks on a moral issue and that is why people are upset.

it was nice of her to take the time finally to answer my questions and she was nice enough on the phone.

though it is official brian and richard are paying the bill for everyting at the moment and that includes the call center and phone lines in spain.

interesting I thought...

why the freeze on spending the fund money and having them foot the bill..

obviously the 14th is when the issue will be raised and discussed till then I suspect they dont want to touch the cash till a bulletproof plan is formulated and a reponse to those seeking refunds.

best not spend anything donated until then eh Wink
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
ShuBob



Joined: 20 May 2007
Posts: 4154

PostPosted: Thu Nov 08, 2007 1:10 pm    Post subject: Report this post Reply with quote

[quote="thentherewere4"]On rereading it I cant quite believe this question she asked,

"why do people feel they need a refund what have they been saying.?"

She is as misguided as the Mccanns.[/quote]

========================================

I believe it was a rhetorical question Wink
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
thentherewere4



Joined: 09 Sep 2007
Posts: 3718
Location: http://the3arguidos.makeforum.org/
PostPosted: Thu Nov 08, 2007 1:12 pm    Post subject: Report this post Reply with quote

Thanks to the 2 evil dwarves,not much money has been spent then ?

Just saw it ShuBob yeah it could be or who knows?

Last edited by thentherewere4 on Thu Nov 08, 2007 1:13 pm; edited 2 times in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
bjr



Joined: 13 Sep 2007
Posts: 3084
Location: http://the3arguidos.makeforum.org/
PostPosted: Thu Nov 08, 2007 1:13 pm    Post subject: Report this post Reply with quote

I bet they love me and nbrado, I bet we won't get any christmas cards Laughing Laughing Laughing
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
ShuBob



Joined: 20 May 2007
Posts: 4154

PostPosted: Thu Nov 08, 2007 1:13 pm    Post subject: Report this post Reply with quote

[quote="nbrado"]No problemo guys and gals.

lets see what the 14th brings in terms of how people are entitled to a refund from the board.

I did point out to esther that legally i'm not implying that they did anything wrong but the whole thing stinks on a moral issue and that is why people are upset.

it was nice of her to take the time finally to answer my questions and she was nice enough on the phone.

though it is official brian and richard are paying the bill for everyting at the moment and that includes the call center and phone lines in spain.

interesting I thought...

why the freeze on spending the fund money and having them foot the bill..

obviously the 14th is when the issue will be raised and discussed till then I suspect they dont want to touch the cash till a bulletproof plan is formulated and a reponse to those seeking refunds.

best not spend anything donated until then eh Wink[/quote]

========================================

This then begs the question: how did they manage to spend £300k up until September 7? What did they spend it on????


First  Previous  2-4 of 4  Next  Last 
Reply
 Message 2 of 4 in Discussion 
From: MSN Nicknametin-lizzySent: 2/17/2008 5:42 PM
Page 23 cont....
 
thentherewere4



Joined: 09 Sep 2007
Posts: 3718
Location: http://the3arguidos.makeforum.org/
PostPosted: Thu Nov 08, 2007 1:14 pm    Post subject: Report this post Reply with quote

[quote="thentherewere4"]Thanks to the 2 evil dwarves,not much money has been spent then ?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
nbrado



Joined: 06 Sep 2007
Posts: 1881
Location: @ my WWW link
PostPosted: Thu Nov 08, 2007 1:15 pm    Post subject: Report this post Reply with quote

No xmas hamper for us!

if you do get one make sure its not got a ticking noise and have it checked with a geiger counter!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
bjr



Joined: 13 Sep 2007
Posts: 3084
Location: http://the3arguidos.makeforum.org/
PostPosted: Thu Nov 08, 2007 1:17 pm    Post subject: Report this post Reply with quote

[quote="nbrado"]No xmas hamper for us!

if you do get one make sure its not got a ticking noise and have it checked with a geiger counter![/quote]
-------------------------------
And don't accept any free Turkeys we could be ill right into the new year. Laughing Laughing
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
ShuBob



Joined: 20 May 2007
Posts: 4154

PostPosted: Thu Nov 08, 2007 1:17 pm    Post subject: Report this post Reply with quote

nbradders, did you ask what exactly £300k had been spent on in such a short time?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
lurker1



Joined: 01 Nov 2007
Posts: 357

PostPosted: Thu Nov 08, 2007 1:21 pm    Post subject: Report this post Reply with quote

BUMP, BUMP!!!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Dizzy



Joined: 17 May 2007
Posts: 897

PostPosted: Thu Nov 08, 2007 1:24 pm    Post subject: Report this post Reply with quote

[quote="sabot"][quote="bjr"]To get a company registered by the 15.5.07 he must have had the vision by Friday Laughing Laughing Laughing[/quote]

A very fishy day![/quote]

==============================

Well pointed out. When was the vision does anyone know?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Dizzy



Joined: 17 May 2007
Posts: 897

PostPosted: Thu Nov 08, 2007 1:45 pm    Post subject: Report this post Reply with quote

OK no response but hey the vision was on the 1st Sunday which was the 6th of May 07. But who at that point as quite rightly asked by another poster had pledged their own money.

I know 100k was offered as reward money by a friend but this surley wasnt a donation.

Phone calls were made on the 7th of May so the idea 3 days after Maddie dissapeared.


http://www.thetablet.co.uk/articles/9930/

"When I was praying I started thinking of all the things that were happening. There were lots and lots of ideas in my head and how we could make things better and I was really feeling very down and not sure which way to proceed. I had this mental image of being in a tunnel and instead of the light at the end of the tunnel being extremely narrow and a distant spot, the light opened up and the tunnel got wider and wider and went in many different directions. I talked to you [Kate] about it and said, ‘I am not prepared to pursue one path. We are going to do everything in our power to influence things.'

"It was almost like something - I am not saying it was the Holy Spirit - came into me and gave me that image. That is when I really felt I had a clear path."

Was it a religious experience?

"I can't say it was a vision because I am not clear what a vision is but I had a mental image and it certainly helped me decide. I became a man possessed that night. The next day I was up at dawn, making phone calls."
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous: All Posts1 Day7 Days2 Weeks1 Month3 Months6 Months1 Year Oldest FirstNewest First 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Forum Index -> The hunt for Maddy All times are GMT
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 22, 23, 24 ... 29, 30, 31  Next
Page 23 of 31

Reply
 Message 3 of 4 in Discussion 
From: MSN Nicknametin-lizzySent: 2/17/2008 5:49 PM
PAGE 8
The Fund Pls. read/bump- Re Companies House - UPDATE 06/11
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 7, 8, 9 ... 29, 30, 31  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Forum Index -> The hunt for Maddy
Author Message
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Emmet



Joined: 08 Jun 2007
Posts: 578

PostPosted: Sat Oct 13, 2007 7:55 pm    Post subject: Report this post Reply with quote

Amazing how something is able to be made out of nothing on this forum.

I created my limited company on a Sunday afternoon a while back via my accountant who has everything set up for it to be done automatically online. The company memorandum and articles were emailed to me as soon as my debit card online payment was taken i.e. immediately. I don't know where the idea has come from that it takes weeks or months.

The McCanns had to do it immediately because (surely you haven't all forgotten so soon?) the Portuguese secrecy laws prevented the police from making any public statement or appeal about the case so a little girl of (then) 3 years old was missing and no-one would have known what she looked like or what she was wearing when she went missing. Experience in both the US and UK has shown that the first 48 hours are critical in the investigation of missing children and publicity is essential to stand any chance of an early location of the child.

Is that not a good enough explanation?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
amplyjustified



Joined: 03 Sep 2007
Posts: 2838

PostPosted: Sat Oct 13, 2007 8:04 pm    Post subject: Re: The Fund and Reward - Pls read/bump - Re Companies Hous Report this post Reply with quote

I too have already contacted the Charity Commission about this 'fund'. I contacted the Charity Commission within 2 - 3 weeks of the fund being set up because we know the difference between a registered charity and a Ltd. Co.

They told me that they were extremely disturbed at the way that the Maddy Fund was being advertised - it gives people the impression it is a charity when in fact it is definitely nothing at all like a charity with all of the rules and regulations which govern the conduct of the fundraisning and which controls the PROPORTION of the charities funds that are spent on overheads, expenses and wages....[/quote]


*************************************************************

I always thought that they may have had to chose a fund rather than a charity because of the use of private detectives, who may have had to venture into - shall we say - murky areas, in their investigations.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Cassi



Joined: 14 Aug 2007
Posts: 2021

PostPosted: Sat Oct 13, 2007 8:12 pm    Post subject: Report this post Reply with quote

[quote="Emmet"]Amazing how something is able to be made out of nothing on this forum.

I created my limited company on a Sunday afternoon a while back via my accountant who has everything set up for it to be done automatically online. The company memorandum and articles were emailed to me as soon as my debit card online payment was taken i.e. immediately. I don't know where the idea has come from that it takes weeks or months.

The McCanns had to do it immediately because (surely you haven't all forgotten so soon?) the Portuguese secrecy laws prevented the police from making any public statement or appeal about the case so a little girl of (then) 3 years old was missing and no-one would have known what she looked like or what she was wearing when she went missing. Experience in both the US and UK has shown that the first 48 hours are critical in the investigation of missing children and publicity is essential to stand any chance of an early location of the child.

Is that not a good enough explanation?[/quote]


~~~~~~~~


No. the McCann's and company were on the telly from day 2 with pictures and descriptions. The police are allowed to comment on missing children’s cases or suspected abductions. Secrecy laws do not apply here.

Tell me, you really think that the police and the McCann's did not make any statements until 15 May?

So you are saying they needed to set up a company begging for money to get her description out and focus on the case?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Banshee



Joined: 15 Jul 2007
Posts: 612

PostPosted: Sat Oct 13, 2007 8:27 pm    Post subject: Re: time delay Report this post Reply with quote

[quote="bjr"][quote="bmen"]actually there is another item in the time scale ,they initially tried to register as a charity so few days would have been wasted there before the ltd company evolved[/quote]

Oh I forgot about that do you mind if I put this comment in the Opening Post.[/quote]

McCann had his ' vision ' in church ... whether it was during Sunday mass ... or one of the regular tea-time services held for them I'm not sure ... what I am positive about is that this whole case absolutely stinks to high heaven and back ...

Strangely enough ... when this case broke on 4th May ... I distinctly remember several of the younger members on a sports forum I've been going on for years ... saying quite clearly ... " something is not right about this story ... there will be more to this than meets the eye " type comments ... at that time I was puzzled by these observations because I believed implictly what McCann was telling the world ... it was only after the Gerry one compared losing his daughter to that of being a student and finding no money in his bank account Shocked ... that bells started ringing loudly ... this was 25th May, he said this ... so, it'd appear it has always been about money ... how callous can anyone get ... saying losing a child is like going to the bank and finding you're skint ... McCann will never need to worry about being poor again ... will he ... he has made sure of that ... by his canny use of the law and media ...

GMcC gives me the impression he could be a very dangerous man when crossed.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Emmet



Joined: 08 Jun 2007
Posts: 578

PostPosted: Sat Oct 13, 2007 8:30 pm    Post subject: Report this post Reply with quote

[quote="Cassi"


~~~~~~~~


No. the McCann's and company were on the telly from day 2 with pictures and descriptions. The police are allowed to comment on missing children’s cases or suspected abductions. Secrecy laws do not apply here.

Tell me, you really think that the police and the McCann's did not make any statements until 15 May?

So you are saying they needed to set up a company begging for money to get her description out and focus on the case?[/quote]

__________________________________________________________

Now, why am I not surprised by that response...

Reply
 Message 4 of 4 in Discussion 
From: MSN Nicknametin-lizzySent: 2/17/2008 5:50 PM
bjr



Joined: 13 Sep 2007
Posts: 3022

PostPosted: Sat Oct 13, 2007 8:30 pm    Post subject: Report this post Reply with quote

Banshee, you are right they have in my opinion exploited poor Madeleine, if she was my child, I would sell everything I owned and give my right arm to have her safe with me. Anyway she would never have been left in the first place.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
bmen



Joined: 15 Aug 2007
Posts: 676

PostPosted: Sat Oct 13, 2007 10:12 pm    Post subject: Report this post Reply with quote

i believe it would be a perfectly legitmate to ask all the directors we already know the 2 relatives abstained in voting, what their relationship with the 2 suspects are even a casual relationship i.e friend would in my opinion bar them from voting on any issue involving the 2 arguidos
anyone tried this yet ?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
bjr



Joined: 13 Sep 2007
Posts: 3022

PostPosted: Sat Oct 13, 2007 10:18 pm    Post subject: Report this post Reply with quote

molly1 is going to ring companies house on monday and when she posts what they say, we should go from there, but you have a point there conflict of interest etc.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
lionheart



Joined: 11 May 2007
Posts: 2068

PostPosted: Sat Oct 13, 2007 10:18 pm    Post subject: Re: The Fund and Reward - Pls read/bump - Re Companies Hous Report this post Reply with quote

[quote="bjr"]http://wck2.companieshouse.gov.uk/399da18496994340755086e10276b4f4/compdetails

Above is the link for Comapnies House about the Madeleine Fund.

The date that this Company is registered is the 15.5.07 just 12 days after Madeleine disappeared.

First Madeleine went missing on the night of the 3rd May and most people did not know until Friday 4th May. Unless you wrote and posted a cheque straight away to the McCanns in Ocean village PDL Portugal to arrive in PDL by about Tuesday or Wednesday 9th/10th there would not have been enough money to even contemplate starting a fund.

Most people would have waited for at least a few days to see if Madeleine was found before sending money. So that would have been in the w/c Monday 8th.
So by the time it got to Portugal, Rothley etc it would have been the end of the week.

Mostly rewards were offered in the beginning for the safe return of Madeleine but these were would only be paid if Madeleine was found and the abductor charged.

So why register for a Fund just 12 days after the disappearance of Madeleine, surely by then there was not enough money coming in to warrant a fund.

The date of the 15.5.07 was the date the company became registered and would not have been the date the papers were sent to Companies House. Obviously it must take a couple of days to get papers drawn up, a fund set up amongest other things so this would have been done in the week commencing the 8.5.07.

So for this fund to have been in place the lawyers were there straight after Madeleine disappeared. Why? Was it to give legal comment on what might have happened on the 3.5.07 and to point out where they stood in the eyes of the law. Client confidentiality etc.

It as also been pointed out by another poster that prior to the setting up of the limited company, they also enquired about registering as a charity.[/quote]

Bump.
We have been saying such, for many months now!
This needs to be bumped so that those new to this forum are aware of The TRUTH!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
bjr



Joined: 13 Sep 2007
Posts: 3022

PostPosted: Sat Oct 13, 2007 10:36 pm    Post subject: Report this post Reply with quote

BUMP
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
urcrazy



Joined: 16 Sep 2007
Posts: 3149

PostPosted: Sat Oct 13, 2007 10:46 pm    Post subject: Report this post Reply with quote

[quote="bjr"]Exactly why would you apply to Companies House for Fund, register a Trademark, my god these people are unbelieveable.[/quote]


They needed to apply to Companies House to set up the fund legally; there is nothing AT ALL sinister in this.

And they probably decided to trademark the name as a simple precaution against the type of scamming b*stards who always try to freeload of these things by collecting money for nothing other than their own Christmas fund.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
lynnkx



Joined: 10 Jul 2007
Posts: 2061

PostPosted: Sat Oct 13, 2007 10:50 pm    Post subject: Report this post Reply with quote

Unlike a normal limited company it is not set up to make profit.

It is a company that is set up to not make a profit and the directors do not receive any pay [wages].

IE - it has just been set up to receive money and to spend it... without being subject to The Charity Commission's rules and regulations Sad
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
bmen



Joined: 15 Aug 2007
Posts: 676

PostPosted: Sat Oct 13, 2007 10:58 pm    Post subject: Report this post Reply with quote

exactly lynnkx the charities commission wouldnt register them they were astute enough to see what was about to happen they simply couldnt meet the requirements at that stage alarm bells should have been ringing loudly
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
lynnkx



Joined: 10 Jul 2007
Posts: 2061

PostPosted: Sat Oct 13, 2007 11:13 pm    Post subject: Report this post Reply with quote

[quote="bmen"]exactly lynnkx the charities commission wouldnt register them they were astute enough to see what was about to happen they simply couldnt meet the requirements at that stage alarm bells should have been ringing loudly[/quote]

The Charity Commission would have registered them if they were going to behave like a charity and spend the money received mainly on the purpose of the charity.

Instead - they wanted to use the money/fund for LIVING EXPENSES plus massive wages for everybody. I have even read a report which said that Jane Tanner and O'Brien were being paid as nannies to the twins... Whoever is being paid to be nannies to the twins - the money is coming out of the fund to find Maddy Crying or Very sad

The wages bill and the expenses bill are far to high for it to be accepted as a charity - and they do not spend much money on the purpose which the fund was set up in either...

The lawyers were there to advise AGAINST setting up a charity and to advise the setting up of this special sort of 'Ltd.Co.' instead..... Crying or Very sad Crying or Very sad
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
bjr



Joined: 13 Sep 2007
Posts: 3022

PostPosted: Sat Oct 13, 2007 11:18 pm    Post subject: Report this post Reply with quote

[quote="urcrazyAnd they probably decided to trademark the name as a simple precaution against the type of scamming b*stards who always try to freeload of these things by collecting money for nothing other than their own Christmas fund.[/quote]

------------------------------------------
Double standards I am afraid they don't mind using a website that offers it's services to other grieving parents. The person that runs their website contacted the family of the young girl in Hampshire offering his services. I would hazard a guess, but I bet he didn't offer to do for free.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous: All Posts1 Day7 Days2 Weeks1 Month3 Months6 Months1 Year Oldest FirstNewest First 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Forum Index -> The hunt for Maddy All times are GMT
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 7, 8, 9 ... 29, 30, 31  Next
Page 8 of 31

First  Previous  2-4 of 4  Next  Last 
Return to Esther McVey