MSN Home  |  My MSN  |  Hotmail
Sign in to Windows Live ID Web Search:   
go to MSNGroups 
Free Forum Hosting
 
Important Announcement Important Announcement
The MSN Groups service will close in February 2009. You can move your group to Multiply, MSN’s partner for online groups. Learn More
Madeleine McCannContains "mature" content, but not necessarily adult.[email protected] 
  
What's New
  
  WELCOME  
  LATEST NEWS  
  PJ FINAL REPORT  
  Member Messages  
  ►►SITE MENU◄◄  
  ►► MESSAGES �?/A>  
  All Messages  
  General  
  Messages For Maddie  
  Madeleine  
  Off Topic  
  Breaking News  
  Pet Memorials  
  MEMBER WELCOME  
  MEET THE MANAGER  
  ►►SUMMARIES◄◄  
  ►►�?MEDIA ◄◄�?/A>  
  NEWSPAPERS  
  Telegraph  
  Newspaper Thread  
  MAY Reports  
  JUNE Reports  
  SUN BOARD  
  TIMES BOARD  
  Daily Mail  
  MIRROR BOARD  
  GUARDIAN BOARD  
  Deleted EXPRESS  
  News Archives  
  News Articles  
  TV Program Links  
  Transcripts  
  TV News  
  Video Links  
  JOURNALISM  
  News Sniffer  
  ►INVESTIGATION�?/A>  
  Interviews  
  Suspicious  
  Re-enactment  
  Subliminal & Propaganda  
  Contrived Abduction  
  Facts  
  'Evidence'  
  Libel Threats  
  Lies  
  Quotes  
  Theories  
  Forged Photos?  
  McCann Travels  
  Timelines  
  FUND INFO  
  Fund  
  FUND INCOME / EXPENSES  
  Fund Compilation  
  FUNDRAISING  
  Fund 'Sources'  
  ►►►PEOPLE◄◄�?/A>  
  Kate McCann  
  Key People  
  Clarence Mitchel  
  Government  
  Brian Kennedy  
  Jon Corner  
  Metodo 3  
  Photofit  
  People MISC  
  Witnesses  
  Family  
  Unknown People  
  Esther McVey  
  Pol. Judiciaria  
  Tapas 7  
  Backers  
  ►►►► INFO◄◄�?/A>  
  Weather  
  The Law  
  Beachy  
  thentherewere4  
  Beachy Posts  
  AMBER ALERT  
  Information  
  M & E Children  
  Statistics  
  HUMAN BEHAVIOUR  
  Body Language  
  ►► CHAT ROOM�?/A>  
  Chat User Guide  
  ►► OPINIONS◄◄  
  Coldwater  
  HiDeHo  
  Jon Gaunt  
  Comments to Note  
  Gerry's Blog  
  Personal Attack  
  Misc Blogs  
  bb2002  
  Tabs poem  
  ►►WEBSITES◄◄  
  mccannfiles.com  
  Website Links  
  ►►PICTURES◄◄  
  Pictures  
  Manager Graphics  
  Pics fo Posting  
  Photo Curiosity  
  Backgrounds  
  ►►FORUMS◄◄  
  Digital Spy  
  Websleuths  
  THE 3 ARGUIDOS  
  3A Thread Lists  
  3A at Brussels Conference  
  3A Smiles  
  3A Ref. Threads  
  3A Distributions  
  3A Leaflets  
  MIRROR FORUM  
  M F Threads  
  Memorable Posts  
  Great Posts  
  Lost Pages  
  ►E-MAIL ADDYS�?/A>  
  ►►COMPUTER ◄◄  
  COMPUTER HELP  
  Computer Tips  
  HOW TO TIPS FOR 3A  
  3A How To Post  
  Avatars  
  ►►�?GAMES◄◄�?/A>  
  Brain Teasers  
  Time Wasters  
  Interesting Fact  
  Funnies  
  Points To Ponder  
  Nostalgia  
  Amateur Sleuth  
  For Skeptics  
  Estelle's Posts  
  Search  
  Priest  
  Remember Madeleine  
  Songs & Lyrics  
  'Source' Info  
  British Police  
  Sheree Dodds  
  PR & Spin  
  Trial  
  Your Web Page  
  3A Here To Stay  
  Documentaries  
  Diary  
  TEAM McCANN  
  Mgzne Interviews  
  TV INTERVIEWS  
  Robert Murat  
  Oprah  
  AMARAL'S BOOK  
  Fridge  
  McCanns History  
  McCann 'Defence'  
  Martin Brunt  
  Statements  
  Apologies  
  Investigate Fund  
  Statement Tables  
  MISC Web Pages  
  Millenium /Tapas  
  
  
  Tools  
 
Information : Times - Inside the world where experts try to unlock DNA clues
Choose another message board
 
     
Reply
 Message 1 of 1 in Discussion 
From: MSN Nicknametin-lizzy  (Original Message)Sent: 3/2/2008 3:29 AM

Inside the world where experts try to unlock DNA clues

Although the technology has improved vastly, scientists warn that genetic evidence is not a shortcut to the truth

Ben Macintyre

The key to unlocking the Madeleine McCann case may lie in a clue so small that it cannot be seen with the naked eye. It may even hinge on a single cell, weighing no more than six picograms, or six trillionths of a gram, but enough to yield a strand of DNA.

Madeleine’s DNA was allegedly recovered from the boot of the car her parents hired several weeks after she disappeared, but that discovery, while important, is open to widely differing scientific and legal interpretations.

“The television shows tend to make it seem very simple,�?Paul Debenham, director of technology and innovation at LGC, Britain’s largest independent forensics laboratory, says. “DNA science is not that easy.�?

LGC provides forensic science services predominantly for police work. At its laboratories scientists extract clues from physical evidence: blood, urine, hair, fibres, insects, guns, footprints, paint, telephones, computers, drugs, corpses, clothes and glass.

A new official spokesman has been appointed, so who are the team behind the McCanns now?

LGC’s headquarters in Teddington, West London, is one of Europe’s main centres for the extraction, analysis and identification of DNA samples �?the unique genetic signature that has revolutionised policing and detective work.

In the past two decades, hundreds of murderers, rapists, drug dealers and thieves have been tracked down by their DNA, often long after the cases had gone “cold�? But as Mr Debenham points out, the science is not the universal crime-cure that the public imagines, or shows such asCSI: Crime Scene Investigation make it appear.

“What DNA can do is say who is the originator of a sample,�?he said. “What it can’t tell us is why that sample is where it is.�?

There has been much confusion in the McCann case over the match between Madeleine’s DNA and that found in the car: this has been reported variously as between 60 and 100 per cent. While declining to comment directly on the case, Mr Debenham pointed out that DNA matches are seldom expressed as percentages but rather in terms of the probability of finding another person with the same DNA at random in the population.

If all 20 markers used to identify DNA are present and match, the average probability of finding a match at random in the population is roughly one in a billion. If only 16 markers are present, and the other four cannot be identified, there is just a small mathematical possibility that the DNA could have come from someone else.

“If you got down to only three or four matches, then you would be worried,�?said Mr Debenham. “You have to ask why there is only a partial match: it could be because only a very small amount of DNA was recovered, or because the sample had degraded, or because it has been transferred from something else.�?

In essence, the task of the DNA scientists is to prove (or disprove) beyond reasonable doubt that a sample comes (or does not come) from a specific individual, but with DNA being deposited and gathered in such a multitude of different circumstances the extraction of a reliable sample is paramount. “You’ve got to be sure that whatever you’re producing is so robust and accurate that it’s acceptable in court,�?Ros Hammond, a scientific adviser at LGC, said.

The analysis in the McCann case has been done at the Government’s Forensic Science Service laboratory in Birmingham, but the process is identical to that carried out on hundreds of DNA samples at LGC every day.

The evidence arrives in carefully labelled blue crates, usually with specific instructions from police. Technicians first extract the genetic material from the evidence, then use heating blocks and enzymes to separate the DNA strands and replicate it. Once the specific DNA sequence is identified, it is matched, if possible, with samples in the national DNA database.

Extraordinary precautions are taken to ensure that the sample is not contaminated with other DNA. The air is purified and sterilised “scene suits�?are worn by the technicians over specially laundered scrubs, which are replaced daily. Visitors must provide a DNA sample via an oral swab before entering the lab to ensure that if any contamination occurs the intrusive DNA can be identified and ruled out.

Samples may be degraded, or present in very small quantities, for a variety of reasons: perhaps an item of clothing has been worn briefly or only once, or it has been washed. In that case, extra precautions are taken with a process called “high sensitivity profiling�? with rigorously regulated sterile lab conditions for extracting, diluting and then replicating the DNA samples.

This is the procedure that will have been followed with the samples in the McCann case. Among the other techniques used to gather the samples, forensic scientists in Portugal will have used a method called “touch DNA�? gathering the smallest flecks of human material from the seat, boot and other parts of car using a swab to try to pick up microscopic particles of Madeleine’s DNA.

In another part of the LCG laboratory, Gavin Trotter, lead scientist in toxicology, tests blood, urine and body tissue for evidence of drugs, alcohol, poisons and sedatives. He speaks over the din from what looks like a large sewing machine with robotic arms, processing samples from workers such as bus drivers, airline pilots and soldiers. The machine can test for drugs, alcohol and other substances at the rate of 2,000 samples a day.

Hair �?particularly dark hair, which retains chemical signatures longer than blond or grey hair �?can be a particularly useful source of evidence. “Since hair grows at roughly one centimetre a month, you can use it to find out what a person has ingested over a fairly lengthy period of time,�?Mr Trotter said.

If sufficient amounts of Madeleine’s hair are recovered, these could provide important evidence as to whether she was alive when the sample was deposited and what was in her body. If the hairs have roots attached, a full DNA profile can usually be obtained.

“If hair has fallen out because of decomposition, you may be able to tell,�?Mr Debenham said.

DNA science is advancing at breath-taking speed. Two decades ago a DNA sample the size of a 2p piece was needed to make a meaningful test. Today, thanks to advanced replication technology, the tiniest fragment of DNA may be sufficient to make an identification if it is preserved adequately. But with advanced DNA testing techniques has come a faith in the science that is sometimes unrealistic.

“There is a tendency to be DNA-focused,�?Ms Hammond said. “Sometimes we need to remind police that there are other ways of investigating besides forensics.�?

In the McCann case, a DNA sample has been found, but that has raised a host of questions that would certainly be asked in court if the case were to get that far. How good is the sample? What else can it tell us and, above all, how did it get where it was found?

I'm sure the FSS laboratories are hugely competent and the statistics on DNA matching absolutely correct. Exactly what we thought about Professor Sir Roy Meadow.

eric campbell, harrogate, uk

Interesting, the other question that would have to be raised is how was the evidence collected and what are the chances of cross contamination?

Tel, London,

Even if they find madeline alive or dead the parents left them children alone while they went out for a meal, im sorry but that is disgusting im a mother and i would never leave my daughter alone while i went out, and what kind of mother sudates there children anyhow. Even if the child is a hand full you are still a parent and should handle what life throws at you. I think social services should do something about leaving madeline and the twins alone, if any parent over here had left there children alone they would have there children took off them.

bev, birmingham, uk

So, after a week of innuendo and trial by media, its obvious that the forensic evidence is unreliable. Yet another bungle by the Portuguese cops, who'd literally managed to 'convict' the McCanns despite the fact that there is no proof of Madeleine's death.

The media frenzy to demonise the parents has also meant that they couldn't expect a fair trial anyway.

The British Press and TV media should be thoroughly ashamed for their lowered standards of reporting - instead of dishing the dirt on the parents, they should have increased the demands on the Portuguese police to find Madeleine (alive or dead).

In the meantime, the search for the missing girl has stopped -
there just might be a little girl crying to be found!!

Sam, Pristina, Kosovo

How very interesting! I do not think the McCann`s had anything to do with the disapearance of Madeleine and hope that some concrete evidence shows results soon. It is assumed that Madeleine is dead but how can this be such a strong view when there has not yet been any real evidence!
It`s looking more like a set up every day! How is it when the PJ need something from the McCanns they leak it to the press 1st ! I still beieve that this litle girl is alive somewhere and hope she is found soon!
(maybe the should re-open the case of the little girl who went missing in sept 2004, her mother was imprisioned for her murder! no body found and no real evidence, oh and 4 of the PJ are accused of torture and tampering with statements, these PJ are working on the Madeleine case! )



First  Previous  No Replies  Next  Last