Not being spiteful, critical, nor pointing fingers, but I'm just wondering, how do all the people that believe the McCann's are innocent support that theory?? I see comments all the time, "innocent until proven guilty"....yes, that is true, or maybe not...look at O.J. Simpson(just one example), he has as much as said he did it...he just got away with it...I try to not believe that someone could injure their own children, but I don't shut my eyes and look away when I know it happens all the time. I would just like to know, given the facts that have arisen in the McCann's case, how do the McCann supporters not have any doubt that they are the tiniest bit guilty? I could understand if the supporters would say, "that action does cast some doubt", or , "that just doesn't seem right"...but to totally just dismiss all the discrepancies in the stories of the Tapas 7/9, 10 , 11 or however many there are of that group now, and insist the McCann's are innoncent. Not only do the supporters insist, they get down right dirty about it....just what part of the story the McCann's tell , make a supporter sway to the McCann's side??? I would just like to know what actions did the McCann's take that makes people support them? Sooo, they went extremely public, they asked for money to keep Maddie in the public eye, they went to the pope (even tho McCann's mom stated they weren't that religious), they do everything in their power to draw attention to themselves....okay, sooooo........... which of their actions BEFORE they did all this, i.e. at the time Maddie became missing, encourages one to think they are innocent???? The fact they are innocent because they have not been proven guilty????? Kate and Gerry didn't even go search for Maddie the night she disappeared!!! I just don't understand and am trying to look at all sides...so could someone please tell me some points that make the McCann's innocent instead of all the facts that make them seem guilty of "something"...