MSN Home  |  My MSN  |  Hotmail
Sign in to Windows Live ID Web Search:   
go to MSNGroups 
Free Forum Hosting
 
Important Announcement Important Announcement
The MSN Groups service will close in February 2009. You can move your group to Multiply, MSN’s partner for online groups. Learn More
5th Comm BnContains "mature" content, but not necessarily adult.[email protected] 
  
What's New
  
  5th Communications Bn.  
  ADD ANY NEW PHOTO'S HERE  
  Pictures  
  5TH COMM ROSTER  
  5th Comm. Bn. Missing After Action-MAAs  
  Message Board  
  
  General  
  
  5th Comm Busines  
  Calvin McKenzie project  
  
  
  Tools  
 
All Message Boards : New Oath???
Choose another message board
 
     
Reply
 Message 1 of 2 in Discussion 
From: Dick  (Original Message)Sent: 1/30/2009 4:33 PM
So what happens to the Commander in Chief status?
 
 
 
Published: Jan 29, 2009
Author: Michele Chang
Post Date: 2009-01-29 10:38:14 by mel_living
12 Comments

Secretary of Defense Robert Gates is extremely frustrated with orders that the White House is contemplating. According to sources at the Pentagon, including all branches of the armed forces, the Obama Administration may break with a centuries-old tradition.

A spokesman for General James Cartwright, the Vice Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, states that the Obama Administration wants to have soldiers and officers pledge a loyalty oath directly to the office of the President, and no longer to the Constitution.

“The oath to the Constitution is as old as the document itself.�?the spokesman said, “At no time in American history, not even in the Civil War, did the oath change or the subject of the oath differ. It has always been to the Constitution.�?/FONT>

The back-and-forth between the White House and the Defense Department was expected as President George W. Bush left office. President Obama has already signed orders to close Guantanamo and to pull combat troops from Iraq. But, this, say many at the Defense Department, goes to far.

“Technically, we can’t talk about it before it becomes official policy.�?the spokesman continued. “However, the Defense Department, including the Secretary, will not take this laying down. Expect a fight from the bureaucracy and the brass.�?/P>

Sources at the White House had a different point of view. In a circular distributed by White House Press Secretary Robert Gibbs, the rationale for the change was made more clear.

“The President feels that the military has been too indoctrinated by the old harbingers of hate: nationalism, racism, and classism. By removing an oath to the American society, the soldiers are less likely to commit atrocities like those at Abu Ghraib.�?/P>

“We expect a lot of flak over this!,�?the classified memo continues. “But those that would be most against it are those looking either for attention or control.�?/P>

The time frame for the changes are unknown. However, it is more likely that the changes will be made around the July 4th Holiday, in order to dampen any potential backlash. The difference in the oath will actually only be slight. The main differences will be the new phrasing. It is expected that the oath to the Constitution will be entirely phased out within two years.


_______________________________________________
Mrfa mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.rivervet.com/mailman/listinfo/mrfa_rivervet.com


First  Previous  2 of 2  Next  Last 
Reply
 Message 2 of 2 in Discussion 
From: DickSent: 1/30/2009 6:01 PM
Mikey just informed me this "oath" post is bogus and marked "satire" somewhere on the net.  I hate when that happens, aint the first time I've been sucked in on this new fangled cyber shit.
 
SF,
 
Dick