MSN Home  |  My MSN  |  Hotmail
Sign in to Windows Live ID Web Search:   
go to MSNGroups 
Free Forum Hosting
 
Important Announcement Important Announcement
The MSN Groups service will close in February 2009. You can move your group to Multiply, MSN’s partner for online groups. Learn More
A Peaceful Place[email protected] 
  
What's New
  
  �?•�?·´`·.·�? �?/A>  
  Copyrights  
  Disclaimer  
  �?•�?·´`·.·�? �?/A>  
  Messages  
  General  
  Articles - Misc.  
  ADHD,ADD, Autism  
  �?Allergies �?/A>  
  Alternative & +  
  § Arthritis §  
  Depression  
  �?Diet �?/A>  
  �?Exercise �?/A>  
  Eyes  
  Fitness and Exercise  
  �? FM & CF �?/A>  
  Headaches  
  Herbs etc  
  IBS & Other DD's  
  �?•�?·´`·.·�?�?/A>  
  Liver  
  Lung Health  
  MS �?/A>  
  ◄Mycoplasms�?/A>  
  Osteoporosis  
  Pain-Coping  
  Skin Disorders  
  Sleep  
  �?Supplements  
  �?Toxins �?/A>  
  Humor �?/A>  
  Household ☼¿☼  
  Mind-Body-Spirit  
  Pictures  
    
  �?Links �?/A>  
  Snags  
  Sources & Resources  
  ≈☆≈E-Cards ≈☆�?/A>  
  Pesticides Exp  
  �?Organic Living  
  Organic Gardens  
  See the Most Recent Posts  
  
  
  Tools  
 
Articles - Misc. : Antibiotics 'n Bacteria, etc.
Choose another message board
View All Messages
  Prev Message  Next Message       
Reply
 Message 1 of 7 in Discussion 
From: Rene  (Original Message)Sent: 10/11/2005 5:13 PM


Antibiotics Aren't Always the Answer

By DEBORAH FRANKLIN
Published: August 30, 2005


It's hard not to wheedle.

Your throat feels as if you've swallowed broken glass, your sinuses have been clogged for a couple of days, you're coughing up green stuff and you're slated to fly in a week.

Never mind that your doctor thinks you're suffering from a viral infection that antibiotics won't touch. Why not start a prescription of some powerful bacteria-busting drug immediately, just in case?

Dr. Alastair D. Hay, who teaches medical students at the University of Bristol in England and also treats patients, says that until recently, even he may occasionally have succumbed to the pressure to hand over a prescription.

"As a personal policy, I don't get into heated arguments with my patients," Dr. Hay said.

And giving the standard lecture about how antibiotics will not stop a virus but may contribute to the growing, worldwide problem of drug resistance rarely convinces sick people that they don't need the drugs. "Unless you can tell them that there's an immediate downside for them personally," Dr. Hay said, "the message just doesn't sink in."

Now, though, Dr. Hay can quote direct evidence of a downside. An increasing number of studies, including his own work, suggest that even a properly prescribed antibiotic can foster the growth of one or more strains of antibiotic-resistant bacteria for at least two to six months inside the person taking the pills.

"Carrying" a microbe inside you that is resistant to drugs also means that, during that time, you're likely to "share" the resistant bug with family, co-workers and others in your path.

That particular strain may not make you sick. But if you find yourself one day immune-suppressed after chemotherapy, cut open by a car accident or surgery or especially vulnerable to bacterial pneumonia after a bad flu, those resistant strains of bacteria living inside you increase the odds that any infection will be hard - or even impossible - to beat.

In a study published in the July 2005 issue of The Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, Dr. Hay and nine colleagues solicited urine samples from a broad cross-section of generally healthy people throughout southwest England.

They then checked the samples for E. coli, a common intestinal bacterium that can invade the urethra. Published surveys estimate that roughly 25 to 35 percent of women ages 20 to 40 in the United States have had a urinary tract infection, and E. coli is the most frequent cause.

Of the 618 men and women from whom Dr. Hay and his colleagues were able to isolate E. coli and also get extensive medical records, 39 percent carried a bacterial strain that was resistant to one or more of the first-line antibiotics commonly used to treat urinary infections.

More significantly, Dr. Hay said, a patient's likelihood of carrying a resistant organism was doubled if the patient had taken "any antibiotic for any reason within the previous two months, when compared with those who had not taken an antibiotic."

The findings dovetail with results from other studies that found a strong, though temporary, link between drug-resistant urinary tract infections and antibiotics taken in the previous six months.

"A lot of women have had the experience of having a urinary infection that doesn't seem to be treatable, or of going through more than one drug," said Abigail A. Salyers, a microbiologist at the University of Illinois and a co-author with Dixie D. Whitt of the new book "Revenge of the Microbes: How Bacterial Resistance Is Undermining the Antibiotic Miracle."

"Having to go through a number of drugs magnifies the time that you're miserable," she said.

But the implication of the research goes beyond urinary infections. Doctors are beginning to realize that any oral or injected antibiotic they prescribe to fight a particular infection also cuts a wide swath in bacterial neighborhoods throughout the body, mowing down microbes that are susceptible and leaving room, temporarily at least, for resistant bugs to colonize the empty real estate and thrive.

Bacteria differ in their ability to fend off antibiotics, and in the methods they use. The most worrisome are those that quickly and easily trade genetic material across species. A bacterium that was once vulnerable to any one of several drugs can overnight become impervious to all of them. It does this by picking up an extra loop of DNA - essentially a highly portable genetic suitcase containing several different resistance genes - from a passing microbe.

Public health officials used to assume that these sorts of superbugs arose mostly in hospitals, where a variety of conditions - including a concentration of seriously ill patients, open wounds, hands-on care and the wide use of powerful antibiotics - made the buildings incubators of drug resistance.

But just because hospitals are incubators doesn't mean that's where the problems start or stay.

"Many hospital infections walk in the front door, on the patient, or the patient's family, the doctors, or the guy in the next bed," Dr. Salyers says. "It's the opportunistic bacteria that we all carry around with us that are causing the trouble in hospitals."

Which brings us back to you, with your nasty sore throat, throbbing sinuses and cough, waiting in the exam room, hoping for a prescription from your doctor.

Dr. Ralph Gonzales, an internist at the University of California, San Francisco, is one of a growing cadre of researchers dedicated to improving the way antibiotics are prescribed and taken in community clinics.

Dr. Gonzales hopes to preserve the drugs' powerful benefits while minimizing resistance. Several years ago, he worked with medical associations and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention to devise evidence-based guidelines for doctors to use in telling which patients need antibiotics for their respiratory infections and which patients do not.

But increasingly, Dr. Gonzales thinks it is the patients - particularly the 30- or 40-year-old professionals with bad colds and overwhelming deadlines - who need to be persuaded, as much as other doctors.

Studies have shown that when patients come into the clinic expecting a drug, Dr. Gonzales said, doctors are more likely to prescribe one.

"Very few ask directly for an antibiotic," he said. "Instead you'll hear, 'I have a wedding coming up - my wedding - and my cold won't go away.' "

To nip patients' expectations of receiving antibiotics before they see the doctor, Dr. Gonzales is putting up posters in exam rooms that, for example, help explain which symptoms suggest a bacterial infection and which indicate a viral source.

And at what looks like an automated teller machine in the lobby of the hospital's acute care clinic, patients waiting to see a doctor can now view video clips and answer questions aimed at guiding them to a better understanding of why antibiotics aren't always the answer.

Will such measures help? It's too soon to tell. But the last bit of advice that the modified A.T.M. dishes out on its touch screen will certainly reduce infections. Immediately find the nearest restroom, the machine advises, so you can wash your hands.

 

From:     http://www.nytimes.com/2005/08/30/health/

 
 
Health Sciences Institute e-Alert, March 30, 2004
 
Dear Reader, Every day, school is in session inside our bodies. And the students and teachers are one and the same: bacteria.
 
Bacteria are highly adaptive because they actually "teach" one another to resist antibiotics. When one bacterium develops resistance to an antibiotic, it can share that resistance with similar and even unrelated strains. They do this by passing DNA-containing organisms called plasmids, from one to another. The result: Due to the excessive use of antibiotics, virtually all of the bacterial infections known to scientists are becoming resistant to even the most powerful antibiotics.
 
Fortunately, awareness of this overuse has led to a general rethinking about how best to utilize antibiotics. Now a new test has been developed that may provide doctors with the information they need to avoid prescribing antibiotics unnecessarily. 
Sorting the Bs from the Vs 
 
Antibiotics can only control bacteria - not viruses. But because many viral and bacterial infections have similar symptoms, doctors often prescribe antibiotics to treat viruses on the chance that they might be bacteria. So it's no mystery why many unneeded prescriptions are filled for respiratory infections and colds that are viral infections.
 
Currently there are tests that can determine the exact nature of an infection, but they tend to either take too long to show results or are too expensive to be practical. But a new test may change all that. This test quickly measures levels of procalcitonin, a blood protein that rises sharply in the presence of a bacterial infection. Procalcitonin levels rise only slightly in response to viral infections.
 
As reported in The Lancet medical journal last month, researchers at the University Hospital in Basel, Switzerland, devised a trial to examine the procalcitonin test. More than 240 subjects who were admitted to the hospital with lower respiratory tract infections were assigned either standard care, or care based on the results of a procalcitonin test.
 
In the procalcitonin group, 43 percent showed levels high enough to prescribe antibiotics. In the standard care group, patients were diagnosed using x-rays and other tests to determine infection type. In this group, 83 percent received antibiotics.
 
Favorable outcomes for patients in both groups were about equal, and none of the patients in the procalcitonin group experienced any adverse effects due to a lack of antibiotics. Follow-up tests to verify infection types confirmed that approximately 20 percent of the patients in both groups had bacterial infections.
 
One of the authors of the study observed that while antibiotics were over-prescribed in the procalcitonin group, "The test halves antibiotic use, without altering the clinical outcome."
 
Future: "quick and easy dipstick test"
 
What the immediate future holds in store for the procalcitonin test remains to be seen. More research and development is required in order to transform it into what one antibiotic resistance expert calls a  "quick and easy dipstick test" that could reveal bacterial infection right away.
 
So it may be awhile yet before your doctor has a procalcitonin test ready to use in his office. In the meantime, doctors and patients alike need to be more careful about resorting to antibiotics to treat every sniffle, earache and cough. And the growing crisis of antibiotic resistance is only part of the reason to be wary.
 
Just last month, in the e-Alert "Protection Jumps The Rails" (2/19/04), I told you about a large University of Washington study that revealed how excessive antibiotic use may be associated with an elevated risk of breast cancer. In that study, the women who had the highest rates of cumulative days of antibiotic use over 17 years had a sharply increased risk of death due to breast cancer.
 
And in a recent "Baseline of Health" newsletter, HSI Panelist Jon Barron shared details about a 2003 study of the effects of antibiotic use in young children. The Henry Ford
Hospital (Detroit) researchers followed 448 children from birth to seven years. Nearly half of the children received antibiotic treatments (mostly penicillin) within the first
six months of life, and among these children the risk of developing asthma was two and a half times greater than the risk to children who received no antibiotics within the first six months. Risk of developing allergies was also significantly increased in the antibiotic group.
 
Good alternatives
Without question, antibiotics are important, life-saving tools. But the overuse of these drugs has to be curtailed or the antibiotic resistance crisis will turn into a disaster. So the next time your doctor suggests writing an antibiotic prescription, ask specific questions about why it's necessary and what other options might be workable.
 
For instance, in many cases a natural antibiotic could be just as effective as a pharmaceutical variety. In the e- Alert I mentioned above I reviewed four natural antibiotics recommended by HSI Panelist Allan Spreen, M.D.: vitamin C, grapefruit seed extract, olive leaf extract and colloidal silver. (You can find that e-Alert on our web site at
www.hsibaltimore.com with a search of the e-Alert archives.)
 
And I've made a special note to follow the progress of the procalcitonin test, which could emerge as the most important means of cutting back antibiotic use. As that develops I'll keep you posted.
 
 
Sources:
"Effect of Procalcitonin-Guided Treatment on Antibiotic Use and Outcome in Lower Respiratory Tract Infections: Cluster- Randomised, Single-Blinded Intervention Trial" The Lancet, Vol. 363, 2004, thelancet.com

"Test May Lower Antibiotic Use" Helen R. Pilcher, Nature Science Update, 2/20/04, nature.com

"New Test May Determine Antibiotic Need" Associated Press, 2/18/04, msnbc.com

"Antibiotic Use in Relation to the Risk of Breast Cancer" Journal of the American Medical Association, Vol. 291, 2004, ama-assn.org

"Asthma and Antibiotics" Jon Barron, Baseline of Health, 10/13/04, jonbarron.org

"Questions and Answers About the Prostate-Specific Antigen (PSA) Test" National Cancer Institute, cis.nci.nih.gov
 
Copyright (c)1997-2004 by
www.hsibaltimore.com, L.L.C.
The e-Alert may not be posted on commercial sites without written permission.
 


Replies to This Message The number of members that recommended this message.    
     re: Antibiotics 'n Bacteria, etc.   Rene  12/6/2005 9:07 PM
     re: Antibiotics 'n Bacteria, etc.   Rene  3/2/2006 10:22 PM