MSN Home  |  My MSN  |  Hotmail
Sign in to Windows Live ID Web Search:   
go to MSNGroups 
Free Forum Hosting
 
Important Announcement Important Announcement
The MSN Groups service will close in February 2009. You can move your group to Multiply, MSN’s partner for online groups. Learn More
Ants to the rescueContains "mature" content, but not necessarily adult.[email protected] 
  
What's New
  
  * Welcome Page  
  * The Old Firm - history and statistics  
  * Old Firm Honours Lists  
  * Messageboard  
  * The Silver Lining  
  * Biased match reports  
  
  
  
  Tools  
 
General : The Old Firm match thread View All Messages
  Prev Message  Next Message       
Reply
 Message 35 of 35 in Discussion 
From: MSN NicknameCollegeRosco  in response to Message 34Sent: 12/29/2008 10:42 AM
The game was won and lost in the mid-field. Celtic were very strong physically and mentally where we were too weak and timid. I lost count of the number of 50-50 challenges we lost.The game always looked like the first goal would probably win it and so it proved.
 
Old Firm games are usually won by the team which shows the most desire and I thought all the Celtic players showed this. They didn't all play well individually of course but as a team they were a much more cohesive unit than we were.
 
Losing one of these games is always hard to take but it is even worse when you know your team has not really turned up on the day. It was difficult to pick out any of our players who had a decent game. In fact it is easier to pick out the ones who were poor on the day but you all saw who they were.
 
One thing that puzzles me. On the radio people were saying that the pitch was watered half an hour before the game. I was in the ground at 11.30am and went up to see the pitch and the players warming up on three occasions before kick-off and I never saw any sprinklers on. The pitch definitely got worse as the game went on so I don't know what occurred. Any information?