MSN Home  |  My MSN  |  Hotmail
Sign in to Windows Live ID Web Search:   
go to MSNGroups 
Free Forum Hosting
 
Important Announcement Important Announcement
The MSN Groups service will close in February 2009. You can move your group to Multiply, MSN’s partner for online groups. Learn More
askjoel[email protected] 
  
What's New
  
  AskJoel  
  Ask Joel  
  Questions/Answers  
  Prior Questions  
  Who is Joel?  
  Joel's Library  
  Links  
  No Medical Advice  
  Joel's Videos  
  
  
  Tools  
 
General : smoking after baby being born!  
     
Reply
 Message 1 of 11 in Discussion 
From: socialsmoker  (Original Message)Sent: 11/26/2006 3:20 PM
I have always smoked very randomly, about a pack a week or two..mostly while drinking. (since college) I totally stopped while pregnant, then after my baby was born I swore I would never smoke again..well the stress of new motherhood has made me start up..I am so angry at myself, but I try to justify it because I only smoke about a pack every two weeks..never around my child! It  is so hard for me to quit because I am still so stressed, and this is something that relaxes me. How bad is it healthwise to smoke this little? It is getting better, but sometimes I still crave one..am I addicted?


First  Previous  2-11 of 11  Next  Last 
Reply
 Message 2 of 11 in Discussion 
From: JoelSent: 11/27/2006 3:42 AM
 
Are you a nicotine junkie?
 
 
The one attribute that shows the addictive nature of nicotine
is not how hard or how easy it is to quit, nor is it
how hard or easy it is for an individual to stay off smoking.
The one true property that shows the power of the addiction
is that no matter how long a person is off, one puff and that
quit can go out the window.
 
Don't ever try to prove to yourself that you were not addicted.
You were addicted to nicotine all of the years you used it and
you are addicted to it today too. But as an ex-smoker the
addiction becomes asymptomatic. To keep it that way and
to basically stay in control always remember to
Never Take Another Puff!
 
Joel

Reply
 Message 3 of 11 in Discussion 
From: JoelSent: 11/27/2006 3:44 AM
 
I saw yesterday where one member stated she was quitting smoking because she was planning for having a child and another post where a member actually found out she was pregnant. While it is always paramount for long-term success in smoking cessation that the smoker focuses on the fact that he or she is quitting for his or her own primary benefit, this is an area that a woman needs to take a little extra consideration for another life.
 
There are great risks posed to the unborn child if women smoke while pregnant. There is a greater risk of smaller babies, sicker babies, stillbirths, and more death within the first year of life. Children who grow up in smoking households have more chronic colds and respiratory diseases.
 
I haven't researched this area for quit sometime, but I know years ago that there were some pretty strong studies that showed that if women quit smoking during the first trimester of pregnancy, the risk of low birth weight babies were reduced back to non-smoking mothers again. It seemed at least at that time that a good part of the danger was induced smoking past that time period.
 
It is important for women who are in the stage of their lives of family planning take their smoking into consideration. The idea of just quitting to get pregnant or having a baby can pose a risk after the baby is delivered. You can figure now that the risks are now gone, you quit for the important time period. But still keep in mind that even though you did your baby a favor by quitting, you really did yourself the bigger favor.
 
For not only did you reduce the risk to your baby, you reduced your risk of being sicker throughout your life and eventually dying prematurely--you increased your ability to be active with your baby, throughout his or her life, even when your baby becomes an adult. You increased the odds that you will be around to see your baby eventually have children of his or her own, and even then you can be an active participant in yet another generation, as opposed to an elderly person on oxygen who watches family events from the sidelines, if you can even go to see them at all.
 
Quitting for pregnancy is a reason to start your quit. Staying off though is more comprehensive than this. There are many other benefits that go along with staying an ex-smoker that will stick with you throughout your entire life. To keep these benefits, always remember that the best way to improve "your" overall health and quality of life is to never take another puff!
 
Joel
 
Here is a link to the CDC fact sheet on smoking and pregnancy. There are plenty of other sites that I am sure have similar information too. I just went for the first one that popped up in a search engine.

Reply
 Message 4 of 11 in Discussion 
From: JoelSent: 11/27/2006 3:45 AM
Are there social smokers--yes there are. First thing to note though, no one here at Freedom was a social smoker--at least not when they finally quit smoking. We KNOW that because they showed up here at Freedom in the first place. A social smoker would not likely ever type the word "quitting" or "help on quitting" into a search engine. If a social smoker did by chance come upon our site, they would have read for a few minutes, realized none of this applies to them, and never have gone through our application process.
 
Now that we have established that the people here are not social smokers, who are the social smokers? Well it is not all the people who you think are social smokers. Although before I even address this, the term is almost wrong to start with. Social smoker makes about as much sense in some circles as social leper. There are some people who seem as if they can take it or leave it. I think the term that is used in some scientific communities for these kind of smokers is "chipper," I think used to describe people who smoke under 5 per day.
 
But not all of the people who can smoke that way are actually in control of their addiction per se. Some of these people NEED those one to four cigarettes. They don't think they do but they do. I meet them all the time in clinics. They are spouses of heavy smokers, who basically never bought cigarettes a day in their life. They "only" smoked them because they were around and to be with the spouse. But when the heavy smoking spouse all of a sudden gets sick and has to quit, the light smoking spouse enthusiastically volunteers to quit to for support. After all, they figured they never really need these cigarettes anyway, quitting will be no big deal.
 
These people are OFTEN in for a real surprise. They will find themselves buying their first pack in their lives, and going through a worse time than the heavy smoking spouse. Often these people have full blown withdrawals and often, they don't make it ending up being the sole smoker left in the family. They were not "social smokers" after all, they were full blown addicts who were just at a lower tolerance level than most others. But there is no guarantee that over time their tolerance would not have increased and resulted in them turning into heavy smokers who would be viewed as full-fledged smokers by all around them.
 
The only way for these people to quit and stay off is the same for people who smoke 10, 20, 30, 40, 50 or even one hundred cigarettes a day. It is still by understanding to take and keep control over the nicotine addiction entails always knowing to never take another puff!
 
Joel

Reply
 Message 5 of 11 in Discussion 
From: JoelSent: 11/27/2006 3:46 AM

I Have to Smoke
Because of All My Stress!




Stress is considered a cause for smoking by many people.  Actually, smoking is a cause of stress.  Recent correspondence dealt with reasons people give for going back to smoking: social situations, parties, alcohol consumption and stress.  This month I wish to amplify on stress.

In January of 1979, Chicago and vicinity was devastated by a major blizzard.  Heavy snows fell just after the New Year crippling the area.  Additional snowfall continued throughout the week.  During this time period I was barraged with phone calls from participants of the November, 1978 clinic claiming to be terribly nervous, upset and anxious from "not smoking."  Curiously, most of them were feeling well during the month of December.  They had occasional urges which lasted only seconds and were quite easy to overcome.  What they were experiencing in January was different.  Many felt that they were on the verge of cracking up.  To them life was "just no good" without their cigarettes.  Was the anxiety they were now experiencing really a side effect from giving up smoking?

To any outside observer the answer to the mysterious intensification of perceived withdrawal was obvious.  In fact, if our ex-smokers listened to radio or television or read the front page of any newspaper, they would have encountered a story on cabin fever.  By simply comparing their symptoms with those accompanying cabin fever they would understand what was happening.

Attributing the anxiety to smoking cessation was transference of blame.  In fact, they were having a normal reaction to an abnormal situation - confinement due to the blizzard.  They would have had the same anxiety whether or not they had given up cigarettes.

The above story illustrates an atypical time period in which numerous people experience similar complaints.  In everyday life inherent problems exist.  Work, family, friends, and money can all contribute to daily distress.  Ex-smokers often think that if they just take a cigarette during a stressful episode the situation will be solved.  For example, consider a person who finds he has a flat tire in a parking lot during a freezing rain.  When encountering this kind of misfortune, the ex-smoker's first reaction often is, "I need a cigarette."  What will actually solve this problem is changing the tire, and driving off in a warm car.  What would a cigarette do to help this situation?  It only makes the person see the flat tire longer and freeze more.  This adds up to greater frustration. The first puff will probably reinforce the addiction to cigarettes which is a much greater crisis than the flat tire ever was.  In fact, taking the first puff almost always results in a bigger problem than the crisis that "caused" them to take the puff.  Even in a real catastrophe, such as a death in the family, injuries, illnesses, flooding resulting in major property loss, bankruptcy and so on, a cigarette will not solve the problem.  It will just add another major problem to the originally bad situation.

Remember, smoking cannot solve problems of daily living.  No matter what the problem, there is a more effective way of solving it than smoking.   In fact, a smoker's health risks are a real problem that can only be solved if they - NEVER TAKE ANOTHER PUFF!


While most smokers actually believe that smoking was an effective stress treatment strategy (a drug that calmed them down), when it really comes down to it, smoking never truly calmed them down. All it did was administered nicotine alleviated nicotine withdrawal that was induced by stress. The illustration and text below covers this point.

The one true step that people are doing here to control their stress is getting rid of a product that should cause any thinking person a lot of worry and to stop the vicious cycle of drug feeding and drug withdrawal by always knowing now to never take another puff!

Joel

In the illustration above you can see on the left how a non-smokers reacts to stress. Without it they are happy and comfortable, when encountering stress they lose this comfort and depending on its severity they can get either mildly annoyed or really upset. The resolution of the stress will normally bring the non-smoker back to the original state of comfort, after a little time of cooling down of course.

Smokers are much more complex. Stress has an affect on all people--it makes the urine acidic. Both smokers and non-smokers experience this phenomena. In non-smoker smokers, the urine acidity has no real visible or perceivable effects--smokers are much more complicated. After the initial stress a smoker will feel like a non-smoker encountering stress, for a few seconds. But then the delineation occurs, the smoker's nicotine level depletes because of the urine acidity induced by the stress, and the smoker is kicked into a drug withdrawal state. The smoker has four ways to deal with the situation now.

First, the smoker can just smoke a cigarette. Well low and behold if the smoker does this he or she will feel "better." He or she will not feel good; he or she just won't be feeling withdrawal for the moment but still be feeling the initial stress. In essence, he or she will feel like a non-smoker under stress, not great, but not in withdrawal either.

The second way a smoker can handle the stress is to solve it and also smoke a cigarette. This results in one happy smoker. No stress now and no withdrawal, life is good at the moment. The feeling of bliss is basically the same feeling a non-smoker has who resolves his or her stress.

But then there are the other two scenarios. The smoker can solve the problem but not smoke. Here is the kicker here, the problem is resolved but the smoker is still in withdrawal, the nicotine level has dropped and problem resolution has no way to stop the nicotine depletion, only a cigarette can do that.

The worst of all situations is the smoker who cannot solve the problem and also cannot smoke a cigarette. This is a miserable situation to ever be in. You normally don't want to be around a smoker in this situation let alone being one yourself. Many smokers find themselves facing this dilemma daily since many jobs and social settings do not allow smoking yet constantly force the smoker to face stresses.

When you quit smoking these last four reactions to stress become a thing of the past. You still face stress, but you no longer have to face drug withdrawals induced by it. In essence you deal with stress in a totally different way when you don't have chronic drug withdrawals exaggerating it.

To stay in the position of being able to handle stresses with greater clarity and minimal discomfort always know that no matter what the stress, to avoid it having any long lasting and life threatening complications always remember to never take another puff!

Joel

Video version explaining the graphic here:

Video Title
Dial-Up
HS/BB
Audio
Length
Added
Why do smokers smoke? 2.65mb 5.70mb   18:08 11/07/06


Reply
 Message 6 of 11 in Discussion 
From: JoelSent: 11/27/2006 3:50 AM

How would you deal with

the following situations?




Your 2-year-old is having a temper tantrum because he wants a new toy. Would you;

  1. Leave him alone until he calmed down
  2. Give into his demands
  3. Give him a tranquilizer

Your 7-year-old is anxious about next weeks' Little League tryouts. Would you;

  1. Assure him that he can do it
  2. Practice with him and tell him to try his best
  3. Give him a valium every three hours until the game

Your 14-year-old is crushed when she is not asked to the sophomore dance. Would you;

  1. Fix her up with one of your friend's children
  2. Tell her to go anyway
  3. Give her cocaine to pick up her spirits

Your 15-year-old is self-conscious about being 5 pounds overweight. Would you;

  1. Cook lower calorie meals
  2. Enroll her in a diet or exercise program
  3. Put her on appetite suppressants

All of these young people are experiencing what adults would consider "growing pains."  A little time, patience and positive reassuring will help them overcome all of these difficult situations.

The fact is, as long as anyone continues to develop physically, emotionally, intellectually, professionally or spiritually, they too will experience growing pains.  Adults are prone to hurt, pain, sadness, depression and anxiety just as children are.  These feelings are all necessary if we wish to continue to develop our minds and bodies.  Without such growth, we would not experience happiness, satisfaction, contentment or purpose to their full extent.

The third choice in each of the above situations was, of course, ridiculous.  We would not subject our children to chemical hazards to overcome such trivial problems.  However, as adults we are fully capable of practicing such dangerous behaviors for our own relief.  Take cigarette smoking as an example.

When you were still a smoker, how many times would you say you had to smoke because you were lonely and sad without your friendly cigarettes?  How many times did you say that you had to smoke because of all the stress in your life?  How many times did you tell yourself that many social activities were just not fun without your cigarettes?  How many times did you say that you would gain too much weight if you quit smoking?  All you were saying was that you needed nicotine, a drug, to overcome everyday life problems.

It was not until you were off cigarettes that you realized you could overcome such problems without smoking, and in most cases more effectively than when you were a smoker.  Once you had quit you realized just how much a source of stress the habit was to you.  You were caught by a socially unacceptable and physically deadly addiction and were quite often aware of it.  This is when you had the desire to give them up, but thought the pain of quitting too great to even attempt it.

Even today, you probably still desire an occasional cigarette.  It may be in a stressful situation, at a party after a few drinks, or at a time when you find yourself alone with nothing better to do.  The fact is, there is nothing worse you can do than take a cigarette.  One cigarette will not help you over the problem.  In reality, it will create a new problem, a disastrous situation of a reinforced addiction, with all the physical dangers and associated dirty habits.

So, next time you have the desire for a cigarette, sit back and take a few moments to reflect upon what you are setting yourself up for.  Do you need that drug?  Do you want that addiction?  If not, simply remember - NEVER TAKE ANOTHER PUFF!


Reply
 Message 7 of 11 in Discussion 
From: JoelSent: 11/27/2006 3:52 AM
“A Safer Way to Smoke?�?/FONT>

Smokers are always looking for ways to reduce the health risks of smoking. Unfortunately, most techniques used to reduce the risk don't work, and, in many cases, may actually increase the dangers of smoking.

Probably the most popular method of risk reduction is switching to low tar and nicotine cigarettes. If people only smoked to perpetuate a simple habit, low tar and nicotine cigarettes would probably reduce the dangers of smoking. Unfortunately, the necessity to smoke is not continuance of a habit but rather maintenance of an addiction. Switching to a low tar and nicotine cigarette makes it difficult for a smoker to reach and maintain his normal required level of nicotine. The smoker will probably develop some sort of compensatory smoking pattern. Compensatory behaviors include smoking more cigarettes, smoking them further down, inhaling deeper, or holding the smoke down longer.

By doing one or a combination of these behaviors, the smoker will reach similar levels of tar and nicotine in his system as when he smoked his old brand, but, in the process, he may increase the amount of other potent poisons beyond what was delivered by his old cigarettes. Low tar and nicotine cigarettes often have higher concentrations of other dangerous poisons. By increasing consumption, substantially greater amounts of these poisons are taken into the system, thereby increasing his risk of diseases associated with these chemicals. One such poison, found in higher quantities in many low tar and nicotine cigarettes, is carbon monoxide. Carbon monoxide is one of the major factors contributing to the high incidence of heart and circulatory diseases in smokers. Also, to give flavor to the low tar and nicotine cigarettes, many additional additives and flavor enhancers are used. Tobacco companies are not required to disclose what the chemical additives are, but the medical community suspects that many of these additives are carcinogenic (cancer producing) and may actually be increasing the smoker's risk of tobacco-related cancers.

The filter at the end of cigarettes also may make a difference in how much poison a smoker takes in. Some filters are more effective than others, but, again, a smoker will generally alter the way he smokes rendering many of the protective actions of the filters useless. Some cigarettes have holes inserted around the perimeter of the filter permitting more air to be inhaled with the tars and gasses of the cigarette. Theoretically, this lowers the amount of the actual tobacco smoke being inhaled. But, a smoker will normally find these cigarettes difficult to inhale and cannot get the amount of nicotine necessary to satisfy the craving. In response, he may smoke more or may discover an even more innovative way to interfere with the filter's protective action. Many times a smoker will learn how to put the cigarettes a little deeper into his mouth and seal his lips around the ventilation holes, thus decreasing the filter's efficiency. I have even encountered smokers in clinics who put tape around these holes because they found the cigarette easier to inhale and generally tasted better. In the process, they inactivated the semiprotective mechanism of the filter. Their attempts at making their smoking safer were simply an inconvenience and a waste of time. Filters could be developed that would take out all of the nicotine, but, unfortunately, in order to satisfy the addiction, most smokers would give themselves a hernia trying to inhale.

One last method of risk reduction worth mentioning is vitamin supplements. The body's ability to utilize Vitamin C is impaired by smoking. When some smokers learn this, they start taking supplemental Vitamin C. But vitamin C acidifies the urine, resulting in the body accelerating the excretion rate of nicotine. In response, the smoker may smoke extra cigarettes. In the process, he will probably destroy the extra vitamin C and increase his exposure to all of the poisonous chemicals found in tobacco smoke.

Almost every method of making smoking safer is a farce. There is only one way to totally reduce the deadly effects of smoking, and that is, simply, not to smoke. Only then will your chances of diseases such as heart disease, cancer and emphysema be reduced to the level of nonsmokers. And to keep your risk at these low levels, only one method is necessary�?STRONG>NEVER TAKE ANOTHER PUFF!


Reply
 Message 8 of 11 in Discussion 
From: JoelSent: 11/27/2006 3:53 AM
 

I often hear the comment that smoking is the "only" vice a person has left, like this somehow legitimizes smoking. "After all, I don't do this and I don't do that, all I do is smoke."

If any person fully understands what the ramifications of smoking are he or she will quickly realize the foolishness of such a statement.. The fact is that smoking is responsible for more deaths than probably all of the vices that people are referring to when making such comments combined.

Below is a chart from 1998 showing the risks of dying from smoking compared to the risk of dying from other common problems. Many of these problems are caused from behaviors that are considered by some to be vices. Again, look at the numbers. If smoking is your only vice understand something. Your ONLY vice is destroying your health and if not dealt with will likely cause your premature death. The solution to your problem is not finding other vices either, it is simply getting rid of this one deadly addiction by sticking to your commitment to never take another puff!

Joel

 

Death by Smoking

Although the below chart was compiled using 1998 United States data,
your nation's overall death category percentages may be fairly similar.


Cause of Death


How to Prevent These Deaths


   1998   Deaths


AIDS

condoms, education, research

13,426
Alzheimers medical research 22,725
Auto Accidents seatbelts, airbags, highway safety, training 42,191
Bike Accidents reflectors, lights, helmets and training 142
Breast Cancer mammography and medical research 42,068
Diabetes medical research 64,751
Drowning life jackets, swimming lessons, supervision 4,406
Drug Reactions read the labels, consult your pharmacist 276
Falls awareness, safety harnesses and helmets 12,595
Fires & Burns alarms, extinguishers, education and planning 3,362
Gun Accidents deprive children of access and hunter training 866
Hepatitis vaccine (A&B) and clean needles & testing (C) 4,796
Illegal Drugs motivation, education and support 16,926
Leukemia research, exercise, diet, and no tobacco 20,324
Lightening stay indoors and wear rubber shoes 10
Liver Disease sound diet, max. 2 oz. of alcohol, research 25,192
Meningitis vaccinations 768
Murder police, courts, prisons, awareness 18,272
Pedestrians reflective clothes, sidewalks and crosswalks 5,412
Poisoning secure cleaning fluids, poisons and pills 10,801
Prostate Cancer testing, exercise, diet, research 32,203
Snake Bites awareness, boots, vaccines 8
Suffocation think, anticipate and alter ventilation 4,585
Suicide
counseling, mental health and love 30,575
Syphilis abstinence, condoms, education 45
Ulcers avoid tobacco, alcohol and caffeine 4,695
 
TOTAL OF ALL OF THE ABOVE

381,420

TOBACCO


TOTAL 1998 TOBACCO DEATHS


418,690

     

© WhyQuit.Com 2000

Reply
 Message 9 of 11 in Discussion 
From: JoelSent: 11/27/2006 3:55 AM
 
 

Reply
 Message 10 of 11 in Discussion 
From: JoelSent: 11/27/2006 4:09 AM
From: John (Gold)  (Original Message) Sent: 6/29/2003 9:51 AM

   
PLAYING WITH FIRE
"A growing number of young adults are smoking on occasion. They say they're not smokers and they're not addicted to nicotine. But doctors and anti-tobacco advocates say they are."
 
Sunday, June. 29, 2003  

BY TOM MAJESKI,  Pioneer Press

Alexis McKinnis began smoking in high school. By the time she quit three years ago, she was smoking between 10 and 20 cigarettes a day. One night about a year ago, she resumed smoking after a two-year hiatus because she wanted to taste a cigarette again.
 
But this time it's different, McKinnis said. Rather than smoke every day, the 25-year-old Minneapolis resident only smokes three or four cigarettes when she's at a bar, having a few drinks with friends. On rare occasions, she might smoke a cigarette while driving or step outside at home and light up �?if it's not too cold.
 
"As an occasional smoker, I don't have any of the problems that I had before,'' McKinnis said. "It's an indulgence now, not an addiction.''
 
The concept of part-time smokers defies the traditional belief that people either smoke or they don't. But a recent survey by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in Atlanta found that part-time smokers represent a fast-growing segment of the 23 percent of American adults who smoke. Many of those are young adults, people in their 20s and 30s, who believe a cigarette now and then won't necessarily lead to a lifelong habit.
 
The trend, which worries anti-tobacco advocates, has not been missed by the tobacco industry. R.J. Reynolds, the company that makes Camels, has introduced a line of flavored cigarettes �?vanilla, chocolate mint and citrus, for instance �?some say is aimed at consumers who only smoke occasionally, such as following a meal.
 
Company spokeswoman Ellen Matthews said the Camel Exotic Blends come in tin packs, carry premium prices and are designed for adult Camel smokers who "want a little bit of variety on occasion.''
 
But Randy Segal, owner of Segal Wholesale, a Minneapolis tobacco distributor, said the flavored cigarettes are marketed to college students, primarily women. "(R.J. Reynolds) won't say that, but that seems to be the target,'' Segal said.
 
Segal said the flavored Camels sell a little better in urban areas and are popular at coffee shops and sidewalk cafes. Sales were brisk when the cigarettes were first introduced a year or so ago but have since tapered off a bit, he said.
 
According to the CDC survey, the percentage of adult smokers changed little between 1996 and 2001. But 38 states and the District of Columbia showed increases in "someday smokers'' �?people like McKinnis who said they smoked, but not every day.
 
The biggest gains in part-time smokers were in the District of Columbia (from 26.8 percent in 1996 to 41.2 percent in 2001), Utah (from 16.4 percent to 31.2 percent), Oregon (18.5 percent to 26.8 percent) and North Dakota (from 16.5 percent to 29.2 percent).
 
In Minnesota, the percentage of people who consider themselves part-time smokers dropped just slightly, from 24.3 percent in 1996 to 23.9 percent in 2001. In Wisconsin, the rate nudged up from 20.8 percent in 1996 to 22.7 percent in 2001.
 
The trend toward social smoking concerns anti-tobacco advocates because smoking at any level carries with it potentially deadly health risks. Furthermore, many of these part-time smokers eventually will discover that they have become addicted to nicotine.
 
"The whole phenomenon does worry me,'' said Dr. Marc Manley, executive director for the Center for Tobacco Reduction and Health Improvement at Eagan-based Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Minnesota. "Everyone who becomes addicted does so because it sneaks up on them. There are a lot of people who don't consider themselves smokers because they only smoke on weekends. But many of them will wake up some day and realize that they want a daily cigarette. People are playing with fire when they take risks with nicotine. It's not something you want to be hooked on.''
 
Eric Anderson, 27, of White Bear Lake has been a social smoker for about seven years.
 
"I've never really bought a pack of smokes. I just bum them,'' Anderson said. "I strictly smoke at a social setting, so if I'm out at a bar with friends �?I have tons (of friends) who smoke �?I just borrow them.''
 
Anderson said he's not addicted to nicotine, doesn't crave tobacco and doesn't like the smell of cigarette smoke. He doesn't smoke at home, at school, while driving or at work, but likes to light up in a restaurant after a meal or when he's in a bar with friends.
 
"I don't like the addictive things that go along with (smoking), but I do enjoy it on a social level and don't think it's bad for you,'' he said.
 
Manley disagrees. "There is no minimum safe exposure to cigarette smoke,'' he said. "Even being around secondhand smoke isn't safe, so if you smoke a few cigarettes you increase your risk of getting cancer and heart disease."
 
Angela Puckett of Lino Lakes said she, her husband, Todd, and many of their friends are social smokers.
 
"We're all around 34, 35 years old and we're growing up and starting to have children and have to quit because it's disgusting, but we still like to smoke,'' Puckett said. "It's kind of pathetic, actually.''
 
The Pucketts don't smoke in the house, in the car, during the day or around their 2½-year-old son, but do light up when they go out for cocktails with their friends. A former full-time smoker, Puckett said she cut back because of the cost, the health implications, the disgusting smell and her son.
 
Cassandra Smith, 24, of Woodbury has been smoking for 13 years. She eventually got up to two packs a day but quit cold turkey two weeks after she learned she was pregnant about five years ago. "It wasn't hard (to quit),'' she said. After her son's birth, she started up again, but on a more moderate level.
 
"I smoke about eight to 10 cigarettes a day, more when I go out on weekends,'' she said. But she doesn't smoke in her house, in the car or around her 4-year-old son.
 
"It's getting less and less,'' Smith said. "My son's bugging me to quit even though I don't smoke around him.''
 
The Blues' Manley said part-time smoking is a phenomenon of teenagers and people in their 20s. "You don't see many 50-year-old social smokers,'' he said.
 
In an attempt to counteract the alarming trend, Manley and his colleagues at the Center for Tobacco Reduction and Health Improvement have teamed with the American Cancer Society in an effort to find out what messages resonate with young people. The goal will be to encourage them to face the possibility that they might be addicted to nicotine when they think they are not, he said.
 
Social smoking represents a classic example of how addiction works, Manley said. "You do a little at a time until you become addicted.''
 
McKinnis said she's concerned about her smoking because she knows tobacco smoke is a toxin.
 
"I don't think about lung or throat cancer, just that I'm putting something poisonous in my body,'' she said. "It's funny because I'm very conscious about what I eat and the amount of stress I allow in my life because both factors affect your health so much. I know I will have to curb the indulgence eventually to maintain my health, but I will also have to eventually curb my alcohol, soda and candy intake for the same reason."
 
Copyright Pioneer Press 2003
 

 
 

 

How many moderate to heavy drinkers are open and honest with themselves, let alone the world, about their level of consumption?    Although this article has a wonderful title and contains lots of interesting thinking, how would the assertion by the one smoker that they were able to go from being nicotine dependent to a social smoker be received by a teen reader?   Isn't that every addict's dream - to think that they can control the uncontrollable?

Remember when we were young,  how smart we thought we were?   Well I did anyway ; )   Remember thinking that mom and dad had little understanding of how life really worked?   As this article suggests, the newest generation of smokers have been exposed to far more information about the scope and magnitude of smoking's health risks, and a bit more about its ability to permanently enslave, than any prior generation in history.

How are our "intelligent" youth and young people using this info?  Aside from having far fewer acceptable indoor locations to relax and engage in smoking - that might tend to foster the onset of dependency sooner - are some intentionally going a bit slower while being more leery about "playing with fire" than did our generations?
 
I'm sure many of us know someone who constantly reeks of the smell of tobacco yet claims to be the part-time, occasional or social smoker.  I was with one yesterday.  
 
Is price, opportunity to smoke and growing health concerns causing those dependent upon nicotine to smoke fewer cigarettes and to suck 25% deeper and harder with each puff?   
 
Yes, there are some true chippers and, no, we've learned that it doesn't take nearly as much nicotine to maintain active dependency as many "light" smokers would like to  believe, but does the growing stigma of an unhealthy addiction have an increasing number of smokers being less than candid about how much they smoke and their dependency?   
 
As for the article, I'm sure multiple factors are at work including increasing youth awareness of nicotine's ability to enslave, that might naturally tend to cause early experimenters to watch their nicotine consumption a bit more than our generations did. 
 
Also, remember when it was triple cool,kewl, and Kool to wear a tee shirt with a pack of smokes bulging from your pocket, with one behind the ear?   Remember all the fancy cigarette-pack purses and holders that the ladies carried and even the shiny silver metal pack covers and fancy Zippo lighters that many men openly shared?   We used and oozed smoking as a communication ice-breaker.  Now look at things.
 
Yes, times they are a changing!  This coming Tuesday, July 1, 2003, if you travel to Florida for vacation, forget about smoking in any enclosed restaurants.  It's no longer an option. There's only one rule - no nicotine today, Never Take Another Puff!    John
 
 
 
 

Reply
 Message 11 of 11 in Discussion 
From: MSN NicknameSal-GOLDSent: 11/29/2006 12:59 AM
The conclusion of this study Health consequences of reduced daily cigarette consumption is:
CONCLUSION
 
"In both sexes, a reduction in cigarette consumption by 50% was not associated with a markedly lower risk of all-cause mortality and, specifically, of dying from cardiovascular disease or smoking-related cancer. Accordingly, a reduction in consumption does not seem to bring about harm reduction."

First  Previous  2-11 of 11  Next  Last 
Return to General