MSN Home  |  My MSN  |  Hotmail
Sign in to Windows Live ID Web Search:   
go to MSNGroups 
Free Forum Hosting
 
ChristianDebates[email protected] 
  
What's New
  
  General  
  Welcome!  
  What We Believe  
  Site Rules  
  All Topics  
  Messages  
  Group Mailboxes  
  Cattag Offers  
  Cattag Pickups  
  Computer Help  
  MWBC  
  Christian Debates Banners  
  Bible Reading  
  Bible Study Links  
  Members' Studies  
  Prayer Needed  
  Devotionals  
  Please Pray for the Peace of Jerusalem  
  E-mail Stories  
    
    
  Links  
  Pictures  
  Christian RADIO - Listen as you read  
  Member's Links  
  Poems by Doz  
  Heresies in History  
  Fonts  
  To MgrSite  
  Bible Trivia  
  
  
  Tools  
 
General : Another Gospel?
Choose another message board
 
     
Reply
 Message 1 of 5 in Discussion 
From: MSN Nickname_MrWonder_  (Original Message)Sent: 10/27/2008 2:44 PM

ANOTHER GOSPEL? By Dr. Harry A. Ironside <<-- CLICK HERE TO SEE VIDEO

 

THERE is only one Gospel, only one true message of good news from heaven. But there are many substitutes offered in place of the Gospel. It was so in the beginning. It is so now. The apostle Paul wrote to the Galatians:

“I marvel that ye are so soon removed from Him that called you into the grace of Christ unto another gospel; which is not another; but there be some that trouble you, and would pervert the gospel of Christ. But though we, or an angel from heaven, preach any other gospel unto you than that which we have preached unto you, let him be accursed. As we said before, so say I now again, If any man preach any other gospel unto you than that ye have received, let him be accursed.�?(Galatians1:6-9)

THESE are intensely solemn words. They come bubbling up from the steaming heart of the indignant apostle in righteous wrath as he learns of pretentious carnal legalists deliberately seeking to mislead eternally-bound souls with a false message which could only, like a will-o-the-wisp, lead to ruin and destruction at last. He would have us know it is a fearfully wicked thing to trifle with the sacred heaven - sent message that has come to a needy world declaring the grace of God to poor lost sinners.

WHAT then is this Gospel of which the apostle was so jealous? He tells us plainly in 1st Corinthians 15:1-4,

“�?I declare unto you the gospel�?how that Christ died for our sins according to the scriptures; and that he was buried, and that he rose again the third day according to the scriptures.�?

Note carefully: The Gospel is God’s wonderful story of His beloved Son. It is a message of grace to be received in faith. It is not a code of laws to be obeyed or good advice to be followed. It is not a system of ritual observances or a call to submit to certain ordinances. It does not set forth the claims of any human church organization, however venerable, nor does it exhort men to seek after experiences, however remarkable, though a blessed experience follows its acceptance. It simply sets forth Christ crucified and risen as the Savior of all who believe in Him.

WHEN THE MORMON elder comes declaring that an angel revealed a gospel of salvation through a restored church and renewed ordinances, he is preaching another gospel, and angel and man are alike under the curse.

WHEN THE LEGALIST comes insisting that salvation is by obedience to God’s holy law (which in itself is just and good), he is preaching another gospel, for the Word of God declares, “By the deeds of the law shall no flesh be justified in His sight.�?

WHEN THE REVIVALIST comes promising salvation to those “who make a full surrender�?of all that they have to God, and who “pay the price of full salvation,�?he is preaching another gospel, for the price was paid on Calvary’s cross and the work that saves is finished. It was Christ Jesus who made the full surrender, when He yielded Himself unto death for us that we might be redeemed from the curse of the broken law and forever saved from the judgment to come upon all who refuse His grace.

WHEN THE MODERNIST prates in glowing terms and honeyed phrases of salvation by character, salvation by altruism, salvation by ethical culture, he, too is proclaiming another gospel, for if character could have saved, Christ need not have died; if altruism would have fitted sinful men for heaven, the Lord Jesus would surely have told us so; if ethical culture could deliver from the wrath of God, what place would Gethsemane, Calvary and the Empty Tomb have in the Divine economy?

WHEN THE CHRISTIAN SCIENTIST (falsely so-called) denies the reality of sin, disease and death and lulls sinners to sleep by telling them that “God is all and all is God,�?even going so far as to declare the death of Christ was unreal, and His resurrection simply spiritual, and that the blood of Jesus was no more efficacious to cleanse from sins when shed upon the accursed tree than when it was flowing in His veins, he, or she, is promulgating another gospel, which is not another, for it is a baseless dream, a weird and blasphemous “error of mortal mind�?that will leave its votaries at last without God and without hope.

THE SOLEMN FACT IS THERE IS NO OTHER GOSPEL. Every pretended substitute is but a Satan-devised delusion meant to turn men away from the strait gate which alone leads into the narrow way, and make them contented as they crowd down the clear side of the broad way to eternal perdition.

BEFORE there can really be another gospel there must be another savior and another Holy Spirit, and this can never be. Nor is any other gospel needed, for the grand old Gospel of the grace of God is all-sufficient to save “whosoever will,�?and has demonstrated its power throughout the centuries by transforming lost miserable sinners into happy joyous saints. Paul says,

“I am not ashamed of the gospel of Christ; for it is the power of God unto salvation to everyone that believeth; to the Jew first, and also to the Greek. For therein is the righteousness of God revealed from faith to faith�?(Romans 1:16,17).

THE Gospel needs only to be preached in the power of the Holy Spirit to hold its own against every imitation and substitute that the mind of the natural man energized by Satan can devise. Like the Bible itself it is divinely inspired and, therefore, preeminently fitted for the needs of mankind. It convinces the mind and satisfies the heart, if men but take the place of repentant sinners and accept it by faith. It is the dynamic of God unto the deliverance of all who believe it. To refuse it is to be lost. To receive its message is to be saved.

IT reveals the righteousness of God, making known how He “can be just and the justifier of him that believeth in Jesus.�?Satan’s false gospels all pretend to show how man can establish his own righteousness. The Gospel of Christ comes to unrighteous men and tells them of a righteousness that is divine which is imputed to all who believe.

ANOTHER gospel, whatever its outward form, will always be found to center in something that man can be or do in order to obtain merit. The Gospel of God declares what Christ has done in order that the salvation purchased may be justly offered to sinners.

ANOTHER gospel presupposes some strength, some ability to please God, in the natural man. God’s Gospel declares that when “we were yet without strength, in due time Christ died for the ungodly.�?

ANOTHER gospel will land you in hell! God’s Gospel, believed, will bring you safe to heaven.

TURNING from every false hope, I beseech my unsaved reader to rest in what Scripture declares concerning Christ, and thus be able to sing in faith:

“Upon a life I did not live, Upon a death I did not die, Another’s life, Another’s death I hang my whole eternity. None will ever be confounded who put their trust in Him.�?/FONT>

***Dr. Harry Ironside (1876-1951), a godly Fundamentalist author and teacher for many years, served as pastor of Chicago’s Moody Memorial Church from 1930-1948.***

http://onetruegod.wordpress.com/2008/09/21/another-gospel/#comment-1621



First  Previous  2-5 of 5  Next  Last 
Reply
 Message 2 of 5 in Discussion 
From: MSN NicknameHisAlone2Sent: 10/27/2008 3:50 PM
Amen!  Good post.

Reply
The number of members that recommended this message. 0 recommendations  Message 3 of 5 in Discussion 
Sent: 10/29/2008 10:40 AM
This message has been deleted by the author.

Reply
 Message 4 of 5 in Discussion 
From: MSN NicknameKenHamrickSent: 10/29/2008 10:43 AM
While I agree with most of this good message, I do not agree with this part:

WHEN THE REVIVALIST comes promising salvation to those “who make a full surrender�?of all that they have to God, and who “pay the price of full salvation,�?he is preaching another gospel, for the price was paid on Calvary’s cross and the work that saves is finished. It was Christ Jesus who made the full surrender, when He yielded Himself unto death for us that we might be redeemed from the curse of the broken law and forever saved from the judgment to come upon all who refuse His grace.

It is true that Christ paid all that was necessary to purchase our salvation. However, if there were no price for us to pay, then why did the Savior tell us to "count the cost" before beginning the journey? Christ did pay the ultimate price, as Savior of the world, in His death on the Cross. But He also tells us that one must take up his cross to follow Him. Since Christ took up His Cross in our place, is it no longer necessary for us to take up ours? Does Dr. Ironside want us to believe that a half-hearted surrender would suffice, since Christ made the full surrender for us?

It is heart-breaking to see the numbers of young people who grew up in the Church, made a profession of faith, were baptized, were active in the youth group, and considered themselves to be true believers in Christ�?and then went out into the world as young adults and left Christ and their faith behind them. Any gospel that saves incompletely, and teaches that those whom Christ has saved to the uttermost can leave their faith behind if they choose, is ANOTHER GOSPEL.

We cannot be content to rest in the fact that we went to the altar or made a decision for Christ. It is possible to make an emotional decision that does not come from the depths of our heart, and does not include the kind of genuine faith that saves through Christ. Examine yourselves, to see whether you are in the faith. Faith is more than believing that Christ is the Son of God, and that He died for the sin of the world, and rose on the third day, and that all who believe in Him will be saved. Believing these things about Him is not the same as believing in Him. “You believe that God is one; you do well. Even the demons believe—and shudder!�?(James 2:19). Even the demons believe these things about Him and know that they are true. But in order to believe in Him, we must embrace Him with our whole heart, desiring to forsake self, sin, and the world. We must want with our whole heart to live in Him and die to our old self. “Then Jesus told his disciples, ‘If anyone would come after me, let him deny himself and take up his cross and follow me. For whoever would save his life will lose it, but whoever loses his life for my sake will find it.’�?Anyone who prays the “sinner’s prayer,�?while saving his life for himself rather than surrendering his life to Christ, is only fooling himself. When a sinner comes to the cross and surrenders his life to Christ, he is spiritually placed on that cross so that his “old man,�?his self-life, is “crucified in Christ�?and put to death. In this way, the believer forsakes and leaves behind all that he used to be, and “rises again�?to new life in Christ. This is what it means for the sinner to deny himself and take up his cross and follow Christ.

To be saved and believe in Christ only requires a decision�?but it requires an honest decision from the depths of one’s heart. And the God who looks on the heart is not swayed by mere words. A man can be saved without saying a thing; and a man may remain lost though he say all the right things. Jesus told us, in Mark 7:21-23, that there will be many who call Him “Lord, Lord,�?but will be told by Him, “I never knew you. Depart from Me…�?That verse should be sobering to everyone who calls Him, “Lord.�?God desires truth from us—“truth in the inward being�?(Psalm 51:6). Human beings are sinful by nature, and we easily deceive ourselves rather than face difficult truths. Jeremiah 17:9-10 tells us, “The heart is deceitful above all things, and desperately sick; who can understand it? ‘I the LORD search the heart and test the mind, to give every man according to his ways, according to the fruit of his deeds.’�?Let us all search our own heart, and face the truth of who we are in our inward being. This is the most important matter in life, for “How shall we escape if we neglect so great salvation�??�?(Hebrews 2:3). This is why we are told, in Philippians 2:12, “…Work out your own salvation with fear and trembling.�?

Those who honestly face themselves, and the truth of who they are in the inward being, and who embrace Christ and His cross from the depths of their heart—these are they who truly believe in Him. And “…He is able also to save them to the uttermost that come unto God by him, seeing he ever lives to make intercession for them�?(Hebrews 7:25). Do you know Him?

Ken


Reply
 Message 5 of 5 in Discussion 
From: MSN Nickname_MrWonder_Sent: 10/29/2008 1:14 PM
I think the author's point is there are not two salvations, one of them being "full salvation" and the other being partial.
 
I am a member at several sites who believe in "full salvation" which they say is received through obedience instead of grace.  I believe in one salvation, received by grace, and that that salvation is what causes a person to obey.
 
Again, I think the author is referring to salvific value - those sites believe their obedience is what has saved them, as though "full surrender" gives one a "full salvation".  Christ did it all.  Yes, I am to surrender and I am to obey, but I don't get "full salvation" through my works - I work because I have full salvation already.
 
I appreciate your post, and it is a very good post teaching truth - I just think you have somewhat misunderstood the author's intent and the foundation of your post should be commentary on salvation in general and not a possible misconception of what he was saying.

First  Previous  2-5 of 5  Next  Last 
Return to General