Gerrardstown residents reject shale quarry
By Erik M. Anderson / Journal Staff Writer
HEDGESVILLE �?North Mountain Shale LLC has not proven an environmentally friendly neighbor and should not be granted a permit to open a shale quarry on about 11 acres on North Mountain in Gerrardstown, said Wendy Hudock, who was joined by about 200 angry residents Wednesday.
Hudock told the group gathered at the James Rumsey Technical Institute for a state Department of Environmental Protection drainage permit hearing that the company hoping to mine shale from the North Mountain has already caused damage to her nearby farm during exploratory operations and did not take precautions against soil erosion and stream pollution.
“I am here to report that North Mountain Shale is not a good neighbor to us and to the environment. They have caused detrimental damage to my property by operating without implementing any sediment and erosion control plans,�?she said. “This job should be shut down permanently as they have not erected one silt fence nor one bale of hay to control runoff from their so-called prospecting.�?BR>
She added that her farm is a designated historical property and that if the mountain were mined, local tourism would greatly suffer.
Dr. Joseph De Soto, speaking for the American Medical Association, said that mining in the area would put nonremovable carcinogens in the ground water which, even if treated, would probably cause higher cancer rates.
“During the processing of shale, hydrogen fluoride’s produced. Hydrogen fluoride’s converted into hydrofluoric acid. Hydrofluoric acid breaks down bone. It’s absorbed through the skin. Unacceptable,�?De Soto said.
Willard Wynne said the quarry would cut off a portion of North Mountain, which would disrupt the natural flow of water onto his side of the mountain, thus cutting off the supply to his well and those of about 350 of his neighbors.
“Who provides after we all find out, ‘Hey, we’re all out of water?’�?he said.
Steve Teufel, the president of the Berkeley County Commission, said the DEP permit should be denied because the local streams cannot be protected from the quarry runoff. He said the tributary near the proposed mining site that flows into Mill Creek and Opequon Creek, as well as Opequon Creek itself, have been identified by the DEP and other agencies as the number one state priority watershed.
“Storm waters associated with industrial activities ... could exacerbate pre-existing water problems and have an additional detrimental impact on the Mill Creek watershed,�?he said.
Sen. John Unger, the chairman of the state water resources commission, said the Eastern Panhandle’s water supply is essential to the continued development of business in the area, and that because at any time the state of Maryland can cut off the region’s access to the Potomac River, the Panhandle must have every available source of clean and usable water.
He said that he will continue to monitor the situation and ensure that the company follows the exact letter of the law in applying for its permit. The DEP will continue to accept written public comments about the matter until May 24.