MSN Home  |  My MSN  |  Hotmail
Sign in to Windows Live ID Web Search:   
go to MSNGroups 
Free Forum Hosting
 
Important Announcement Important Announcement
The MSN Groups service will close in February 2009. You can move your group to Multiply, MSN’s partner for online groups. Learn More
It's MY Wal*Mart!Contains "mature" content, but not necessarily adult.[email protected] 
  
What's New
  
  Messages  
  Pictures  
  Site Guidelines  
  Who are we?  
  
  
  Tools  
 
General : Ever ask yourself why you keep trying to do a good job?  
     
Reply
 Message 1 of 14 in Discussion 
From: mad martian forever  (Original Message)Sent: 6/19/2008 1:08 AM
I KNEW my inventory would be better this year.  There is not one aspect of my dept that isn't significantly improved.
The store has also improved dramatically.  We have all felt very proud of our progress.
Last year, we had a 1.9% shrink--2nd bad shrink in 2 years.
We KNEW it would be better this year.
We shrank 1.6%; only $30,000 better than last year.
Some depts did well, others were a lot worse than last year.
I don't know what my number was last year, but I KNOW it was better than this year.
I shrank over $29,000.
When the co-mgr annonced that, I felt like he had dropped a brick on my head.  I couldn't stop the tears from rolling down my cheeks.
How could it possibly be worse than last year?!  I have made such great strides, as anyone else in the store will tell you.
My co-mgr and asst mgr think that the problem is missed claims.  I know that sometimes when dog or cat food gets damaged on the truck, they throw it away without documenting it.  Some of them may not know any better.  I'm betting that some of them know better, but don't want to take the time.  Who wants to stop unloading a truck, so that they can clean up the leaking cans of dog food, and turn in  the UPC?  Easier to just scoop it up and toss it in the trash--or better yet, leave it for someone else to clean up, and know that they probably won't process it correctly either. 
I am slowly recovering from this shock, and am feeling a bit more like continuing to do my job as I was, before I found out that nothing I did made any difference.
I wonder if anything I did, kept it from being worse than it was.
 
Sad Mad


First  Previous  2-14 of 14  Next  Last 
Reply
 Message 2 of 14 in Discussion 
From: MSN NicknameoverburdenassociateSent: 6/19/2008 3:50 AM
Mad... I don't think that you should take this personally.  If you've done the best job that you can... what more can anyone ask ?
 
I took over my dept. a year ago... last years shrink was 58,000... this year it was close to 80,000... will it get better.. probably not.  I think that it will get worse.. my shrink is just horrible.  I am finding so many open packages of stuff.. and some of it is over 25.00.
 
I look at it this way... my dept. is mostly a luxury (cosmetics) dept.  You can do without.. so if you have a choice of buying a gal. of milk or putting gas in your car... but you need the makeup .. what would you do ?  Buy what is needed and steal the other.  I am not taking this personally at all.  I know that I am doing the best I can, making sure my price changes are done correctly, fixing on hands..thats all one can do.
 
Cheer up.. it isn't all that bad.

Reply
 Message 3 of 14 in Discussion 
From: MSN NicknameLilAngel37911Sent: 6/19/2008 10:42 PM
I ask myself that all the time.
 
Also consider stuff that we are supposedly sent but don't get. And if it isn't caught we can't file a claim so therefore we are getting charged for merchandise but not receiving it.
 
Last year after inventory on the variance reports it showed that they didn't count 45 coats. We never got them. So unless you have a list of what is supposedly on the truck every night printed off for you then you will never know.
 
A mod never fell for those coats, they never had a price change so how were we to know we didn't get them. I believe the total for them was a little over $2000.00 on what we shrunk out. Get a few missing shipments at those dollar amounts and it isn't long before your shrinking out alot in an area.
 
I believe Wal*Mart needs to go back to when it comes in off the truck it should be scanned by us so that it is putting it in our system. That way reports could then be compared as to wether or not we acutally got it. Time consuming yes but would help cut down on it. Such a shame the world we live in is so fast paced anymore that it's all about who can get it to the store and on the shelves faster. Ends up hurting you in the long run.

Reply
 Message 4 of 14 in Discussion 
From: mad martian foreverSent: 6/20/2008 2:28 AM
For years, the dept mgrs have been told that shrink in our depts is our responsibility.  Everything we do or don't do, is repeatedly used as evidence that we didn't do the best things, for combatting shrink.
Our MM told us not to worry about our shrink being bad, because almost every store is doing badly these days.  After 16 years of being told that my actions influence my shrink, it's hard to let go of that.
My co-mgr is considering giving me the option to do claims-type markdowns on the stuff I know I don't have.  I have been turning in numbers to Claims, for about a month, and when they did the markdowns, that fixed my onhands too.  Of course, the other 11 months, all I did was change my onhands.
I feel strongly that there is a huge gap between what the DC says they ship, and what we get.  I don't know if it's our assoc's, or the Mob, or who, but I know we are getting billed for lots of stuff we never get at the store.
The only thing that seems to make sense, is for everything on the trucks to be scanned in--just like the GM directs, and the grocery vendors who deliver to us; sometimes more than once a day.
You can print out a list of what is supposed to be on the truck, everyday.  Too bad sometimes not everything on the list is on the truck.  Oh, it will show up tomorrow.  Who has time to do their job, and keep up with whether or not we really get eveything?
 
Mad

Reply
 Message 5 of 14 in Discussion 
From: MSN Nicknameladysassy2002Sent: 6/20/2008 7:37 AM
...apparently we do!  Pre-notification report printed every morning/afternoon so that we have a head-up on what is supposed to be coming in.  That report is used to match the freight as we unload it from the pallets...not too bad when you have only one or two pallets of freight...but when you have four, five, six or more pallets...that is another story! Let's just say that in that scenario no one gets out on the floor until very late and by then the shelves look like crap, there are holes everywhere and stuff gets put anywhere just to get rid of it so you can finish checking the freight!  It's a catch-22...and, by the way...we haven't had any missing freight in our department...yet!!! LS

Reply
 Message 6 of 14 in Discussion 
From: MSN NicknameLilAngel37911Sent: 6/20/2008 10:18 AM
Yeah that is another thing that sucks. If the truck was too full then what you were supposed to get could be thrown on another and it come the next day.

Reply
 Message 7 of 14 in Discussion 
From: mad martian foreverSent: 6/21/2008 4:26 PM
In  my dept (Pets), it's normal for us to have 10 pallets or more each night.  Eighteen is not unusual.  By the time I come in, there's rarely more than a float of freight that hasn't been worked.  Since 3rd shift is only allowed so much time to work the freight, there's no way they could take the time to check what came on the truck.  And, since the unloaders are under so much pressure to get the trucks unloaded, I don't see them carefully checking off every item. 
In the past, I used to check my pre-notification report against what was on the floor/in the backroom.  On items that were valued at more than $200 (or whatever amount is the minimum amount that the DC will refund us for), I would turn in a claim to UPC.  The times that I did it, either the DC denied it, or the UPC assoc didn't get it processed in time.
 
Mad

Reply
 Message 8 of 14 in Discussion 
From: MSN Nicknamemreighties80Sent: 6/22/2008 4:54 PM
I work in GM Directs and its takes all day for me and the other Directs person to just do the boxes that came in for us to check in. Now some days we may not get much and I will do most of the checking-in myself. Other days we are overwhelmed with boxes, not to mention that we also have to check-in TLE's tires, car batteries and bulk oil also, that we have to leave some for the next morning.

We get around 100-200 boxes every day and that doesnt include the DVD pdq's that freight lines bring in, or the flower pots, or the pool chemicals, or whatever else comes in.

Now you multiply that times 10 or 1000-2000 boxes that comes on a Wal-Mart truck every day with some days having 2 trucks (or more). Now how many people will it take to scan all that in each day? A lot more than 2 I bet you.

WM sure isnt going to hire people to do that cause they dont even hire to get the job done on the floor.

Hope this post doesnt sound "negative" cause all I am doing is showing you the numbers and WM figures that less people will equal more profit.

mreighties :)

Reply
 Message 9 of 14 in Discussion 
From: mad martian foreverSent: 6/23/2008 2:51 AM
I totally agree, mreighties.  You're not being negative, you're being realistic.  The possible saving grace, is that each case on the truck would only have to be scanned once, without opening the box.  (Although that assumes that the warehouse label is right, which we know it sometimes isn't)  However, we both know that the HO would rather skewer the stores for having too much shrink, than point the finger somewhere else.
 
Mad

Reply
 Message 10 of 14 in Discussion 
From: MSN NicknameLilAngel37911Sent: 6/23/2008 9:11 AM
No where did I say it would only be the 2 GM directs folks responsible for scanning it all in. But I do think you are being realistic. And like you said Mad they would rather put skewer the stores.

Reply
 Message 11 of 14 in Discussion 
From: mad martian foreverSent: 6/23/2008 11:31 AM
Yeah, I know you weren't saying that Directs would be scanning it in.  My point was that they won't assign anyone else to scan it in either; which proves that they don't want to know what doesn't make it to our stores.
I think there's a gap between the DC's and the stores.  I'm not saying the DC's are crooked, but somehow we're not getting everything we get billed for, and the DC's make it tough to get credit for it.  Then the stores are stuck holding the bag.
 
Mad

Reply
 Message 12 of 14 in Discussion 
From: mad martian foreverSent: 7/13/2008 4:09 PM
bump
 
Mad

Reply
 Message 13 of 14 in Discussion 
From: NHYankeeSent: 7/13/2008 8:26 PM
CNBC did a "documentary" back in 2004 on W-M.  Although my opinion is that much information in that program was dated, one of the quotes from Lee Scott has stuck with me.  He said that in a company this large, even if 99.9% of the associates were doing their jobs correctly, the other .1% would still add up to quite a large number.  All I try to do is the best I know how, each and every day.  While I may make mistakes, my hope is that I am doing my part and earning my paycheck.  It sounds like many - if not all - in this group are trying to do the same.

Reply
 Message 14 of 14 in Discussion 
From: mad martian foreverSent: 7/16/2008 2:28 AM
Kinda sounds like Lee thinks that those of us who try to do a good job, don't count for much.  I will work to forget this attitude, so that it doesn't hurt MY work ethic. 
 
Mad

First  Previous  2-14 of 14  Next  Last 
Return to General