MSN Home  |  My MSN  |  Hotmail
Sign in to Windows Live ID Web Search:   
go to MSNGroups 
Free Forum Hosting
 
Important Announcement Important Announcement
The MSN Groups service will close in February 2009. You can move your group to Multiply, MSN’s partner for online groups. Learn More
PME_Lives_onContains "mature" content, but not necessarily adult.[email protected] 
  
What's New
  
  Welcome To PMELO  
  Thank You to our Veterans  
  MSN CoC  
  Site Rules  
  General  
  Message Boards  
  Chit Chat  
  ☺Jokes & Games  
  ☼Philosophy  
  ♪Poets Corner�?/A>  
  Faith-Religion  
  Formal Debate  
  Attn Management  
  Venting  
  Sports Page  
  The Garden Shed  
  Election polls  
  Pictures  
  Member's Links  
  Guest Book  
    
  
  
  Tools  
 
Attn Management : ref: deleted posts
Choose another message board
 
     
Reply
 Message 1 of 79 in Discussion 
From: MSN NicknameBulphrog  (Original Message)Sent: 5/16/2008 9:58 PM
 
Is this like the other thread you were whining about on ask management? the one you counldn't find a thread you posted and claimed was deleted but it was further down on the page, but in your haste to try to cause issues you didn't look?
 
like i have said repeatedly, the first post, posted at 12:20AM, was a simple question.  i asked if anyone had heard of shrub's "sacrifice".  that post, which DID NOT contain this article,  was deleted by 12:22, and at that time, i cut and pasted this article, which went up at 12:28AM.
 
and that first post was NOT identical with the article posted here - although it was on the same topic.  where is it?  it existed for about 2 minutes, and had got one response, and then disappeared - the entire thread did.
 
the second post, put up at 12:28AM the same morning, was this post.  at that point your dipshit puppy dog began ragging me about "mulitiple posts" which is why i say he deleted it, although, up to this point, no one has admitted doing so.
 
at no time was this post put up twice - there were two posts, on this topic, but they were not duplicates.  ever.  the first was the question, the second was this article.
Address the topic, bul. There will be no further discussion about your double posting of the same topic here. 
huh?  you discussed it, above.  i , at the least, get to respond.


First  Previous  65-79 of 79  Next  Last 
Reply
 Message 65 of 79 in Discussion 
From: MSN NicknameBulphrogSent: 5/19/2008 9:08 PM
saleslady, i am still waiting on your explanation, of why you changed my the topic of my thread, from COE mismanagment, to a generalized thread on katrina? 
 
and then why, after you changing that thread, you proceeded to lump tons of shit in the thread, not related to COE mismanagment?
 
see your post 4.

Reply
 Message 66 of 79 in Discussion 
From: MSN NicknameBulphrogSent: 5/19/2008 9:23 PM
i am still waiting on those answers.    you have a LOT of questions pending.

Reply
 Message 67 of 79 in Discussion 
From: MSN NicknameBulphrogSent: 5/19/2008 9:48 PM
saleslady, what does "9 Months After Katrina: What have we Accomplished?" have to do with "COE misdmanagment"?

Reply
 Message 68 of 79 in Discussion 
From: MSN NicknameBulphrogSent: 5/19/2008 9:50 PM

saleslady, what does "Judge says residents can sue Corps over MRGO?" have to do with "COE mismanagment"?


Reply
 Message 69 of 79 in Discussion 
From: MSN NicknameBulphrogSent: 5/19/2008 10:19 PM
no answer?
 
that is because you fucked up.

Reply
 Message 70 of 79 in Discussion 
From: MSN NicknameBulphrogSent: 5/19/2008 11:43 PM
and btw, saleslady, did you notice that in post 12, i begged for a return to the original, legitemate topic?
but we are getting off topic here - this post is about the COE's sloppy record keeping, which shows that they do not even know what levees they are responsible for.  that, in itself, is professional malpractice.

Reply
 Message 71 of 79 in Discussion 
From: MSN NicknameBulphrogSent: 5/19/2008 11:58 PM
you still have not wxplained why you have combined all katrina threads, into one titled "COE mismanagment". why did you do that?

Reply
 Message 72 of 79 in Discussion 
From: MSN NicknameCaptainKBTSent: 5/20/2008 12:06 AM
Having a discussion with yourself....?

Reply
 Message 73 of 79 in Discussion 
From: MSN NicknameBulphrogSent: 5/20/2008 1:33 AM
Having a discussion with yourself....?
yup.  this is the proper place for the discussion, but the people with the answers are simply too fucking cowardly to answer. 
 
should they grow some balls, the questions are here, ready.

Reply
 Message 74 of 79 in Discussion 
From: MSN NicknameBulphrogSent: 5/20/2008 2:32 AM
 
why are there multiple duplicate posts, in multiple layers of this thread about COE mismanagment?  ref: post 24 appears multiple times, because the threads have been duplicated multiple times.
 
at the least, please eliminate those multiple posts, and re-edit all of the threads, so that a response is below the post it references.

Reply
 Message 75 of 79 in Discussion 
From: MSN NicknameBulphrogSent: 5/20/2008 4:53 AM
why did you just delete a post on the COE, in buffalo?

Reply
 Message 76 of 79 in Discussion 
From: MSN Nickname»ŜèčońđŜoń2ńđ1«�?/nobr>Sent: 5/20/2008 4:55 AM
 

Reply
 Message 77 of 79 in Discussion 
From: MSN NicknameBulphrogSent: 5/20/2008 5:08 AM
where are the threads that you deleted, including the one on the COE, in buffalo?
 
and of course i am clear on your censorship of posts regarding katrina.  that has been obvious from the start.  the entire topic of katrina pisses you off.  and you delete what pisses you off.
 
that is what i have said all along.
 

Reply
 Message 78 of 79 in Discussion 
From: MSN NicknameBulphrogSent: 5/20/2008 5:19 AM
i am sure THAT was embarassing.

Reply
 Message 79 of 79 in Discussion 
From: MSN NicknameBulphrogSent: 5/20/2008 5:27 AM
oh yeah, and it is obvious that i piss you off also, and that you delete what pisses you off.  that has been my point all along.

First  Previous  65-79 of 79  Next  Last 
Return to Attn Management