|
|
 |
Reply
| |
puppy dog, where is the obama thread? you deleted it, when you were in your deletion rage last night. |
|
Reply
| |
Your post was combined with the other appeasement thread that was on the board. |
|
Reply
| |
Your post was combined with the other appeasement thread that was on the board. what is the link? |
|
Reply
| |
there is no thread titled "obama appeasement" on the first or second pages. did you combine it with ANOTHER vaguely titled thread, that you converted into another catch all, just for me? when you merge threads, the title of the thread merged to, should have a crystal clear title - especially if you are going to make huge, composite threads like this.. COE mismanagment, for example, is very vague, and hazy, as a the title of a catchall thread for katrina - KATRINA DOES NOT EVEN APPEAR IN THE TITLE. doesn't that sound stupid to you? |
|
Reply
| |
| Clearly discussing Obama and appeasement. |
|
Reply
| |
it is not in these two, and they are the only two i can find that remotely address the topic. where did you put it? |
|
Reply
| |
Clearly discussing Obama and appeasement. huh? the title does not indicate that, at all. if you are going to combine threads, then do so in a thread that is readily accessible, and the topic of both the thread, and the merged thread should clearly indicate the contents of the thread. hiding shit like this, in a thread with a misleading title, is your tactic only. "COE mismanagment" as as title for a composite thread on katrina, for example, is stupid, ludicrous. what, in that title, indicates that this is a generalized thread, on katrina? |
|
Reply
| |
and remember, IT WAS YOU AND WILLY NOT STAYING ON TOPIC, THAT DRAGGED THE COE MISMANAGEMENT THREAD OFF TOPIC. I BEGGED YOU NOT TO DO THAT. TO PUT IT IN YOUR WORDS, I ASKED FOR YOUR CONSIDERATION, AND YOU BLATENTLY AND INTENTIONALLY DRAGGED THE THREAD OFF TOPIC ANYWAY. WHY SHOULD I BE ACCOMMODATING TO YOU, WHEN YOU ASK FOR CONSIDERATION, WHEN YOU DO THAT TO MY THREADS? |
|
Reply
| |
BESIDES, THAT IS NOT THE THREAD I AM TALKING ABOUT. I POSTED AN ARTICLE ON OBAMA CUT FROM HUFFINGTON. IT IS NOT THERE. |
|
Reply
| |
You did not. the post you put up was titled Appeasement. This is the last answer you will get from me. |
|
Reply
| |
I AM LOOKING FOR AN ARTICLE FROM HUFFINGTON THAT I POSTED. |
|
Reply
| |
Aren't you supposed to be playing your banjo over the internet to some imaginary bar and taking questions? Or "interviewing" people who have jobs... but somehow... (due to George Bush *lmfao*) live in tents? Come on man... you are losing your schtick! (fake is it is...) FUFFPO? Is that supposed to be a legit source of anything?  |
|
Reply
| |
Aren't you supposed to be playing your banjo over the internet to some imaginary bar and taking questions? Or "interviewing" people who have jobs... but somehow... (due to George Bush *lmfao*) live in tents? no. Come on man... you are losing your schtick! (fake is it is...) FUFFPO? Is that supposed to be a legit source of anything? what is FUFFPO? do you mean huffington post? of course. and in fact, the article was linked from a newspaper (i forget which one). BUT OF COURSE HUFFINGTON IS A LEGITEMATE SOURCE - ESPECIALLY NOW THAT YOUR USUAL KNEEJERK STEREOTYPICAL CRITICISMS OF "LIBERALS" NO LONGER WORKS. |
|
Reply
| |
I AM STILL LOOKING FOR AN ARTICLE FROM HUFFINGTON THAT I POSTED. TWO NIGHTS AGO AT ABOUT 9:30 PM. PUPPY DOG DELETED IT, IN HIS RAGE. |
|
|
|
Free Forum Hosting
Important Announcement
First
Return to Attn Management