|
|
 |
Reply
| |
As this thread has just evolved into one of frogs usual complaints, it was moved here...
 |
|
 First
Previous
2-14 of 14
Next
Last
|
Reply
| |
Reply
| | | Then we'll just leave it like it is. Your call. | | Reply
| | | Saved for future use... Reply
| | | of course. after your performance of the past little while, i no longer give a shit about your rules, or your sensibilities. you reap what you sow. | | | | Reply
| | | you had not guessed that before i said that? interesting - you are even stupider than i thought. besides, where are you going to "use" that rather obvious statement of mine? in the "court of PME"? give me q fucking break. | | Reply
| | | Then we'll just leave it like it is. absolutely. you should have left the link in the first place. that is your job. | | Reply
| | | No bul, that would be your job. If you want a post to stand with an article you are well aware of the restrictions for fair use. | | |
|
Reply
| |
No bul, that would be your job. If you want a post to stand with an article you are well aware of the restrictions for fair use. why? punishment is not puppy dog's job - and the link would not have been illegal. you just do the minimum required for compliance. but i do understand your penchant for punishment - after all, it is me we are talking about here. you WOULD simply have reposted the link for anyone else. that is my point. |
|
Reply
| |
Punishment?? I gave you the opportunity to make good on your "illegal" thread. And you chose not to. Your call. Your only choice was to complain yet again. |
|
Reply
| |
No bul, we would not have to repost. That would be up to the manager who catches the violation. 2nd asked you to repost according to fair use standards. That in and of itself is fair consideration. You can repost your article and abide by the rules that everyone has to follow. We do not have to "do the minimum for compliance" that would be up to you as the poster. |
|
Reply
| |
No bul, we would not have to repost. i did not say you ahd to do that, but that is what you would do for others here - and i say that because that IS WHAT YOU DO. so, no matter you rules, you are treating me different.yly. and of course, i understand that it matters what managers are here at the time - most of the rational reasonable ones would have simply reposted the link, - it is only you, an your fucking little puppy dog, that are "selective" in your treatment of posters, based upon your mood at the time. that has been my point, all along. |
|
Reply
| |
btw, WHERE IS THE ARTICLE ON OBAMA THAT PUPPY DOG DELETED A WEEK AGO???? IT STILL NEEDS TO GO BACK UP. |
|
Reply
| |
No your point has been to cause trouble all along. You know the rules and they apply to everyone. |
|
Reply
| |
Reply
| | | you could have simply reposted the link | | |
|
Reply
| |
| No your point has been to cause trouble all along. You know the rules and they apply to everyone.
| And as you are a KNOWN AND CONSTANT TROUBLEMAKER, any actions that management take reguarding you is your own doing. You brought this on yourself. Hope you're happy. Don't like the treatment you're getting here? Post somewhere else. |
|
Reply
| |
INTERESTING. WHEN THIS BOARD WAS FOUNDED WE WERE PROMISED "MINIMAL INTERVENTION" BY THE MANAGERS. YOU ARE BREAKING THAT PROMISE. why did you not merely repost that link, as you would have done for anyone else? and in fact, you are as much of a "troublemaker" as i am - this situation is dead even, in that regard. |
|
Reply
| |
No it is not, you chose to break the rules, it will be corrected, just like any other poster. That is not your decision how, that is up to the managers. You could have avoided this by posting the article correctly the first time and you know it! |
|
Reply
| |
No your point has been to cause trouble all along. You know the rules and they apply to everyone. of course they apply to everyone - and for "everyone" you would have reposted only the link. i have seen you do that a lot. but, you treat me differently simply because you do not like me (and of course because i do not back down to your bullshit, and even get aggressive back at you, simply to make that point). that IS my point. and btw, YOU are just as much of a troublemaker in this sitution as i am - YOU are just as aggressive, and even much more arbitrary, more unfair. |
|
Reply
| |
It is true I expect more out of you because you do know our rules. and if someone is new we give them the courtesy of reposting for them to show them what we are talking about. You on the other hand are well aware of what is asked for in our rules. So you chose to make issues. It's not a matter of liking someone, (though personally I do enjoy jousting with you) we only ask that you follow the rules like everyone else. Set an example as you are a strong poster here, Bul. You know the difference between breaking a rule and not breaking a rule. |
|
|
First
Previous
2-14 of 14
Next
Last
|
|
|
Free Forum Hosting
Important Announcement
0 recommendations 
Delete Replies
Delete
Return to Attn Management