MSN Home  |  My MSN  |  Hotmail
Sign in to Windows Live ID Web Search:   
go to MSNGroups 
Free Forum Hosting
 
Important Announcement Important Announcement
The MSN Groups service will close in February 2009. You can move your group to Multiply, MSN’s partner for online groups. Learn More
PME_Lives_onContains "mature" content, but not necessarily adult.[email protected] 
  
What's New
  
  Welcome To PMELO  
  Thank You to our Veterans  
  MSN CoC  
  Site Rules  
  General  
  Message Boards  
  Chit Chat  
  ☺Jokes & Games  
  ☼Philosophy  
  ♪Poets Corner�?/A>  
  Faith-Religion  
  
  Tags and Snags  
  Formal Debate  
  Attn Management  
  Venting  
  Sports Page  
  The Garden Shed  
  Election polls  
  Pictures  
  Member's Links  
  Guest Book  
    
  
  
  Tools  
 
Faith-Religion : Capitalist Failures and Discourses on the Metaphysical
Choose another message board
 
     
Reply
 Message 1 of 85 in Discussion 
From: MSN NicknameBig Daddy  (Original Message)Sent: 3/29/2008 2:27 PM
Here we go, CF.
 
I would like to ask all respondents to try and stay on topic if for no other reason than, no matter who comes out on top here, someone's favorite villian is going down in flames.
 
I would like to thank Capitalist Failures for the opportunity presented here since I have been trying to jump start the spiritual side of my being for months now. This could be just what I have been waiting for; then again, it could be just what my detractors have been waiting for also.
 
CF, I asked you for your definition of proof. I still need you to reply to that question. Thanks.....BD


First  Previous  71-85 of 85  Next  Last 
Reply
 Message 71 of 85 in Discussion 
From: MSN NicknameOpar5Sent: 7/30/2008 7:47 AM
(# 70) little failure,
 
I can't remember ever hearing or seeing an optimist seriously reference Friedrich Nietzsche.       I can understand how those who feel disassociated from humanity might be attracted to cynical mutterings such as his.     A pampered little socially interverted twit who only knew ONE of the people he tried to speak for: a maid, whom he abused.     What a pathetic existence you must "enjoy."     You still have offered no evidence that you're anything more than a fuzzy-logic program, incapable of learning or understanding.

Reply
 Message 72 of 85 in Discussion 
From: slywenchSent: 7/31/2008 6:01 AM
Well I rather find a pretty purring black kitty in the cave than a mouse(shudder) 

Reply
(1 recommendation so far) Message 73 of 85 in Discussion 
From: MSN NicknameOpar5Sent: 7/31/2008 7:19 AM
(# 72) sly,
 
Our neighbors fumigated their yard a couple of years ago, their mice moved into our yard.    We feed them.    If, however, one ever invades out home, it shall be dealt with rather harshly.     Our 130 pound Rottweiler didn't come to the door when I went outside once, and I went looking for her.    Found her in our back yard with her head down, about six-inches from a little mouse, up on his hind legs and nagging her something fierce.    No, I didn't have my camera.     When he finished squeaking his point, he tossed his little head, dropped down on four feet and casually walked about two yards, without looking back at those jaws of death, to a low bush where he may have been nesting.     That was before the neighbors fumigated, and I've never felt or thought the same about mice since.     The incident gives a very likely example of how the Indian "Mouse Warrior" myth may have begun.

Reply
The number of members that recommended this message. 0 recommendations  Message 74 of 85 in Discussion 
Sent: 8/5/2008 7:34 PM
This message has been deleted due to termination of membership.

Reply
 Message 75 of 85 in Discussion 
From: MSN NicknameOpar5Sent: 8/5/2008 9:23 PM
(# 74) poor little failure,
 
As I do?    Yes, I agreed that Saddam Hussein needed to be deposed - not for the reasons Bush stated, but for the $25,000 bounty he offered families of suicide-bombers who killed Jews and/or Americans.     Put a price on a man's head and he's likely to come after you, but you wouldn't understand that.      I do not, however, agree with Bush's impossible nation-building, contrary to the recipients' culture and religion - in any respect.      Again, you haven't read what I've written.      Children often speak without knowledge.

Reply
The number of members that recommended this message. 0 recommendations  Message 76 of 85 in Discussion 
Sent: 8/6/2008 12:46 AM
This message has been deleted due to termination of membership.

Reply
 Message 77 of 85 in Discussion 
From: MSN NicknameOpar5Sent: 8/7/2008 7:40 PM
(# 76) poor little failure,
 
You really don't understand what I, or anybody else has posted.    You just rant to be ranting.     That's sad.

Reply
The number of members that recommended this message. 0 recommendations  Message 78 of 85 in Discussion 
Sent: 8/15/2008 5:51 AM
This message has been deleted due to termination of membership.

Reply
 Message 79 of 85 in Discussion 
From: MSN NicknameOpar5Sent: 8/17/2008 8:17 AM
(# 78)   Explain - if you can.

Reply
The number of members that recommended this message. 0 recommendations  Message 80 of 85 in Discussion 
Sent: 9/12/2008 8:10 AM
This message has been deleted due to termination of membership.

Reply
 Message 81 of 85 in Discussion 
From: MSN NicknameOpar5Sent: 9/14/2008 7:03 AM
Where have I ever claimed that "Bush is 'good'"?      Identify the Post.      You're approving the one who paid on the basis of murder committed - because of who he paid?      You got my attention, by showing yourself dumber than what lays in the yard.     Watch out for those pooper scoopers; you might find yourself where you belong.

Reply
 Message 82 of 85 in Discussion 
From: MSN NicknameCapitalistFailuresSent: 9/16/2008 11:18 PM
Every time you post about how 'correct' the Iraq invasion is, given that it is proved that BUsh lied, you prove again that you believe Bush is fundamentally good, above the rules of law and logic.
You are wrong.
He's a murderer.

Reply
 Message 83 of 85 in Discussion 
From: MSN NicknameOpar5Sent: 9/17/2008 4:45 AM
And what was my stated reasoning for the Iraq invasion?      I don't think you'll find it in any of the Administration's claims - and remember - the congress approved the act and is paying the bills.      Bush knows nothing about Islamic doctrine, and has been foolishly doing what his "experts" recommend.     If you're not talking our your arse, again, refer to the post saying what you're claiming I said.

Reply
 Message 84 of 85 in Discussion 
From: MSN NicknameCapitalistFailuresSent: 9/17/2008 4:47 AM
I remember Opar.
Do you?
Bush lied to Congress and said he was going to stop the WMD he KNEW was not there.
So, no, lying to congress makes HIM responsible, not them.
YOUR reason is your bigotry, and it is probably his real reason as well, but, again, you are wrong and so is he.
That's why they call it "murder".

Reply
 Message 85 of 85 in Discussion 
From: MSN NicknameOpar5Sent: 9/21/2008 8:29 PM
(# 84) poor little cf,
 
You "remember," but can't pull any validating post (my # 83) from your arse is as expected.    So far as the vaunted "WMDs" are concerned; that was about an eight-word sentence of an hour's speech referencing the combined intelligence available to Bush at the time without revealing too much of our intelligence methods and/or sources.     No fissile materials were initially found, but have since been uncovered - and reported.    Also recovered were weapons and ammunition stashes - including fighter planes - that had been literally buried in the sand.     Sifting all the sand in Iraq in search of more is not feasible.       There is still no information about the cargo(s) carried by truck convoys into Syria prior to our invasion of Iraq.     That Saddham could have complied with UN inspection demand resolutions, avoided invasion and still been in power, is evidence that he, and his sons were simply too stupid to live.     Are you related to them?

First  Previous  71-85 of 85  Next  Last 
Return to Faith-Religion